Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Grant
    Grant
    Grant
    Audiobook29 hours

    Grant

    Written by Jean Edward Smith

    Narrated by Keith Sellon-Wright

    4.5/5

    ()

    Switch to ebook

    About this audiobook

    Ulysses S. Grant was the first four-star general in the history of the United States Army and the only president between Andrew Jackson and Woodrow Wilson to serve eight consecutive years in the White House. As general in chief, Grant revolutionized modern warfare. Rather than capture enemy territory or march on Southern cities, he concentrated on engaging and defeating the Confederate armies in the field, and he pursued that strategy relentlessly. As president, he brought stability to the country after years of war and upheaval. He tried to carry out the policies of Abraham Lincoln, the man he admired above all others, and to a considerable degree he succeeded. Yet today, Grant is remembered as a brilliant general but a failed president.

    In this comprehensive biography, Jean Edward Smith reconciles these conflicting assessments of Grant's life, arguing that Grant is greatly underrated as a president. Following the turmoil of Andrew Johnson's administration, Grant guided the nation through the post-Civil War era, overseeing Reconstruction of the South and enforcing the freedoms of new African-American citizens. His presidential accomplishments were as considerable as his military victories, says Smith, for the same strength of character that made him successful on the battlefield also characterized his years in the White House.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateSep 10, 2019
    ISBN9781515933892
    Author

    Jean Edward Smith

    Jean Edward Smith taught at the University of Toronto for thirty-five years, and at Marshall University for twelve. He was also a visiting scholar at Columbia, Princeton, and Georgetown. He is the author of Bush, a biography of the 43rd president; Eisenhower in War and Peace; FDR, winner of the 2008 Francis Parkman Prize of the Society of American Historians; Grant, a 2002 Pulitzer Prize finalist; John Marshall: Definer of a Nation; and The Liberation of Paris.

    Related to Grant

    Related audiobooks

    Biography & Memoir For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Delayed Honor

      Jun 1, 2021

      Delayed Honor
      5 min read

    • Article

      The Tragedy of Edmund Morris

      May 28, 2019

      The Tragedy of Edmund Morris
      5 min read

    • Article

      Target Vicksburg

      Aug 24, 2021

      Target Vicksburg
      13 min read

    • Article

      'Heirs Of The Founders' Profiles The 'Second Generation' Of Great American Leaders

      Nov 13, 2018

      In his latest historical spellbinder, bestselling author and scholar H.W. Brands profiles Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, and John Calhoun, as well as the decades leading up to the Civil War.

      3 min read

    • Article

      An Evolving Soul

      Aug 15, 2023

      An Evolving Soul
      2 min read

    • Article

      Sherman In The Balance

      Dec 15, 2020

      Sherman In The Balance
      9 min read

    • Article

      The Dream Denied

      Jan 18, 2022

      The Dream Denied
      8 min read

    • Article

      Humble Roots

      Apr 18, 2023

      Humble Roots
      3 min read

    • Article

      What’s Worth Watching Week 1

      May 21, 2020

      What’s Worth Watching Week 1
      1 min read

    • Article

      ‘Some Achieve Greatness’

      Nov 14, 2023

      ‘Some Achieve Greatness’
      9 min read

    • Article

      'Stanton' Brings Lincoln's Secretary of War out of the Historical Shadows

      Sep 15, 2017

      Stanton served in two key cabinets posts for two of America's worst presidents (James Buchanan and Andrew Johnson), as well as for Abraham Lincoln, whom he helped to win the Civil War.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Within the Lines

      Feb 9, 2021

      Within the Lines
      6 min read

    • Article

      New Look at ‘Old Thad’

      Feb 25, 2020

      New Look at ‘Old Thad’
      6 min read

    • Article

      Closing the Great Divide

      Dec 15, 2020

      Closing the Great Divide
      9 min read

    • Article

      ‘Carnage Infernal’

      Oct 4, 2022

      ‘Carnage Infernal’
      8 min read

    • Article

      Plucking The Bloom Of Youth

      Jul 18, 2023

      Plucking The Bloom Of Youth
      10 min read

    • Article

      Q&A With S.C. Gwynne, Author Of ‘Hymns Of The Republic’

      Jan 8, 2020

      The historian examines how the Civil War’s outcome hinged on the uncertain prospect of Abraham Lincoln’s reelection in 1864.

