Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear
()
About this ebook
This is a powerful account of how the government played on what was ultimately the race issue. In an essay which is, by terms, witty, dry and bitingly understated, Mungo MacCallum asks what epithets are appropriate for a prime minister who has brought us to this pass. He also raises the question of whether Australia's contemporary treatment of refugees has anything in common with the sane and decent policies that have characterised the better moments in our history.
‘… it will take a long time to recover from the campaign of hate and fear which was deemed to be necessary to return the Howard government in the first year of the new millennium.’ —Mungo MacCallum, Girt By Sea
‘This most cold-eyed of one time Canberra chroniclers brings to this story all his wit and dryness and power of mind. It's a sad tale ... though it is everywhere enlivened by MacCallum's … tendency to suggest that spades really are bloody shovels at the end of the day.’ —Peter Craven
‘A document of immense power … MacCallum's essay will stand as a record of Australia's shame and depravity. It will haunt us. ’ —Julian Burnside, Australian Book Review
‘Mungo’s assertion that Howard is a man with no vision, only division, to his name and his recognition that Howard will never have the approval of those elites he so gratuitously desires, is a blistering strike at the Liberal man.’ —Geoff Parkes, Journal of Australian Studies
Mungo MacCallum has long been one of Australia’s most influential and entertaining political journalists, in a career spanning more than four decades. Mungo has worked with the Australian, the Age, the Financial Review, Sydney Morning Herald and numerous magazines, as well as the ABC, SBS, Channel Nine and Channel Ten. His books include the bestselling Mungo: The Man Who Laughs, The Good, the Bad and the Unlikely: Australia's Prime Ministers and The Whitlam Mob.
Mungo MacCallum
Mungo MacCallum is the author of The Good, the Bad and the Unlikely: Australia's Prime Ministers. He has long been one of Australia’s most influential and entertaining political journalists, in a career spanning more than four decades.
Read more from Mungo Mac Callum
The Good, the Bad and the Unlikely: Australia's Prime Ministers: From Barton to Albanese Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Whitlam Mob Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea
Titles in the series (93)
Quarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 24 No Fixed Address: Nomads and the Fate of the Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 6 Beyond Belief: What Future for Labor? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 1 In Denial: The Stolen Generations and the Right Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 22 Voting for Jesus: Christianity and Politics in Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 18 Worried Well: The Depression Epidemic and the Medicalisation of Our Sorrows Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 7 Paradise Betrayed: West Papua's Struggle for Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 11 Whitefella Jump Up: The Shortest Way to Nationhood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 40 Trivial Pursuit: Leadership and the End of the Reform Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 28 Exit Right: The Unravelling of John Howard Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 4 Rabbit Syndrome: Australia and America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 21 What's Left?: The Death of Social Democracy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 17: ‘Kangaroo Court’: Family Law in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 15 Latham's World: The New Politics of the Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 10 Bad Company: The Cult of the CEO Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 16 Breach of Trust: Truth, Morality and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 13 Sending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 12 Made in England: Australia's British Inheritance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea: Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 32 American Revolution: The Fall of Wall Street and the Rise of Barack Obama Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 14 Mission Impossible: The Sheikhs, the U.S. and the Future of Iraq Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 33 Quarry Vision: Coal, Climate Change and the End of the Resources Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 29 Love and Money: The Family and the Free Market Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 54 Dragon's Tail: The Lucky Country After the China Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 19 Relaxed and Comfortable: The Liberal Party's Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 25 Bipolar Nation: How to Win the 2007 Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Quarterly Essay 2 Appeasing Jakarta: Australia's Complicity in the East Timor Tragedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 3 The Opportunist: John Howard and the Triumph of Reaction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 12 Made in England: Australia's British Inheritance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 23 The History Question: Who Owns The Past? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 7 Paradise Betrayed: West Papua's Struggle for Independence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 9 Beautiful Lies: Population and Environment in Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 53 That Sinking Feeling: Asylum Seekers and the Search for the Indonesian Solution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 13 Sending Them Home: Refugees and the New Politics of Indifference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnnecessary Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 54 Dragon's Tail: The Lucky Country After the China Boom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 63 Enemy Within: American Politics in the Time of Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 44 Man-Made World: Choosing Between Progress and Planet Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 35 Radical Hope: Education and Equality for Australia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThis Whispering in Our Hearts Revisited Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 8 Groundswell: The Rise of the Greens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSunburnt Country: The History and Future of Climate Change in Australia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 27 Reaction Time: Climate Change and the Nuclear Option Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDefending Country: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Military Service Since 1945 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Quarterly Essay 57 Dear Life: On Caring for the Elderly Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 46 Great Expectations: Government, Entitlement and an Angry Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 64 The Australian Dream: Blood, History and Becoming Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 56 Clivosaurus: The Politics of Clive Palmer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 6 Beyond Belief: What Future for Labor? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLarrikins: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quarterly Essay 73 Australia Fair: Listening to the Nation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 49 Not Dead Yet: Labor's Post-Left Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat's for Dinner? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 30 Last Drinks: The Impact of the Northern Territory Intervention Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsQuarterly Essay 45 Us and Them: On the Importance of Animals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fight for Beauty: Our Path to a Better Future Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
World Politics For You
The Hundred Years' War on Palestine: A History of Settler Colonialism and Resistance, 1917–2017 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/577 Days of February: Living and Dying in Ukraine, Told by the Nation’s Own Journalists Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lemon Tree: An Arab, a Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise of the Fourth Reich: The Secret Societies That Threaten to Take Over America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A World Without Jews Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ten Myths About Israel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Israel: A Concise History of a Nation Reborn Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Palestine: A Socialist Introduction Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 2]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Awakening: Defeating the Globalists and Launching the Next Great Renaissance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of The 1619 Project: by Nikole Hannah-Jones - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPutin's People: How the KGB Took Back Russia and Then Took On the West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Light in Gaza: Writings Born of Fire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Beirut to Jerusalem Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5When China Attacks: A Warning to America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat's Really Happening on Planet Earth Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Enemies and Neighbors: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917-2017 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-1962 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Antisemitism: Part One of The Origins of Totalitarianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Quarterly Essay 5 Girt By Sea - Mungo MacCallum
Quarterly Essay
Quarterly Essay is published four times a year by Black Inc., an imprint of Schwartz Publishing Pty Ltd
Publisher: Morry Schwartz
ISBN 1 86395 123 7
Subscriptions (4 issues): $46.95 a year within Australia incl. GST (Institutional subs. $52.95). Outside Australia $74.95. Payment may be made by Mastercard,Visa or Bankcard, or by cheque made out to Schwartz Publishing. Payment includes postage and handling.
Correspondence and subscriptions should be addressed to the Editor at:
Black Inc.
Level 5, 289 Flinders Lane
Melbourne VIC 3000
Australia
Phone: 61 3 9654 2000
Fax: 61 3 9654 2290
Email: quarterlyessay@blackincbooks.com
Editor: Peter Craven
Management: Silvia Kwon
Assistant Editor: Chris Feik
Publishing Assistant: Sophy Williams
Publicity: Meredith Kelly
Design: Guy Mirabella
Printer: Griffin Press
CONTENTS
Introduction Peter Craven
GIRT BY SEA
Australia, the Refugees and the Politics of Fear
Mungo MacCallum
RABBIT SYNDROME Correspondence
Tony Abbott, Dennis Altman, Don Anderson, Jim Hammerton, Noel Hutchison, Peter Pierce, Don Watson
Contributors
Quarterly Essay aims to present significant contributions to political, intellectual and cultural debate. It is a magazine in extended pamphlet form and by publishing in each issue a single writer of at least 20,000 words we hope to mediate between the limitations of the newspaper column, where there is the danger that evidence and argument can be swallowed up by the form, and the kind of full-length study of a subject where the only readership is a necessarily specialised one. Quarterly Essay aims for the attention of the committed general reader. Although it is a periodical which wants subscribers, each number of the journal will be the length of a short book because we want our writers to have the opportunity to speak to the broadest possible audience without condescension or populist shortcuts. Quarterly Essay wants to get away from the tyranny that space limits impose in contemporary journalism and we will be giving our essayists the space to express the evidence for their views and those who disagree with them the chance to reply at whatever length is necessary. Quarterly Essay will not be confined to politics but it will be centrally concerned with it. We are not interested in occupying any particular point on the political map and we hope to bring our readership the widest range of political and cultural opinion which is compatible with truth-telling, style and command of the essay form.
INTRODUCTION
The intrinsic interest of Mungo MacCallum’s account of the so-called Refugee Crisis which dominated the last election (and the winding and woeful tale of the history behind it) scarcely needs defending. With the widespread concern about the conditions at the Woomera detention centre and then the revelations about how the children in the water
story had been manipulated in the interests of the Coalition during the 2001 election, the question of the Refugees has once more become besetting even for people who supported the government’s stance (a group, alas, which included the Labor Party).
Mungo MacCallum is hardly typecast as the chronicler of the story of what has gone right and wrong about the business of immigration, regular and irregular, to this country but this most larrikin and cold-eyed of one-time Canberra chroniclers brings to this story all his wit and dryness and power of mind.
MacCallum was famous in his heyday for the way he could raise the depiction of the follies of Canberra to the level of literature. He could tell his readers that there were moments when Bill Hayden irresistibly brought to mind the fact that he had once been a Queensland cop and he could quote Auden, at the drop of a hat, to illuminate, by contrast, the fatuity of some rambling condemnation of communist tyranny which was not wrong, just very silly. He caught the human face of politics, in the days of Gorton and McMahon and Whitlam and Fraser, and he made it seem, through the medium of his imagination and the sharpness of his eye, like one of the most high and mighty farces on earth. No one who has ever read his account of how the Easter Island Fraser, a man of indomitable personal dignity, was upstaged and made a fool of by a motorbike freak (I think in Tasmania) could doubt the genius of this jester at the court of the kings of Dismissal. He did for Australian politics – from a vantage point that was at once insolent and engaged – what Gore Vidal did for the America of the Kennedys and Christopher Hitchens has done for the Britain of Thatcher and beyond.
He wore his personal style like a scalpel but he remained terrific fun even as he was rehearsing a satire that gained its force from his sense of appal at the thing which was being mocked and the truth which politics was distorting. And if Mungo was a clown, he was a serious clown with a higher quotient of truth than most of his contemporaries could muster.
Well, a clown (who is also a truth teller) has many faces, some of them grave indeed. In Girt by Sea he traces the path that led us to the Tampa and Howard’s declaration that only we would decide what feet touched our soil – a statement, as Mungo MacCallum says, echoic of One Nation for all its mock-Churchillian magniloquence.
It’s a sad tale he tells, with a good deal of gravity and terseness though it is everywhere enlivened by MacCallum’s plain talk and his natural tendency to suggest that spades really are bloody shovels at the end of the day. But it is not, for all its latent vehemence, a pessimistic essay. MacCallum takes the dimmest possible view of what John Howard did when, as he says, he made his play for power against the odds, or rather when the Tampa sailing over the horizon provided him with the kind of opportunity he might have dreamt of. He suggests that the true parallel to John Howard is not Robert Menzies, the patriarch of the Australian Liberal Party, but the Little Digger
who set Protestant against Catholic during the First World War and owed fealty to nothing but the prejudices he could bequeath and bestir.
These are harsh insinuations (though they have their precedent in remarks made by Malcolm Fraser during the election campaign) though Mungo MacCallum also believes that John Howard was displaying the politics of conviction during the 2001 election (a view shared by John Birmingham). No one who reads the section of this Quarterly Essay called What Dare not Speak Its Name
, with its invocation of the traditional figure of the quacking duck will be in any doubt about what Mungo MacCallum thinks of the Prime Minister’s stance on those who come from across the seas, but the charge he levels is not really a personal one.
