Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital
    Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital
    Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital
    Ebook94 pages1 hour

    Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital

    By Robert Paul Wolff

    5/5

    ()

    Read preview

    About this ebook

    Karl Marx’s great work, Capital, has intrigued and puzzled readers for more than a century by its mystifyingly intricate arguments and dramatic literary embellishments. In this book, Robert Paul Wolff dispels much of the mystery surrounding Capital by providing a literary-philosophical analysis of the text and of Marx’s intentions. Writing in a lively, satirical, sometimes comical style that echoes Marx’s own use of language, Wolff shows that Marx was at the very same time and in the very same texts a brilliant theoretical economist and a powerfully imaginative writer and that he deliberately forged an ironic voice in Capital in order to better communicate his theoretical arguments.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherSociety for Philosophy & Culture
    Release dateMar 26, 2013
    ISBN9781301190089
    Moneybags Must Be So Lucky: On the Literary Structure of Capital
    Author

    Robert Paul Wolff

    Robert Paul Wolff is is an American political philosopher and professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Among his books are About Philosophy (1998), The Ideal of the University (1992), The Autonomy of Reason (1990), Kant's Theory of Mental Activity (1990), and Moneybags Must Be So Lucky (1988).

    Read more from Robert Paul Wolff

    Related to Moneybags Must Be So Lucky

    Related ebooks

    Philosophy For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Tales Of Mercy And Sacrifice

      Dec 1, 2021

      Tales Of Mercy And Sacrifice
      3 min read

    • Article

      A Modest Proposal

      Jul 16, 2018

      A Modest Proposal
      7 min read

    • Article

      Man United

      Feb 25, 2022

      The philosopher Nina Power believes men are under attack. Western society has done away with “the positive dimensions of patriarchy”, that is, “the protective father, the responsible man, the paternalistic attitude that exhibits care and compassion”.

      2 min read

    • Article

      I’d Like to Thank the Academy

      Oct 15, 2021

      Many of my students, and even some younger colleagues, think—assume—that creative nonfiction is just part of the literary ecosystem; it’s always been around, like fiction or poetry. In many ways, of course, they are right: the kind of writing that is

      10 min read

    • Article

      Introduction: The Political Economy of Great Works of Literature

      Nov 1, 2020

      The Independent Review aims to be an “interdisciplinary journal devoted to the study of political economy and the critical analysis of government policy,” which covers “economics, political science, law, history, philosophy, and sociology.”1 This iss

      6 min read

    • Article

      'Daemon Voices' Allows Fans A Deep Dive Into The World View Of Philip Pullman

      Sep 24, 2018

      It's not exactly a beach read, but this collection of collection of essays and speeches by Philip Pullman centered on a theme of storytelling yields some genuine gems.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Bird’s Words

      Jul 10, 2023

      Does short-lived English poet John Keats – dead at 25 – belong with the creative youngsters of the last century who passed away when young? With actor James Dean (24), and pop stars Jim Morrison (27) and Jimi Hendrix (27); or does he rub shoulders wi

      3 min read

    • Article

      A Partnership with God

      Feb 2, 2018

      The novelist Nicholas Mosley saw humanity’s salvation at the confluence of love, faith, and technology. The post A Partnership with God appeared first on Guernica.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Ken Lum: Everything is Relevant: Writings on Art and Life, 1991–2018

      Dec 15, 2019

      Concordia University Press, 2020 The most remarkable thing about this generally remarkable anthology of writings by Ken Lum is that it took so long for such a book to appear. In one of the essays collected here, Lum’s now-classic “Canadian Cultural P

      4 min read

    • Article

      Who’s Afraid of Theory?

      Oct 29, 2020

      The conclusion among many folks is that Theory is a kind of philosophical Mad Libs disappearing up its own ass, accountable to nobody but itself and the departments that coddle it. The post Who’s Afraid of Theory? appeared first on The Millions.