      2 min read

    • Article

      From Our Facebook Page

      Feb 26, 2019

      From Our Facebook Page
      2 min read

    • Article

      Milton S. Littlefield

      Oct 17, 2023

      Milton S. Littlefield
      2 min read

    • Article

      ‘The Time Has Come’: Which US Bases May Lose Their Confederate Namesakes?

      Jun 18, 2020

      Pressure is growing to strip the names of Confederate officers from 10 U.S. military bases. Who were these men, and what were they really known for?

      5 min read

    • Article

      Reviews

      Nov 27, 2018

      Reviews
      7 min read

    • Article

      A Time To Laugh, A Time To Weep

      Jul 1, 2020

      A Time To Laugh, A Time To Weep
      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Grant

    4.5/5

    114 ratings13 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      General Grant is moving up the ranks as one of my favorite historical people. This was an amazing book covering the full life of Grant from his early days, through the Civil War, his presidency, and his death. The narrative style is superbly done, and you can't help but respect and admire Grant throughout his life. The Civil War years probably take up about half of the book and these were easily the best parts. His presidency is covered topically and while interesting, it is not as fascinating as his years as the military man.

      If there is a criticism of this book, it is that Grant more or less gets a free pass for his shortcomings as President. The author does not ignore his faults, but he brushes over them. I did not see this as a real negative to the book, but thought it worth mentioning.

