Trouvez votre prochain book favori

Devenez membre aujourd'hui et lisez gratuitement pendant 30 joursCommencez vos 30 jours gratuits

Informations sur le livre

How to Write a Scientific Paper

Name: How to Write a Scientific Paper
Brand: Jari Saramäki
Price: 9.99 USD
Availability: InStock
Rating: 5.0 (2 reviews)
ISBN: 9781386140917

De Jari Saramäki

Actions du livre

Commencer à lire

Notes:

Évaluation : 5 sur 5 étoiles5/5 (2 évaluations)

Longueur: 105 pages1 heure

Éditeur:: Jari Saramäki
Sortie:: Oct 30, 2018
ISBN:: 9781386140917
Format:: Livre

Description

What if writing scientific papers was faster, easier, and a bit less painful?

This book provides a step-by-step, top-down approach that makes it easier to turn your hard-won results into research papers that are focused, readable, and exciting.

The book's systematic approach builds on what I've learned through coauthoring close to 100 research papers with students. You'll learn how to outline your paper from top to down, how to develop your story, and how to think about what to write before you write it. You'll also learn how to deal with many issues that writers of science commonly face, from the fear of the blank page to dealing with critical reviews.

Lire plus

Actions du livre

Commencer à lire

Informations sur le livre

How to Write a Scientific Paper

De Jari Saramäki

Notes:

Évaluation : 5 sur 5 étoiles5/5 (2 évaluations)

Longueur: 105 pages1 heure

Description

What if writing scientific papers was faster, easier, and a bit less painful?

This book provides a step-by-step, top-down approach that makes it easier to turn your hard-won results into research papers that are focused, readable, and exciting.

Lire plus

Éditeur:: Jari Saramäki
Sortie:: Oct 30, 2018
ISBN:: 9781386140917
Format:: Livre

À propos de l'auteur

Jari Saramäki

Auteurs liés

Skip carousel

carousel previous carousel next

En rapport avec How to Write a Scientific Paper

Catégories liées

Ignorer le carrousel

Aperçu du livre

How to Write a Scientific Paper - Jari Saramäki

clearly.

Why Does Writing Feel So Hard?

Being a writer is a very peculiar sort of a job: it's always you versus a blank sheet of paper (or a blank screen) and quite often the blank piece of paper wins. ― Neil Gaiman

Every scientist has struggled with writing at some point. Most of us struggle with every paper we write. Science is hard, and so is writing. Together they are harder. If you are a PhD student, you can add in a lack of experience as a researcher and as a writer. And when you combine all of that with the usual time pressure, it is no wonder that the blank document in front of you looks like the north face of Mount Everest. It looks impossible. We have all been there, staring at that wall.

While no mountaineer would risk climbing Everest without a route plan, an inexperienced writer tends to neglect the importance of planning. Having no plan, she tries to do everything at once. She opens a blank document in her editor. She stares at the document—still blank—and tries to think of the first word of the first sentence of the first paragraph. But because she doesn’t yet know what story the first paragraph (or the whole paper) should tell, she tries to figure that out at the same time as choosing the first word. She doesn’t necessarily even realise that this is happening. The first sentence just feels excruciatingly difficult to write. It feels like a looming vertical cliff covered in ice, too steep to climb. And that’s just the first sentence.

At the same time, our writer is still—perhaps unbeknownst to herself—in the process of understanding her results and what to make of them. She might even be uncertain of the point that her paper should make. Everything is undecided. Everything is hanging in the air. The cliff is slippery. It is hard to get a grip on anything.

Under these circumstances, it is not surprising that writing feels impossible. It is almost impossible if you don’t have a plan for how to proceed. No one can solve all these problems at the same time, from choosing the right words to figuring out what it is that you want to tell the world. Problems are best solved one at a time.

Writing becomes much easier if you separate the process of thinking from the process of writing. To write clearly is to think clearly, and for scientific papers thinking should precede writing. Writing becomes much less of a struggle if you first think through the right things in the right order.

Think of, say, a software project. At the beginning, the software architects and developers consider the big picture: what should the software do? What functions and classes are needed for it to work? No developer would ever begin by writing code for the internal bits and pieces of these functions and classes without knowing how they interface with the rest of the program. It is meaningless to write code for functions whose purpose and specifications are unclear.

Similarly, a successful paper-writing project should never begin at the level of words and sentences. Rather, it should begin at the level of ideas and structure. It is much more efficient to first consider what the point of the paper is and how to best communicate the results in terms of structure and storyline. Details such as sentences should be left for the final stages of writing.

