The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law: A Handbook for Parents, Teachers and Other Professionals, Third Edition
()
About this ebook
You do not have to be a lawyer to understand the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law is written by an attorney in a concise and accessible manner and is a valuable resource to all involved in educating students with disabilities, including parents, teachers and special education administrators. It is an essential tool to help parents get the best education possible for their child. The Everyday Guide covers IDEA Part B (services for children aged 3-21), Part C (services for infants and toddlers), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law features information from the IDEA regulations and court decisions including resolving disputes using the State Education Agency complaint process; obtaining compensatory services; timelines for dispute resolution and due process hearings; burden of proof in due process hearings; what constitutes a pattern of removal of a student in the disciplinary process triggering the need to conduct a manifestation determination; and services for children with disabilities placed by their parents in private schools.
The Third Edition also covers:
· Schools and service animals
· Charter schools, private schools and private school voucher programs
· LRE and preschool programs
· Bullying
This edition contains all of the Second Edition updates including:
· Timelines for dispute resolution and due process hearings
· Burden of proof in due process hearings
· What constitutes a pattern of removal of a student in the disciplinary process triggering the need to conduct a manifestation determination
· Services for children with disabilities placed by their parents in private schools
Randy Chapman has acquired a national reputation for his straightforward, practical, and reassuring approach to this complex legal area. As an attorney, he has been representing parents with children in special education since 1977. He is the author of four books and over 200 articles on disability law. Parents and school district personnel appreciate his detailed, comprehensive, and easy-to-understand style.
This hand book gives parents courage, credibility, and respect to effectively advocate for the their child’s right to an inclusive education.
Related to The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law
Related ebooks
Teaching in a Special Education Classroom: A Step-by-Step Guide for Educators Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Your Special Education Rights: What Your School District Isn't Telling You Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPreventing Litigation in Special Education Workbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Everything Parent's Guide to Special Education: A Complete Step-by-Step Guide to Advocating for Your Child with Special Needs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Classroom Teacher's Inclusion Handbook: Practical Methods for Integrating Students with Special Needs Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law, Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Survival Guide for New Special Educators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaking Inclusion Work: Effective Practices for All Teachers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTeaching Children with Autism in the General Classroom: Strategies for Effective Inclusion and Instruction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecial Education: A Parent's Quick-Start Guide Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The IEP from A to Z: How to Create Meaningful and Measurable Goals and Objectives Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Praxis Elementary Education For Dummies with Online Practice Tests Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFTCE Elementary Education K-6 Book + Online Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInterventions That Work With Special Populations in Gifted Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmotional and Behavioral Problems: A Handbook for Understanding and Handling Students Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTo Be Gifted and Learning Disabled: Strength-Based Strategies for Helping Twice-Exceptional Students With LD, ADHD Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLearning About Learning Disabilities Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5NYSTCE Students with Disabilities (060) Book + Online Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fundamentals of Special Education: A Practical Guide for Every Teacher Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnderstanding Assessment in the Special Education Process: A Step-by-Step Guide for Educators Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Special Education Savvy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Works for Special Education and At-Risk Learners: A Framework for General Education Teachers and Administrators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTeaching Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Step-by-Step Guide for Educators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Big Book of Special Education Resources: Second Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTeaching Students with Emotional Disturbance: A Practical Guide for Every Teacher Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEducating Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Guide for Teachers, Counselors, and Psychologists Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Effective Inclusion Strategies for Elementary Teachers: Reach and Teach Every Child in Your Classroom Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Exceptional Teacher's Handbook: The First-Year Special Education Teacher's Guide to Success Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Almanacs For You
Pisces 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #12 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGemini 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCapricorn 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #10 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Food Almanac: Recipes and Stories for a Year at the Table Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brilliant Bathroom Reader (Mensa®): 5,000 Facts from the Smartest Brand in the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAries Daily Horoscope 2023: Daily 2023, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScorpio 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #11 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAries 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilitary & Nautical Phrases Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe World Almanac and Book of Facts 2013 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Organized Teacher's Lesson Planner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Harry Potter Quiz Book Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVirgo 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #6 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLeo Horoscope & Astrology 2022: Astrology & Horoscopes 2022, #5 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings71 Ways to Practice English Writing: Tips for ESL/EFL Learners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Pub Quiz Master's Trivia Compendium Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aquarius 2023: Horoscopes 2023, #11 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philadelphia Citizen's Almanac: Daily Readings on the City of Brotherly Love Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTropical Reef Fishes: Periplus Nature Guide Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Almanac of American Philanthropy 2017 Compact Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRestore Gut Health: How to Heal Leaky Gut Naturally and Maintain Healthy Digestive System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPurposeful Retirement: How to Bring Happiness and Meaning to Your Retirement (Retirement gift for men) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Adams Resume Almanac Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe World Almanac Road Trippers' Guide to National Parks: 5,001 Things to Do, Learn, and See for Yourself Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 2019 Baby Names Almanac Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Publishers Weekly Book Publishing Almanac 2022: A Master Class in the Art of Bringing Books to Readers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Blue & Gray Almanac: The Civil War in Facts & Figures, Recipes & Slang Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Bible Figures of Speech Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLittle Book of the 1970s Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTimeline of the 60's Counter-Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law - Randy Chapman, Esq.
