The Washington Post Pulitzers: Carol Leonnig, National Reporting
By Carol Leonnig and The Washington Post
()
About this ebook
In September of 2014, a man leapt the White House fence, ran across the lawn, and got into the mansion, where he was only later tackled by an off-duty agent who happened by. In 2011, the Secret Service mishandled the aftermath when a shooter took aim at the White House itself, sewing confusion within the division and amongst the First Family. The mission of the Secret Service is to keep our leaders safe. In this respect, the Secret Service has had a string of failures bordering on near-catastrophe.
Carol Leonnig got beyond the stonewalling of the Secret Service, notoriously tight-lipped about its procedures, and its shortcomings, to write a meticulously researched, utterly devastating expose into one of the most vital police forces in America. She has chronicled security lapses, mishandled resources, failures from the leadership on down, and reported on the men and women who protect the President.
This Pulitzer Prize winning work offers an unprecedented window into the flaws of an agency that once seemed picture-perfect. Many agents and officers spoke to Leonnig at the risk of their livelihoods. The impact of her groundbreaking work cannot be underestimated: the President, present and future, will be safer.
Related to The Washington Post Pulitzers
Related ebooks
Zero Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Secret Service by Carol Leonnig: Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Sedition Hunters By Ryan J. Reilly: How January 6th Broke the Justice System Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mueller Report: The Final Report of the Special Counsel into Donald Trump, Russia, and Collusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Plot to Hack America: How Putin's Cyberspies and WikiLeaks Tried to Steal the 2016 Election Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Workbook on Zero Fail: The Rise And Fall Of The Secret Service by Carol Leonning (Fun Facts & Trivia Tidbits) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mueller Report Illustrated: The Obstruction Investigation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary: Peril (Illustrated Study Aid by Scott Campbell) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Whistleblower Complaint Against President Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Secret Man: The Story of Watergate's Deep Throat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bigly Book of Donald Trump Tweets: Volume 1 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Despot's Apprentice: Donald Trump's Attack on Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Laboratories of Autocracy: A Wake-Up Call from Behind the Lines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary: “A Warning" by Anonymous - Discussion Prompts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIt's Even Worse Than You Think: What the Trump Administration Is Doing to America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Crisis: What Went Wrong. How We Recover. Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Summary: “It Was All a Lie: How the Republican Party Became Donald Trump" by Stuart Stevens - Discussion Prompts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mueller Report: Complete Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference In The 2016 Presidential Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHouse of Trump, House of Putin: The Untold Story of Donald Trump and the Russian Mafia by Craig Unger | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsI Actually Did It!: Becoming Canadian because of Trump Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Citizen Trump: A One Man Show Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Steal: The Attempt to Overturn the 2020 Election and the People Who Stopped It Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump and the Erosion of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The View from Flyover Country: Dispatches from the Forgotten America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All I Ever Wanted to Know about Donald Trump I Learned From His Tweets: A Psychological Exploration of the President via Twitter Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProof of Collusion: How Trump Betrayed America Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5What Were We Thinking: A Brief Intellectual History of the Trump Era Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last of the President's Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Taking Down Trump by Tristan Snell: 12 Rules for Prosecuting Donald Trump by Someone Who Did It Successfully Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Humanity Archive: Recovering the Soul of Black History from a Whitewashed American Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anarchist Cookbook Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Washington Post Pulitzers
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Washington Post Pulitzers - Carol Leonnig
Letter of Introduction
January 21, 2015
To the Judges
Rarely has any journalist penetrated the Secret Service, one of the world’s most locked-down organizations. Yet The Washington Post’s Carol D. Leonnig did just that, turning out story after story exposing serious security lapses and official misconduct. This long-revered agency, Leonnig revealed, was not living up to its most solemn duty — to keep the president safe.
The Secret Service was anything but forthcoming about its flaws. At times, it engaged in deception to avoid scrutiny. It was routinely unresponsive to Leonnig’s inquiries. And still, The Post’s reporting has been repeatedly affirmed.
The power of Leonnig’s reporting was especially apparent over two remarkable weeks in the fall. In the days after a man leapt the White House fence on Sept. 19 and ran inside the mansion. The Post was the first to document numerous lapses, including the failure of a perimeter surveillance unit to identify the intruder, the attack dog that an officer never released, and the alarms that had been muted. Later that month, Leonnig broke yet more news regarding the fence jumper: Despite Secret Service statements that the intruder had been stopped immediately inside the front door, the man had in fact raced through much of the mansion’s main floor before being tackled in the East Room. In a subsequent scoop, Leonnig reported that the intruder’s capture was partly luck; he was tackled by an off-duty agent who happened to be walking through the mansion.
In late September, Leonnig produced her penetrating account of the Secret Service’s bungled response to a 2011 shooting attack on the White House. Her report showed for the first time that supervisors had disregarded accounts from agents who believed that bullets had struck the residence, that President Obama’s mother-in-law and daughter Sasha had been home at the time, and that the first couple were not told immediately and were incensed about the response.
Earlier in the year, Leonnig disclosed Operation Moonlight.
Agents who were supposed to be working exclusively on a White House surveillance unit had been sent to rural Maryland to monitor a neighborhood dispute involving the director’s administrative assistant. Late in the year, an investigation by the Department of Homeland Security’s inspector general found that the operation was a serious lapse in judgment.
The Secret Service said its records showed the operation lasted only days while several agents remembered it lasting many weeks — as both the Post and the IG noted — but the inspector general concluded that, however long it went on, there was no justification
for it. He said: These agents, who were there to protect the President and the White House, were improperly diverted for an impermissible purpose.
At a Sept. 30 hearing, members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee repeatedly read aloud from The Post as they questioned Secret Service Director Julia Pierson. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) said he was thankful
for The Post’s work. Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) read from Leonnig’s account of how an officer on the scene of the 2011 White House shooting who thought she heard bullets strike the mansion described her fear of being criticized if she contradicted her supervisors. Cummings prodded Pierson to ultimately concede that the officer was right.
The New York Times published an editorial that evening titled The Collapse of the Secret Service,
citing The Post four times for its unsettling revelations. Pierson resigned the next day.
Reporting on an agency that stonewalls journalists at nearly every turn is hugely challenging. And Leonnig’s huge and important volume of work on the Secret Service included one error. The Post reported that an armed private security guard who had not been screened by the Secret Service had been permitted onto an elevator with President Obama during a visit to Atlanta. That was correct. The Post’s story, however, described the unidentified guard as a convicted felon. He had not been convicted; he had been arrested. The Post published a corrective story immediately upon learning of its error. The central, and unnerving, point of the original story remains: An unauthorized armed man had breached what was supposed to be the world’s tightest security ring. Acting Director Joseph Clancy told the House Judiciary Committee in November, a month after The Post’s report, that a lack of due diligence
led to the incident and that the Secret Service on that day had failed our procedures.
Questioned more broadly by angry lawmakers about false Secret Service statements made amid Post revelations about other security lapses, Clancy assured them that, I have the same outrage as you.
Weeks later, a top-to-bottom Department of Homeland Security review prompted largely by The Post’s reporting echoed much of Leonnig’s cumulative findings — citing widespread distrust of management among the rank and file, staffing decisions that led to security gaps, and scaled-back training that left many officers unprepared for an intruder. The government report was unusually scathing as it described a dysfunctional Secret Service that is starved for leadership
and stretched beyond its limits, and it called for sweeping changes. In response, Acting Director Clancy forced out or accepted resignations from most of the agency’s top managers, declaring, Change is necessary to gain a fresh perspective on how we conduct business.
Leonnig’s reporting, based on trust she had built