Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 15

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.

FAST PLANETS Co LTD.,


ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT P.0. BOX : 34620 RIYADH - 11478

ANALYSIS / COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EXISTING 25+4.0m Extended Latticed MONOPOLE TOWER (LTE Project 2011)

Main Site No.:

ZND090

ORIGINAL DESIGN LOAD + EXISTING & PROPOSED LOADING CONDITION

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE NO.

COVER PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CONCLUSION TOWER COMPARATIVE STUDY TABLE I - WIND LOAD ON ANTENNA SUPPORT PIPE AND OTHER MOUNTED POLE STRUCTURE
TABLE II - STANDARD 25m SELF-SUPPORT MONOPOLE WIND LOAD

1 2 3 3 4 6 7 8 9

TOWER DEFLECTION TOWER INFORMATION ATTACHMENT ORIGINAL TOWER LOAD DESIGN CALCULATION TOWER PROFILE

Analyzed by:

Checked by:

Approved by:

J.B.Vasquez Telecom Engineer

J.A.Hasson Structural Engineer


L'

A.A.Aleem Projects Manager

Page 2 of 11

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

Main Site No.

ZND090

INTRODUCTION
Tower load comparative study for main site no. ZND090 was performed to compare the design load against the actual load to determine its feasibility to support the existing and the proposed new antenna loading to be used for LTE Project 2011. Refer to pages 4 to 7 for the detailed comparative study of the tower original design loading and actual loading. Tower existing loading condition and proposed new antennas and tower physical condition and other relevant information are tabulated on pages 9 to 11. For information on tower mast geometry and member sizes, see attachment.

CONCLUSION
The results show that the tower meet the criteria of 39 m/s (140KPH) basic wind speed. The original design load of the tower is greater than the present actual load and it is indicative that there is no increase in antenna loads. Hence, we can conclude that the tower can safely support the existing and the proposed microwave antenna loading for LTE Project 2011 .

Page 3 of 11

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

Comparison between original design loads and actual loads for standard 25.0m Monopole tower

Tower height = Gh =

25 m 1.690

Original Design Loads


Wind speed = Design Loads
PANEL HP HP Tubular Poles 1 Mounted Poles 2 Cantilevered Lattice 3

39 m/s Size (m)


900 MHZ 1.20 DIA 2.40 DIA 25.0 m high 2.0 m high 4.0 m high GSM MW MW GSM GSM GSM 9 2 1 LS LS LS

Dept

Qty, n

Elevation (m)
25.0 25.0 25.0 N/A 4 N/A 4 N/A 4

Kz
1.299 1.299 1.299 1.000 1.000 1.000

Fa (kN)
0.89 1.39 5.56 N/A 4 N/A 4 N/A 4

Fa*Gh*Kz*n (kN)
17.51 6.10 12.21 N/A 4 N/A 4 N/A 4

Base Moment (kN-m)


437.64 152.57 305.15 4636.41 2.86 137.89

Total Base Moment =

5672.52

1 25.0m high Monopole Tubular Pole 2 2.0 m high Mounted Pole 3 4.0m high Cantileverd Lattice 4 Previously gusted (i.e. K Z and Gh equal to 1.0), see Tables I, II & III

Page 4 of 11

LTE Project 2011


Actual Loads
Wind speed = Actual Loads
LR PANEL HP PANEL HP PANEL 3G HP HP HP HP HP NEW LTE 1 Tubular Poles Mounted Poles Cantilevered Lattice

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A
Kz
1.3687 1.3555 1.3420 1.3139 1.2842 1.2992 1.2992 1.2842 1.2687 1.2687 1.2607 1.2687
1.314 1.000 1.000 1.000

35 m/s Size (m)


0.20 x 2.0m

Dept
GSM GSM MW GSM MW GSM GSM MW MW MW MW MW GSM GSM GSM GSM

GH = 1.69 Qty, n Elevation (m)


1 3 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 LS LS LS

Fa (kN)
0.016 0.713 0.120 0.534 0.120 0.713 0.538 0.120 0.350 0.120 0.120 0.120 0.538 N/A 2 N/A 2 N/A 2

Fa*Gh*Kz*n Base Moment (kN) (kN-m)


0.04 4.90 1.09 1.19 0.26 1.57 1.18 0.26 0.75 0.26 0.51 0.26 3.58 N/A 2 N/A 2 N/A 2 1.08 142.10 30.48 30.83 6.25 39.14 29.53 6.25 17.26 5.92 11.51 5.92 93.18

900 MHZ 0.30 DIA. 1800 MHZ 0.30 DIA. 900 MHZ 2100 MHZ 0.30 DIA. 0.60 DIA. 0.30 DIA. 0.30 DIA. 0.30 DIA.
25.0m high 2.0M high 4.0m high

30 29 28 26 24 25 25 24 23 23 22.5 23
26.00 N/A 2 N/A 2 N/A 2

3734.14 2.26 111.26

Total Base Moment = % Comparison of original design loads versus actual loads =
1 2

4267.11 0.7522

New GSM antenna Previously gusted (i.e. K Z and Gh equal to 1.0), see Tables I & II

Conclusion : Since there is no increase in antenna loads, therefore the tower can safely support the existing plus the proposed new loading.