Another way of looking at the problem of writing is linearity versus modularity. The fear of the blank page arises out of linearity: the feeling that the only way to fill the page is from left to right, starting with the first word and proceeding towards the last, sentence by sentence, word by word. This is not so. Whereas reading is usually linear, writing does not have to be. The process of writing should be modular: first, sculpt your raw materials into rough blocks that together form your story, and then start working on the blocks, filling in more and more details until entire sentences begin to appear towards the end of this process.

In this book, you will learn an approach wherein the writing process is divided into a series of hierarchical tasks. This makes it easier and less painful to get from a pile of results to a polished research paper.

This top-down approach begins by identifying the key point of the paper and then involves structuring the material that supports this point into a storyline. That’s right: scientific papers are stories. They are not just containers of information! This storyline is then condensed into the abstract of the paper—my advice is to always write the abstract first, not last. This is unconventional, but it works. Writing the abstract first serves as an acid test: if you cannot do it, your storyline is not ready. But if you can, congratulations, because now you know the point of your paper and have a story to tell.

After finishing the first draft of the abstract, there are many steps to be taken before writing complete sentences again. These include planning the order of presentation and figures and mapping the story into paragraphs so that the topic and point of each paragraph is decided in advance. Then, the paragraph contents are expanded into rough sketches, and finally these sketches are transformed into whole sentences. At this point, there is no fear of the blank page because there are no blank pages. For each section and for each paragraph, there is a map and a route plan, and the only decision that you need to make is how to best transform that plan into a series of words.

There is an additional bonus for writers who have a good plan: it becomes possible to make progress whenever there is a gap in the schedule. When writing without a plan, it is very difficult to come up with much useful text if you unexpectedly get 15 minutes of spare time because your commuter train is delayed. If you have no plan, it takes all of those 15 minutes just to remember where the paper was supposed to be going. But when writing with a plan, you can just have a look at your notes and immediately start turning those notes into sentences. This way, you become much more productive.

When you have transformed your outline into text, the outcome of this top-down approach is a finished draft of the manuscript that already resembles the polished end product. But it shouldn’t be too polished. It is usually much faster to write a quick-and-dirty first draft and then edit it several times than it is to attempt flawless sentences from the outset. Editing is much faster than writing and—at least for me—much less painful.

So, let’s get started! I hope you now have a number of results at hand and at least a vague idea of their meaning. It is time to figure out together what it is that you want to tell the world!

Part I

Story

How To Choose The Key Point Of Your Paper

"Most of the fundamental ideas of science are essentially simple, and may, as a rule, be expressed in a language comprehensible to everyone." ― Albert Einstein

Let's begin our top-down approach to writing your paper at

Vous avez atteint la fin de cet aperçu. Inscrivez-vous pour en lire plus !

Commencez votre essai gratuit

Page 1 sur 1

Avis

i love this book. It helped me get over the fear of a "blank page", which used to make academic writing a pain.

Rating: 5

Langue

Bienvenue sur Scribd !

Trouvez votre prochain book favori

Informations sur le livre

How to Write a Scientific Paper

Actions du livre

Description

Actions du livre

Informations sur le livre

How to Write a Scientific Paper

Description

À propos de l'auteur

Auteurs liés

En rapport avec How to Write a Scientific Paper

The Scientist's Guide to Writing: How to Write More Easily and Effectively throughout Your Scientific Career

Research Paper Writing & Publishing: A Step-by-Step Guide for Biomedical Sciences

Thesis Statement: How to Write a Good Thesis Statement

The College Student's Guide to Writing A Great Research Paper: 101 Easy Tips & Tricks to Make Your Work Stand Out

Writing Your Dissertation Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide

Writing Science in Plain English

Academic research and writing: A concise introduction

How to Finish Your Dissertation in Six Months, Even if You Don't Know What to Write

The Researcher's Bible

Scientific Writing = Thinking in Words

The Craft of Scientific Communication

Scientific Papers and Presentations

Research Papers For Dummies

The Only Academic Phrasebook You'll Ever Need: 600 Examples of Academic Language

Academic Writing & Research: How to Write a Good, Strong, Important and Interesting Thesis

How to Write a Master's Dissertation: Outline and Examples

Research Proposals: A Guide to Success

How to Complete and Survive a Doctoral Dissertation

Writing Your Dissertation in Fifteen Minutes a Day: A Guide to Starting, Revising, and Finishing Your Doctoral Thesis

