Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The News Where You Are: A Novel
The News Where You Are: A Novel
The News Where You Are: A Novel
Ebook325 pages6 hours

The News Where You Are: A Novel

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

From the bestselling author of What Was Lost comes a spirited literary mystery about a television anchorman's search for the truth about the disappearances that surround him

Frank Allcroft, a television news anchor in his hometown (where he reports on hard-hitting events, like the opening of canine gyms for overweight pets), is on the verge of a mid-life crisis. Beneath his famously corny on-screen persona, Frank is haunted by loss: the mysterious hit-and-run that killed his predecessor and friend, Phil, and the ongoing demolition of his architect father's monumental postwar buildings. And then there are the things he can't seem to lose, no matter how hard he tries: his home, for one, on the market for years; and the nagging sense that he will never quite be the son his mother—newly ensconced in an assisted-living center—wanted.

As Frank uncovers the shocking truth behind Phil's death, and comes to terms with his domineering father's legacy, it is his beloved young daughter, Mo, who points him toward the future. Funny and touching, The News Where You Are is a moving exploration of what we do and don't leave behind, proving once more that Catherine O'Flynn's writing "shimmers with dark brilliance" (Chicago Tribune).
The News Where You Are is a 2011 Edgar Award Nominee for Best Paperback Original.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateJul 6, 2010
ISBN9781429942300
The News Where You Are: A Novel
Author

Catherine O'Flynn

Catherine O'Flynn was born in Birmingham in 1970, where she grew up in and around her parents' sweet shop as the youngest child of a large family. She has been a teacher, web editor, mystery customer and postwoman. What Was Lost won the Costa First Novel Award 2007 and was shortlisted for the Guardian First Book Award and longlisted for the Orange and Man Booker prizes. She is the author of two further novels - The News From Where You Are and Mr Lynch's Holiday.

