100%(6)100% ont trouvé ce document utile (6 votes)
3K vues2 pages
Petitioner and respondent disagreed on the rental rate of a commercial building. To resolve the controversy, they submitted their disagreement to arbitration. Two arbitrators have been appointed by the parties while the appointment of the third arbitrator was held in abeyance. Petitioner argued that in Special Case No. 6024, the respondent court sits as a special court exercising limited jurisdiction and is not competent to act on respondent Yao's claim for damages.
Petitioner and respondent disagreed on the rental rate of a commercial building. To resolve the controversy, they submitted their disagreement to arbitration. Two arbitrators have been appoi…