Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Boy in the Moon: A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son
The Boy in the Moon: A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son
The Boy in the Moon: A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son
Ebook300 pages4 hours

The Boy in the Moon: A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A New York Times Top 10 Book of 2011


"[A]n intimate glimpse into the life of a family that cares around the clock for a disabled child, that gets so close to the love and despair, and the complex questions the life of such a child raises...It is a beautiful book, heartfelt and profound, warm and wise."

--Jane Bernstein, author of Loving Rachel and Rachel in the World


Ian Brown's son Walker is one of only about 300 people worldwide diagnosed with cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome--an extremely rare genetic mutation that results in unusual facial appearance, the inability to speak, and a compulsion to hit himself constantly. At age thirteen, he is mentally and developmentally between one and three years old and will need constant care for the rest of his life.


Brown travels the globe, meeting with genetic scientists and neurologists as well as parents, to solve the questions Walker's doctors can't answer. In his journey, he offers an insightful critique of society's assumptions about the disabled, and he discovers a connected community of families living with this illness. As Brown gradually lets go of his self-blame and hope for a cure, he learns to accept the Walker he loves, just as he is.


Honest, intelligent, and deeply moving, The Boy in the Moon explores the value of a single human life.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 26, 2011
ISBN9781429978781
The Boy in the Moon: A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son
Author

Ian Brown

Ian Brown’s police career started as a beat constable in Cumberland before transferring to the Metropolitan Police and completing his service as a Detective Superintendent in The British Virgin Islands where he headed a very successful drug squad.His involvement in high profile and regulation cases led to some thirty commendations from courts and law enforcement agencies around the world and earned him a Queen’s Commendation for Bravery.Now an ‘enrichment speaker’ for Cunard, P&O and other cruise lines, he regularly presents to packed houses. He is also an accomplished after dinner speaker.Ian has been engaged as a police advisor on several television crime programmes. He lives in Kent with his wife and his main interests are criminal research and sport as he is also a professional Lawn Tennis Association coach.

Read more from Ian Brown

Related to The Boy in the Moon

Related ebooks

Relationships For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Boy in the Moon

Rating: 4.1 out of 5 stars
4/5

20 ratings20 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Bracing and honest. Finds resonance with parenthood on all levels. Made me want to be a better father, not because Brown is some kind of saint but because he has keen insight into what parenthood is in practice.

    But I would have been happy with a shorter book that omitted Brown's journalistic voyage into the medical history and social present of the mentally disabled. When he's talking about Walker he's superb.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Following, a review by Rachel Giese, from The Walrus, which sums up my thoughts and feelings far better than I could express."In his affecting new book, Globe and Mail journalist Ian Brown sets himself the awesome task of measuring the value of human life—specifically that of his profoundly disabled thirteen-year-old son, Walker. The boy was born with a genetic mutation called cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, referred to by experts as an “orphan syndrome” because its occurrence is so random and rare. Walker is small—he weighs just sixty-five pounds—and globally delayed. He can’t feed himself, he barely communicates, and he functions at the level of a two-year-old.There are no ribbon campaigns or telethons for sufferers of CFC and very little medical knowledge about the condition; it’s only since the arrival of the Internet that a small support network of families has coalesced. Brown and his wife, journalist Johanna Schneller, muddle through—epically sleep deprived and battle scarred from Walker’s vicious tantrums—with the help of a miracle-worker nanny and a series of doctors, therapists, and support caregivers, none of whom offer much hope that their son’s situation will ever improve.Brown expanded the story from a series of articles first published in the Globe. Even with the most intimate material, he maintains his reporter’s discipline and impartiality, a rigour that makes the storytelling still more intimate. His accounts of his attempts to connect with Walker, and to be a good father, are at once tender and resolutely unsentimental. “Walker had given my life shape, possibly even meaning,” he writes. “But Walker had also made our lives hell.”The boy’s needs strain Brown’s finances and his marriage. (“The grit of resentment lay like a fine dust over everything,” he writes of his relationship with Schneller.) And in the zero-sum game of contemporary child rearing, he is beset by guilt for not being enough of a “disability warrior” for his son, and by fears that other parents view him as a failure.Yet raising Walker also offers Brown extraordinary moments of grace: the visceral pleasure of sharing a bath or holding hands; the wisdom of a kind-hearted doctor who likens Walker’s condition to the Buddhist idea of “pure being”; and the heartbreaking decency of friends who “tried to reach down into our darkness and hold us.”Given the current glut of smug daddy blogs and cutesy mommy memoirs, it’s bracing to read a story about parenthood in which there is something so extraordinary at stake. Here, Brown and Schneller grapple with whether to place Walker in a group home. It feels like a betrayal to send him away, but the level of care he requires is simply too much for them to manage. To sort out his feelings, Brown embarks on a journey to meet other families of children with CFC—a narrative device that at times feels forced. And after a visit to a Christian community of disabled people in France, he finds something like peace. It doesn’t come from the group’s beliefs, which he respects but does not share. Rather, it lies in himself: “I have begun simply to love [Walker:] as he is, because I’ve discovered I can.”
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The boy in the moon is Brown’s son, who has an extremely rare genetic disease that has given him both mental and physical handicaps. CFC- cardiofaciocutaneous- syndrome is not a hereditary disease but one that randomly crops up, so the author and his wife had no inkling that their second child might not be like their first one. Walker cannot speak or even swallow (he is fed through a tube directly into his stomach) or control his bladder or bowels, and requires constant care, which his parents (both writers and so home a great deal of the time) and a nanny provide for him at home for the first 11 years of his life. The hardest part of dealing with him, however, is not the diapers or lifting a child growing into his teens or the fact that they never get to sleep an entire night, but the fact that Walker hits himself in the head all the time. As one can guess, that’s agonizing to watch. And it finally comes to a point where they just can’t do it by themselves anymore, physically or emotionally; they have to place Walker in a home. The first part of the book is biographical: Walker’s and their history, what they did and how they did it. The second half is spiritual and philosophical: what is the meaning of Walker’s limited life? What is the meaning of anyone with a mental handicap? What do they teach the rest of the population? The author gives us a history of how the mentally handicapped and mentally ill have been treated in the past- for the most part, horribly. He spends a good deal of time with the people of a group of communities called L’Arche, founded by Vanier in France forty years ago and extending into Canada and the USA now. In these small communities, the mentally handicapped are treated as the norm. They and their care givers have meals together, go out into the towns, and are all equals. It’s a fairly ideal situation, and there is a twenty year waiting list for people to get into these communities. The home that Walker is in isn’t quite as good as L’Arche, but it’s pretty good. Brown also makes great efforts to medically understand Walker’s disease; he has genetic tests done to try and get a positive diagnosis of CFD (he doesn’t) and an MRI to see what Walker’s brain looks like. He goes from place to place, trying to find out how Walker works, whether Walker has any sense of self. He keeps hoping that there is some way to ‘fix’ Walker. In the end, Brown really gets no answers. Walker has made his father into a different person that he was before- less selfish, more attuned to others, more appreciative of his friends and family, and, finally, a person who has to accept that Walker cannot be fixed, he can only be loved for who he is. If he has a ‘purpose’, other than to just live, if may be that. The book is, frankly, pretty grim. No matter how much love there is, taking care of someone who is severely handicapped is hard work and it’s very hard on families. That they were able to keep Walker home for over 10 years is testament to their devotion. But despite its grimness, the book is a well written meditation of what it means to have a family member with a mental disability.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The Boy in the Moon is Ian Brown's powerful, honest, and emotionally complicated memoir of raising his son, Walker―one of only a few hundred people worldwide who live with an extremely rare genetic mutation.Born with CFC (cardiofaciocutaneous) syndrome, Walker Brown is a mystery, as remote to his family as the moon. Unable to speak or swallow, compelled to hit himself, requiring surgeries, and round-the-clock care, he becomes the focus of his father's keen intelligence.As Brown becomes part of a community of families, he lets go of his self-blame and his desire to "fix" Walker, learning to accept the boy he loves, just as he is.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    An honest, moving, well-written memoir about raising a child with a rare and tragic syndrome (I hate using words like tragic, but when a symptom of a disorder is unstoppable self-harm it is difficult to avoid.) Having and loving a disabled child comes with many gifts, and many many sacrifices. Brown does a wonderful job of conveying all of that. For me it was perhaps too detailed with regard to accessing services and needed items such as bearing the outrageous costs of simple things like a lifetime of diapers and formula (Brown's son could not swallow or talk or be toilet trained) to hold my interest. All that said, when I finished I immediately gave it to a friend with an adult child severe autism and intellectual disabilities who had had many of the same struggles getting services and laying out a plan for her daughter for after she and her daughter's father are gone. I know it will be a meaningful read for her.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Ian Brown (not to be confused with the Stone Roses front man) is a Canadian journalist and radio personality. He and his wife Johanna (also a writer) have two children, Hayley and Walker. Walker has CFC, a genetic syndrome that renders him developmentally disabled, unable to talk, and subject to a raft of health problems.

