The Imaginary Indian: The Image of the Indian in Canadian Culture
4/5
()
About this ebook
Read more from Daniel Francis
Becoming Vancouver: A History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Imaginary Indian
Related ebooks
Big Bear (Mistahimusqua): A Biography Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMétis in Canada: History, Identity, Law and Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStandoff: Why Reconciliation Fails Indigenous People and How to Fix It Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Long Journey: Residential Schools in Labrador and Newfoundland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGabriel Dumont Speaks 2nd Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetis Pioneers: Marie Rose Delorme Smith and Isabella Clark Hardisty Lougheed Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingskiyam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Canoe construction in a Cree cultural tradition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrazy Wolf: A Half-Breed Story Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRocky Mountain Kids Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Voyageur's Highway: Minnesota's Border Lake Land Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Ouisconsin to Caughnawaga: Or Tales of the Great Lakes First Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLouis Riel: Let Justice Be Done Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAboriginal Ontario: Historical Perspectives on the First Nations Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Serpents and Other Spiritual Beings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSoviet Religious Policy in Estonia and Latvia: Playing Harmony in the Singing Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mounties: Tales of Adventure and Danger from the Early Days Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Canadian Girl's Memoir: The Early Years Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5James Macleod: The Red Coats' First True Leader Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNipissing: Historic Waterway, Wilderness Playground Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Auburn: The Classic City Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Queen at the Council Fire: The Treaty of Niagara, Reconciliation, and the Dignified Crown in Canada Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Salish People: Volume III: The Mainland Halkomaelem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCanada and the Métis, 1869-1885 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlaying the Indian Card Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWriting Indian Nations: Native Intellectuals and the Politics of Historiography, 1827-1863 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Sea of Grass: A Family Tale from the American Heartland Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Pemmican Eaters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Time Bomb: Canada and the First Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Native American History For You
Black Elk: The Life of an American Visionary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Island of the Blue Dolphins: The Complete Reader's Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lakota Woman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Deaths of Sybil Bolton: Oil, Greed, and Murder on the Osage Reservation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee: An Indian History of the American West Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Everything That Is: The Untold Story of Red Cloud, An American Legend Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nine Years Among the Indians, 1870-1879: The Story of the Captivity and Life of a Texan Among the Indians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing Crazy Horse: The Merciless Indian Wars in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5We Survived the End of the World: Lessons from Native America on Apocalypse and Hope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThey Called Me Number One Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The First Frontier: The Forgotten History of Struggle, Savagery, & Endurance in Early America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5NATIVE AMERICAN MYTHS: collected 1636–1919 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Captivity of the Oatman Girls: Being an Interesting Narrative of Life among the Apache and Mohave Indians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEverything You Wanted to Know About Indians But Were Afraid to Ask Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Kin: An Indigenous Call to Unforgetting the Past and Reimagining Our Future Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Cahokia Mounds: America's First City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Killers of the Flower Moon: The Osage Murders and the Birth of the FBI By David Grann Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe North-West Is Our Mother: The Story of Louis Riel's People, the Métis Nation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Captivity of the Oatman Girls Among the Apache and Mohave Indians Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daughters of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5365 Days Of Walking The Red Road: The Native American Path to Leading a Spiritual Life Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Trail of Tears:The 19th Century Forced Migration of Native Americans Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Other Slavery: The Uncovered Story of Indian Enslavement in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Life Among the Piutes: Their Wrongs and Claims Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for The Imaginary Indian
8 ratings1 review
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Indian is a familiar icon in Canadian culture. In this book, Daniel Francis shows us that the iconic Indian is largely imaginary -- made up by non-Aboriginals based on fears, prejudices and romanticised ideals.From the beginning, Indians were treated as something less than fully developed individual people or communities. The name Indian itself comes from Columbus not knowing where he was. Plains Indians had little in common with those from the west or east coasts, yet were lumped together as one group of people. As the government tried to assimilate Indians, they wanted to modernize their image: to show them as farmers rather than as warriors. Environmentalists appropriated the Indian as a true steward of the earth. No one just let them be who they were.Leaving our Indians -- and other aboriginal peeoples -- with similar problems today. Stereotypical thinking abounds, some of it good, but most of it not. This book deepened my understanding of Canada's cultural views towards First Nations. I wish Mr. Francis would bring his book up to date by examining current images and beliefs surrounding issues like the barracades in Caledonia, Ontario or the Oka crisis.
