ORIGINS OF GLOBAL WARMING

POLICIES AND IDEAS

Will the policies or ideas proposed to cut down greenhouse gas emissions in or/and involving the United States of America be beneficial to its economy in the long run versus a scenario where nothing is done in this regard?

Barack Obama and Al Gore.

Strongly believe that global warming exists.

Consider global warming to be a real threat. Believe that measures should be taken.

President Obamas green tech proposal:

Introduction of green technology. Greenhouse gas pollutants of 50 million cars removed. Also, the greenhouse gas emissions will be reduced by 80% by the year 2035.

1. 2. 3.

The threat of global warming completely removed.

Major facts and figures ignored. Inefficiency of alternative fuels=>Rise in fuel costs. Conversion to proposed technology adversely affecting the economy. The possibility of natural disasters ignored e.g. floods, earthquakes. Wont they affect the economy as well?

Will it even survive till 2035?

Believe that global warming is a hoax. People of Category A are suggesting their so-called policies with the intention of lining their pockets. People of Category A like Al Gore who have been criticized for asserting false scientific data.

Discovery of fossil fuels

Millions of jobs generated

Economy benefitted

Issue of unemploy ment

Discovery of fossil fuels

Cost of excavation

Insufficiency of the resources discovered

Funding for the project

Economy suppressed

Global warming does not exist. Against all sorts of policies or ideas.

Consider bystanding the only solution.

People like George Carlin.

SCENARIO A

SCENARIO B

Global warming exists

Global warming is a hoax

Category A

Category C