      Highly recommended!
    • 5/5
      Sadly, this is another book that sat on my shelf a little too long, and with Ron Chernow’s massive new biography just being published – a book I hope to read in the near future – I thought I’d better get busy reading Jean Edward Smith’s bio of the man who won the Civil War and then went on to be President. And having read it, I must confess to some shame at having too long passed by a great book that gives us an in depth look at Ulysses S. Grant, one that goes against some of the harsher judgments of historians. At a little more than 600 pages, Smith’s book is shorter than Chernow’s thick volume, but there is still plenty of depth and detail to satisfy the most fervent history buff. I especially liked the pace of book; Smith moves briskly through Grant’s early years in Ohio and Illinois, West Point and the Mexican War (which he thought was waged most unjustly) and arrives at the opening stages of the Civil War by Chapter Four on page 99. Despite this fast pace early on, the author takes the time to give us a portrait of a man who went to West Point to get an education, served ably under fire in Mexico, and then floundered in the peace time army to the point where a drinking problem forced him to resign and return to civilian life, where he would fail in business and be reduced to working in a general store under his younger brothers. Just before the outbreak of the Civil War, Grant was selling fire wood on the streets of Galena, Illinois, in order to provide for his family; less than three years later, Grant was accepting the surrender of the Confederate commander at Vicksburg, the turning point of the war, one of the greatest reversals of personal fortune in American history. That Grant was humbled, even humiliated, in the years between the Mexican and Civil wars, there is no doubt, yet to his great credit, it did not make him bitter or arrogant in the later years when he was at the height of military and political power. Was Grant an alcoholic, as his enemies alleged during his lifetime, and many have implied in the years since? Smith gives plenty of evidence that the man had a problem with alcohol in his early years in the army, but that it was mainly acerbated by the separation, due to deployments, from his wife, Julia, and their children. No period of American history has been better documented than years between 1961 and 1865, where the Civil War has been told and retold and revised from every conceivable viewpoint; what Smith does is concentrate on Grant as he rose from a Colonel in a company of Illinois volunteers to General in command of all Union armies in the field. If nothing succeeds like success, than Grant won by winning, more to the point, winning where others would have quit and retreated, like after the first day at Shiloh in 1862, where the Union army was routed from the field after a surprise attack by the Confederates at dawn; Grant held his ground, gathered reinforcements over night and counterattacked on the second day. In May of 1864, in Virginia at The Wilderness, Robert E. Lee’s army would pound the Union forces for three days, nearly rolling up the line and inflicting heavy casualties, yet when the carnage was done, Grant would flank Lee’s army and continue his relentless push toward Richmond, a campaign he that would not end until Appomattox. From Mill Springs to Forts Henry and Donaldson to Shiloh, Vicksburg, Chattanooga, The Wilderness, Spotsylvania, Cold Harbor, and Petersburg, Grant was cool under pressure, clear in his objectives, possessing an uncanny ability to get the most out of the forces at his command; he threw away the old Napoleonic War era playbook, and singlehandedly, forged the rules of modern warfare, where the destruction of the enemy’s capacity to wage war became the main goal. He would do all this, and still retain the confidence and affection of the men he ordered into battle, while earning the respect of his Confederate foes, to whom he gave generous terms and an outstretched hand on the day they surrendered.After the assassination of Lincoln, Grant was the most universally popular figure in the nation, a position he somehow managed to retain as General of the Army through the turbulent politics of the early Reconstruction. That was not an easy feat as the irreconcilable goals of bringing the Confederates back into the Union while insuring and protecting the full rights of citizenship of the newly freed slaves brought on a clash between Lincoln’s politically inept successor, Andrew Johnson (who was Grant’s Commander in Chief) and the Republicans in Congress (who made the policy the Army would have to implement); the former wanted to restore the South to the Union (sans slavery) as if the war had never occurred, while the latter insisted on a military occupation of the Confederate states and vigorous protection by the federal government of