Table of Contents
Cover
Title Page
Copyright
Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction
Dedications
I. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
What Is a Free Appropriate Public Education?
Who Are Children with Disabilities?
What Is Special Education?
What Are Related Services?
Medical Services versus Related Services
What Are Supplementary Aids and Services?
What Are Assistive Technology Devices and Services?
Extended School Year
School Records and Confidentiality
I. Supplemental Information
The IDEA and Charter Schools
What Are Charter Schools?
What about the IDEA, Section 504, and the ADA?
Federal Civil Rights Laws Apply to Charter Schools
School Districts and Public Benefits
II. Least Restrictive Environment
The Courts and LRE
Supplementary Aids and Services
LRE and the IEP
II. Supplemental Information
Change in Location Can Be a Change in Placement
Preschool Children with Disabilities and Least Restrictive Environment
The U.S. Department of Education’s Fifteen Principles Regarding the Use of Restraint and Seclusion
Placing Student on Homebound for His Senior Year Violated 504
III. Evaluating the Needs of Students with Disabilities
Initial Evaluation
Referral for Initial Evaluation
Consent
Screening
Evaluation Process
Specific Learning Disabilities
Severe Discrepancy Standard
Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Reevaluation
Summary of Performance
Independent Educational Evaluations
III. Supplemental Information
Procedural Safeguards Apply to Functional Behavior Assessment
Colorado District’s Failure to Evaluate Student While Implementing RTI Violated 504
OSEP Guidance on RTI
Paying for Independent Educational Evaluations
Parents Have a Right to Revoke Consent to Services
IV. The Individualized Educational Program
Who Are the Members of the IEP Team?
Team Absences
What Are the Components of the IEP?
Developing the IEP and Special Factors
Transfer Students
Transfer Within the Same State
Transfer from Outside the State
Transition Services
Specific Services
Reviewing, Revising, and Amending the IEP
Amending the IEP
Using the IEP Process
Hints for Parents
Hints for Educators and Other Members of the IEP Team
Conclusion
IV. Supplemental Information
Parents’ Right to Participate in an IEP Meeting Trumps the Annual Review Date
V. Resolving Disputes under the IDEA
The IEP Process
Informal Dispute Resolution Procedures
Procedural Safeguards
Prior Written Notice
Procedural Safeguards Notice
Surrogate Parents
Impartial Due Process Hearings
Due Process Complaint Notice
Response to the Due Process Complaint Notice
Response to the Specific Issues Raised in the Due Process Complaint Notice
Sufficiency of the Due Process Complaint Notice
Amending the Due Process Complaint Notice
Mediation
Resolution through Mediation Is Legally Binding
Mediation Means Finding a Middle Course
Resolution Session
Resolution Session Settlement Agreement
Impartial Due Process Hearing
Hearing Issues
Timeline for Requesting a Hearing
Rights in the Hearing Process
Burden of Proof
Qualifications of the Hearing Officer
Timeline for Hearing Officer’s Decision
Appeal Process
Administrative Appeal
Civil Action
Attorney’s Fees
The Stay-put Rule
State Education Agency Complaint Process
Filing a Complaint with the State Education Agency
Thoughts and Hints about Dispute Resolution
Dispute Resolution Timeline
V. Supplemental Information
Charter School Violated IDEA by Dis-Enrolling a Student During Pendency of a Hearing
VI. Discipline and Disability
Discipline Overview
Manifestation Determination
Provision of Educational Services
Functional Behavioral Assessment
Authority of School Personnel
Special Circumstances
Manifestation Determination
The Manifestation Determination Process
If the Behavior Is a Manifestation of the Student’s Disability
If the Behavior Is Determined NOT to Be a Manifestation of the Student’s Disability
Interim Alternative Educational Setting
Appeals and Procedural Safeguards
Notice
Disciplinary Appeal Process
Expedited Hearings and the Authority of the Hearing Officer
Expedited Hearing Timeline
Authority of the Hearing Officer
Placement during Disciplinary Appeals
What About Children Who Haven’t Been Determined Eligible for Special Education?