      14 min read

    • Article

      Airea D. Matthews: Texting with Anne Sexton

      Mar 22, 2017

      For the second installment in a monthly series of interviews with contemporary poets (read part one here), Peter Mishler corresponded with poet Airea D. Matthews. Airea D. Matthews’s first collection of poems, Simulacra, received the 2016 Yale Series

      7 min read

    • Article

      Lazarus of the Picnic Table: On John McPhee’s ‘Draft No. 4’

      Oct 26, 2017

      Writing remains an anguished, halting process—confidence an account that is zeroed out each time McPhee files a piece. The post Lazarus of the Picnic Table: On John McPhee’s ‘Draft No. 4’ appeared first on The Millions.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Nothing Outside the Text

      Sep 27, 2021

      Close reading is sometimes slandered as brutal vivisection, but it's really a manner of possession. In the sifting through of diction and syntax, grammar and punctuation, image and figuration, there are pearls. The post Nothing Outside the Text appe

      14 min read

    • Article

      Creating Wider, Deeper, Better Realities: The Millions Interviews Patrick Madden

      May 20, 2020

      I came to the conclusion that what I loved more than anything, and what I wanted to do for the rest of my life, was to think. Period. The post Creating Wider, Deeper, Better Realities: The Millions Interviews Patrick Madden appeared first on The Mill

      10 min read

    • Article

      Reconsidering the Classics of Political Economy

      Jan 1, 2020

      What is a “classic”? There will never be a definitive list. Yet in almost every field there are exceptional works of great influence that have changed our understanding of the world. Economics is no exception. In this issue of The Independent Review,

      2 min read

    • Article

      Books

      Nov 21, 2021

      by Bryan Walpert Mākaro Press — $35 It needs to be made clear that this is a science fiction novel, specifically of the time travel variety. It takes place in three alternating narrative streams, one of which is told in reverse, so that the couple wh

      7 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Moneybags Must Be So Lucky

    5/5

    1 rating0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Moneybags Must Be So Lucky - Robert Paul Wolff

      Published by Society for Philosophy & Culture at Smashwords

      Copyright 2013 Robert Paul Wolff

      Moneybags Must Be So Lucky

      On the Literary Structure of Capital

      Robert Paul Wolff

      Society for Philosophy & Culture

      Wellington

      2013

      Published by

      Society for Philosophy & Culture

      Wellington, NZ

      2013

      books@philosophyandculture.org

      © Author

      First Published

      The University of Massachusetts Press Amherst

      1988

      ISBN: 978-1-301-19008-9

      For Susie

      My once and future love

      In order to be able to extract value from the consumption of a commodity, our friend, Moneybags, must be so lucky as to find, within the sphere of circulation, in the market, a commodity, whose use-value possesses the peculiar property of being a source of value, whose actual consumption, therefore, is itself an embodiment of labour, and, consequently, a creation of value. The possessor of money does find on the market such a special commodity in capacity for labour or labour-power.

      Capital,

      Volume one, Chapter 6,

      The Buying and Selling of Labour-Power

      Introduction

      One: The Ontological Presuppositions of Literary Style

      Two: The Factory and the Cave – The Inverted World of Capitalism

      Three: Mrs. Feinschmeck’s Blintzes

      Introduction

      These reflections on the relation between the literary form and philosophical message of Capital were originally delivered at the Amherst campus of the University of Massachusetts as the Romanell-Phi Beta Kappa Lectures for 1984-85. In their present form, they constitute the second of what will eventually be a trio of books devoted to a reinterpretation of Marx’s great work. The entire undertaking dates from the late 1970s, when I began an attempt at interpretation and understanding that has occupied most of my scholarly attention for the past decade.

      I had read volume one of Capital in 1957 as a graduate student and, like most progressive intellectuals of the sixties, I had pored over the early humanist writings – the 1844 Manuscripts, the German Ideology, On the Jewish Question, and so forth. I even considered myself some sort of socialist, though what that meant was a bit unclear to me. But the opening chapters of Capital had mystified me, and I accepted, unthinking, the received opinion that Marx was something of a crackpot when it came to economic theory.