Read more from Catherine O'flynn

Related to The News Where You Are

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The News Where You Are

Rating: 3.875 out of 5 stars
4/5

40 ratings40 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I like the style of writing, but the plot didn't hold my interest.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Most stories follow a linear timeline outlining and then resolving a specific plot. If you’re lucky with your reading material, descriptive prose and interesting characters are included in the mix. This book was a bit different. It was primarily a character study of a man named Frank, a middle-aged TV newscaster who provides for his wife and young daughter, and regularly visits his depressive mother in a care facility. There is a bit of a story, but the timeline is sometimes scattered instead of straightforward. The story is told in a series of vignettes that feature Frank or someone close to him. In this manner you get to know Frank very well, as well as some of the people around him. All I know is when I finished this book I felt a little sad, the way you do when you say goodbye to a friend.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    adult fiction; living and dying. Another haunting novel from Cathering O'Flynn--I liked Mo but pretty much all the other characters were a bit depressing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An enjoyable elegiac comedy on ageing, media culture, transience and memory.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I like reading Catherine O'Flynn's writing. She has a knack of taking ordinary, flawed, and unassuming people and turning them into endearing, meaningful characters. The plot in The News Where You Are doesn't have any major action, but it has a nice flow and is an pleasurable read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    i didn't want this to end. the story is sort of all over the place but that is life. good reader. coincidently tom is reading what was lost by o'flynn and is whipping through it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This novel unpeels like an onion and each layer can bring tears. Frank, a local newscaster, is devastated by having to report on the anonymous deaths of the Eleanor Rigbys and makes it a point of attending their funerals. He's surrounded by his aging broadcast mentor, a miserable mother, an astute young daughter, a washed up joke writer and his architect father, deceased and just as distant when he was alive. Quite a collection and Frank himself is a lovely man. The majority of characters are quite admirable, a rarity in today's fiction. This is like the anti-Gone Girl, quiet and thoughtful and well constructed.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Set in the world of regional TV news. Frank, a news anchor, is concerned by the transience of things: his architect father’s once-visionary buildings, now almost all demolished; yesterday’s news stories; people’s lives. He reports on the deaths of too many forgotten people, and is sometimes the only mourner at their local authority funerals. He finds one such lonely death tying in to the earlier death of a former colleague, and is moved to investigate further.Strangely, although this wasn’t a dull book at all – the plot trotted along quite nicely and the characters were well drawn – I still forgot what was going on every time I turned the page. My fault, I think, rather than the author’s.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I enjoyed Catherine O’Flynn’s first novel ‘What Was Lost’ so much I bought this one without so much as reading the synopsis. I didn’t think it was quite up to the standards of that first novel, but I enjoyed it all the same. It had a similar feel – as though a novel had been constructed around a series of comic set-pieces. A gentle sort of story, it will be bubbling along in a nondescript sort of way and suddenly out of the blue will come an acutely observed detail or a really really good joke.The protagonist Frank is an engaging character. He goes against the literary grain – not having any problems with his marriage or home life in general, not disliked by anyone, not having any kind of personal crisis worth speaking of. He’s an all round good egg, if a bit uncool. Various people try to tell him he is uncool in ways varying from kind to cruel, but he already knows and genuinely doesn’t care. For this reason I liked him. On the other hand I kept forgetting he was supposed to be famous on a local level (he is a regional news presenter). Not to say that such people can’t be likeable, but I’m sure that reaching even the B-list of TV presenting requires fire in the belly and sharpened elbows. In short, he was too nice.It’s not clear as the novel progresses what in essence it’s about, or what sort of conclusion we are heading for. There is a mystery of sorts, but I guessed the answer correctly without much difficulty; it’s not the sort with clever twists and that element of it might disappoint. On the other hand, fans of character-based fiction will find much to appreciate here.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Although the book starts off with a hit and run accident it is basically a gentle book. I enjoyed the main character, and the ones who revolve around him, or visa versa. I really thought I had guessed the plot, so was pleased with the final twists and turns to confound me.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    (Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.com]. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted illegally.)Although everything about it screams "pleasantly middlebrow British character dramedy," readers of the Booker-nominated Catherine O'Flynn's latest, The News Where You Are, should brace themselves for something a lot darker and more depressing; for in telling this story of an aging local TV news anchor, whose most lasting fame is among snotty college students in ironic love with his terrible jokes, right at the same time that the city he lives in is in the process of destroying all his late father's ugly old '70s architectural projects (which themselves replaced a series of crumbling Victorian buildings which no one at the time wanted, which ironically in modern times have now become highly sought after), O'Flynn's main message seems to be, "None of us appreciate things until it's too late to do anything about it, living instead in perpetual dissatisfaction and disappointment at the details of our lives, until finally the sweet release of death comes to us all." And that's a heavy message for what's essentially the story of a bunch of genial, middle-aged, middle-class suburban Brits, and the comings and goings in the small town where they live, which is why I found myself divided over my opinion of the book by the time I finished -- an interesting and well-done read but an undeniable downer as well, one whose pure banality eventually wears you down like ten thousand drops from a Chinese water torture. It's getting an only middle-of-the-road score today for that reason, and only a limited recommendation as well.Out of 10: 7.5