    Brown's book is a memoir of the difficulty of raising his son, a rumination on the history of the care (or lack of same) of the mentally retarded (and yes, Brown uses that word) in history, a quest for answers, and a philosophical examination of the value of the less abled to the rest of us, and vice versa.

    It's a book you'll certainly dialogue with. It'll challenge your idea of your own level of empathy and get you thinking about the role of society in raising special needs children. It's especially relevant in these times: first because genetic testing and termination of pregnancies may eventually eliminate these special cases from our ranks; second because the current social Darwnism being shoved down our throats by small government advocates would offer no respite or help for parents who would most need it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The boy in the moon is Brown’s son, who has an extremely rare genetic disease that has given him both mental and physical handicaps. CFC- cardiofaciocutaneous- syndrome is not a hereditary disease but one that randomly crops up, so the author and his wife had no inkling that their second child might not be like their first one. Walker cannot speak or even swallow (he is fed through a tube directly into his stomach) or control his bladder or bowels, and requires constant care, which his parents (both writers and so home a great deal of the time) and a nanny provide for him at home for the first 11 years of his life. The hardest part of dealing with him, however, is not the diapers or lifting a child growing into his teens or the fact that they never get to sleep an entire night, but the fact that Walker hits himself in the head all the time. As one can guess, that’s agonizing to watch. And it finally comes to a point where they just can’t do it by themselves anymore, physically or emotionally; they have to place Walker in a home. The first part of the book is biographical: Walker’s and their history, what they did and how they did it. The second half is spiritual and philosophical: what is the meaning of Walker’s limited life? What is the meaning of anyone with a mental handicap? What do they teach the rest of the population? The author gives us a history of how the mentally handicapped and mentally ill have been treated in the past- for the most part, horribly. He spends a good deal of time with the people of a group of communities called L’Arche, founded by Vanier in France forty years ago and extending into Canada and the USA now. In these small communities, the mentally handicapped are treated as the norm. They and their care givers have meals together, go out into the towns, and are all equals. It’s a fairly ideal situation, and there is a twenty year waiting list for people to get into these communities. The home that Walker is in isn’t quite as good as L’Arche, but it’s pretty good. Brown also makes great efforts to medically understand Walker’s disease; he has genetic tests done to try and get a positive diagnosis of CFD (he doesn’t) and an MRI to see what Walker’s brain looks like. He goes from place to place, trying to find out how Walker works, whether Walker has any sense of self. He keeps hoping that there is some way to ‘fix’ Walker. In the end, Brown really gets no answers. Walker has made his father into a different person that he was before- less selfish, more attuned to others, more appreciative of his friends and family, and, finally, a person who has to accept that Walker cannot be fixed, he can only be loved for who he is. If he has a ‘purpose’, other than to just live, if may be that. The book is, frankly, pretty grim. No matter how much love there is, taking care of someone who is severely handicapped is hard work and it’s very hard on families. That they were able to keep Walker home for over 10 years is testament to their devotion. But despite its grimness, the book is a well written meditation of what it means to have a family member with a mental disability.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a book about parenting a child with an extremely rare disability, written from the father's perspective. It's a book about the realities of such parenting, for example, about how for the parents of some children, the sleepless nights of babyhood aren't something that the child and family grow out of of but rather just a part of daily parenting, year in and year out. It's a book about the difficulties of finding options for child care and the emotional dilemma of choosing to care of a special needs child at home, or having the child live in residence, if that's even an option at all. In Ian Brown's boy's case, it did become an option after many years on a waiting list, and seems to have been the best option for Walker, the boy in question in this book.The first part of this book is mostly about the reality of having parented Walker full-time (two parents and a daytime nanny) for, I believe 15 years or so, until Walker found a spot in a home with full-time caregivers and other teens with special needs like him. Then, the second part is more about a quest for information and meaning once Walker no longer lives at home. The author does this by meeting other kids with CFC (the extremely rare disorder his son has), their families, genetics researchers who work at identifying CFC, and adults living with disabilities and their care-givers in l'Arche communities in Montreal and France. This part is both pragmatic -- how will Walker live as an adult, how will he be cared for if his parents are no longer around? -- and philosophical -- what is the contribution of Walker to the world? why are there people with such severe disabilities and what is their place in society? It's about the inherent value of being human and of simply being. One aspect that I found lacking in this memoir was more details about the other members of the family, the author's wife and daughter. They are ever present in the background, as they must be, in order for the author to tell what he is telling -- his experience of parenting his son. And I get that that's what he's focusing on -- parenting his son, not a general family memoir. And I get that he can't do it without referring generally to the family setting. But the effect on me as a reader was to just have my curiosity piqued about his marriage, his wife's experience parenting Walker (in what ways was it exactly like his, in what ways did it differ?) and especially his daughter's childhood experience with her parents being consumed by her brother's needs. I would have liked to get a bigger, better picture of the overall family life. This was a thought-provoking and informative memoir. Well done.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Ian Brown and his wife welcomed their son, Walker, into the world in 1996 – and immediately they recognized there was something wrong. Walker’s disabilities showed themselves early with bouts of unrelenting crying, an inability to eat, and a failure to thrive. But it took a long time to find a diagnosis for their boy. Eventually they would have an answer – a genetic disorder called cardiofaciocutaneious (CFC) syndrome, a rare affliction that strikes fewer than 300 children worldwide and marks them with unusual facial appearances, communication deficits, and severe developmental delays and mental retardation. In Walker’s case, the disorder also made him act out with self-injurious behaviors (SIB). For the Browns, who already had a typically developing daughter, Walker was a mystery…and he turned their world upside down.The Boy in the Moon is Ian Brown’s memoir of the first thirteen years of their son’s life. Brown recounts the sleepless nights, the sadness, and the strain on his marriage because of Walker – but, he also shares the deep and dedicated love he has for his son, the moments when Walker filled his life with awe or taught Brown something about himself.Sometimes I think this is his gift to me – parceled out, to show me how rare and valuable it is. Walker, my teacher, my sweet, sweet, lost and broken boy. - from The Boy in the Moon -Walker wasn’t much to brag about, intellectually or physically. But like many other CFC children, he had changed lives, mine as much as anyone’s – deepened and broadened me, made me more tolerant and durable, more ethically dependable. He had given me a longer view. – from The Boy in the Moon -Brown is nothing if not brutally honest in his memoir. He does not pretend that he is a saint, or that his love for his child is not filled with ambivalence. He lays it all out and bares his emotions on the page. As difficult as his story is to read, I still found myself laughing at times…because Brown has discovered something that many people have not – that humor can elevate us above the worst situations and make our most difficult challenges bearable.I dreaded the doctor’s waiting room, with its well-dressed mothers and well-behaved children. They were never anything but kind, but walking in with Walker yowling and banging his head, I felt like I’d barged into a church as a naked one-man band with a Roman candle up my ass and singing “Yes! We Have No Bananas.” - from The Boy in the Moon -Brown’s memoir is not just about Walker…it is about all families raising children with severe