      Then, in the fall of 1976, I offered a graduate seminar called Classics of Critical Social Theory and, as an act of bravado, assigned Capital, volume one, to open the course. Almost from the first moment that I began to read through the text, as preparation for teaching, I was seized by a vision of Marx’s enterprise that has guided my investigations ever since. As I worked through the extraordinary first chapter on value, with its bizarre mixture of classical economics and Hegelian metaphysics, couched in a bitterly satirical language quite unlike anything I had encountered elsewhere in political philosophy or the social sciences, I became more and more powerfully convinced that Marx’s abstract theories of price and exchange, his angry critique of the injustices of capitalism, his complex conception of the objectively mystified character of bourgeois social reality, and his richly metaphorical invocation of the religious, political, and literary images of the Western cultural tradition, were so integrally connected that each could be understood only in relation to all the others.

      The first task confronting me was a serious engagement with the technicalities of Marx’s economic theories, and in this I was lucky to have, ready to hand in the Economics Department of the University of Massachusetts, the largest collection of Marxist economists in North America. Guided by the reading suggestions and periodic explications of Sam Bowles, Herb Gintis, and others, I undertook to master at least the elements of the modern mathematical reinterpretation of Marx’s economics that was being carried out by first-rate theoretical economists around the world.

      My relationship to the literary side of the enterprise is different. I am not a student either of literary critical theory or of textual interpretation. My principal acquaintance with each came through my familiarity with the scholarly and critical work of my former wife, Professor Cynthia Griffin Wolff. One reviewer of this manuscript speculated about whether I was a naive reader or a sophisticated student of literary thinking, and ended by paying me the enormous, but unfortunately unjustified, compliment of assuming the latter. As a consequence, I engage from time to time in the critical equivalent of reinventing the wheel. For example, the extended remarks in the first lecture on the relationship of Plato to his several audiences re-plough ground long planted and harvested – some might even say exhausted: – by the critical community.[1] Nevertheless, I have chosen to publish the text without a burdensome critical apparatus. My purpose is to attempt not merely to explicate Marx’s text but also to re-invoke something of its affective power.

      The third, or philosophical side, of the triangle was, as Eliza Doolittle would put it, mother’s milk to me, and seemed to pose the most manageable challenge. Since that time, I have come to see that this last portion of the enterprise is actually the conceptually most problematic, requiring as it does a thorough sorting out of the long-debated issue of methodological individualism and the analysis of social reality.

      I conceived the product of these investigations as a single lengthy volume in which I would exhibit the inner connection between the linear equations of Marxian value theory and the satiric thrust of Marx’s literary invocations, all in the aid of explicating the objectively contradictory character of capitalist social reality in its ironic relation to those of us who strive to understand capitalism from within.

      Fortunately, concerned friends called my attention to the fact that there is a very small audience indeed for a book that is part linear algebra, part literary criticism, and part methodology of the social sciences. Good sense prevailed, and I determined to recast my reading of Capital in three shorter volumes, each of which would be independently accessible to an appropriate audience. The first volume, devoted to the mathematical reinterpretation of the economic theories, appeared several years ago.[2] With the publication of the present volume, there remains only the hardest part of the job to complete – the philosophical weaving together of the two in an explication of Marx’s theory of social reality. Long experience has taught me not to make promises that I am uncertain to fulfil, but I can at least hope that the third volume will appear with no greater delay than has separated the first from the second.

      There is, of course, nothing novel in construing Capital as a work of literary art, over and above its character as a work of theoretical economics. The first person to understand this was the author himself. He was notoriously dilatory about getting manuscript to the publisher, and for several years before the actual publication of volume one in 1867, his letters are full of predictions of its appearance, apologies for the delay, promises that it would be delivered to the printer, and even, if I interpret one letter correctly, wagers with Engels.[3] In a letter of 31 July 1865, Marx offers the following justification

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1