Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Rolfing and Physical Reality
Rolfing and Physical Reality
Rolfing and Physical Reality
Ebook233 pages3 hours

Rolfing and Physical Reality

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

A warm and wise self-portrait of the woman who originated the therapy that bears her name. Here, Ida Rolf tells about her life, about the wonder of the human body, about life in general, and about Rolfing in particular, explaining her technique of manipulating muscle tissue to allow the body to come into its correct alignment.
After Rolfing, your body has been encouraged to do what it wants to do--you move with ease, your lungs take in more air, and you are taller (and therefore, slimmer).
LanguageEnglish
Release dateNov 1, 1990
ISBN9781620553381
Rolfing and Physical Reality
Author

Ida P. Rolf

Ida P. Rolf received her Ph.D. in biochemistry and physiology from Columbia University in 1920, and subsequently worked at the Rockefeller Institute in chemotherapy and organic chemistry. She is the founder of the Rolf Institute in Boulder, Colorado. She is also the author of Rolfing and Physical Reality.

Related to Rolfing and Physical Reality

Related ebooks

Wellness For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Rolfing and Physical Reality

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
3/5

2 ratings1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    its a collection of passages: some philosophical, aphoristic, autobiographical, poetic, instructional, reflective, etc. some r interesting. many r boring. most r mundane.only someone seriously into rolfing and ida rolf's thought would ever benefit from reading this. trying to get thru all of them is a slog, flipping thru randomly is frustratingly boring, and there is practically no organization

Book preview

Rolfing and Physical Reality - Ida P. Rolf

Introduction

I first met Ida Rolf at Esalen ten years ago. What is now called humanistic psychology or the human potential movement was then just beginning to hit its stride. People like Will Schutz, Abe Maslow, and Fritz Perls had been doing their own work for years, but when they got to Esalen it was as though they had been handed a megaphone. Showing your work at Esalen could either make your reputation or break it—Esalen was always a turning point. This was equally true for Rolfing. Ida Rolf had been working for twenty-five years in New York; she had been teaching all across the United States and in Canada and England since the 1950s. Yet it was only after she began at Esalen that Rolfing became widely known, the subject of much notice and some controversy.

The people who came to Esalen for workshops stayed to get Rolfed. Some wanted to be trained to do Rolfing, and soon there were classes in Big Sur every summer. Eventually, like so many other new things that were cradled there, Rolfing outgrew Esalen and moved out into the world. In these ten years, 180 Rolfers have been trained; there is now a Rolf Institute,¹ with a home in Boulder, Colorado, and a group of teachers, and the beginnings of research; any number of articles have been written and books are coming into being.

I was one of the people who trained as a Rolfer. And, after I learned Rolfing, I worked with IPR² a few years longer—as secretary, organizer, friend, chief-cook-and-bottle-washer, associate, and assistant in writing. The outcome of that time was a book: Rolfing: The Integration of Human Structures, by Ida Rolf. It is a big, complex book full of illustrations and intricately put together. It is a formal exposition of the nature of the human body as understood by the principles of Rolfing.³ It was quite literally an education for me to work on that book with IPR, and work on it we did for five years.

As we wrote, rewrote, and edited, I realized that I would like to see another book, one that was less formal, one that could capture the everyday feeling. Spending a day with IPR, working together, was so often a matter of moments that could shed light on a whole landscape. She was generous with her responses, unguarded and quick to let you know what she thought. This is the feeling that I’ve tried to capture here. My hope is that the serious student of Rolfing will read this book in conjunction with the formal exposition, the person who was just Rolfed may read it to get some amplification of his or her experience, and others may find in it some wisdom from a pioneering, original mind.

People like to ask about the origins of Rolfing—even to speculate and invent. Dr. Rolf tends to be reticent. On one occasion, a friend and I tried a trick. We made up a plausible lie for an article to be published in the Bulletin of Structural Integration,⁴ saying that she had started her career in an ashram in Bombay. We hoped to get the real information as she edited the piece; she changed it to read an ashram in the Bronx and let it go at that. Finally, years later, IPR and I spent a pleasant afternoon taping an interview about her early days. I found out that the ashram in the Bronx wasn’t so very far from the truth.

IPR was born in New York in 1896 and grew up in the Bronx. She attended Barnard College, graduating in 1916 in the middle of World War I. At the time, with young men fighting in Europe, the supply of qualified technical personnel in so many fields was pre-empted, and so she was given a unique opportunity for a woman at that time. She was hired by Rockefeller Institute (now Rockefeller University) in New York City, and allowed to continue her education while working there. She received a Ph.D. in biological chemistry from the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University and continued at Rockefeller, eventually attaining the rank of associate. In the late 1920s, family business, including the management of her father’s estate, forced her to leave.

Dr. Rolf started to work with people almost accidentally. As she tells the story:

During the early war years, a friend of ours one day brought his wife to call; it must have been about 1940. I was talking about the fact that I had been visiting schools. I used to come into New York once a week and visit some of the experimental schools, trying to make up my mind what kind of school I wanted to send my kids to. I think the school I was talking about was the Ethical Culture School; at any rate it was somewhere they did unusual work with music. We were talking about this work and that I admired it, and so forth—just afternoon-tea conversation. And she said, It sounds like the work my sister Ethel does. I said I’d like to meet her sister Ethel, but she said, There’s no use meeting her because she’s been through an accident and she can’t teach music any more. She can’t play the piano, she can’t use her hands, she can’t even comb her own hair.