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    When I started at university, a topic that came up surprisingly often among my new friends was the issue of exactly what you were used to in the half-hour after the six o'clock news. Me, I was used to Northwest Tonight. I had friends who were used to Midlands Today, and Look North; my partner morosely talks about Reporting Scotland, because, as he puts it, all of Scotland is apparently one region. They are all preceded the same way: "And now," says the national newsreader at six thirty, "the news where you are."Frank Allcroft, the protagonist of this novel, works for Heart of Midland Reports, a fictional but very accurate local news programme. He's happy in local news; he feels a connection to the city he was born in, Birmingham, and he doesn't want to leave it. The corny jokes in his scripts have led him to being voted Britain's unfunniest man, but he doesn't really mind. He has two, slightly strange hobbies: one of which is chasing up on the people whose deaths appear on the programme - people who have no family, so their deaths aren't discovered and eventually they end up on the news - and the other one of which is taking his daughter to look at the buildings his father, a notable architect, built during the sixties in Birmingham, which are now in the process of being torn down.There is a whodunit of sorts in this novel - the mystery of one of Frank's former colleagues and how he died, and what his death had to do with one of the pensioners whose death was in one of Frank's reports - but that's not the centre of it. Rather, it's about Frank's sense of loss at the changes being wrought in the city, and the way the past is being erased. There's such a sense of place and time here, and a clear, slow evocation of the change.But - this isn't a depressing novel. It's uplifted by the simple fact that Frank adores his wife, Andrea, and his six-year-old daughter, Mo, and they love him. He wants Mo to have a sense of her past as well as the future, and that's the thread that holds it all together. This is a very British novel - I don't think it could have been set or written anywhere else - and I really love it for that, as well as everything else. It's very good, and it lingers beautifully.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Truly beautiful work about aging and personal history. The main character's fascination with the solitary deaths of strangers, including the deaths of more abstract things like styles, beauty, and professional aspirations, ties the whole book together. In many ways, this is a book about what time takes from us, both individually and as a society. As such, it is a very sad book, but thanks to O'Flynn's artistry, it is never depressing. In the unlikeliest of places, O'Flynn finds an affectionate humor that never sinks to the gallows level, and in the unlikeliest situations, she finds hope. So that, in the end, "The News Where You Are" is not only about what time takes from us, but also about the subtle gifts it bestows.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I had been putting off reading this one for a while because I hadn't heard a lot of strong things about it. I wish I hadn't put off reading it because I absolutely loved it. Or maybe it's one of those cases of going into it with low expectations and then it can really blow you away. Basically, if you like subtle British humor (or should I say humour), the likes of which Mark Haddon's 'A Curious Incident of A Dog in the Night Time' also excelled at then you will probably love this one too. If you don't then, you will just think it's your average story. Our hero is a bumbling middle aged man named Frank who lives in Birmingham, England and is a newscaster for a local evening news show. He will never make it big time and for the most part he is ok with that. He has a wife and daughter who love him and he loves them but he is having a bit of a mid life crisis. It all probably starts with the death of one of his closest friends and mentors Phil. The death is a bit mysterious and Frank becomes, maybe a little unhealthily, obsessed with solving it.However, that isn't necessarily the main focus of the book. I think, perhaps, the main focus of the book is just Frank's average life. All of the characters that come in and out of it and finding the humor in the everyday. His daughter Mo, who I think is around age 8 is an absolute delight and is probably his greatest joy. He needs to learn to appreciate her more. His mother is in a senior living center and is a mean old lady but Frank and his family try to cheer her up. They can't seem to but it is entertaining watching them try. Frank's father has passed away and was an architect whose buildings are being torn down. Frank is trying to save them. Andrea, Frank's wife, often says that their life is very involved with Frank's past and is important that he learns to move into the future. I think that is what the story is trying to deal with more than solving the mystery of Phil.However, we do solve the mystery and it is an interesting ride. We meet the people Phil was dealing with up until his death. Phil was a newscaster who had made it to the big time but didn't want to grow old, however old he may have been at the time of his death. Was it an accident or not? The book is all very subtle but I was hooked from the get go and I have O'Flynn's first book 'What Was Lost' on my shelf and I am looking forward to digging that back out now too.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I really enjoyed Catherine O'Flynn's debut novel What Was Lost (my review) and was looking forward to her second - The News Where You Are.Frank is a television news presenter. Viewers enjoy him, but it is the bad puns and jokes (penned by odd duck Cyril - inherited from former presenter and star Phil) that are the appeal for many of the viewers. He lives in a house that he's having trouble selling as it's removed from everything. He loves his wife Andrea who loves him just as much. They have a young daughter Mo who is a breath of fresh air with her sunny view and outlook. Frank's mother Maureen lives in a Seniors development and can only seem to see the worst in everything. Frank questions the verdict of accidental death in Phil's case and does some investigating on his own.Back cover blurbs include the phrases 'brilliantly funny and heartbreakingly sad and spirited literary mystery". I must say I really didn't find the book funny at all. I did find sadness though. Frank is a multi leveled character. By turns he seems lost, but he's a fantastic father, devoted son and faithful friend. Yet is all seems to be done with a sense of obligation. Frank's father was an architect and the demolition of many of his buildings seems to be an allegory for the breaking down of many barriers in Frank's life, past and present. O'Flynn uses architecture and descriptions of same to mirror many characters' moods and feelings.The character of Mo stole the show for this reader. Her determined attempts to cheer up her grandmother, her vibrant imagination and her love of life and everything in it were a high point for me.The 'spirited mystery' wasn't there for this reader. The mystery surrounding Phil's death certainly is an impetus in Frank rediscovering his life but did not fit the 'mystery' tag for me.O'Flynn has a way with words and many of her scenarios and descriptions are quite eloquent in their simplicity. But the novel moved along quite slowly in the first half for me - the second half was less meandering. I wanted to love this book as much as I did her first one, but for me it was just an okay read.