What Happens If the School District Does NOT Know the Student Has a Disability?
What If the Parent Requests that the Student Be Evaluated after the Student Is in the Disciplinary Process?
What To Do If Your Child Is Suspended
VI. Supplemental Information
Manifestation Determination Review Is Not a Hearing!
504 Requires Manifestation Determination Reviews Even for Students Ineligible under the IDEA
Manifestation Determination Review Teams Must Look Beyond the Special Education Eligibility Label
VII. Children in Private Schools
Private School Placements by the Public Schools
Private School Placements by Parents Because the Public School Program Is Inappropriate
Students Whose Parents Choose Private School Placement
Child Find
Service Coordination and Planning
Services Plans for Parentally-Placed Private School Children with Disabilities
Appeal Process for Parentally-Placed Private School Children
VII. Supplemental Information
Reimbursement of Private School Tuition
Fronting Private School Tuition
Private School Voucher Programs Must Comply with the ADA
Justice Department Sues Private School Chain for Discriminating against Children with Disabilities
The IDEA and Home Schooling
VIII. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act
What Is a Free Appropriate Public Education under Section 504?
Who Is a Person with a Disability under 504?
Examples of 504 Accommodations
Evaluation under Section 504
Standardized Assessments
Assistive Technology and Section 504
Discipline and 504
Procedural Safeguards under Section 504
The Americans with Disabilities Act
Title III and Private Schools
Disability Harassment
Retaliation
Community Access
Filing Complaints with the Office for Civil Rights
VIII. Supplemental Information
Disability Harassment
Schools Must Take Action to Prevent Bullying
School Should Have Been Proactive to Protect Student with Cognitive Disabilities from Name-Calling
Department of Education Issues Guidance Targeting Harassment and Bullying
Teachers May Sue to Protect Their Students
Extracurricular Athletics for Students with Disabilities
Excluding Children with Diabetes
Formal Guidance from the Office for Civil Rights
Schools Cannot Rely Solely on Grades when Determining 504 Eligibility
Service Animals at School
Decisions on Service Animals Must Be Made by a Group
Virtual Public Charter School Required to Comply with Section 504
IX. Back to the Beginning: Part C Early Intervention Services
Infants and Toddlers
Infant or Toddler with a Disability
Early Intervention Services
Part C Service Providers
Natural Environments
Individualized Family Service Plan
Content of the Individualized Family Service Plan
Parent Consent
Service Coordinator
Transition from Part C Early Intervention Services
Procedural Safeguards
Stay-put
Conclusion
X. Facing Forward Looking Back
Appendix A
Sample Letter
Appendix B
Sample Letter (Due Process Complaint Notice)
Appendix C
Letters: Charter Schools & Preschool LRE
Letter: Disability Harassment
Letters: Harassment and Bullying & Extracurricular Activity
Appendix D. Glossary and Acronyms
Appendix E. Circuit Courts
Index
About Mighty Rights Press
About the Author
Endnotes
Mighty Rights Press
Title PageThe Everyday Guide to Special Education Law
A Handbook for Parents, Teachers, and Other Professionals
By Randy Chapman, Esq.
Copyright © 2015 Mighty Rights Press (print edition)
Copyright © 2016 Mighty Rights Press (e-book edition)
455 Sherman Street, Suite 130
Denver, Colorado 80203
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from Mighty Rights Press except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and general information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the author and the publisher are not engaged in rendering legal or other professional services. If specific legal advice is required, please consult an attorney.