disability. In the years after Walker’s birth, Brown began to ask himself: What is the value of one human life? He wanted to find meaning in Walker’s existence. His journey took him around the world, seeking out other families with children diagnosed with CFC. He also met with individuals whose progressive view of the disabled was opening doors to communities where the disabled could be accepted for who they were, and treated as equal and important members of society.In Brown’s memoir, the reader is introduced to extraordinary people – the nanny, Olga, whose love and patience with Walker was a gift; the day workers and night workers at the group home where Walker is eventually placed who adopted him into their hearts; and the parents of other CFC children who had sacrificed everything for their children. Along the way, Brown challenges government bureaucracy and the overwhelming medical establishment in his effort to make sense of the world and Walker’s place within it.The gift that Brown gives his readers is a glimpse into the despair, hope, and eventual acceptance which parents raising children with disability face every day. He reveals the boy beneath the diagnosis and offers a deeper understanding of what it means to be human.Because on his good days, Walker is proof of what the imperfect and the fragile have to offer; a reminder that there are many ways to be human; a concentrator of joy; an insistent nudge to pay attention to every passing mote of daily life that otherwise slips by uncounted. – from The Boy in the Moon -I was deeply moved by the story of Walker. Brown’s writing is flawless, honest, heartbreaking, and wise. I have worked as a physical therapist with adults with severe developmental delay for nearly ten years now, and so much of what Brown says in this book resonated with me. He puts into words what I have long felt in my heart.The Boy in the Moon should be mandatory reading for everyone. It is easy to cast our eyes away from those who are struggling; it is easy to forget about the children and adults living with disability behind the closed doors of their group homes. But, we do ourselves a disservice by not taking notice – somehow we become more human when we allow ourselves to be touched by the lives of people like Walker.Profoundly moving, The Boy in the Moon is a book I highly recommend.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    It's hard for me to review this book. It was well written, it was interesting. I suppose I'd recommend it. But I found it so disturbing and depressing. It's about the author's profoundly retarded and disabled son, his rare genetic disease, and other children like him. Walker, Brown's son, was born with cardiofaciocutaneous (CFC) syndrome, an extremely rare genetic mutation that results in unusual facial appearance, the inability to speak, and a compulsion to hit himself constantly. At age thirteen, he is mentally and developmentally between one and three years old and will need constant care for the rest of his life. Usually these books are full of "we wouldn't trade him for anything, he's taught us so much!" which I find hard to comprehend. What has he taught you? To live in the moment? To find joy in simple things? I guess I don't see those as hugely profound lessons, and I don't feel that's a good trade-off for having to care for this person 24/7. This book has a little of that - at one point they see a doctor who comments that in Buddhism the goal is to live in the moment, and Walker is able to do that in a way most of us can't - but it's also straightforward about the frustrations of having such a child. The book starts with a description of a typical night with Walker and the exhaustion he and his wife have endured for all the years of caring for Walker. His honesty is wonderful.A lot of the book is about their difficult decision to move him to a group home. It took years to do this. As an American observing Canadian health care, this was very interesting. The province has only so much money for health care, so families have to fight to get a piece of the pie, to the point of hiring a professional to advocate for them. The rest of the book is about life after Walker has moved to the group home (which seems to be good for him - he has a life outside his immediate family, other people who care for him.) Ian Brown travels to meet with scientists and parents of other CFC patients. Most of them are as profoundly disabled as Walker is. One young man has learned to speak and can do things like drive a tractor. It's hard to tell if this is because his parents worked harder with him, he was less affected by the syndrome, or what. Brown and his wife have, of course, wondered what might have been if they'd gotten a diagnosis sooner, done something different, etc. He wonders if he and his son can connect, if he can ever understand his son's condition, if his son is happy and fulfilled to the extent that he can be. I found that the saddest part. But he's a journalist, and that's his way of dealing with things.He also visits L'Arche group homes for the mentally disabled in France where people just live in a household with carers as a family. This is an international organization founded in France by Jean Vanier. Those homes seem like an ideal place for people with such disabilities, and Brown seeks to find such a place for Walker. I had a hard time reading about them because I have a hard time being around mentally disabled people and can't imagine wanting to work with them. I was very curious about the carers and what motivates and rewards them.At the end Brown is still questioning the value of his son's life and trying to resolve his questions about whether Walker is or can be happy. The book ends with Walker having a seizure, which will probably increase and eventually kill him, and Brown holds him in his arms and simply knows he loves his son and his son knows it, and that they'll face the future together. That's moving, but what a way to live.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Ian Brown and his wife, Johanna, have a daughter, Hayley, and a just-born baby, Walker. Walker has a rare genetic deformity that makes it impossible for him to eat except through a tube. He will need diapering, even beyond the age when toilet training has normally taken place. He can't talk, nor can he respond to stimuli in the way that is expected of other children his age. Ian and Johanna are sleep-deprived and can barely keep up with their jobs as writers while trying to take turns having sleepless nights in order to give round-the-clock care to their infant son. As he grows older, he begins to bang his head on walls and tears at his ears, for unknown neurological reasons. At an age when most parents would have put teething pain and diapers behind them, there is no relief in sight for the beleaguered family. The parents have an especially supportive network of friends and extended family. Subsidies from government allow in-house workers and nannies. Due to the extremity of the challenge, the staff is constantly changing (revolving door) but nevertheless includes stellar individuals of much longer tenure such as Olga.(The book does jump back and forth between two periods: The first two or three years of Walker's life, and another one closer to when he is ten and over. The jumps are never gratuitous, and the thematic juxtapositions from different phases of Walker's growth are expertly rendered.) I reread pages 180-183 several times. This is in the second period, when the husband and wife have one of their most agonizing discussions about whether it was right to have sent their son to a group home, and the ensuing guilt. And whether, if they had had the type of pre-birth testing for genetic abnormalities later to become available, they might have decided to abort the fetus. Whether the decision to abstain from attempting a third pregnancy was a joint decision, or a contentious issue that went away without ever being resolved. In this discussion, the sentiments of one parent are by no means identical to the other. The union survived even up to the end of the book, but the reader can feel the strain on the relationship to be much different from that which would ensue from quick, and therefore, comparatively minor events like losing a job or having a car stolen or suffering from a bout of appendicitis.During one all-nighter when Johanna by mutual agreement has the night off, Ian is attending to Walker and his needs (pages 225-226): “One evening I was so exhausted I fell down the stairs with Walker in my arms: my heel slipped on the lip of the step, I fell backwards, the familiar bolt of terror sucking my breath out of my throat, that thought, Walker, flashing through my whole body, whereupon I curled my arms around him and made a sled of myself, and we shot down, Walkie on my chest, until we bumped to a stop at the bottom. He laughed. Loved it. And so, I did too. He took me into darkness but he was often the way out of it as well.”Especially poignant are the reflections of the author as he inspects the storage spaces containing inventories of toys. Some of them are the normal ones that everyone buys from the toy store for normal kids. The other ones are the diagnostic and remedial toys that came from the psychologists and