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    While the writing style is crisp, clean and easy to follow, I found the story telling to meander for the first half of the book. Okay, it actually meandered through most of the book, but as it was deliberately writtne in this manner I won't dwell on that. The story is about an aging local TV newscaster Frank, his mentor Phil and Frank's reminisces regarding his childhood and relationships with his parents. Frank's father Douglas was a well known local architect of repute and the void between father and son is brought to light over time. While there is a mystery in this story - Phil was killed while out jogging on a country road by a hit and run - the story is really about relationships, aging and Frank's examination of the complexities of life. Overall, the story started out as a cluster of seemingly unrelated ramblings with focused direction, but the last 50 pages of the story managed to bring closure on some of the topics raised in this story. It is an easy story to read - I read it over the course of one day - but I do admit I was tempted halfway through to abandon the book as not exactly my cup of tea. I am glad I stuck it out to the end, but it is not a favorite that I would re-read in the future.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Catherine O'Flynn is a great writer, she transforms small things into a good piece of fiction. Nothing major happened, but there was great writing, and I do like great writing.This is the story about Frank, a news anchor who has been in the business for 20 years. He likes where he is and never wanted to be bigger. He is also a joke, a man famous for bad one-liners. Something that he inherited from his mentor and friend, but he never did get them right. Now Phil is dead, in a strange accident. And Frank is left with his strange hobby as his wife calls is, going to funerals of people who had no one else coming.Frank is a good guy, he likes his job (ok not the crap jokes), but he is a solid guy. He loves his wife and cute little daughter. And he searches for lost relatives for those people who have died without any family showing up. His mum seems constantly depressed, but he visits her. But there is something sad over him, perhaps cos if his search through out the book. But that will change too.The book uses flashbacks to show some clues, Michaels past (the guy whose relatives he is trying to find), some moments from Phil's past, before his death and earlier, and lastly Frank's past. His dad who was always working and his mum who had good and bad days.Life in general, and a search for that which is lost is what this book is about. From people gone, to his dad's buildings being torn down to make new for new ones. And the last sentence of the book tells you everything:"Our absence is what remains of us."It's beautiful and sad at the same time.She has a way of telling is straight, but there is also a subtle humour in this book. A strange book, and a completely normal book at the same time. What I am left with is that she writes great fiction, easy fiction, and fiction that should be noticed.Final thoughts: I do like my genres, and sometimes I need an author who can write beautiful prose, saying a lot, or saying nothing, and she is good. I sometimes like books cos of the story, sometimes for the written word, and this time it was the latter.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Well written novel about a newsreader who delves into the death of his friend and peer, Phil.It was just 2 chapters too long, as by the time I got to the "ah-ha" reveal, it should have been wrapped up.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is the story of a newscaster and how he deals with life (and death). Frank is taking to heart too much of his news stories. As much as he feels connected to them (and especially with people who die lonely deaths), he ironically seems to have trouble connecting with his elderly mother.I liked this book for its characters and story. It was well-written and held my interest. I found it a bit sad in parts - not anything specific - but just the sense of time passing and faded memories for things and people once enjoyed and still longed for. All in all a very good book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is the story of a newscaster and how he deals with life (and death). Frank is taking to heart too much of his news stories. As much as he feels connected to them (and especially with people who die lonely deaths), he ironically seems to have trouble connecting with his elderly mother.I liked this book for its characters and story. It was well-written and held my interest. I found it a bit sad in parts - not anything specific - but just the sense of time passing and faded memories for things and people once enjoyed and still longed for. All in all a very good book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I was excited to read this, as I really enjoyed Catherine O'Flynn's debut novel, What Was Lost. This book did not disappoint. Overriding themes of loss, what we remember, and who remembers us. Wrap that up with a little mystery, and a surprising twist, and you've got a page-turner that makes you think. I enjoyed the author's technique of moving forward and back through time, to give us snippets from other characters' points-of-view -- in some books this can be really annoying, but here it moved the story along nicely. A very good book - I'm looking forward to the author's next novel!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I was excited to read this, as I really enjoyed Catherine O'Flynn's debut novel, What Was Lost. This book did not disappoint. Overriding themes of loss, what we remember, and who remembers us. Wrap that up with a little mystery, and a surprising twist, and you've got a page-turner that makes you think. I enjoyed the author's technique of moving forward and back through time, to give us snippets from other characters' points-of-view -- in some books this can be really annoying, but here it moved the story along nicely. A very good book - I'm looking forward to the author's next novel!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    O'Flynn's latest novel, set in her native Birmingham, revolves around the themes of aging, memories, regrets, and forgiveness, particularly in the life of her main character, Frank Allcroft, co-anchor of a popular local TV chat/news show. Frank is questioning his decision to move his wife and daughter to a home in a small country town that has turned out to be rather bleak; and he is haunted by the hit-and-run death of his predecessor and mentor, Phil Smethway. Distressed by the planned demolition of the last of his architect father's buildings, Frank reminisces about their rather distant relationship. Even though he visits his mother three times weekly in her senior citizen residence, he can't shake the memories of her emotional withdrawal--a withdrawal she still maintains. And why is it that he feels such a responsibility to lonely people like Mike Church who end up in the news solely because they died alone and without being missed by anyone? Frank, in his late 40s, seems to be reassessing his own life as he hears the clock ticking behind his ear.It's a little hard to pin this novel down. In part, it's a mystery about learning the truth of Phil's death (and the mystery of Mike Church as well). In part, it's a family drama. And in part, it's a book about a midlife crisis and a man coming to terms with his past. O'Flynn has structured the novel into short chapters, most of them about Frank but others focused on the other characters, and the chapters also shift in terms of their time frames. Overall, it's a solid but not outstanding book. I almost gave it four stars but cut back to 3.5, mainly because I felt that O'Flynn may have been trying to cover too much territory and as result sometimes lost focus.