Book preview
The Imaginary Indian - Daniel Francis
THE IMAGINARY INDIAN
Copyright © 1992 by Daniel Francis
Preface and afterword © 2011 by Daniel Francis
Second edition: 2011
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any means without the written permission of the publisher, except by a reviewer, who may use brief excerpts in a review.
ARSENAL PULP PRESS
#101-211 East Georgia St.
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6A 1Z6
arsenalpulp.com
The publisher gratefully acknowledges the support of the Canada Council for the Arts and the British Columbia Arts Council for its publishing program, and the Government of Canada (through the Canada Book Fund) and the Government of British Columbia (through the Book Publishing Tax Credit Program) for its publishing activities.
Photograph of the author by Patrick Francis
CANADIAN CATALOGUING IN PUBLICATION DATA:
Francis, Daniel, 1947-
The imaginary Indian [electronic resource] : the image of the Indian in Canadian culture / Daniel Francis. -- 2nd ed.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Electronic monograph in PDF format.
Issued also in print format.
ISBN 978-1-55152-324-8
1. Indians of North America—Canada—Public opinion. 2. Indians of North America—Canada—Mass media. 3. Canada—Popular culture. I. Title.
E98.P99F73 2011a 305.897'071 C2011-905444-2
Preface to the Second Edition
As the twentieth anniversary of The Imaginary Indian’s first publication approaches, this new edition allows me to acknowledge a debt which I did not even know was owed when the book first came out in 1992. Over the years when asked where the title came from, I answered truthfully that I did not recall. The phrase is so wonderfully concise and descriptive it is no surprise that I chose it, but who suggested it to me? I never assumed that I was the first to use it, but when the book first appeared neither was I aware of anyone else who had. (The idea of The Imaginary Indian
derives from Robert Berkhofer Jr’s wonderful 1978 book, The White Man’s Indian, but Berkhofer does not use the phrase itself.) It was only after my book was published that I discovered that Marcia Crosby had written an essay titled Construction of the Imaginary Indian,
which appeared in Vancouver Anthology: The Institutional Politics of Art, edited by Stan Douglas and published by Talonbooks and the Or Gallery a year before my book was published and presented as a lecture a year before that (1990). Crosby, whom I have not met, is a Haida/Tsimpshian art historian. Her essay discusses the ways that Euro-Canadians consistently have appropriated Indian images to use for their own purposes. Even when the representations are positive, Crosby argues, their use reveals more about non-Aboriginals than it does about the people they are supposed to represent. Emily Carr loved the same Indians Victorian society rejected,
writes Crosby, and whether they were embraced or rejected does not change the fact that they were Imaginary Indians.
My belated discovery of Crosby’s essay was embarrassing not just because I should have known about it but also because it makes my own use of the phrase appear to be an example of the appropriation which she discusses in her essay. So now I am able to plead ignorance, a slightly less serious literary crime than wilful plagiarism, and to apologize for inadvertently appropriating Ms Crosby’s excellent phrase.
Another question that has arisen often over the past twenty years is why I chose to indulge in the first person narrative. Why make the book sometimes about me rather than a straightforward objective history? My intention in writing the book was to present a way of thinking about the relations between Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people that asks non-Aboriginals like myself to re-examine their prejudices. In other words, I wanted to accomplish what every writer wants to accomplish: change the way the reader sees the world. For this reason the first-person seemed not just appropriate but necessary. I did not want to accuse readers of anything, nor to preach at them like an omniscient Voice of God.
If I hoped to engage them in an examination of their preconceptions about Indians,
it seemed like a good idea to begin with my own. As a result, I have always been a bit nonplussed when readers ask me, as they frequently do, You’ve exposed all these images and stereotypes that are inaccurate. But you don’t say what you think the real Indian is?
My answer never seems to satisfy but it is the only answer I have: the whole point of my book is that such a question should not be asked, at least not of me. There is no correct
image of the Indian, or if there is I am not the person to be saying what it is. That comes from the First Nations themselves. My book presents the question; answering it is the responsibility of the reader.