Third Edition
Publisher’s Cataloging-In-Publication Data
(Prepared by The Donohue Group, Inc.)
Chapman, Randy.
The everyday guide to special education law : a handbook for parents, teachers and other professionals / by Randy Chapman, Esq. — Third edition.
At head of title: IDEA.
Includes most recent changes to federal law and regulations, plus supplemental information on administrative and case law.
Includes index.
ISBN: 978-0-9770179-7-3 (paperback)
ISBN: 978-0-9974426-0-1 (e-book)
1. United States. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 — Handbooks, manuals, etc. 2. United States. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act — Handbooks, manuals, etc. 3. United States. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 — Handbooks, manuals, etc. 4. United States. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 — Handbooks, manuals, etc. 5. Special education — Law and legislation — United States — Handbooks, manuals, etc. 6. Children with disabilities — Education — Law and legislation — United States — Handbooks, manuals, etc. I. Title. II. Title: IDEA
KF4209.3 .C453 2015
344.0791
Book and Cover Design by Karen Saunders & Associates
Front Cover Concept by John O. Kjos and Randy Chapman
Edited by Mandy M. Rigg
Production coordinated by Reina Knapp, Randy Chapman, Mary Anne Harvey, and Julie Z. Busby
Indexing by Katie Banks, Eagle-Eye Indexing
E-book created by Mariposa Book Transformation Services
Preface
I wrote this book primarily to help students, parents, advocates, and other professionals better understand the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). Congress most recently amended the IDEA in 2004. Subsequently, the Department of Education adopted regulations implementing the IDEA 2004 that were effective July 5, 2006. This edition of The Everyday Guide to Special Education Law addresses the major changes in the IDEA 2004 including references to the Department of Education regulations. The IDEA statute is very detailed and, for the most part, the regulations follow the statute without adding much clarification. So, I have only referred to the regulations where I thought they provided additional information or clarified the statute. I have also tried to make the law a little less confusing.
By saying I wrote this book primarily for students, parents, and advocates, I don’t mean that it isn’t also intended for teachers and other educators. Most teachers and educators advocate for children with disabilities, in general, and their own students, in particular. They just advocate from within the educational system. So, while the book is written from a parent’s perspective, the information is also intended to help those who have answered the call to become members of that most honorable of professions, teaching.
This book is not intended to be a legal treatise on special education case law. The book is meant to be an everyday guide to special education law to help parents, advocates, students with disabilities, and educators to understand the basic requirements of the IDEA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
School services for children with disabilities are developed through an individualized planning process. The planning process involves parents, educators, and other professionals. For infants and toddlers that process results in an Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) and for children aged three to twenty-one that process results in an Individualized Educational Program (IEP). The IFSP and IEP meetings should involve a collaborative process.
Generally, I do not believe the IEP, IFSP, and other education meetings are the appropriate settings for lawyers and others to debate legal standards and court rulings. Those debates are more appropriate for due process hearings and court cases. Educational planning meetings should focus on the student’s needs and meeting those needs. Parents, teachers, and other professionals know about the individual students and how to teach students with disabilities. Early intervention service providers and families have expertise on providing early intervention services to infants and toddlers. While parents and teachers should understand the legal requirements in the special education process, they are not in the planning meeting to be lawyers. They are in the meeting to be parents and teachers. I believe parents and educators — not attorneys — should design educational programs.
Having said that parents and educators — not attorneys — should design programs, I would also like to point out that there is certainly a role for attorneys to play in ensuring that students receive a free appropriate public education under the IDEA. Disputes often arise over the delivery of special education services. While most disputes can be resolved informally without involving lawyers, some require more formal dispute resolution procedures, like due process hearings. While parents are not required to use attorneys in due process proceedings, due process hearings are formal legal proceedings and school districts are most likely represented by attorneys.
Consequently, parents will likely need representation by an attorney. Moreover, parents may need to seek advice from an attorney to make decisions regarding dispute resolution. Although this book contains information about the legal rights of students with disabilities, it is not a substitute for legal advice or legal representation when either is needed. The book is best used as a guide to the law and the rights of students with disabilities to get a free appropriate public education. If legal advice is needed, it should be sought from an attorney competent in this area of the law.
