Comments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution"
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
Daniel W. Houck, at the John Leland Center for Theological Studies, attempts the refresh the theology of Thomas Aquinas, in regards to original sin. His book is published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press.
There is a drawback to Houck's effort. Unbeknownst to him, there are hypotheses on human evolution that the scientific community has not entertained. This is the nature of scientific inquiry. The paradigm concerning evolution, in general, remains unchallenged. The paradigm concerning human evolution is about to change.
To date, evolutionary scientists fail to address three questions. What is the ultimate human niche? Why are the past 8000 years so radically different than the preceding 1.8 million years? What is the nature of langue, the system of differences arbitrarily related to parole, in our current Lebenswelt?
Razie Mah proposes three hypotheses on the nature of human evolution.
The first proposal, elaborated in The Human Niche, states that hominins adapt to traidic relations. Our ultimate niche is not material.
The second proposal is that there is a twist in human evolution, starting 7820 years ago. An Archaeology of the Fall dramatizes. The First Singularity tells of a Fairy Tale Trace. Our current Lebenswelt is not the same as the Lebenswelt that we evolved in.
The third proposal considers the meaning, presence and message underlying a spoken word that is crucial to current civilizational discourse. How To Define the Word "Religion" marks the beginning of an inquiry into the nature of langue, in our current Lebenswelt.
The second hypothesis directly impacts Houck's recover of Aquinas.
Indeed, Aquinas treatment of original sin offers great insight into the nature of the first singularity.
The Tree of Life in the Garden of Eden is a metaphor for original justice.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Weigel’s Book (2007) Faith, Reason and the War against Jihadism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on How Institutions Think Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution"
Related ebooks
Comments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Religious Experience of the Roman People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReading the Book of Nature: How Eight Best Sellers Reconnected Christianity and the Sciences on the Eve of the Victorian Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Forgotten Compass: Marcel Jousse and the Exploration of the Oral World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNewton on Matter and Activity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHenry Chadwick: Selected Writings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Origin of Sin: An English Translation of the "Hamartigenia" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNietzsche Was Probably Right Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAquinas, Science, and Human Uniqueness: An Integrated Approach to the Question of What Makes Us Human Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Journey of the Dialectic: Knowing God, Volume 3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRupturing Eschatology: Divine Glory and the Silence of the Cross Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdam's Curse: Reflections on Religion and Literature Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5God's Mirror: Renewal and Engagement in French Catholic Intellectual Culture in the Mid–Twentieth Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Philosophy of Christology: From the Bultmannians to Derrida, 1951–2002 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGod Sent His Son: A Contemporary Christology Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Malicious Objects, Anger Management, and the Question of Modern Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivine Presence: An Introduction to Christian Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tests of Time: Readings in the Development of Physical Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Progressive Publication of Matthew Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Philosophy and the Republican Future: Reconsidering Cicero Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDivine Humanity: Explored and Defended Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmpire of Corruption: The Russian National Pastime Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlatonism and Naturalism: The Possibility of Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Gospel of John and the Religious Quest: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Concept in Thomism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRecognizing the Gift: Toward a Renewed Theology of Nature and Grace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Science For You
Designed to the Core Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dark Night of the Soul: A Psychiatrist Explores the Connection Between Darkness and Spiritual Growth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Great Is Our God Educator's Guide: 100 Indescribable Devotions About God and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Tome: A Book of Modern Satanic Ritual Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bible, Dimensions, and the Spiritual Realm: Are Heaven, Angels, and God Closer than We Think? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sleeping, Dreaming, and Dying: An Exploration of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case for Miracles: A Journalist Investigates Evidence for the Supernatural Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wormwood Prophecy: NASA, Donald Trump, and a Cosmic Cover-up of End-Time Proportions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Revealer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Miracle Myth: Why Belief in the Resurrection and the Supernatural Is Unjustified Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Flip: Epiphanies of Mind and the Future of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5In the Beginning... We Misunderstood: Interpreting Genesis 1 in Its Original Context Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nibiru Falling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everyday Zen: Love and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wonder of Creation: 100 More Devotions About God and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Physics of God: How the Deepest Theories of Science Explain Religion and How the Deepest Truths of Religion Explain Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of a Soul: The Autobiography of the Little Flower Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God According to God: A Physicist Proves We've Been Wrong About God All Along Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Evolution: Scripture and Nature Say Yes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Determined to Believe?: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Faith Unraveled: How a Girl Who Knew All the Answers Learned to Ask Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Related categories
Reviews for Comments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution"
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution" - Razie Mah
Comments on Daniel Houck's Book (2020) Aquinas, Original Sin and the Challenge of Evolution
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2020
Notes on Text
This work comments book by Daniel W. Houck, titled Aquinas, Original Sin, and the Challenge of Evolution, published in 2020 by Cambridge University Press. My goal is to comment on this work using the first singularity, the triadic structure of judgment, the category-based nested form and other relational models within the tradition of Charles Peirce.