the newly enfranchised freedman. It is not a high point in American history, and many of the prominent figures involved - Johnson, Charles Sumner, Edwin Stanton – did little to cover themselves in glory, but Grant remained true to the Constitution and the law as he saw, and straight forward in his dealings with all involved, while maneuvering his way through much political conniving. In 1868, he was the unanimous choice of the Republican Party and was elected President in a landslide, the first of two terms.Smith does not give us a strictly linear account of Grant’s Presidency, instead giving us individual chapters devoted to how he handled foreign affairs, Reconstruction policy, the Indian Wars, and the Gilded Age. In the process, the author makes a good case that Grant was a much better President than he is given credit: patching up relations with Great Britain and settling grievances that had festered since the Civil War, establishing a harmonious relationship with the Mother country that has lasted to the present day; adapting a humane policy toward the Plains Indians as westward expansion increasingly brought them into conflict with white settlers, repeatedly resisting calls for an all out military solution advocated by Generals William Sherman and Philip Sheridan, both close friends of Grant; repeatedly using federal troops against the Klu Klux Klan and other white terrorist groups in the South, doing this even as support for Black American equality was rapidly diminishing in the Republican North. His order to the Treasury Department sell off part of its gold reserves on Black Friday (when speculators Jay Gould and Jim Fiske tried to corner the private gold market) helped stave off a devastating economic collapse, and was the first time the government in Washington had directly intervened to protect American citizens in an economic crisis. Quite a list of accomplishments, but it would be the squalid scandals and corruption of many of Grants appointees that would get the headlines, and sadly, would be what was most remembered from his administration. Grant’s own honesty was always above reproach, but in civilian life, he was not the best judge of character, and was far too trusting of men anxious to be his friend.It was a trusting nature that would serve him poorly after the Presidency, when a part ownership in a Wall Street investment firm failed due to a dishonest partner would leave Grant penniless. He would restore financial security to his family by writing his memoirs of the Civil War years, written as Grant was dying of throat cancer. He finished the book only days before death. It was a bestseller; surprisingly, Grant was a natural born literary talent, his book is considered the benchmark against which all other Presidential memoirs are judged; it has never gone out of print. If I have one complaint, it is that Smith hurries through these last years, which are essential to understanding who Ulysses Grant was.After reading this book, I think Grant, with the possible exception of George Washington, was the finest leader of men America ever produced, in warfare he had tenacity and drive that was simply unstoppable, put a Vicksburg or a Richmond in front of him, and it was as good as taken. He seemed devoid of vanity, and imbued with a humility and personal modesty that must have been a product of the hard times in his life, proving that the best leaders are people who have stumbled and fallen once or twice, and have had to get back up on their feet before success came their way. Recently there have been calls by some in NYC, where Grant’s tomb is located, to remove his name from public monuments, part of an ongoing national jihad to punish the leaders of the past for being people of their times. Ulysses S. Grant deserves better from the nation he helped save in its worst crisis, read Jean Edward Smith’s fine biography and learn the story of a truly great American.
    • 4/5
      I do not know much about Grant. Well not in the great depth that author, Jean Edward Smith provided in this book. At over seven hundred pages, there is a ton of information. A good portion of the book starts out in very detail about the Civil War and the role and type of leader that Grant grew up to become. This played a strong part later in his life when he would become President. As I stated, there is lots of information in this book. A history buff will enjoy this thoughtful book. If you didn't get enough information, you can find more facts in the footnotes throughout the book. These are gold nuggets to me. I enjoy reading these as they are packed full of interesting information. I am a fast reader but this book did take me a while to get through it due to all of the facts. After reading this book, I do have a better respect for Grant. I plan to check out other books written by this author.
    • 5/5
      Best biography I have read recently