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Frank Allcroft is a news anchor in England on a show I imagine to be similar to Regis & Kelly here in the U.S. He is happily married with a lovely child. Frank is haunted by the past, his mother's moods and his architect father's unavailability and cold demeanor. His father passed away years ago, but Frank visits his mother in her rest home, and she is still all doom & gloom. Phil was the previous news anchor of the show and has remained friends with Frank even after moving on to national fame. The book opens with Phil's death and the mystery surrounding that death. This was a slow-starter and, at first, somewhat confusing. I loved O'Flynn's previous book, "What Was Lost," and so I stayed with this one, and things eventually started to flow. O'Flynn is an amazing writer, and her characters jump off the pages. Look forward to reading more of her books.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Frank, the main character of Catherine O’Flynn’s latest book, The News Where You Are, is a 40-something newscaster who is facing numerous crises. For example, the buildings created by his father, a renowned post-war architect, were being demolished because they didn’t adequately meet the needs of the residents (though Frank’s father meticulously designed each one with “the future” in mind). As Frank mourns the loss of his father’s architecture, he also mourns the lost relationship between them.Frank is also dealing with the death of his friend and mentor, Phil – a popular national newscaster who had a Dick Clarkian way of non-aging. Phil was killed in a hit-and-run accident one evening, and his sudden death left a big void in Frank’s life.While mourning the loss of his friend, Frank became interested (borderline obsessed) with news stories about people who died alone. For Frank, this is the worst way to go, and he begins to investigate one death in particular – that of Michael Church. Frank soon discovers that Michael was Phil’s childhood friend, and he begins to piece together an incredible story of friendship and secrets.The News Where You Are is a small book but packed with many complex themes – the young and the old; the popular and the lonely; the past and the future. Each character, from Frank and his cranky mother to Frank’s spirited daughter and his practical wife, are developed with the precision of an artist. As Frank uncovers the past life of Phil and Michael, he explores his own childhood and begins to rectify the relationship with his parents. Ultimately, it’s his daughter Mo who offers Frank the best counseling, reminding him that it’s not the past or future that’s important – but the present with the people you love. In essence, the news is – quite simply – exactly where you are.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The News Where You Are begins with Phil, an aging news anchor, being killed in a hit and run accident. The story then moves on to Frank, a local news presenter who worked with Phil for years, and who becomes interested in the story of a local man who died recently who turns out to be connected to Phil. I wouldn't call this a mystery, because even though Phil's death is the catalyst for the story, the story isn't really about investigating who done it, it's about getting to know the characters and understanding what has happened in their lives. It was really interesting, and I think the story and characters will stick with me.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Poor Frank Allcroft! He's a news show anchor with little social awareness and not much of a sense of humour. He's still mourning the death of the anchor he has replaced. Phil was a legend, and Frank's mentor. He's also 43 and verging on a midlife crisis. He begins to look into Phil's hit and run death a little more closely. Frank actually 'deals' with the news stories he covers belatedly. Deaths of people with no next of kin particularly bother Frank. Frank was a great character, never wanting to hurt anyone's feelings, but ends up being put upon. It makes him seem like a pushover, but he really isn't.The story moves along nicely, with a slight mystery. I wouldn't call this book a mystery from the genre, but there is an overarching mystery to be solved, along with Frank settling issues in his life. O'Flynn writes wonderfully rich characters like Frank and his wife and daughter, who are also very real. The overlying themes in this book are about appearances. Frank's father was an architect involved in the rebuilding after the war. His buildings are now being torn down after valuing function over appearance. His town planning idea shows that you can't always plan for things to turn out the way you want them to. Frank does a lot of reminiscing about his childhood and his parents, and how they led him to be the way he is. The book isn't long, but as I try to write about it, there are so many ideas and layers that it is hard to describe. So, O'Flynn - terrific writing, lots of humour, rich characters, a mystery or two that keep you turning the page, great surprising ending, along with some social commentary. I think I've found a new author to watch.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    When I read the description of this book on ER, I thought it sounded like a perfect summer read for me. But, sadly, I just couldn't get into the book. I really wanted to, and I tried several times, but the book just did not grip me. I don't think the writing was bad, and it seemed like it would be easy to read...I guess it just wasn't my cup of tea after all. I am so sorry. However, I will be passing this book along in the hopes that someone else will be able to appreciate it, and give you a wonderful review.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    After reading What Was Lost I was eagerly anticipating O'Flynn's new novel. But after reading it I have been thinking about how to review it. Did I love it as much as the first one - probably not. It is quite a slow moving exploration of Frank Allcroft's life as a TV presenter and his midlife crisis in Birmingham England. Almost every character in the book is dealing with a loss of some kind whether it is a death, loss of youth or loss of a dream. My favorite character was not one of the main ones - it was Julia the disillusioned co-anchor and I wished she had been a larger part of the book. The death of Frank's predecessor provides a mystery theme that is neatly and surprisingly solved at the end of the book. Do you get a better mental picture of Frank's surroundings if you have lived in England as I have - yes I think you do. But does it lessen your reading experience - probably not. Although I did have to wonder how many non-Britons would get the Jimmy Savile reference on the first page and the mental picture it created. But all in all it was pleasant way to spend a couple of nights and there was never any danger that I wasn't going to finish book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was a very well-written novel, that I would term "slice of life". It centres on Frank, a news presenter in Birminghan, England. It's written in numerous, short chapters, usually from Frank's perspective but occasionally from the perspective of a few of the other characters. It's about Frank at work, Frank with his family, and Frank in the past. There is a bit of a mystery that serves as the main plot and it is interesting to see it unwinding. While much of the content isn't directly related to the mystery, for me, this didn't serve as an annoying diversion from the mystery plot. Instead, the mystery plot added an element to keep things together.The author, Catherine O'Flynn, did such a good job of convincing me she was in Frank's head that I forgot she was a woman, assumed the author was male, and was surprised at the end to look at the cover of the book and be reminded that she is a woman. To me, it is quite rare for authors to present opposite-sexed lead characters in such a convincing way, in this type of intimate fiction that involves delving into characters' minds and hearts.