What he tries to do is place John Howard’s attitude to race (and the harshness of his government’s treatment of the Refugees) in the context of Australian history with its many splendours and miseries. He begins by suggesting that we are all – probably even the Aborigines – boat people and then goes on, with a characteristic sideways motion, to tell the story, humorous and hopeful, of how that old ruffian Sir Henry Parkes reacted to a boat load of French and Italians in the light of his anti-Catholic prejudice.
It is all a far cry from the story of poor Shayan, the little boy driven out of his wits, the child repeatedly depersonalised by the minister for immigration, Phillip Ruddock, a child whose family’s privacy was abused on all sides.
And it was not ever thus, even if there were ghastly tendencies. Mungo MacCallum provides his own laconic ode to Reffo Australia, the Australia of the ’40s and ’50s, when Arthur Calwell initiated a policy of allowing non-Anglo immigration into the country in a way that anticipated and made possible what was to come. It’s a genial picture MacCallum paints, though not a sentimental one, and he is also at pains to emphasise the Calwell who was sudden death on any suggestion of Asian immigration: two Wongs don’t make a White,
as the famous quip has it. The prejudice extended to the spouses of white Australians, though Mungo MacCallum also emphasises that the Menzies Opposition in 1949 could teach Kim Beazley a trick or two.
One of the striking things about the historical backdrop that Mungo MacCallum sketches in is that it was Malcolm Fraser’s government that welcomed the Vietnamese refugees. MacCallum sees the crunch as coming under Hawke, partly as an ironic consequence of apparent liberalism. The ferocity of the bureaucratic reaction to this began the long process of delegitimising the refugees and of treating them as de facto criminals. That process was completed under the Howard government when it further toughened up the detention centres in the direction of American-style punitiveness.
And it has helped enormously in the war against harried strangers that Mr Ruddock has found effectively invalidating terms for them. Mungo MacCallum’s lack of what might be thought of as an automatic tone of moral superiority (of the bleeding heart variety) makes his response to these violations of language all the more impressive.
And that is the note he strikes throughout his detailed exposition of the Tampa story and its aftermath. This is a remarkable story of innocence exploited and ruthless politics which Mungo MacCallum tells without adornment, with a dry joke here and a feint nudge there. The effect is more devastating than a whole theatre of handwringing because there is no thrill of moral fervour on the narrator’s part. This is Mungo MacCallum, the laconic chronicler of the ’60s and ’70s, discernibly a man from a happier and more civilised moment in our history, who saw much of that time as a delicious cavalcade of folly. But what he sees in the treatment of the refugees is nothing like that, it is flatly awful and his withering summary of it carries conviction.
And so too with the characteristically terse description of the worst that could be said about the Prime Minister. Mungo MacCallum provides scarcely more in the way of lines of argument than a punter might in a pub but the effect has the devastating economy of a great cartoon that captures a likeness (not fairly but too well) as no photograph could. It is, in its way, a great humorist’s tribute to plain speaking, even as Mungo MacCallum can seem to throw his own charge away with his suggestion that it could be a canard.
The delineation of Howard, as with the ghostly stick figures of Australian history, Arthur Calwell and Billy Hughes, Menzies and Whitlam, Fraser and Keating, is in no way vengeful. The narration is far too laconic for that, as if analysis could be there as an implication in the recounting, in the narration of what happens: how a man fidgets, what Harradine said. You just get the sense that sometimes history turns human beings into giants and sometimes it turns them into pygmies. You take your pick. Maybe it’s a matter of character or circumstance or inheritance, who knows? In any case it is clear that Mungo MacCallum thinks that we have ceased, in the eyes of those who seek a haven, to have any right to be considered a sophisticated and sane society with a sense of charity and mercy.
Not that his conclusion is one of despair. Folly happens and it can be rectified. The mood of the people seems to have changed and maybe there’s the light of something saner – more like the tradition we have a right to cherish, the welcoming one – just down the road.