The Imaginary Indian marked an important step in my evolution as a writer. While working on it I came to recognize the approach to history that would characterize most if not all of my subsequent books. I realized that I was preoccupied less with what happened in history than with what people thought happened (and the gap between the two is often wide). Why do we believe what we believe about the past? That became the question that I tried to answer. In the case of The Imaginary Indian, for example, I am examining the images and stereotypes non-Aboriginal Canadians have had about Aboriginals and wondering where they came from. In the book which followed, National Dreams: Myth, Memory and Canadian History, I identified some of the driving narratives of Canadian history and thought about why they had had such a strong hold on our imaginations. But even in subsequent books that were less overtly about image and stereotype, my interest tends to gravitate to the why, not the what. For example, in 2004 I published a biography about an early mayor of Vancouver, Louis D. Taylor (L.D.: Mayor Louis Taylor and the Rise of Vancouver). Part of what interested me about Taylor was the fact that he had disappeared so completely from the historical record. In a sense what I ended up writing was a history of a reputation. Why had Vancouverites washed their memories of their longest-serving mayor? My biography was an attempt to answer that question. It was with The Imaginary Indian that this tendency to investigate history as a set of unreliable narratives began. As such it has a special meaning for me and I am pleased to have a chance to present this second edition in the hope that it will find another generation of readers who share my interest in these issues.
What was done becomes clear enough. What people thought they were doing is much less clear, but often much more important.
—J.E. Chamberlin, The Harrowing of Eden, 1975
It is useless for us to become involved in a struggle to improve our image, because native people did not create these images, and they should not be concerned with trying to improve them so that whites will respect them. The society would simply create new racist images for us to work at...
—Howard Adams, Prison of Grass, 1975
Contents
Acknowledgements
Foreword by Randy Fred
Preface to the Second Edition
1. Introduction
I. TAKING THE IMAGE
2. The Vanishing Canadian
3. Writing Off the Indian
4. Red Coats and Redskins
II. PRESENTING THE IMAGE
5. Performing Indians
6. Celebrity Indians and Plastic Shamans
7. Indians of Childhood
III. APPROPRIATING THE IMAGE
8. Marketing the Imaginary Indian
IV. IMPLEMENTING THE IMAGE
9. The Bureaucrat’s Indian
10. Guns and Feathers
Afterword to the Second Edition
Endnotes
Sources Consulted
Index
About the author
Acknowledgments
In the course of my research for this book, I acquired many debts: to archivists and librarians who gave so freely on their knowledge; to the authors of the many books I pillaged for insights and information; to family and friends who endured my harangues on the subject with tolerant patience; and to Brian Lam and his colleagues at Arsenal Pulp Press for being so supportive of the project. Special thanks are reserved for three friends: Jim Taylor, whose interest in the subject got me going in the first place; Donald B. Smith, whose knowledge of the Indian image far exceeds my own and who generously shared the contents of his voluminous files; and Stephen Osborne, editor and friend, who helped me work out my ideas in conversation, and then in prose. They get the credit for inspiring the project; I get the blame if the final result fails to live up to our shared expectations.
Foreword
BY RANDY FRED
My first contact with white kids was in grade seven, when kids from the residential school were bussed into town so we could go to a public
school. We didn’t want to be there, and it was pretty clear the white kids didn’t want us to be there either. Social Studies was the worst class, because Indians were some-times its subject. I didn’t know who the Iroquois were, or who the Hurons were (no other Indians were mentioned in those classes), but I knew they were Indians, and so was I.
They were savage people, the Indians we learned about in the Social Studies class.
Residential school kids were not to associate with reserve kids—many of whom, where I lived, were my close relatives. The rule was that we couldn’t go within ten feet of the chicken-wire fence separating the schoolyard from the reserve. Reserve kids, we were told again and again, were dirty and useless. This was a problem for me, because in the summer I lived on the other side of the fence: for a couple of months every year, I was a reserve kid.
I was in that school for nine years. When I got out of there it was like getting out of jail.
We saw the same movies in that school that white kids did: westerns; and, like them, we cheered on the cowboys or the cavalry. We too played Cowboys and Indians—and we all wanted to be cowboys.
I felt I had a special claim on cowboys, as I was named after Randolph Scott, one of the biggest movie cowboys.
I was twenty years old when I woke up in a hospital bed in Jasper, Alberta, and heard a doctor say: These Indians don’t know how to take care of themselves.
I had a job, I had a good wage, I had insurance. But there was nothing I could say.
At about the same time, I learned that I was slowly going blind: I had retinitis pigmentosa, as the doctors like to say. Since then my sight has been diminishing. These days I am entitled to a white cane, and when I carry it, I see how easily the white cane blinds people to my Indian-ness. As long as I carry the cane, I hear no slurs when I stumble; but without the cane, I hear enough that will not bear repeating. In 1976 I found myself in Stanley Park on a Sunday afternoon, down by Lumberman’s Arch. There was some kind of arts and crafts show happening, and there were several booths—all run by non-Natives, to my dismay—displaying paintings of Indian-like people, all of whom had the same expression on their faces—frowning and looking very mean and stony—even though they had been painted by different artists.
Native people live within a world of imagery that isn’t their own: in this book Dan Francis shows us where that world of imagery comes from, and how necessary it is that we struggle to sweep it away.
Randy Fred is a member of the Tseshaht First Nation and the founder of Theytus Books in Penticton. He lives in Nanaimo, BC.
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction
... the indians
are not composed of
the romantic stories
about them ...
—John Newlove, The Pride
SOME YEARS AGO a friend and I decided to pay a visit to Head-Smashed-In Buffalo Jump. Located where the prairie meets the foothills in southwestern Alberta, Head-Smashed-In is a high cliff over which Native people stampeded the great herds of buffalo hundreds of years ago. Archaeologists believe that people used this place as a slaughterhouse for almost 6,000 years. The United Nations has declared it a World Heritage Site, one of the most culturally significant places in the world.
We drove south from Calgary on a sunny Thanksgiving day. On our left the flat plain ran away to the horizon under a wide, blue sky; on our right the land folded into rolling hills all the way to the Rocky Mountains, faintly visible in the distance. There were few signposts along the way and we had begun to fear that we had missed the turnoff when at last we spotted the sign and left the highway on a meandering strip of asphalt heading west toward the mountains. Just about the time we once again thought we must be lost, we arrived at a gravel parking lot, seemingly in the middle of nowhere. We were there.
The site at first seemed unimpressive. The visitors’ centre, actually a mini-museum, is a concrete building several stories high embedded in the face of the cliff. It appears to have been built to make as little impact on the landscape as possible. Entering at the front door, we climbed up through a series of levels and emerged at the top of the cliff, at the edge of the buffalo jump, right where the stampeding animals would have run out into empty space and begun the long, bellowing fall onto the rocks below.
The anthropologist George MacDonald has written that the three holiest places in Canada are a row of stone statues at Eskimo Point in Nunavut, Bill Reid’s large cedar carving, The Raven and the First Men,
at Vancouver’s Museum of Anthropology, and the abandoned Haida village of Ninstints on Anthony Island. Well, I thought, as I looked out from the clifftop across a vast sweep of undulating prairie, lightening and darkening as the billowing clouds obscured the sun and set it free again, add a fourth; if by holy you mean a place where the warm wind seems to be the earth breathing, a place where personal identity dissolves temporarily, where you can feel the connectedness of lives back through time to be a reality, and not just an opinion.
Back inside the museum, looking at the various items depicting the history of the buffalo and the people who hunted them, my attention shifted from the display cases to the people who were tending them. I became aware that the facility was staffed entirely by Indians (Peigan, as it turned out, from a nearby reserve). But I found myself thinking that they didn’t look like Indians to me, the Indians I knew from my school books and from the movies, the Indians, in fact, who were depicted inside the museum displays I was looking at. That is where most of us are used to seeing Indians, from the other side of a sheet of glass. But at Head-Smashed-In, they were running the place. They stood around in jeans and dresses and plaid shirts—not feather headdresses and leather moccasins—talking and laughing. If curious visitors like myself asked them something, they answered thoroughly but not pedantically: as if this was some-thing they knew, not something they had studied.
After a long afternoon learning about the buffalo, I left Head-Smashed-In dimly aware that I had changed my mind about something. It had been an encounter not just with an important place in the history of the continent, but also with an idea, my own idea about what an Indian was. If I thought I had known before, I didn’t think I knew anymore. And perhaps that is where this book began. How had I come to believe in an Imaginary Indian?
II
In 1899, the poet Charles Mair travelled into the far Northwest as secretary to the Half-Breed Scrip Commission, appointed by the government in Ottawa to carry out negotiations related to Treaty Number Eight with the Native people of northern Alberta. Negotiations began on the shore of Lesser Slave Lake, before a large tent with a spacious marquee beneath which the members of the official party arranged themselves. The Native people, Beaver and Metis, sat on the ground in the sun, or stood in small knots. As the speeches droned on through the long June afternoon, Mair observed the people as they listened to what the government emissaries had to say. Instead of paint and feathers, the scalp-lock, the breech-clout, and the buffalo robe,
he later wrote:
there presented itself a body of respectable-looking men, as well dressed and evidently quite as independent in their feelings as any like number of average pioneers in the East ... One was prepared, in this wild region of forest, to behold some savage types of men; indeed, I craved to renew the vanished scenes of old. But, alas! one beheld, instead, men with well-washed unpainted faces, and combed and common hair; men in suits of ordinary store-clothes, and some even with boiled
if not laundered shirts. One felt disappointed, even defrauded. It was not what was expected, what we believed we had a right to expect, after so much waggoning and tracking and drenching and river turmoil and trouble. [1]
Unlike most Canadians of his time, Charles Mair possessed extensive knowledge of the country’s Native people, living as he had for so many years as a merchant trader in the future province of Saskatchewan. He knew well that the contemporary Indian no longer galloped across the plains in breechcloth and feathered headdress. However, Mair did expect to discover in the more isolated regions of the north a Native population closer to his image of the picturesque Red Man. His disappointment was profound when instead he found a group of commonplace men smoking briar-roots.
