Dissent and the Supreme Court: Its Role in the Court's History and the Nation's Constitutional Dialogue
Written by Melvin I. Urofsky
Narrated by Dan Woren
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this audiobook
From the admired judicial authority, author of Louis D. Brandeis ("Remarkable"-Anthony Lewis, The New York Review of Books; "Monumental"-Alan M. Dershowitz, The New York Times Book Review), Division and Discord, and Supreme Decisions-Melvin Urofsky's major new audiobook looks at the role of dissent in the Supreme Court and the meaning of the Constitution through the greatest and longest lasting public-policy debate in the country's history, among members of the Supreme Court, between the Court and the other branches of government, and between the Court and the people of the United States.
Urofsky writes of the necessity of constitutional dialogue as one of the ways in which we as a people reinvent and reinvigorate our democratic society. In Dissent and the Supreme Court, he explores the great dissents throughout the Court's 225-year history. He discusses in detail the role the Supreme Court has played in helping to define what the Constitution means, how the Court's majority opinions have not always been right, and how the dissenters, by positing alternative interpretations, have initiated a critical dialogue about what a particular decision should mean. This dialogue is sometimes resolved quickly; other times it may take decades before the Court adjusts its position. Louis Brandeis's dissenting opinion about wiretapping became the position of the Court four decades after it was written. The Court took six decades to adopt the dissenting opinion of the first Justice John Harlan in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)-that segregation on the basis of race violated the Constitution-in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
Urofsky shows that the practice of dissent grew slowly but steadily and that in the nineteenth century dissents became more frequent. In the (in)famous case of Dred Scott v. Sanford (1857), Chief Justice Roger Taney's opinion upheld slavery, declaring that blacks could never be citizens. The justice received intense condemnations from several of his colleagues, but it took a civil war and three constitutional amendments before the dissenting view prevailed and Dred Scott was overturned.
Urofsky looks as well at the many aspects of American constitutional life that were affected by the Earl Warren Court-free speech, race, judicial appointment, and rights of the accused-and shows how few of these decisions were unanimous, and how the dissents in the earlier cases molded the results of later decisions; how with Roe v. Wade-the Dred Scott of the modern era-dissent fashioned subsequent decisions, and how, in the Court, a dialogue that began with the dissents in Roe has shaped every decision since.
Urofsky writes of the rise of conservatism and discusses how the resulting appointments of more conservative jurists to the bench put the last of the Warren liberals-William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall-in increasingly beleaguered positions, and in the minority. He discusses the present age of incivility, in which reasoned dialogue seems less and less possible. Yet within the Marble Palace, the members of the Supreme Court continue to hear arguments, vote, and draft majority opinions, while the minority continues to "respectfully dissent." The Framers understood that if a constitution doesn't grow and adapt, it atrophies and dies, and if it does, so does the democratic society it has supported. Dissent-on the Court and off, Urofsky argues-has been a crucial ingredient in keeping the Constitution alive and must continue to be so.
Related to Dissent and the Supreme Court
Related audiobooks
A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Landmark Supreme Court Decisions and How They Impact Your Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Justices Behind Roe V. Wade: The Inside Story, Adapted from The Brethren Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Supreme Court: The Personalities and Rivalries That Defined America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Free Speech Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Justice Deferred: Race and the Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRatification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5American Epic: Reading the U.S. Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Free Speech and Turbulent Freedom: The Dangerous Allure of Censorship in the Digital Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Worse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Packing the Court: The Rise of Judicial Power and the Coming Crisis of the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Burger Court and the Rise of the Judicial Right Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Supermajority: How the Supreme Court Divided America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5History of the Supreme Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Declaration: A Reading of Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Shadow of Korematsu: Democratic Liberties and National Security Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Studies: Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Uncivil Warriors: The Lawyers' Civil War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Demand the Impossible: One Lawyer's Pursuit of Equal Justice for All Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhen Freedom Speaks: The Boundaries and the Boundlessness of Our First Amendment Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFree Justice: A History of the Public Defender in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Jury: A Very Short Introduction Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fundamental Cases: The Twentieth Century Courtroom Battles That Changed Our Nation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5My People: Five Decades of Writing About Black Lives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScalia's Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/551 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Constitutional Law For You
The Executive Juris Doctor: Learn to Think Like a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution Demands It: The Case for the Impeachment of Donald Trump Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lies the Government Told You: Myth, Power, and Deception in American History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Federalist Papers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Reading the Constitution: Why I Chose Pragmatism, not Textualism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSex and the Constitution: Sex, Religion, and Law from America's Origins to the Twenty-First Century Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Unwarranted: Policing Without Permission Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Civics, Law, and Justice--How We Became U.S.: Insights from a Trial Judge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWorse Than Nothing: The Dangerous Fallacy of Originalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Well-Regulated Militia: The Founding Fathers and the Origins of Gun Control in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We the People: A Progressive Reading of the Constitution for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Dollars for Life: The Anti-Abortion Movement and the Fall of the Republican Establishment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Cult of the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Scalia's Court: A Legacy of Landmark Opinions and Dissents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Conversations with RBG: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Life, Love, Liberty, and Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Constitution Today: Timeless Lessons for the Issues of Our Era Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Second Amendment: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Closing the Courthouse Door: How Your Constitutional Rights Became Unenforceable Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Dissent and the Supreme Court
0 ratings0 reviews