Additionally, please note that in some places I have directly quoted the law. But in many places, I have modified and paraphrased the legal language to make it more understandable. Footnotes are provided so you can find the actual statute or regulation being discussed. The IDEA statute is cited as 20 U.S.C. 1400 to 1487. The IDEA regulations are 34 C.F.R. Part 300. You can find the IDEA statute and regulations at the United States Department of Education website IDEA.ED.gov. The Section 504 regulations are cited as 34 C.F.R. Part 104. The letters U.S.C. stand for United States Code and C.F.R. stands for Code of Federal Regulations. If you are seeking to quote the law exactly, you should use these footnotes to find your exact quote, rather than quoting this book.
This third edition of The Everyday Guide supplements the previous edition by providing information about judicial and administrative decisions that occurred after the second edition was published. There is also information about specific topics such as charter schools, home schooling, the use of restraint in schools, private school voucher programs, and service animals that were not covered in the previous edition. The majority of this information has been adapted from Randy Chapman’s Ability Law Blog, which can be found at RandyChapman.WordPress.com. The supplemental information follows the chapters that most closely relate to that information.
Additionally, a glossary is provided as Appendix D. Terms that are defined in the glossary are in italics the first time they appear in the main text of this book.
Finally, I greatly enjoyed writing this book and hope it’s helpful.
Mighty Rights PressRandy Chapman
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Mary Anne Harvey, our Executive Director, for her support, suggestions, and as always, excellent editing skills. I would like to thank Bill Higgins, former Managing Attorney in our Grand Junction office; Angie Garberding, Rights Advocate; Julie Busby, Development Director; Reina Knapp, Office Manager; Chaz Gilmore, Administrative Assistant; and Kyliegh Vestal, Intern. Thanks also to staff who are no longer at Disability Law Colorado, but who played a critical role in this publication: Thom Miller and Heidi Van Huysen, who left to pursue other legal work; and Diane Carabello, who passed away in 2009.
Thanks also to Chug Roberts of TheCapitol.Net in Alexandria, Virginia, for his consultation and encouragement, and to Mandy M. Rigg for her enthusiastic support and advice.
Additionally, I want to thank the following people who also reviewed drafts of this book and provided invaluable insight and suggestions: Allison Seyler and Shirley Swope with the PEAK Parent Training Center in Colorado Springs; Romie Tobin, who as a parent advocated for her son and now helps other parents; Dr. Fred Smokoski, who is a former Director of Special Education in Colorado and helped bring students from the Wheat Ridge State Home and Training School into the public schools; Susan Smith with Colorado Department of Education; Julie Haynes with the Colorado Foundation for Families and Children; Patricia S. Tomlan, PhD, with PST Educational Consultants; and Carol Meredith, Cg LaScala and Paula A. House with the Arc/Arapahoe & Douglas.
We are grateful to the Colorado Developmental Disabilities Council for funding this project. In addition, we extend our gratitude to the Daniels Fund for a challenge grant to encourage charitable support to broadly distribute this book to families who need it and make it available in Spanish.
Last but not least, I want to acknowledge Carol, Connor, and Sean Chapman who patiently tolerated my hogging the computer room
while writing this book.
Mary Anne Harvey and I
would especially like to acknowledge
John Matousek of our Board of Directors
for nurturing the entrepreneurial spirit
that will sustain our future.
Introduction
In 1980 The Legal Center for Handicapped Citizens and the Association for Retarded Citizens in Colorado sued the Colorado Department of Education because children at the Wheat Ridge State Home and Training School were not attending school. The Wheat Ridge State Home and Training School (Ridge) was an institution for persons with developmental disabilities located in the Jefferson County School District. Most of the children living in the institution originally came from a variety of communities and school districts, other than the Jefferson County School District. Abandoned today, the wards at Ridge are empty. But in 1980, children filled wards labeled Moonbeam, Aspen, and Starlight. Filled wards, empty days.