doctors trying to help Walker catch up to all the other kids, which he will never be able to do. Fine, Walker will not be able to say that two plus two equals four. Neither will het be able to do calculus nor write an essay about Hamlet, but what about basic human communication and empathy? At this juncture, I believe it was particularly appropriate when the author described his visits to Jean Vanier (the leader of L’Arche) in France, where he saw that a community of abundant communication can exist where verbal language is weak or fails. Maybe to rely only on verbal communication is too facile. What are humans communicating to each other when they look at each other with a glance of empathy, or laugh together, or sigh together? It is beyond the scope of mere words.As an example, at the group home where Walker lives, his friend Colin has died. ( “Friend,” in this context, means Colin is the boy who, when he noticed that Walker would obscure his (Colin's) view of a video game, would in a friendly way abstain from asking Walker to get out of the way. ) One may ask if Walker is cognizant of the reason for the sudden absence of Colin. And if so, what are the ways that Walker could communicate his feelings about Colin? After you read pages 249-250, see if you believe whether Walker misses his friend or not. Every year I read thousands of pages and forget thousands of pages, but I can't ever forget these 2 pages. The average reader's experience of living in a family with a disabled individual is minimal to non-existent. We see an occasional news story or short magazine article, but here is a full-length book that gives a comprehensive view. I still do not know how anyone could live through this. But the book starts to give at least some idea about what it is all about.I have wrestled with what it means to be a parent. It's true that an infant human needs proportionately longer parental intervention to avoid certain death (18 years?) compared to many other species. What parent hasn't rued the day when activities of procreation created a life-long commitment, with uncertain guarantees of good health? The author checks in on the thoughts of Darwin, which are currently much brought to bear on arguments about palliative care and the expense of caring for disabled persons. But wait, maybe Darwin is not saying the cruel things that we always assumed he did:(Page 285):“We should ... bear in mind that an animal possessing great size, strength, and ferocity, and which, like the gorilla, could defend itself from all enemies, would not perhaps have become social: and this would most effectually have checked the acquirement of the higher mental facilities, such as sympathy and the love of his fellows. Hence it might have been an immense advantage to man to have sprung from some comparatively weak creature.”It was a gripping book. Once I started it, it was a one-day read. No boredom was felt from the first page to the last.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The Boy in the Moon, by Ian BrownAs a person with a ‘now’ lifelong neurological disability, I can relate to Ian Brown’s search for his son. My disability is much different than Ian’s, but I can relate to how Ian Brown feels for his son. In my case, my disability changed my life forever in middle life, but I had and lived a full life. For Walker, he never had a chance to experience any part of a normal life, and deep down, it was Ian’s desire to try to draw his life out for him to live a normal life. When a person has a disability, their world is a completely different world than anyone elses. You are not in the ‘normal’ world anymore. It’s so different. Yet, if you think Walker’s world in this way, this is all that Ian knows. He does not know life to be any different than the life he has lived so far. I know Ian Brown knows this. I base that upon my in-laws who have a son with Autism who is barely reachable. He is happy. It is the only life he knows. Yet day to day, he lives his life and knows no other. It is ‘his’ life, his world. That is how I feel for Walker. This ‘is’ his life as he knows it. He has no loss of life as this is what it is. It is just different than other peoples. Walker doesn’t even realize it is different. Life just is. This is his every day. With the severity of his disability, I think it is good he does not know any different.I understand all of Ian’s intense research, going to meet with different doctors, specialists, and meeting with as many people as he knew that has/had a child like Walker. I think it is a coping mechanism and also another search for answers to help, because I did the same thing when I was diagnosed with a very rare neurological disease that hits only 1 in 1 million people. With very rare diseases, most all doctors are at a loss to help. Like Ian said in the book, some doctors never heard of the disease he has. When they know nothing of the disease (and I even experienced doctors leaving the room to look my disease up on the internet), you feel so empty. Then you go about a search as Ian did, trying to find and get to the doctors who do know about it and sometimes it can be impossible. When it comes to a disability, if it is the parent or the person afflicted, they/we are going to do whatever it is we can to find more answers. There just ‘might’ be a glimmer of hope to help make the disease better by learning different treatments, etc. For people who do not have a lifelong disability, this may be hard to understand unless you actually experience this. Unless you are really in a world of Ian’s or have a disabled person in your family, you know how deep down how devastating it can be, yet it also puts a drive into you/Ian, to try to find a cure, and even a deeper drive to too reach his son, to find something to help him live a better life.The decision to put him into a group home most likely still haunts Ian to this day, without him admitting so, but there comes a time where the parent does have to admit that they cannot help their child any longer like a home can. To admit that is like giving in to defeat. I admire ALL that Ian and his wife have done for Walker. They stuck together. This story was very heart touching and true to life for myself. I could relate to all that Ian wrote about, but in a different way, as this is a child and from the beginning of his life.I really enjoyed this book as I related to most all of it. At the end of the book, Ian wrote that it took him so long to write the book, but it was because he was living it first. So true. Such a devoted father! Ian is a very lucky boy, even if he never understands it, you know he knows it.Laurie Carlson
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I really enjoyed reading this book. Ian Brown's perspective as the father with a disabled son was at times brutally honest and others beautifully. I would love to read a book from his wife's perspective. The book did throw me off at several points. The politics of health care are a topical point in this story, however when the author was taking incited, or supported in anyway, shots at certain parties, it felt self indulgent and immature. My favorite quote from the book, " I don't think his life should only have value because he makes other people feel more contented with their own lives. I think his life should have a value of its own."
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    While reading this book, I was most struck by Brown's honesty in dealing with his son's illness and his reactions to it. At times, the emotions are quite raw and Brown's need to find meaning, any sort of meaning, in the situation is palpable. Other times, he seems quite distanced from the situation, dealing almost in abstractions. It gives a good balance to the book and Brown moves back and forth between his life, the medical jargon, and his travels around the world meeting with other families dealing with the same condition as his son (CCF), as well as through other communities who cater to the disabled. Surprisingly, one emotion I thought was missing was anger. There are times when Brown writes about being angry, but, for the most part, the anger is quite muted. In the few conversations he relates with his wife, she seems angrier than he. I don't know if I could have handled the situations faced by his family without a great deal of anger. Maybe that's what I'll take away most from this book: anger at situations beyond your control isn't productive.