      It is a shame that history chose to downplay Grants importance during and after the civil war.

      If you wish to learn the real General and President read Smith's biography. I now want to track down Grants memoirs. He wanted not only to do right by African Americans but the Native Americans as well. He also wanted to follow Lincoln's request that we show no malice to our Southern brethren by ending Johnson's animosity of the south. He had his generals end the Klu Klux Klan during his time he helped to get the country on a stable footing.

      His biggest mistake was being to trusting of his closest confidants.

      History buffs will enjoy this biography.
    • 5/5
      Excellent biography of the most remarkable man. Significance of Grant in US history is well known, but this book made me realize what an extraordinary person he was. In fact, in terms of greatness of 19th century US presidents I rate him higher than Lincoln. It's quite amazing that he was penniless and totally unsuccessful in all his endeavors in his 30s. What an amazing transformation.
    • 5/5
      I have been reading a number of biographies of US presidents, focusing on their years in office and skipping most of the earlier years. "Grant" devotes less about a quarter of its 628 page volume to his two terms as president, so I thought I would read a bit about his Civil War battles to get to know the man coming into the White House. I found those chapters so interesting, and with so many references to previous battles and officers on both sides, that I hopped back even further, to his battles in what was then called the 'west', Kentucky, Tennessee, etc. So my route through "Grant" was not typical, but very enjoyable nevertheless. Matter of fact, in the coming weeks, I will probably pick up the book once again, and read of his experiences in the Mexican War (I know little of that war anyway) and perhaps of his meeting Julia. I have become so enamored of Grant, that I have ordered his Memoirs, written over 130 years ago; I understand that book focuses mainly on the Civil War and the edition I ordered includes many personal letters that he wrote to family.Coming into Smith's book I was certainly aware of Grant's bulldog tenacity, something not at all characteristic of the many generals who had preceded him. Most casual readers of Civil War history know that he went after Lee and just kept at him. Attack, attack, attack. What Smith's book does such a fine job at is describing what a strategic thinker Grant was, how his personality differed from most other generals, and how effective his leadership style was. Not only on the battlefield, but in handling his bosses back in Washington, including Lincoln. If there was one portion of the book that I wished more detailed, it would be the White House years. Smith covers the major issues of the time, reconstruction, the economy, Native Americans and violence in the West, and budding diplomatic relationships, but there didn't seem to be much continuity. I had difficulty in occasionally identifying the specific time at which some of these events were happening. And there was little written about smaller issues. It seemed to me that 150 pages to cover two terms was insufficient.Smith clearly liked Grant, and while he does mention his flaws, he may be a bit too kind in his judgments. I don't know; like many I had preconceived notions about Grant's drinking and the scandals that riddled his White House years, particularly the second term. Smith makes a convincing case that Grant wasn't the out of control drunk as portrayed in other accounts, nor was he guilty of any active participation in the several fraud cases surrounding his administration. But Smith would find him guilty of an unacceptable naivete, and an over-abundance of trust in his fellow man.Grant died of cancer in 1885, only days after completing his memoirs. He was never an effective manager of his personal finances and was virtually penniless at the time of his death. But he was beloved by the country for both his leadership in the war and for his terms as president, and his memoirs sold extremely well providing Julia with sufficient funds thereafter. I recommend the book highly.
    • 4/5
      Good biography if a tad too fawning. Pales in relation to Caro and Morris.
    • 5/5
      Very good biography of Grant, both as general and as president. five stars
    • 5/5
      Ulysses Grant is more frequently remembered as the Union General who defeated Robert E. Lee in the American Civil War than as a two term President after that war. But the two are so inter-related - Grant's popularity because of his military success lead to his election and his position as the Commander-in-Chief in later years protected the legacy of the Union victory.Ulysses Simpson Grant neé Hiram Ulysses Grant was the son of a tanner. He attended West Point at the same time as William Tecumseh Sherman, George Thomas, Rosencrans, and Ewell who all served under him in later years as well as James Longstreet who he would fight against. In his early Army career during the Mexican-American War, Grant learned his style of command - sensible discipline, calmness in the face of adversity, and orders in the fewest well-chosen words. Grant also saw the value of a well-planned attack including preparations related to management of supplies as well as manpower. They were lessons he repeated call upon in future years.When the Civil War broke out, Grant was no longer in the military but volunteer to prepare a regiment using his quartermaster skills of the Mexican War. He was eventually given command of the Illinois volunteers. His command style and training showed his understanding of the difference between regular soldiers and volunteers and achieved the best results. His first successes were on the Western Front, capturing Fort Henry, Fort Donelson, and Nashville, then becoming Commander of the Army of The Tennessee went on to the battles of Shiloh and Vicksburg. "Vicksburg was Grant's great victory in the West and the turning point of the war, but as one historian noted, the triumph at Chattanooga proclaimed his military genius."Recognizing his abilities as a leader, Lincoln brought him east to assume command of the Army of the Potomac and take the battle to defeat Lee's Army of Northern Virginia. Been named General in Chief, Grant had no "army" that he specifically commanded. His was to issue commands to the other Generals. This caused issues at several battles. While fighting to gain Petersburg, "the fault was not in Grant's plan, but in faulty execution. Corps Commanders were sluggish, orders executed late, halfheartedly, reinterpreted, or not done at all."The battles that followed were bloody and costly. The toll in dead and wounded at the battles of Cold Harbor and the Wilderness had Northerners