Research Methods for Students, Academics and Professionals: Information Management and Systems

How to Write a Thesis: Quick Tips on How to Finish your Thesis or Dissertation

Analysing Data For Your PhD: An Introduction: PhD Knowledge, #3

Case Study as Research Method: A Practical Handbook

Writing a Research Paper: Quick and Easy Guide

Academic Writing Guide: Paragraph Structure

How to Write an Exceptional Thesis or Dissertation: A Step-by-Step Guide from Proposal to Successful Defense

Research Proposal: Academic Writing Guide for Graduate Students

Research Methods: Information, Systems, and Contexts

Methods of Research: Simple, Short, And Straightforward Way Of Learning Methods Of Research

The Everything Guide To Writing Research Papers Book: Ace Your Next Project With Step-by-step Expert Advice!

Double Your Productivity and Focus on What Matters with Marc Effron

Special Topic Issue: Power

Power Development for Golf

055: Note to Parents of Adolescent Kids: Stay Out if You Want In by Dr. Tim Loving of Science of Relationships

Interval Training for the Senior Population

Text in the Social Sciences Session 4: Topic Modeling: Félix Krawatzek and Andy Eggers discuss methods to analyse large bodies of text in more systematic and reliable ways.

Tactical Strength and Conditioning Special Topic Issue

The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory: The Complete Idiot's Guide to String Theory

Interview with SCJ Editor in Chief

Episode117: Science vs. Experience [Joe D. Rant Alert!]: This week, Joe reads an email from a listener who wants to know his thoughts on "Scientific Research vs Practical Experience". This leads to an episode-long rant on the topic. Enjoy :) For Show Notes & Timestamps go to Joe DeFranco's...

Carl Zimmer: Understanding Heredity: Drawing on scientific research and his own experiences with his two daughters, Zimmer offers a fascinating new way to understanding heredity and who we really are.

Quantum Leap: A New Alchemy of Science and Spirituality: Pa'Ris'Ha and the Quantum Leap Book Club Co-Hosts begin their discussion of "Mind Into Matter: A New Alchemy of Science and Spirituality”

The Skeptics Guide #135 - Feb 20 2008

The Skeptics Guide #789 - Aug 22 2020

What it Means to Learn Science: Professors Megan Bang and Carrie Tsou discuss the need for change in science education.

Paula Poundstone's new show launches July 8

The Skeptics Guide #478 - Sep 6 2014

041: Afraid to Ask Someone Out? Read This by Lisa Hoplock with Science of Relationships

The Long and Winding Road: DNA Evidence for Human Migration; Plus July Issue Highlights: The Long and Winding Road: DNA Evidence for Human Migration; Plus July Issue Highlights

The Skeptics Guide #446 - Feb 1 2014

257: Mind Pump vs. Jim Stoppani: There is probably no other industry that passes off pseudo-science as science more than the fitness industry. More often than not this is done to build authority and to earn a profit. Of course, most fitness enthusiasts are hungry for results and are...

Ep 169: Pathological Science with Ken Hite: Feast your ears on scientific crankery as the boys talk pathological science with Ken Hite! Pathological Science deals with experiments and results that didn’t quite pan out as true, yet the myths remain and the misinformation carries on. Writer an

#224 The Half-Life of Facts: This week, guest host Marie-Claire Shanahan spends an hour exploring knowledge and certainty, and how they change over time. She&rsquo;ll speak to Samuel Arbesman,&nbsp;applied mathematician and fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science a...

The Skeptics Guide #339 - Jan 14 2012

The Skeptics Guide #415 - Jun 29 2013

The Skeptics Guide #456 - Apr 5 2014

How To Make Science Experiments As Common At Home As Bedtime Stories

Pentagon Accepts That UFO’s Do Exist. What Next?

A Word

We Need a New Science of Progress

Think Your Credentials Are Ignored Because You're A Woman? It Could Be.

It Was A Difficult Year, But We Made It - Matric Achievers

Staring At The Shadows

Bright Sparks

Meet This Issue’s Experts…

The Atlantic Daily: The Studies That Turned Their Fields Upside Down

#224 The Half-Life of Facts: This week, guest host Marie-Claire Shanahan spends an hour exploring knowledge and certainty, and how they change over time. She’ll speak to Samuel Arbesman, applied mathematician and fellow at the Institute for Quantitative Social Science a...