And I said, Well, I’d like to meet your sister Ethel anyhow. So the day came when Ethel came up the front lawn. She’d fallen on a hole in the pavement in New York and she had very badly injured one hand and arm, and the other wasn’t that good. I looked at her and I said, I bet I can fix that. Do you trust me to try? You can’t be worse off. (She had just sued the City of New York and lost the suit, and she had paid all kinds of money in doctors’ bills and so forth—$20,000 anyway. So she was feeling pretty low in her mind.) I said, I’ll make a bargain with you. If I can get you to the place where you can teach music, will you teach my children? She said yes. And so I started in. I started, really, with yoga exercises, which I myself was using at that point. After we worked together about four times, she was in good enough shape to start teaching music. So we had a small class for four kids in Manhasset at my house. And that’s where Rolfing really started. Because, of course, Ethel had a friend who hadn’t been able to get help, and this friend had a friend, and so forth. And from then on my doorstep was pretty much filled with people who hadn’t gotten help elsewhere. This was the beginning of the war, by the way, and Ethel was accepted as a WAC in a year or two, so you could call that a successful undertaking.

This story contains a number of the elements in IPR’s personality that brought Rolfing into being. She had always investigated what was new and was never afraid to take what she learned and use it. She already knew a fair amount about yoga and osteopathy and had done considerable reading in homeopathy. All of these she investigated out of concern for her own health, because she too was one of the people who hadn’t been able to get help elsewhere. She told me:

As a young woman, I had been struck by a horse’s hoof on a trip to Colorado. As a result of that I had some symptoms that looked like pneumonia. The accident occurred the day before I was leaving for Yellowstone. It was a horrible trip. I had a temperature of about 104 degrees and was stranded alone in a cabin that was heated only by a stove and had no hot water. Eventually I landed in a hospital in Montana. The doctor there wasn’t satisfied with my progress and so he said, I’m going to send an osteopath in. So a young man came and after his ministrations I could breathe again. When I got well enough to walk home so to speak (there was a railroad strike in those parts at the time), I could barely get across the country. Eventually I did get across, and my mother took me to a blind osteopath in Port Jefferson, Dr. Thomas Morrison. (He was very highly regarded by his confreres: shortly before his death, they planned to build an osteopathic hospital or center on Long Island and wanted to call it the Morrison Center.) It was unusual to go to an osteopath at the time; there was still a great deal of controversy going on between the medics and the osteopaths and they were not accepted at all. I got to be friends with Morrison, and I became interested in the theory of osteopathy—that structure determines function.

Osteopathic treatment changes the way the bones of the body relate to each other, freeing obstructions between joints and thereby improving well-being. This is easy to understand in an injury caused by a traumatic impact such as Ida’s kick from a horse: in that case the simple mechanics of the situation dictate that if a rib is out of place, breathing will be difficult. When the rib is put in its proper position, breathing will be easier. Osteopaths work directly with the bony structure throughout the body.

Similarly, Rolfing seeks to enhance function by changing structure, but it differs from osteopathy in two important respects. As Rolfers, we see that bones are held in place by soft tissue—muscles, ligaments, tendons, etc. If a muscle is chronically short, it will pull the attached bone out of balance. Repositioning the bone is not enough; the individual muscle and allied tissue must be lengthened if the change is to be permanent. In addition, when one part is in trouble, the body as a whole gets out of balance. This is easy to understand in a static structure, such as a house. If, for example, a door doesn’t swing true or close properly, it really isn’t enough to rehang the door. Probably the house has settled; in order to balance the door permanently, it would be better to look to the symmetry of the foundation. Structures must be balanced as a whole— this is as true of living structures as it is of houses and bridges.

Dr. Rolf learned about homeopathy in the early 1920s when a friend of hers, who was seeing a Dr. Schmidt in Geneva, told her to go and get what they call a chronic. She remembers:

I had plenty wrong with me; I was a curvature case but I didn’t know it. And I was a prediabetic and I didn’t know that either. (Hypoglycemia hadn’t been invented in those days.) I went to Switzerland on a leave of absence from the Rockefeller Institute. I studied in Zurich during the week and on weekends I went over to Geneva and got hold of the homeopathic Materia Medica. I read all Saturday night and all Sunday night and I went back to my physics classes in Zurich on Monday morning.

Homeopathy is a branch of medicine not frequently practiced in the United States, where allopathic medicine is more popular. The difference between the two types of healing lies principally in the choice of remedy. The allopathic physician will use whatever works to alleviate a given symptom. The homeopathic physician, on the other hand, will endeavor to arouse his patient’s healing powers by giving him something that produces a temporary increase in his symptoms and then leads to what is known as a healing crisis. (This is, in some respects, similar to the ideas underlying vaccination.) One of the central theories of homeopathic medicine has to do with chronic complaints. A chronic is usually seen as an accumulation over time of different diseases imperfectly resolved, which then gather together and express themselves in a form that is long-standing and does not readily yield to treatment. In order to remedy this type of condition, the homeopathic physician must find his way back through the history of the complaint, treating first the most recent symptoms, then the earlier ones, and so on back to the earliest beginning of the problem. They believe that in this way chronic disease can be permanently dispelled. The sequence of unraveling the problem from the present to its origin was called by Hahnemann (founder of homeopathy) the law of cure.

Osteopathy and homeopathy were known to Dr. Rolf, and contributed to her early understanding of the body. But the cornerstone of her thinking was yoga (she called it yog). All through the 1920s, she belonged to a group that practiced yoga asanas (positions) and held meetings and lectures and discussions. Her teacher then was an American, Pierre

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1