Civil War Times

LANGUAGE MISCONCEPTION

O PERSON IN THE UNITED STATES from the 1830s through the 1850s thought in terms of an “antebellum” era. Latin for “before the war,” the word came into use only after the Civil War ended and participants, historians, and others sought to label the decades preceding the outbreak of fighting at Fort Sumter. Commonplace in the historical literature for many generations, it summons thoughts of a young republic lurching toward political collapse. Deployment of antebellum can create an impression of inevitability, of citizens increasingly obsessed with sectional differences, and of time ticking inexorably toward bloodshed on a massive

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Civil War Times

Civil War Times1 min read
Civil War Times
MICHAEL A. REINSTEIN CHAIRMAN & PUBLISHER CHRIS K. HOWLAND EDITOR RICHARD H. HOLLOWAY SENIOR EDITOR BRIAN WALKER GROUP DESIGN DIRECTOR ALEX GRIFFITH DIRECTOR OF PHOTOGRAPHY AUSTIN STAHL ASSOCIATE DESIGN DIRECTOR CLAIRE BARRETT NEWS AND SOCIAL EDITOR
Civil War Times1 min read
Two Triggers
Savage bullets are quite rare to find in an archaeological setting. I’ve only ever found 4, 3 of which were in one hole and the 4th was fired. Oddball looking revolvers! —Elijah Filbert I’m wondering if it’s a “one and done design.” —Steve Sickles Ed
Civil War Times15 min read
‘Many A Campfire Brightened’
In 1911, the Wisconsin Historical Commission published Ethel Hurn’s Wisconsin Women in the War. The book was a product of her history thesis, in which she collected women’s accounts of their involvement in the Civil War. Hurn ultimately focused the b

Related Books & Audiobooks