Book preview

The News Where You Are - Catherine O'Flynn

prologue

april 2009

He gave up any pretense of jogging now and walked slowly along the lane, following in the wake of an empty crisp packet blown along the tarmac. Without its example he wasn’t sure he’d have the will to move forward.

His steps were heavy and the elasticized cuffs of his tracksuit made his wrists itch. He looked at the loose flesh on the back of his hand pinched by the bright red polyester and found the contrast grotesque.

Mikey had let him down again. Finally he understood that Mikey would never do it.

The sky had darkened as he walked along and now the first fat drops of rain splattered on the road around him. Phil nodded his head. Rain was all that had been missing.

He heard a car approaching. Its passing force would whip the crisp packet away and he didn’t know what he’d follow then. The driver was making the most of the straight country lane and picking up speed. Phil moved slightly closer to the hedgerow on his left. He knew he cut a pitiful figure—an old rain-soaked man dressed head to toe in Nike. Jimmy bloody Savile.

The car was getting closer now and as it did it veered slightly toward Phil’s side of the lane. Phil smiled blandly in its direction—force of habit. As it drew down upon him, he realized that the driver wasn’t going to swerve away. In the last few seconds, the sky’s reflection on the windscreen vanished, and Phil saw the familiar face behind the wheel, white with fear and running with tears.

one

six months later

Frank’s daughter sat in the front passenger seat humming the same tune over and over. The notes spiraled upwards and then abruptly plummeted, before starting the ascent again. Frank drove toward the city.

What’s the tune, Mo? asked Frank.

It’s a song by the Beatles. It’s a man asking questions about when he gets old.

What? ‘When I’m Sixty-four’?

Yeah. That’s it . . . Dad, do you want to know something?

Erm, yes, please.

When I’m sixty-four, I’ll be eight times older than I am now. Eight times eight is sixty-four.

That’s true.

She looked out of the window. Eight hundred percent! She shook her head in amazement and began to hum again.

Frank frowned. But ‘When I’m Sixty-four’ doesn’t sound anything like that.

Mo beamed. I know! I invented a new tune. It’s better.

Oh, okay. Frank paused. It’s very different to the original. Are the words the same?

I don’t know, I’m just humming.

I know, but in your head are the words the same?

No. They’re better too. He wants to know will there be robots, and will his cat be able to talk and will his car fly.

It’s quite a strange tune.

It’s how he thinks music will sound when he’s old.

Oh, I see, future music. That explains it.

Mo hummed another few bars and then, to Frank’s relief, stopped.

Dad?

Yes.

Do you think Gran ever listens to music?

Not future music. I don’t think so.

No. I mean any music.

Yes, I’m sure she does sometimes. She has a radio in her room.

I know, but it’s all covered in dust. She should listen to music. I think it would make her less sad. She could listen to stuff she remembered when she was young.

Frank said nothing.

Maybe I could take her some old music and she could listen to it on my headphones.

Frank glanced at Mo. Sometimes old music makes people sad. It reminds them of the past and things that have gone.

Oh, said Mo.

Frank reached across and squeezed her hand. Mo spent a lot of time trying to think of ways to make his mother less unhappy. It was a project for her.

Are we going a different way to the supermarket?

I want to show you something first.

Okay.

Frank put the radio on and they listened to a comedy program. Mo laughed when Frank laughed.

He parked at a meter in a back street and then walked with Mo down to the busy ring road. A pedestrian bridge spanned the six lanes of traffic and Mo and Frank climbed the zigzagging concrete steps to the top. Halfway across they stopped. Frank bent down toward Mo so she could hear him above the roar of the traffic. Her hair blew into his face.

Remember I told you about my dad.

That he had a dog! said Mo excitedly.

Yeah, that’s right. He had a dog when he was a boy. But do you remember what I said my dad’s job was?

Yes. He was an architect. He made buildings.

Can you see that block over there? The tall one with the dark glass.

Yeah. I can see it.

That’s called Worcester House. My dad designed that building.

Did he live in it?

No, he didn’t live in it. We lived in a house. He made this for people to work in.

How many floors has it got?

Twenty.

Are there escalators?

No, there are two lifts.

Can we go up in them?

No, I’m sorry. We can’t go in the building now.

Can we go and look at it?

That’s where we’re going.

Mo ran across the rest of the bridge and then waited for Frank to catch up. The building was a little farther away than it seemed from the bridge, tucked amid a cluster of other blocks, converted town houses and car parks. Worcester House was a classic mid-period Douglas H. Allcroft and Partners creation. Built in 1971, it was an uncompromising, thuggish-looking block, clad in precast concrete panels and devoid of all exterior decoration. Despite its height it appeared squat and defensive, occupying a large plot on the corner of Carlton Street and Newman Row, glowering down on the few Georgian blocks still remaining in the center.

As they drew closer to it at street level, Mo noticed the white boards all around the outside of the building:

Why are the boards there, Dad?

They’re there to protect people when they demolish the building.

Mo stopped walking. They’re demolishing it?

Frank nodded. That’s why I brought you today; it’ll be gone soon.

But why are they knocking it down? Is it broken?

No, it’s not broken; it’s fine. It’s just . . . they don’t need it anymore.

But, Dad, loads of people could work here. Or they could use it to put homeless people in—that’d be better than sleeping on the streets. They could sleep under desks and go up and down in the lifts.

They want to build new homes in the city now—apartments for the people who work here—and this building isn’t right for homes. Dad didn’t build it for that, and so they say it has to be taken down and started again.

Mo thought for a while. Does that happen to all buildings? Do they all get knocked down?

Some stay for a long time. Like Aston Hall. But lots don’t. It’s a bit like clothes. You know, you wouldn’t wear the clothes Mom and I used to wear—they’d seem really uncool to you—and sometimes that happens with buildings. People just don’t like them anymore; they aren’t fashionable.

