0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
24 vues5 pages
Development of Heterodera avenae biotype Ha 31 was compared on the resistant cultivars barley C 164 and oat Kent. Development in barley roots was normal, but the majority of adult females remained small-sized and failed to extrude from the roots. Sex ratio was affected in favour of males. Oat cultivars HFO 114, Kent, OS 6 and OS 7 commonly grown in Haryana State of India were resistant to biotype Ha
Development of Heterodera avenae biotype Ha 31 was compared on the resistant cultivars barley C 164 and oat Kent. Development in barley roots was normal, but the majority of adult females remained small-sized and failed to extrude from the roots. Sex ratio was affected in favour of males. Oat cultivars HFO 114, Kent, OS 6 and OS 7 commonly grown in Haryana State of India were resistant to biotype Ha
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Development of Heterodera avenae biotype Ha 31 was compared on the resistant cultivars barley C 164 and oat Kent. Development in barley roots was normal, but the majority of adult females remained small-sized and failed to extrude from the roots. Sex ratio was affected in favour of males. Oat cultivars HFO 114, Kent, OS 6 and OS 7 commonly grown in Haryana State of India were resistant to biotype Ha
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd