Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
These comments examine a roughly hewn history of the Biblical stories of Adam and Eve. Greenblatt is both a modernist and postmodernist. He reduces complex phenomena. He expresses grievance for politically favored identities.
For example, he reduces the existence of the early Genesis text to an innate human compulsion towards stories with nonsensical components, such as fairy tales. Similarly, he grieves for the way Eve was used to justify “murder” by early and medieval Christians.
This is standard fare in today’s literature on this topic.
Leavened with these comments, however, Greenblatt’s account is no longer standard. Instead, the entire work stands as an unwitting testimony to a larger, more comprehensive history. Open the comments and see.
Greenblatt’s prologue indicates that, during his teenage years, he “dies” to his parent’s cultural cognitive space. No wonder he ends up sitting in an endowed chair as a Professor of Humanities at Harvard. He is “born again” to Big Government Liberalism.
Indeed, his mission is to announce the demise of his parent’s cultural cognitive space. This is required by BGL. However, in the epilogue, he glances longingly back to the stories of Adam and Eve. They provide something that a scientific account of human evolution cannot: meaning.
Greenblatt never imaginatively enters the stories of Adam and Eve. He writes of those who do. Yet, in the very construction of his work, he re-enacts Saint Paul’s vision. Through Adam, paradise is lost. Through Christ, heaven is gained.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Zuckerman, Li and Diener's Article (2018) "Religion as an Exchange System" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Barrett and Krystalli Damilati’s Essay (2004) "Some Light on the Early Origins of Them All" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Sensible and Social Construction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Miguel Espinoza's Essay (2012) "Physics and the Intelligibility of Nature" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marie George’s Essay (2019) "Aquinas Teachings on Concepts and Words" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Dan Pattee’s Essay (2016) Social Justice and Catholic Social Thought Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve
Related ebooks
Reconciling Genesis and Science: Unlocking the Theories of Creation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFaith or Gullibility? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Pagan and Christian Creeds: Their Origin and Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLucifer's Roles: A Literary Composite of the Antichrist Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Golden Cord: A Short Book on the Secular and the Sacred Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Four Phases of Morals: Socrates, Aristotle, Christianity, Utilitarianism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Bible and Modern Criticism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience and Christianity: An Introduction to the Issues Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBear's Adventures in Muse Hollow: The Stars Sang Together! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond Human?: Science and the changing face of humanity Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Love and Quasars: An Astrophysicist Reconciles Faith and Science Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Did You Know About Bible History? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusted: Exposing Popular Myths about Christianity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTribalism: An Existential Threat to Humanity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRichard Dawkins’ God Delusion: A Repentant Refutation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCascade Companion to Evil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Order of God: Renewing the Doctrine of God for Twenty-First-Century Christians Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroducing Science and Religion: A path through polemic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntelligent Evolution: How Alfred Russel Wallace's World of Life Challenged Darwinism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dna of Scripture: How True Natural Science Confirms the Holy Scriptures as True Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYahweh, the God of the Hebrews, Is Not the Only God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Compendium of the Doctrines of Genesis 1-11 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEden Evolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fable of the Genesis Creation Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Foundation of Everything: Genesis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Redeemed Good Defense: The Great Controversy as a Theodicy Response to the Evidential Problem of Evil Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMoses and the Big Bang: Science and Divine Creation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExpose Three Evil of the CCP: Century Sentence, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod Is Here to Stay: Science, Evolution, and Belief in God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Essential Wisdom for Getting Through the Storm Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mindfulness in Plain English: 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education: An Emotional Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Be Here Now Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The City of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Brain Training with the Buddha: A Modern Path to Insight Based on the Ancient Foundations of Mindfulness Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lessons of History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve - Razie Mah
Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2017
Notes on Text
This work comments on a book by a professor of humanities at Harvard University. The book is titled, The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve, and is published by W.W. Norton & Company.
My goal is to examine the book from the perspective of the first singularity. The hypothesis of the first singularity addresses the question: Why civilization?
As such, two essays serve as prerequisites to this work: The First Singularity and its Fairy Tale Trace and Comments of Original Sin and Original Death.
Greenblatt’s book is also a prerequisite.
‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.
Table of Contents
Don’t Look Up
Chapters 1, 2 and 3
Chapters 4, 5 and 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8, 9 and 10
Chapters 12, 13 and 14
Don’t Look Up
0001 Stephen Greenblatt, the John Cogan Professor of the Humanities at Harvard University, is an expert on the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the period that Leo Strauss initially identifies as founding the modern era. In particular, Strauss points the finger at Thomas Hobbes, a contemporary of the poet, John Milton.
0002 Later, Strauss shifts his accusation to Machiavelli.
0003 Why this shift?
Machiavelli is interested in power. Hobbes writes about truth and power.
0004 Modernists are interested in scientific truth and mechanical power. Post-modernists are fixated on social power. The first goes with Hobbes. The second attaches to Machiavelli. The first comes in the form of reduction. The second harvests grievance and ambition.
Greenblatt is both modern and postmodern. He is a Big Government Liberal.
0005 In the prologue, Greenblatt tells