III
Two very similar experiences, almost a century apart. Charles Mair, myself, and how many other White people, having to relearn the same lesson: Indians, as we think we know them, do not exist. In fact, there may well be no such thing as an Indian.
Indirectly, we all know this to be true; it is one of the lessons we learn as school children. When Christopher Columbus arrived in America five hundred years ago he thought he had reached the East Indies so he called the people he met Indians. But really they were Arawaks, and they had as much in common with the Iroquois of the northern woodlands as the Iroquois had in common with the Blackfoot of the western Plains or the Haida of the Pacific Coast. In other words, when Columbus arrived in America there were a large number of different and distinct indigenous cultures, but there were no Indians.
The Indian is the invention of the European.
Robert Berkhofer Jr. introduced me to this unsettling idea in his book, The White Man’s Indian. Since the original inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere neither called themselves by a single term nor understood themselves as a collectivity
Berkhofer began, "the idea and the image of the Indian must be a White conception. Native Americans were and are real, but the Indian was a White invention... " [2]
The Indian began as a White man’s mistake, and became a White man’s fantasy. Through the prism of White hopes, fears and prejudices, indigenous Americans would be seen to have lost contact with reality and to have become Indians
; that is, anything non-Natives wanted them to be.
IV
This book attempts to describe the image of the Indian, the Imaginary Indian, in Canada since the middle of the nineteenth century. During this time, what did Canadians think an Indian was? What did children learn about them in school? What was government policy toward them? What Indian did painters paint and writers write about? I want to make it perfectly clear that while Indians are the subject of this book, Native people are not. This is a book about the images of Native people that White Canadians manufactured, believed in, feared, despised, ad-mired, taught their children. It is a book about White—and not Native—cultural history.
Many of the images of Indians held by Whites were derogatory, and many were not. Many contained accurate representations of Native people; many did not. The truth
of the image is not really what concerns me. I am not setting out to expose fraudulent images by comparing them to a real Indian.
It is, after all, the argument of this book that there is no such thing as a real Indian. When non-Native accounts of Indians are at variance with the known facts I will say so, but my main intention is not to argue with the stereotypes, but to think about them. The last thing I want to do is to replace an outdated Imaginary Indian with my very own, equally misguided, version. My concern is rather to understand where the Imaginary Indian came from, how Indian imagery has affected public policy in Canada and how it has shaped, and continues to shape, the myths non-Natives tell themselves about being Canadians.
Every generation claims a clearer grasp of reality than its predecessors. Our forebears held ludicrous ideas about certain things, we say confidently, but we do not. For instance, we claim to see Indians today much more clearly for what they are. I hope that my book will undermine such confidence. Much public discourse about Native people still deals in stereotypes. Our views of what constitutes an Indian today are as much bound up with myth, prejudice and ideology as earlier versions were. If the Indian really is imaginary, it could hardly be otherwise.
Take, for example, the controversial 1991 decision by Chief Justice Allan McEachern of the Supreme Court of British Columbia relating to the Gitksan-Wet’suwet’en land claims case. Much of what Judge McEachern wrote about Native culture in that decision could as easily have been written by another judge one hundred, two hundred, three hundred years ago. In dismissing the Natives’ claim, he wrote: The plaintiffs’ ancestors had no written language, no horses or wheeled vehicles, slavery and starvation was not uncommon, wars with neighbouring peoples were common, and there is no doubt, to quote Hobbs [sic], that aboriginal life in the territory was, at best, ’nasty, brutish and short.’
[3]
It is unclear whether Judge McEachern was aware when he borrowed this well-worn phrase that Thomas Hobbes actually coined it in 1651 to describe "the savage people of