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A sweet, sad and ultimately very thought provoking memoir written by the father of a severely disabled boy. Walker Brown has a genetic mutation resulting in a syndrome that only about 100 people on the planet have. Walker cannot speak, does not eat food and is fed through a G tube, wears diapers and must wear protective gear as he constantly hits himself and beats his head into the wall. He is very small for his age and cannot communicate through any discernible means. Ian, his wife Johanna, and the older sister Hayley spend 13 years caring for Walker round the clock until the parents finally find a suitable group home for him. Ian then embarks on a journey to discover what, if anything, his son's life means to him, to the community and to humanity. Surely there must be some answer as to what his life means?The author travels around Canada and the US meeting other families with children that have this syndrome. He travels to California to meet the geneticists who first confirmed this condition and understand how a mutation on a gene can occur to create the condition. He goes to France to meet advocates for the disabled, philosophers of disability studies, and to visit communities of severely disabled. He looks at his own heart and mind and reactions to people like Walker and he takes a cursory look at how the severely disabled have been treated in the Western world throughout history. I was fascinated by the picture he painted of his life, his marriage and his unending love for his son. He thoroughly examines all the ethics at work in studying genes that produce disabled humans, the ethics of how we treat the least of all in our care and the philosophies behind how to treat these children. It was all wonderfully enlightening. A fascinating look at people who we don't like looking at or even being around.I am humbled by the questions Mr. Brown raises and by his own love for a child who most of society will always see as lesser. I really understood the love he described for his son, and his own interest and passion for helping and understanding the disabled helped me understand a bit more about being a parent.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    According to the cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome website, CCF (as it is more commonly called) can be diagnosed by some of the following symptoms:- a distinctive facial appearance; - unusually sparse, brittle, curly hair; - skin abnormalities; - heart malformations present at birth (congenital heart defects) - growth delaysAs a reader of The Boy in the Moon, I offer you some more information about CCF:There is no cure for CCF. It is a genetic condition that a child is born with.It will be seen as a disability for the child’s entire life, and will cause society to view the child (and the eventual adult) differently. It is extremely rare, and the severity of it can differ from child-to-child.It impacts lives.It is CCF that has made Walker Brown who he is, and it is Walker Brown who is the raison d’etre for The Boy in the Moon.The Boy in the Moon is a memoir, by Ian Brown (Walker’s father). Brown is a reporter for Canada’s national newspaper, The Globe and Mail. Brown had frequently written articles about his son prior to writing this book, and had thus familiarized Canadians with his family’s challenges.The book examines the relationship that Walker has with his father, his family, and the world at large. This book is Brown’s search for the meaning of Walkers life in our society that has distinct and opinionated views on disabled individuals.CCF has shaped the Brown family in many ways. The parents, Ian and Joanna Schneller, have been forced to abandon dreams for a “normal life” for both their son and daughter. The parents are permanently attached to their son - in a way that parents of “normal” children will never be – and sometimes suffer guilt for abandoning their son (when placed in a group home) or perhaps even causing his condition. It is CCF that has forced the Brown family to seek solace and support of other advocates for the disabled, and has allowed them to create valuable bonds with other CCF parents. And yet, it is CCF that allows Walker to see the world as it truly is: simple in its joys and mysteries. It is Walker’s view on the world which Brown desperately grasps at with this book. He wants to insight into his son and his sons actions. Their communication is limited to smiles, grunts, and hits; however, they are still able to understand one another at an almost primordial level. It is Walker that brings about Brown’s search for enlightenment, and who is Brown’s passion for life.I received this book as part of the Early Reviewers Program, and I voraciously read it. Brown’s writing is hauntingly eloquent, and this book will be, I suspect, read and re-read. The journey of the Walker and his family is one that will not easily be forgotten.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Writers search for meaning and to a degree manufacture it when it cannot be found. The stories we tell ourselves about our circumstances, and that of those around us, allow us to make sense of our world. This book is such, a sense making story, a full picture of coming to terms with trauma, traumatic loss of what could be possible for a new child, and an eventual coming to positive terms with what "is". It is the story of Brown’s son with CFC, society’s relationship to disability and a kind of medical philosophy rolled into one book. Brown searches for answers to the "whys" of his son’s condition from the micro level of genetics to the macro-level of neurological MRI examinations. And, in the latter half of the book takes the individual experience of his son outwards to examine no only the lives of other CFCr's and their families but, the possibilities of living that exists for individuals with disabilities. Brown shows himself, despite a seemingly dogged sense of failure, to be both a good parent and human in his search for meaning. At the same time, indirectly, he reminds us of our own interdependence and social contract responsibilities. The book is a deeply human life changing read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Ian Brown is a reporter and feature writer at the Toronto Globe and Mail. In 1996, three years after their daughter, Hayley, was born, Brown and his wife, Johanna, had their second child, Walker. It soon became clear that something was very wrong with him, physically and developmentally, and when he was seven months old, they were given a diagnosis: Walker had cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome. CFC is, as Brown puts it, “a technical name for a mash of symptoms” caused by an extremely rare genetic mutation. He cannot speak – although, as his parents learned, he has his ways of communicating – and must be fed through a tube because he cannot swallow solid food. CFC also gives Walker unusual (and to the uninitiated, sometimes startling or even frightening) facial expressions and makes him feel compelled to hit himself constantly. At the time of this book's writing, Walker's chronological age was 13, but his mental and developmental age is in the range of one to three years. He will need round-the-clock care for the length of his life. The Boy in the Moon is much more than a memoir. The book is subtitled “A Father's Journey to Understand His Extraordinary Son,” and Brown takes the reader along with him on this journey as he tries to find answers to difficult questions: How did this happen? Why did it happen? Does my child have something of value to give to the world, just as he is? Why are people so frightened of disability? Is this an individual problem for my family to manage and solve on our own, or does society have an obligation to help and support? Having a child with CFC also raised some very personally painful questions for Walker's parents. At one point, the author relates a conversation he had with his wife in which she admits to feeling that if she were “any kind of a mother,” she would have been able to care for Walker at home, rather than making the decision, as she and Ian did when Walker was eight or nine, to place him in a group home (it actually took several more years after that to find a place that was acceptable to them and that also had an opening). Both Ian and Johanna struggled with feelings of guilt, with wondering if they would have chosen abortion had a diagnostic test been available when Johanna was pregnant (there is now; there wasn't then), with exhaustion as a result of the sheer physical endurance required to care for Walker 24/7, with resentment toward each other, with wildly shifting emotions toward Walker. How is it possible to have a child who needs constant hands-on care without sometimes feeling like you hate him? How is it possible to acknowledge such feelings without enormous guilt?In an effort to find answers to some of these questions, Ian Brown reached out to other families with CFC children. He travelled around the world to talk with geneticists and neurologists. He initiated conversations with advocates for disabled people who approached the issue from varying perspectives: religious, educational, and philosophical as well as scientific. The result is a book that is both a dispassionate, richly informative journalistic examination of one of Western society's last taboo subjects, and a deeply honest and heartfelt memoir of Brown's attempt to understand Walker as well as his own conflicted feelings about him: “Walker, my teacher, my sweet, sweet, lost and broken boy.”
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a well-written and deeply personal portrayal of life as a father of a severely disabled boy. Ian Brown allows readers a glimpse into his own challenges in this role, as well as the family dynamics that result. It is both educational and emotionally moving. I now see the relationship between society and the disabled differently.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    In my top 5 list at least, if not #1. Bless you Ian for telling my story.