Ridge students had the right to an education under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975.¹ The Legal Center had first discovered in 1979 that children living at Ridge were not going to school. Consequently, on behalf of the parents of several of the children living at Ridge, The Legal Center requested school services from the children’s home school districts, specifically the Denver, Boulder, and Weld County districts. These home school districts, however, refused to provide school services because the children lived in Jefferson County. The Legal Center then turned to the Jefferson County School District for services, but services were refused because the children’s parents resided outside of Jefferson County.
Since the Education for All Handicapped Children Act required that the State Education Agency (the Colorado Department of Education) assure that all children with disabilities in Colorado receive a free appropriate public education, The Legal Center implored Colorado’s Commissioner of Education to resolve which school districts were responsible for teaching these children. Eventually, the Commissioner of Education determined that the school districts where the children’s parents resided were responsible for educating children living at Ridge. Unfortunately, that decision was not enforced; the children stayed out of school.
Consequently, the class action lawsuit was filed in 1980 in federal district court in Denver. In May 1981 Judge John Kane ruled that, in fact, the Commissioner of Education and the Colorado Department of Education were responsible under the Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 for assuring that all children with disabilities in Colorado, including the children at Ridge, receive a free appropriate public education.² The lawsuit was later settled, and in the fall of 1981 children at the Ridge State Home and Training School attended school for the first time. At the same time, school services were also provided to children living at Colorado’s other State Home and Training Schools in Pueblo and Grand Junction. For a while, some children received school services at the State Home and Training School, but nearly one half of the children left the institution and attended schools in their home district.
Many of these children had very severe disabilities. Some were unable to speak or walk. For the first time children with very severe disabilities received services in Colorado’s public schools. Over time, this lawsuit directly resulted in improving the ability of Colorado’s public schools to serve children with severe disabilities. This improvement, in turn, led to closing almost all of the segregated schools in Colorado, children leaving the institutions, and children with severe disabilities being more fully included in the public school system. All of these changes came about because of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act!
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act was adopted by Congress in 1975. Congress passed the law because nationwide children with disabilities were either excluded from the public schools (like the children at Ridge), or provided minimal educational services. Initially, the courts confronted the exclusion of children from the public schools through the civil rights movement. In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregating children in the public schools based on their race violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution. Racial segregation in the public schools denied children an equal access to a public education.³ Later, other parents pressed for equal access to the public schools for their children with disabilities.
Armed with the Brown decision, parent advocacy groups also chose the courts as a battleground to get school services for their children with disabilities. In 1972 two landmark decisions, Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania⁴ and Mills v. D.C. Board of Education,⁵ determined that children with disabilities must have equal access to public education, and parents must have a meaningful opportunity to challenge decisions excluding their children from school. Although these two decisions led the charge, there were court cases in other states seeking school services for children with disabilities.
In 1975 Congress passed Public Law 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act, which is now called the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act or the IDEA.⁶ In passing the law, Congress found that there were more than eight million handicapped children in the United States.
⁷
Sadly, Congress further found that more than half of the handicapped children in the United States do not receive appropriate educational services which would enable them to have full educational opportunity,
and one million of the handicapped children in the United States are excluded entirely from the public school system and will not go through the educational process with their peers.
Sadly, Congress further found that more than half of the handicapped children in the United States do not receive appropriate educational services which would enable them to have full educational opportunity,
⁸ and "one million of the handicapped children in the United States are excluded entirely from the public school system and will not go through the educational process with their peers."⁹ Note that these Congressional findings documenting the exclusion of children with disabilities from our nation’s schools are as recent as 1975. To remedy this national shame, the new law required that children with disabilities receive a free appropriate public education and that special education and related services be provided to children according to an Individualized Educational Program (IEP). Congress had set out to right this great wrong.
In 1990 Congress amended some of the language in the Education for All Handicapped Children Act and changed its name to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act or IDEA. Fittingly, throughout the law the term handicapped children
was replaced with the term children with disabilities.
In 1997 Congress reauthorized and amended the IDEA, and then in March 1999, the U.S. Department of Education issued new regulations interpreting the amended IDEA.¹⁰ The IDEA 97 was the first major revision of the law since its original passage as the Education for All Handicapped Children Act in 1975. The law was again amended in 2004.
Without question, this federal legislation improved the lives of millions of children with disabilities throughout the country. Many of the children, initially served by the law in the