‘Words that belong together’ are denoted by single quotes or italics.
Prerequisites: A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction
Recommended: Comments on James DeFrancisco's Essay Original Sin and Ancestral Sin
, An Archaeology of the Fall, The First Singularity and Its Fairy Tale Trace, Comments on Original Sin and Original Death, Romans 5:12-21.
Table of Contents
Introduction
Painting a Picture of Original Justice
Painting a Picture of Human Subjectivity
Original Justice and the Structure of Triadic Judgment
Interlude
Original Justice and Signification
The First Singularity
How Does The First Singularity Impact Original Justice?
What About Infant Baptism?
Scholastic Introjections
Introduction
0001 Daniel W. Houck faces many challenges in his attempt to recover Thomas Aquinas's teachings on original sin.
0002 One, Aquinas does not challenge Augustine's mechanism of original sin. Original sin descends through Adam to all humans through human reproduction. Augustine's speculation is now on the chopping block, because modern biologists observe no large genetic bottleneck, as required by Augustine's proposed scenario. Concupiscence may be undeniable. But, it does not plague humans due to descent from a single ancestral pair.
On one hand, original sin cannot be accounted for as a sexually transmitted disease.
On the other hand, sexually transmitted diseases can, in part, be accounted for by original sin.
0003 Two, original sin is inextricably tied to a difficult conversation about the fate of the souls of infants and fetuses, who tragically die. Where do the souls of aborted fetuses go? To the city dump?
0004 Three, the doctrine of original sin does not appear in Scripture. Instead, original sin comes from interpreting Scripture. It's like the smell of rotting food. If one reads Scripture and follows the unfolding theodrama with care, one cannot help but conclude with Paul, in his notorious Letter to the Romans, that Adam and Christ are linked. The Scriptures stink of original sin. Yet, the fragrance of redemption overcomes the sordid aromas. That is the Good News. Jesus is a breath of fresh air.
0005 Four, despite recent attempts to revive the theology of Thomas Aquinas, his account of original sin remains neglected. There is a reason. Thomas never locks onto a clear and concise reckoning. A hundred years ago, Aquinas's thoughts on the matter are debated. Jean Baptiste Kors publishes an in-depth examination under the title, La Justice primitive et le peche originel d'apres S. Thomas (1922). Now, it is crickets.
0006 Five, Houck consigns even the crickets to silence, because the crickets never considered Neodarwinism and how it puts Augustine's speculation on the chopping block. In light of the shimmering axe of negation poised above the City of God, much less the City of Man, the crickets may snicker at Houck's promise to tie together Aquinas's account of original justice with other areas of the great medieval theologian's thought. Does a synthesis matter? After the blade of scientific expertise comes down on the idea that Adam and Eve are the first humans, will the executioner call out, Next, original justice.
?
0006 Already modern theologians slink away from the historicity of the Fall.
Can they do without this non-scientific nonsense?
Houck does not think so. No Christian theologian thinks so.
Houck must juggle these five juggernauts, as if each does not have a life of their own. What is the secret that brings them into obedient motion, where one goes up while another comes down?
It is not to be found in his book.
0007 It is to be found in the hypothesis of the first singularity.
The stories of Adam and Eve, along with all currently known written origin stories of the ancient Near East, point to a recent time-horizon, beyond which civilization cannot see.
They point to the first singularity.
They cannot see beyond this event.
The ancient myths say, Humans are made right before civilization starts.
Now, archaeologists testify to humans before the time horizon of the first singularity.
Humans walk the earth long before the dawn of history.
Painting a Picture of Original Justice
0008 Is Adam the first human, as suggested by Augustine, as well as by the Genesis text?
If Adam is not the first human, then who is Adam?
Adam must be a figure in a fairy tale. The fairy tale may be about an event, or something like an event, hidden in time. We (moderns) do not know much about what came before this event. We know more than nothing. We have excavated artifacts that tell us