wondering of Grant should be replaced, but Lincoln wouldn't budge and on April 9, 1865 the war ended for all intents and purposes with Lee's surrender of the Army of Northern Virginia.Grant went to Washington where after Lincoln's assassination, he worked with President Johnson on Reconstruction. Johnson wanted to try Lee for treason, Grant balked stating "I will never consent to his arrest. I will resign the command of the army rather than execute any order to arrest Lee or any of his commanders so long as they obey the law." He felt that the terms of the surrender needed to be honored and would not be a party to prosecuting any of the officers in the Confederate Army as long as they follow the terms their parole. Johnson realizing Grant's popularity with the people, backed down.The surrender terms at Appomattox were thought by many to be too lenient. However, Grant was following Lincoln's directions "with malice toward none, with charity for all" so his generosity to the Confederates started the healing process - "Appomattox was Grant's finest hour, his determination to protect those who surrendered there, ranks a close second."Grant was a brilliant commander but had his flaws as well. Since feelings were that he would be the next President, many tried to ingratiate themselves with him. After the war, he accepted houses in Galena, Ohio and Philadelphia as gifts from a grateful nation as well as a testimonial check for $105,000. Because President Johnson was not happy about the expectations of Grant's future, Grant lost the support of the Commander-in-chief and frequently had to travel a fine line between the President's favor and that of Congress to get Reconstruction progressing.Grant's diplomacy was demonstrated in the areas of management of the Southern states, British relations due to the suit for damages caused by the Confederate's Alabama damages, and French occupation in Mexico. He also showed the same ability to choose capable "lieutenants" when creating his cabinet. As a President, not only did he have to continue with the Reconstructive process, deal with the rising of the Ku Klux Klan, protect the rights of the freed slaves, and prevent an economic collapse on the Gold Market but he did it all honorably. Perhaps not being a politician was beneficial because when he vetoed the Inflation Bill, his party believed that he had killed their chances in the next election. What his veto showed was that he was opposed to unredeemable paper currency. He took the necessary steps to stabilize the currency and save the nation's credit. Grant's last crisis came with the election of his successor. Because of the Reconstructive process still ongoing, three states election results were in contention. It was necessary to pass legislation to create a committee of fifteen to determine which elector votes would be counted. The committee consisted (at Grant's suggestion) of 5 Democrats, 5 Republicans, and 5 Justices from the Supreme Court (they did make a decision on a presidential election prior to 2000). With the committee's decisions, Rutherford Hayes was elected by 1 vote over Governor Tilden. Thus, Grant was instrumental in calming another Constitutional crisis.The last years of his life were not easy. He was involved in a Wall Street debacle which wiped out his entire fortune, and was only saved by the offer of Mark Twain to publish his memoirs. Fighting throat cancer, he completed the task only a few days before his death. His funeral was a major event attended by not only those he had commanded but also those he had fought against. The nation grieved for the man who had led the Union to victory.
    • 5/5
      One of my personal goals lately has been to read a biography of each US president in order. This approach has some distinct advantages - the biggest is the perspective one gets from seeing the overlapping look at events from the point of view of each president. As one might imagine, the quality of biographies varies, both on the scholarship and the interest side of writing. Clearly, the high point has been David McCullough's John Adams. After all, how many presidential biographies have been turned into a major series on HBO? Jean Edward Smith's Grant is easily on par with McCullough's work. The portrait of General Grant is sympathetic without glossing over his faults, interesting reading while keeping a high level of scholarship and analysis, and downright compelling in spots. The chapter on the surrender at Appomattox was one of the best pieces of writing I've read in a while. There are, I'm sure, dissenting opinions on Grant. His military strategy, for example, is sometimes criticized for the heavy casualties it produced. His handling of relations with the Plains Indians was muddled and too trusting of those on the ground. He was in over his head dealing with business and finance, and was burned many times by less than scrupulous underlings. Smith recognizes these issues, but makes us see Grant's motivations, how that drove him to do the things he did, and the personal cost of these decisions through his life. And I don't think Smith was too easy on Grant - much of the discussion on his Presidency centered around how Grant's military style of leadership really wasn't well suited to the realities of a political office. Yet his popularity enabled him to get past this to succeed in major efforts Reconstruction and foreign policy even as his attempts to deal with Native American issues failed. Sometimes politics is about convincing others to do what you believe is right, not about command, and in many ways Grant didn't get that.All in all, I highly recommend Smith's biography of Grant. It's good reading, and it's about an interesting person. He's also written a biography of FDR that I'm now going to make sure I read when the time comes!
    • 5/5
      Outstanding biography of U.S. Grant. I was constantly amazed at the misfortunes the man endured and his ability to persevere. I was also impressed by his dedication to equal protection under the law for both freedmen and Indians. The book was a pleasure to read and very, very informative! First class!
    • 5/5
      Great biography of Grant. Since I try to read books in the order in which I receive them, I rarely jump ahead to read one that sounds special, but in this case I made an exception. If you like Grant, and haven't read this, I really recommend it.
    • 3/5
      An excellent one-volume biography. Ulysses S. Grant just moved into position as one of my favorite presidents. I love how an ordinary guy, not particularly distinguished--dismissed, even from the army for drunkeness--falls bass-ackwards into the presidency. Well done! He may have been somewhat unsophisticated, as the New England elite were quick to point out, but he did genuinely believe in equal rights for black citizens.