Frank realized that unfashionable wasn’t quite adequate. People did not feel about his father’s buildings the way they felt about marble-washed denim or ski pants. They might smile ruefully and shake their heads about their own lapses in taste, but not those imposed on their city. Aside from the family home he built in Edgbaston, only two of the eight buildings his father had created in the city remained. In a few weeks there would be only one.

Mo was squinting at the building, counting the windows. When she’d finished, she turned back to Frank. But, Dad, sometimes things come back into fashion. Like Mom always says, the clothes in the shops now are the same as twenty years ago. Maybe if they waited this building would be in fashion again.

Frank nodded. Maybe. People don’t always agree, though. A few of us thought it should be saved, but others didn’t and . . . well, they won in the end.

I don’t think this building is uncool.

Frank got out his camera. Anyway, I want to take a photo of you and the building behind you. So however many different buildings come and go you’ll always know this building was here, and that you and I stood on this spot and talked about it one morning.

Mo wouldn’t smile for the photo. She said it was for when she was grown-up and serious. Afterward she said, Dad, are you sad that it’s going to be demolished?

Frank looked up at the top floor of the building and remembered looking out from there as a boy. Yes, I am.

Mo held his hand. She looked at the other buildings in the street. Worcester House was the only one surrounded by boards. Me too.

two

Two days later Frank listened to the countdown on his earpiece, took a swig of water and stowed the bottle under the desk. In the last few seconds his expression became attentive with the hint of a frown. He spoke on cue.

Now on to a remarkable story of survival. Sixty-five-year-old Alan Purkis had something of a shock when he discovered a thirty-foot-deep hole had opened up in his back garden. The retired electrician from Droitwich was only saved from a plunge into the abyss by the timely arrival of a cuckoo. Head inclined to one side, his quizzical expression segued into a reassuring smile: Scott Padstow gets the full story for us.

The package ran. Frank had a headache and thought he should have eaten something before they went live. He thought of the Mars bar that had sat on his desk all afternoon and he was filled with sharp longing and regret. He turned and looked at Julia’s exposed arm and could imagine with terrible clarity ripping into it with his teeth. When he looked up, she was staring at him. He gave a little shake of his head as if coming out of some private reverie. He looked, he hoped, as if his thoughts had been on something distant and intangible or, failing that, on anything other than eating her flesh. He gave a slight, sickly smile. Julia was still in a foul mood.

Great story. News that almost happens. A man doesn’t fall down a hole.

The producer’s voice sounded in their earpieces. Come on, Joolz, can we get over this? The man almost falling isn’t the story—it’s the hole. Why is it there? Is it going to widen and open up in other gardens, maybe swallow entire houses? I think that is of some interest to people in our region.

Right—but that’s not really what the link focused on, is it? It bills it as a ‘remarkable story of survival,’ and what about the cuckoo? Where’s the news value in that?

Another voice cut in: Back with you, Julia, in five, four, three, two . . .

Julia introduced an item about a pub in Wolverhampton whose steak and kidney pies were doing well in a national competition.

Frank thought that a pie might be an option. Beef and Guinness. He knew he didn’t have one at home, so that’d mean a trip to Tesco, and that was too depressing a prospect. He wished, not for the first time, that he had a local pub that served decent food. He thought of the Rose and Crown whose menu consisted of three types of frozen pizza—brittle seven-inch singles of misery that resisted any attempts at cutting. They came topped with a mysterious molten substance that clung to the roof of the mouth and burned straight through. Frank didn’t expect much from food, but he thought it shouldn’t injure you.

The story about pies was coming to a close. Frank read the next link just ahead of his cue and braced himself. He tried too late and too halfheartedly to apply a mischievous smile and instead achieved only a half-cocked imbecile grin.

"Reaching the national finals of that competition is pie no means a small achievement! He turned and beamed at Julia who looked back at him with barefaced contempt. His grin faded. But seriously, well done to the Bull’s Head there and good luck on the night."

After the bulletin he apologized to Julia. You know I don’t want to do the jokes.

Well, I wish you fucking wouldn’t, then. There is no humor there, Frank; they are not recognizable as jokes. The only way I can tell that’s what they’re supposed to be is because otherwise what you’ve just said makes absolutely no sense. What the hell am I supposed to do? If I laugh, I look as if I’m mentally ill. If I don’t laugh, I look as if I hate you.

Maybe just smile, pityingly. The viewers would understand that.

It’s not easy to smile, Frank; believe me, it’s not easy.

Try to imagine it’s an illness. That’s what I do.

Julia shook her head as she got her coat. See you tomorrow, Frank.

The door closed behind her and Frank was left wondering what to do for the evening. His hunger had mysteriously evaporated and he didn’t feel like going straight home. That morning Andrea had taken Mo to visit her aunt in Bradford and they wouldn’t be back till the next day. He found the house just about bearable when his family were there; with them away he avoided it as much as he could. Sometimes he’d grab a drink with the crew, but tonight the thought of being that particular version of himself, of talking and listening and laughing in the right places, seemed too much effort.

He got in his car and headed for the Queensway. The car seemed to guide itself—gliding up over flyovers and swooping down into underpasses. The lights of the tunnels passed through his windscreen and across his face. Familiar glimpses of the city slid by and as they did stray names and faces associated with them from old news stories combined with memories from his own past. He was at his most susceptible to nostalgia and melancholy when he was tired.

The car pulled in at a garage and for a moment Frank had no idea why he was there, until he saw the buckets of flowers and realized that tonight he would pay his respects. He was too weary to resist.

The young man at the till recognized him and Frank switched his face on.

I seen you on the telly, man.

Right, yes, that’s me.

What’s that other one? The babe. Julie, is it? She fit, mate. Flowers for her, are they?

These? No, actually they’re for someone else.

Ahhh—you bein’ a bad boy? Sniffin’ up some other telly lady?

Yes, that’s right. These are for Esther Rantzen.

You tell that Julie, if she’s getting lonely, to come down here and ask for J and I’ll show her a sexy time. Tell her I know what she likes.

Well, I’ll certainly pass that on, J. She’s a busy woman, but you never know.

As he walked away, Frank heard the assistant say to his colleague, She could do a lot better than him, man. Frank smiled, knowing how much that would amuse Andrea when he told her.

He drove out of the city on the Expressway and was surprised to find he remembered the way, despite the passing of time. The street was lined with parked cars on both sides, but he managed to find a space within sight of the house. It had changed since the first time he’d seen it. Then paint had peeled from the woodwork and the privet hedge in the front garden had expanded in all directions, covering the bay window and half the pavement. He didn’t know how many people had come and gone in the intervening years. The windows were UPVC now, the front garden gone altogether and replaced by some slabs providing not quite enough space for a 4x4, which was wedged in at an angle, jutting out onto the pavement.

Frank was sure that whoever lived there now would know nothing about William Grendon. No one had noticed him when he lived and no one had noticed him when he died. The single thing that had brought his existence to the notice of the wider world was the smell of his decomposing body. He was discovered sitting upright in a high-backed chair with a twenty-six-day-old newspaper on his lap. Frank remembered there was no photo of William to show on the bulletin, so instead he had delivered the story in front of an image of the outside of the house.

He pulled the flowers from the cellophane and then carried them loose in his hand to the front of the house. He looked at the houses on either side; the blue light of a television flickered through the gaps in the curtain of one. He dropped the flowers on the slabs.

Frank stood and thought of William Grendon. Something invisible had disappeared, but it left a mark. There was always a mark.

three

On Saturday he drove out to Evergreen. His mother sat in her room, a book on her lap, the same one she’d been reading for a year. She looked at Frank with a pained expression. Is it still sweltering out there?

No, Mom, it’s October; it’s cold.

I can’t bear it. It suffocates me. I can’t breathe. How do people live in those places like Spain? Why do people go to those places? Sweating on the beaches, roasting like chickens in an oven. I’d die. I’d die.

Do you want me to open the window?

We need some rain. God, anything to freshen the air. What I’d give for a downpour now.

Mom, it is raining. Look out of the window.

Maureen moved her head slowly and looked out. Oh, she said. Thank God. Then after a pause: It makes my joints ache so.

What does?

The rain.

Frank pulled up a chair beside her. So what have you been up to this week?

Sitting here, dying slowly. Too slowly. Frank exhaled and his mother looked at him. Oh, I know it must be very boring for you to have to come and visit me, endlessly clinging on. I’ve told you before, forget about me, leave me here, live your life. I’m dead already.

Frank ignored this and looked over toward the window. They could do with someone clearing up the leaves out in the grounds. It all looks a bit grotty out there at the moment. Do the gardener and his mate not come out so much now?

She shrugged. Maybe they leave them there deliberately. Maybe they think that dead leaves are exactly what we should be contemplating as we sit in here waiting to fall off the branch.

Mom . . .

You see how you fare. You’ll be old one day. You see how you cope when all your friends are dead, and your senses are gone.

Your senses aren’t gone, Mom. You’re in excellent health . . .

Ha. That’s a joke.

. . . You’re in much better shape—physically and mentally—than most of the other people here, but you lock yourself away in your room. You’re seventy-two, Mom—that’s nothing. They sit and talk in the lounge, they listen to music, they walk in the garden.

‘Why aren’t they screaming?’ Frank, do you know who wrote that?

Philip Larkin. You quote it every time.

Well, I’m an old fool too, she snapped, and I forget.

They fell silent for a while.

Have you read this one? said Maureen, indicating the book on her lap.

No, no, I haven’t.

Oh, it’s terribly involved and clever. I can’t wait to get to the end. It’s about a man who discovers that he had an older brother that his parents never told him about and he tries to find this brother and it turns out that he’s a . . . a . . . oh, blast . . . What do you call it?

A paleontologist.

Exactly! I thought you said you hadn’t read it.

Frank smiled at her. I haven’t. It was just a lucky guess.

Remarkable, of all the things he could have been.

They fell silent again.

Andrea sends her love. She’s had to go on a course today.

Oh, Andrea, she was always one for the books, wasn’t she. Is she still a great reader? I remember some marvelous conversations we’ve had about books. She’d love this one.

Well, you can tell her about it on Wednesday when she comes, said Frank, knowing that Andrea had not only read the book, but had given her copy to his mother and listened to the same description of the first chapter each time she visited. The flowered bookmark she had given along with the book remained stranded at the same page in the book week after

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1