Book preview

The Boy in the Moon - Ian Brown

one

For the first eight years of Walker’s life, every night is the same. The same routine of tiny details, connected in precise order, each mundane, each crucial.

The routine makes the eight years seem long, almost endless, until I try to think about them afterwards, and then eight years evaporate to nothing, because nothing has changed.

Tonight I wake up in the dark to a steady, motorized noise. Something wrong with the water heater. Nnngah. Pause. Nnngah. Nnngah.

But it’s not the water heater. It’s my boy, Walker, grunting as he punches himself in the head, again and again.

He has done this since before he was two. He was born with an impossibly rare genetic mutation, cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, a technical name for a mash of symptoms. He is globally delayed and can’t speak, so I never know what’s wrong. No one does. There are just over a hundred people with CFC around the world. The disorder turns up randomly, a misfire that has no certain cause or roots; doctors call it an orphan syndrome because it seems to come from nowhere.

I count the grunts as I pad my way into his room: one a second. To get him to stop hitting himself, I have to lure him back to sleep, which means taking him downstairs and making him a bottle and bringing him back into bed with me.

That sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? But with Walker, everything is complicated. Because of his syndrome, he can’t eat solid food by mouth, or swallow easily. Because he can’t eat, he takes in formula through the night via a feeding system. The formula runs along a line from a feedbag and a pump on a metal IV stand, through a hole in Walker’s sleeper and into a clever-looking permanent valve in his belly, sometimes known as a G-tube, or mickey. To take him out of bed and down to the kitchen to prepare the bottle that will ease him back to sleep, I have to disconnect the line from the mickey. To do this, I first have to turn off the pump (in the dark, so he doesn’t wake up completely) and close the feed line. If I don’t clamp the line, the sticky formula pours out onto the bed or the floor (the carpet in Walker’s room is pale blue: there are patches that feel like the Gobi Desert under my feet, from all the times I have forgotten). To crimp the tube, I thumb a tiny red plastic roller down a slide. (It’s my favourite part of the routine—one thing, at least, is easy, under my control.) I unzip his one-piece sleeper (Walker’s small, and grows so slowly he wears the same sleepers for a year and a half at a time), reach inside to unlock the line from the mickey, pull the line out through the hole in his sleeper and hang it on the IV rack that holds the pump and feedbag. Close the mickey, rezip the sleeper. Then I reach in and lift all 45 pounds of Walker from the depths of the crib. He still sleeps in a crib. It’s the only way we can keep him in bed at night. He can do a lot of damage on his own.

This isn’t a list of complaints. There’s no point to complaining. As the mother of another CFC child once told me, You do what you have to do. If anything, that’s the easy part. The hard part is trying to answer the questions Walker raises in my mind every time I pick him up. What is the value of a life like his—a life lived in the twilight, and often in pain? What is the cost of his life to those around him? We spend a million dollars to save them, a doctor said to me not long ago. But then when they’re discharged, we ignore them. We were sitting in her office, and she was crying. When I asked her why, she said Because I see it all the time.

Sometimes watching Walker is like looking at the moon: you see the face of the man in the moon, yet you know there’s actually no man there. But if Walker is so insubstantial, why does he feel so important? What is he trying to show me? All I really want to know is what goes on inside his off-shaped head, in his jumped-up heart. But every time I ask, he somehow persuades me to look into my own.

But there is another complication here. Before I can slip downstairs with Walker for a bottle, the bloom of his diaper pillows up around me. He’s not toilet-trained. Without a new diaper, he won’t fall back to sleep and stop smacking his head and ears. And so we detour from the routine of the feeding tube to the routine of the diaper.

I spin 180 degrees to the battered changing table, wondering, as I do every time, how this will work when he’s twenty and I’m sixty. The trick is to pin his arms to keep him from whacking himself. But how do you change a 45-pound boy’s brimming diaper while immobilizing both his hands so he doesn’t bang his head or (even worse) reach down to scratch his tiny, plum-like but suddenly liberated backside, thereby smearing excrement everywhere? While at the same time immobilizing his feet, because ditto? You can’t let your attention wander for a second. All this is done in the dark as well.

But I have my routine. I hold his left hand with my left hand, and tuck his right hand out of commission under my left armpit. I’ve done it so many times, it’s like walking. I keep his heels out of the disaster zone by using my right elbow to stop his knees from bending, and do all the actual nasty business with my right hand. My wife, Johanna, can’t manage this alone any longer and sometimes calls me to help her. I am never charming when she does.

And the change itself: a task to be approached with all the delicacy of a munitions expert in a Bond movie defusing an atomic device. The unfolding and positioning of a new nappy; the signature feel of the scratchy Velcro tabs on the soft paper of the nappy, the disbelief that it will ever hold; the immense, surging relief of finally refastening it—we made it! The world is safe again! The reinsertion of his legs into the sleeper.

Now we’re ready to head downstairs to make the bottle.

Three flights, taking it in the knees, looking out the landing windows as we go. He’s stirring, so I describe the night to him in a low voice. There’s no moon tonight and it’s damp for November.

In the kitchen, I perform the bottle ritual. The weightless plastic bottle (the third model we tried before we found one that worked, big enough for his not-so-fine motor skills yet light enough for him to hold), the economy-sized vat of Enfamil (whose bulk alone is discouraging, it implies so much), the tricky one-handed titrating of tiny tablespoonfuls of Pablum and oatmeal (he aspirates thin fluids; it took us months to find these exact manageable proportions that produced the exact manageable consistency. I have a head full of these numbers: dosages, warm-up times, the frequency of his bowel movements/scratchings/cries/naps). The nightly pang about the fine film of Pablum dust everywhere: Will we ever again have anything like an ordered life? The second pang, of shame, for having such thoughts in the first place. The rummage in the ever-full blue and white dish drainer (we’re always washing something, a pipette or a syringe or a bottle or a medicine measuring cup) for a nipple (but the right nipple, one whose hole I have enlarged into an X, to let the thickened liquid out) and a plastic nipple cap. Pull the nipple into the cap, the satisfying pop as it slips into place. The gonad-shrinking microwave.

Back up three flights. He’s still trying to smash his head. Why does he do it? Because he wants to talk, but can’t? Because—this is my latest theory—he can’t do what he can see other people doing? I’m sure he’s aware of his own difference.

Cart him into the bed in his older sister Hayley’s room on the third floor where I have been sleeping, so I can be near him. Hayley, meanwhile, is downstairs with her mother in our bedroom so they can get some sleep. We take turns like this, reduced by the boy to bedroom Bedouins. Neither Johanna nor I has slept two full nights in a row in eight years. We both work during the day. After the first six months, I stopped noticing how tired I was: my days and nights simply became more elastic and similar.

Lay him down on the bed. Oh, fuck me dead—forgot the pump! Build a wall of pillows around him so he doesn’t escape or fall off the bed while I nip back into the other room. Remember 4 cc’s (or is it 6?) of chloral hydrate, prescribed for sleep and to calm his self-mutilation. (I tried a dose once: the kick of a double martini. William S. Burroughs was thrown out of school as a kid for experimenting with it.) Reprogram the pump, restart the familiar mild repetitive whine, his night pulse.

At last I sink into bed beside him and pull the wriggling boy close. He begins to hit his head again, and because we know of no acceptable way to restrain him mechanically, I hold down his small right hand with my large right one. This brings his left hand up to his other ear—he’s a genius for finding ways to hurt himself, his teacher told me the other day. I grab his left in my left, which I have threaded behind his head. He begins to kick himself in the crotch with his right heel, so hard it makes me wince. I run my big leg over his little leg, and lay my right hand (holding his right hand) on his left thigh, to keep it still. He’s stronger than he looks. Under his birdy limbs, he’s granite. He’ll mash his ears to a pulp if no one stops him.

There is a chance, of course, that none of this will work. Every once in a while, the chloral hydrate rebounds and transforms him into a giggling drunk. It’s not unusual to have to perform the entire routine again an hour later. When he has a cold (eight, ten times a year), he coughs himself awake every twenty minutes. Sometimes he cries for hours for no reason. There are nights when nothing works, and nights when he is up and at it, laughing and playing and crawling all over me. I don’t mind those nights, tired as I am: his sight is poor, but in the dark we’re equal, and I know this makes him happy. In the night, there can be stretches when he is no different from any normal lively boy. It makes me almost cry to tell you that.

Tonight is a lucky night: I can feel him slip off after ten minutes. He stops grunting, strokes his bottle, turns his back and jams his bony little ass into my hip, a sure sign. He falls asleep.

I hurry after him. For all this nightly nightmare—the years of desperate worry and illness and chronic sleep deprivation, the havoc he has caused in our lives, threatening our marriage and our finances and our sanity—I long for the moment when he lets his crazy formless body fall asleep against me. For a short while, I feel like a regular little boy’s father. Sometimes I think this is his gift to me—parcelled out, to show me how rare and valuable it is. Walker, my teacher, my sweet, sweet, lost and broken boy.

In the early years, after Walker was first diagnosed with CFC syndrome at the age of seven months, the estimated number of people who suffered from the syndrome changed every time we visited the doctor. The medical profession—at least the handful of doctors who studied cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome, or knew what it was—was learning about the syndrome as we did. The name itself was nothing more than an amalgam of the syndrome’s most prominent symptoms: cardio, for ever-present murmurs and malformations and enlargements of the heart; facio, for the facial dysmorphia that was its signal characteristic, a prominent brow and down-sloping eyes; cutaneous, for its many skin irregularities. The first time a geneticist ever described the syndrome to me, he told me there were eight other children in the world with CFC. Eight: it wasn’t possible. Surely we had been blasted out to an unknown galaxy.

But within a year, after our doctors had begun to sweep the medical literature for references to CFC, I was informed there were 20 cases, because more had turned up in Italy. Then there were 40. (The speed with which the number changed made me sneer at the doctors: they were trained medical professionals, surely they ought to know more than we did.) More than 100 cases of CFC have been reported since the syndrome was first described publicly in three people in 1979; some estimates are as high as 300. Everything about the syndrome was a mystery, an unknown. It was 1986 before it had a name. Symptoms ranged wildly in severity and kind. (Some researchers believe there may be thousands of people with CFC, but with symptoms so mild the condition has never been noticed.) Some CFC children hit themselves, though most didn’t. Some could speak or sign. All but a few were anywhere from mildly to severely retarded. Heart defects ranged from serious to unimportant. (Walker had a mild murmur.) Their skin was often sensitive to touch, to the point of agony. Like many CFC children, Walker couldn’t chew or swallow easily; he couldn’t speak; his vision and hearing were compromised (he had narrowed optic nerves, one more than the other, and skinny ear canals subject to incessant infection); he was thin and wobbly, hypotonic in the medical jargon.

Like virtually all CFC children, he had no eyebrows, sparse curly hair, a prominent brow, wide-set eyes, low-set ears and an often charming cocktail-party personality. The CFC features grew more noticeable, more abnormal, as he grew older. I assumed my little boy was an average example of the condition. It turned out I was wrong. It turned out the average didn’t exist—not here.

Nor did those conditions change. Today, at thirteen, mentally, developmentally—I’m terrified even to write these words—he’s somewhere between one and three years old. Physically, he’s better off than many CFC children (he doesn’t have frequent seizures, doesn’t have ulcerated intestines); cognitively, less so. He could live to middle age. Would that be good luck, or bad?

Minus a few new genetic details, this was and still is the sum total of what the medical profession knows about CFC. It isn’t widely studied, as autism is. Most parents of CFC children know more about the affliction than their pediatricians. The CFC population isn’t large and politically powerful like that of Down syndrome, which more than 350,000 people live with in North America, and which occurs once in every 800 births. CFC shows up no more often than once in every 300,000 births, and possibly as rarely as once in a million. The Office of Rare Diseases at the National Institutes of Health characterized CFC as extremely rare, way out at the far, thin end of the statistical branch, alongside bizarre genetic anomalies such as Chédiak–Higashi syndrome, a bleeding disorder caused by platelet dysfunction and white cell abnormalities. There were only two hundred known cases of Chédiak–Higashi, in part because so few born with it ever survived.

Raising Walker was like raising a question mark. I often wanted to tell someone the story, what the adventure felt and smelled and sounded like, what I noticed when I wasn’t running through darkness. But who could relate to such a human anomaly, to the rare and exotic corner of existence where we suddenly found ourselves? Eleven years would pass before I met anyone like him.

two

Early on I learned my son could lift my mood, that I responded to his unusual emotional valence. Many days, even now, follow a pattern:

I arrive home from work tired (possibly from being up with him the night before), even defeated: some ship has not only failed to come in, but turns out not to have sailed at all. The daylight is fading. Walker is playing with Olga, his nanny since he was born. Her last name is de Vera, but she’s always just Olga to us. If she hasn’t already returned with him from a three-hour walk outside (he loves the outside) and given him a bath, I can. I used to do it every other day, back when he was with us all the time. Bathing him brings me back to myself.

I run the bath; fetch him from Olga downstairs (he follows her steadily from the kitchen to the laundry in the basement back up to the kitchen, intermittently conducting self-guided tours of the living room, dining room, piano, front hall, and stairs of our narrow city house; for a long time, until he was six, the stairs were his favourite lounging space); eagerly unburden him of his clothes (the buttons, the zips, the geometry problem of extracting his stiff arms from his sleeves, keeping him on his feet, preventing him from slumping to the ground while I am upside down undoing his shoes, wishing we had bought the Velcro model instead of the laceups); ditch his diaper and perform cleanup if called for. Done. Lift him into the bath, watch him like traffic so he doesn’t submerge while I undress in an instant, jump in with him.

Then: we recline in the tub, the smooth of his naked back against my chest. He is as calm as a pond. His nipples are minute, literally the size of rivets. They make me nervous, I don’t know why. (I can only imagine.) His shoulder blades and the bones of his back are oddly soft, plastic, bendable, as if covered by some miracle upholstery. The skin of his arms and thighs feels almost manufactured too, too much matte and not enough flow, the cells rampaging, overbuilding, one of the more direct results of the genetic miscues that made him this way.

His body changes so slowly I often forget how much it has changed. The older he gets, the more noticeable are his deformities—they warned us about that, back when he was a baby. He has a small pot-belly now, which he never did before. When he was younger he was nothing but rope, whereas now around his middle, there is a quarter-inch pinch of flesh, like a roll in a sock. His skin is actually softer than when he was a baby, as if time were running in reverse.

At first, when he was an infant, baths upset him. But if you got the temperature right and sat quietly with him for long enough, slowly replacing the cooling water with hot, he calmed down long enough to enjoy it, briefly, until you rinsed his hair or delivered a new shocking sensation to his exterior: CFCers hate new stimuli, their nerves seem to be permanently scalded. Over time, he grew to like the bathwater; it seemed to free his all-too-loosely-linked limbs, lighten the load gravity imposed on them. The irony was that water had been one of his original nemeses: too much amniotic fluid in the womb, some of it aspirated before birth; also too much fluid in the brain, filling his overlarge cerebellar cavities.

He laughs more when he’s in the bath. Of course I like to think he laughs because he’s with me, but that’s absurd. He’ll laugh with almost anyone.

Another day. This morning we’re up before breakfast, while everyone else sleeps. We’ve started to let him get up when he wants to, to give him the illusion of choosing. Walker and I are in the kitchen, and I am making my daily inventory of his body: his ears (he has cauliflower ears from hitting himself, prone to constant infection), his nose (don’t ask), his general well-being. He’s playing with a Baggie filled with pop-can tabs. Olga saves them. I don’t know why she saves them but there are hundreds of pop-can tabs, secured and wrapped and secreted around the house—awaiting some strange catastrophe for which Olga endlessly prepares.

Maybe the catastrophe of her eventual absence? Olga saved our lives. She had been looking after the dying mother of a prominent capitalist when we found her through the Filipino nanny mafia. Hayley was a year old. Olga had worked around the world as a caregiver and a maid, after being forced to leave nursing college in Manila to provide for her family. When Walker appeared two years later, trouble from day one, Olga enveloped him. He was a shorter version of her: compact, intent, difficult to distract. She washed his clothes and kept his room and managed his meds and fed and changed and walked him for hours on end and sang him to sleep; and if she didn’t, she helped us do it. She did laundry the way pilgrims perform religious rituals, precisely and at least twice a day. Only at night and in the morning and on weekends, when she went home, did the house feel less secure: we were on our own again, Olgaless. Nothing fazed Olga—not screaming nor illness nor filth nor disaster. She wrote down everything Walker-related—number and nature of bowel movements, duration of walks, his mood, medicines and dosages four times a day, spells and fits, the odd proverb, our various whereabouts—in a coiled notebook she kept on the microwave:

Nov. 19 A.M.

Walker Brown

10:30-chloral

11:00-Peptamol/ Claritin/Risperidone

Poo=Yes=M=Reg

Bath=Yes

If she wasn’t looking after Walker, she rubbed Hayley’s back and feet. Hayley called her Olgs. She had no special qualifications to look after a boy as complex as Walker—beyond endless patience, an imagination, an eccentric sense of humour, cast-iron reliability, a love of the cellphone and a massive heart that did not distinguish between the needs of one person and the next. On the rare occasions Walker fell asleep, she devoured every newspaper in the house at the kitchen table. She was my age, exactly. Every couple of months she and forty Filipina girlfriends would stack themselves into a package-tour bus and drive to Orlando or Las Vegas or Chicago or New York or Atlantic City and back, in five days. After that, maybe even Walker was a vacation.

The Baggie full of pop-can tabs that Walker is mauling is metallic pulp: he pulls it and grasps it and flattens it, working it continuously between his flank-steak hands like a robot’s rosary, a thing to calm the future. Like something out of Blade Runner. I don’t know why he does it, what it means to him; I have to be content instead with the only certainty I have, which is that he likes to touch the bag, a lot. This is one unusual thing about having a boy like Walker: he has his own life, his own secret world, always has. It gives him a grave, adult air, even as a boy. He has things to do, objects to press.

Is it the sharp tabs under the softness of the plastic bag—two equal and opposite feelings at the same time? Maybe a plastic bag filled with pop-can tabs is Walker’s version of negative capability, the objective correlative of Keats’s ideal of equal and opposite notions held in the mind at the same time without having a nervous breakdown, without choosing one over the other. An idea reduced to something physical. Or maybe I’m reaching. He gives me no choice but to reach this way. He and I invent our world together every moment I am with him. How are you, Walkie? What are you doing? Ah, you’re banging the bag of pop-can tabs, trying to find some music somewhere. Is that it?

There are worse ways to pass time.

Everything about him compels me, unless it terrifies me, and sometimes it does both. Today, up in his room, before we clump downstairs one step at a time, hand on the banister—he always leads with his left foot—we have a pillow fight. It lasts twenty minutes, longer than I’ve ever known his enthusiasm to endure. For the first time in ten years, I discover that he loves to be batted with a pillow. Astonishment—how did I miss this?—pleasure, a little boredom when it drags on too long, but (overall) happiness because he is happy. Before the chloral hydrate seeped into his system, while he was still standing beside his bed trying to defecate (his morning chore, right out of bed, whammo!), his defecation look on his impassive face (and the act does have its own look), he was cranky and upset, rasping his fingers at the site of his G-tube as if it were an open-pit mine. Not breaking the skin; just abrading it, minor stuff by Walker’s self-punishing standards. The skin was white, chafed. I imagine it was painful, though he seems not to

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1