Page 5 of 11

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

Table I - Wind load on antenna support pipe and other mounted pole & latticed structures.
Tower ht. = Wind speed = Gh1 =
Actual Loads

25 m 39 m/s
1.5625 1.00 </=GH</=1.25 Sec.2.3.4.1 of TIA-EIA-222-F

Size

Dept

Length, l Diameter, d Appurtenance (mm) (mm) 20.0


c/l Elev., (m)

Kz

Pressure qz (kPa) 1.274

CF (C<4.40)

Force, Fc (kN/m) 0.048

LR

20mmx2.0m

GSM

2000

29.80

1.366

0.912

1.200

multiplied by 1.25, to compensate for the greater gust response for mounted pole structure (EIA/TIA-222-E, Sec. 2.3.4.4)

Table I - Wind load on antenna support pipe and other mounted pole structures.
Tower ht. = Wind speed = Gh1 =
Actual Loads

25 m 35 m/s
1.5625 1.00 </=GH</=1.25 Sec.2.3.4.1 of TIA-EIA-222-F

Size

Dept

Length, l Diameter, d Appurtenance (mm) (mm) 20.0 c/l Elev., (m) 29.80

Kz

Pressure qz (kPa) 1.025

CF (C<4.40)

Force, Fc (kN/m) 0.038

LR

20mmx2.0m

GSM

2000

1.365

0.818

1.200

multiplied by 1.25, to compensate for the greater gust response for mounted pole structure (EIA/TIA-222-E, Sec. 2.3.4.4)

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A
Total Base Moment = 1042.59

Page 7 of 11

LTE Project 2011 TABLE II - 25.0M SELF-SUPPORTING MONOPOLE TOWER Typical tower wind load distribution as per section in normal to the tower face.
H= V= GH = 25
39 1.69 m m/s

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

Heightof Monopole

Basic Design Wind speed for the structure


Gust Response of Monopole as per Section 2.3.4.2 of TIA-EIA_222-F

SECTION 1 2 3

AG(sq.m.) 9.567 10.719 9.121

AR(sq.m.) 9.854 11.041 9.395

F=qz*GH*CF*AR(kNs) GH*qZ*AG zequivalent(m) OTM(kN-m) 18456.99 130.95 20.482 2682.12 17668.57 140.46 11.520 1618.10 14372.05 97.22 3.458 336.187 Total =

4636.41

kN-m

TABLE II - 25.0M SELF-SUPPORTING MONOPOLE TOWER Typical tower wind load distribution as per section in normal to the tower face.
H= V= GH = 25 m
m/s

Heightof Monopole

35
1.69

Basic Design Wind speed for the structure


Gust Response of Monopole as per Section 2.3.4.2 of TIA-EIA_222-F

SECTION 1 2 3

AG(sq.m.) 9.567 10.719 9.121

AR(sq.m.) 9.854 11.041 9.395

F=qz*GH*CF*AR(kNs) GH*qZ*AG zequivalent(m) OTM(kN-m) 14865.10 105.47 20.482 2160.24 14230.11 113.12 11.520 1303.14 11575.13 78.30 3.458 270.761 Total =

3734.14

kN-m

MT-Td-0001 Rev.A

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

TOWER DEFLECTION As per original design loads:

ELEV. (m)

45 m/s WIND SPEED DEFLECTION (mm) ROTATION (deg) DEFLECTION (mm)

33 m/s WIND SPEED ROTATION (deg) ALLOW. TILT/SWAY (deg)

36.00

79.70

0.24

44.00

0.13

0.50

The above shown tower deflection is based on the original design loads (attached); considering that the existing + proposed antenna loads are less than the original design loads, thus actual tower deflection will be lesser than the deflection due to original design loads.

Page 8 of 11

Page 8 of 11

LTE Project 2011

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

TOWER SITE INFORMATION


The following two tables include existing tower loading, proposed loading, physical condition of the steel tower and foundation and other relevant information.

Page 9 of 11

LTE Project 2011


Site Survey Report - Tower Antenna Loads Date: 22/05/2009 Site 306-00-000
ANTENNA LOADING DATA No. TYPE SIZE (meter) ELEV. (meter) AZIM. (deg.) F/L QTY

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

FEEDLINES/ LADDER DATA SIZE (mm) TYPE REMARKS

NOTES:

ANTENNA DATA: No. Assign a number to each antenna, starting at top of tower and working down. TYPE Paraboloid (Dish): S- Solid, G- Grid, HP- High Performance (Flat Shielded), R- with Radome T.V.- UHF, BC- Broadcast, Y- Yagi, D- Directional (cellular), O- Omnidirectional, P- Paging Reflectors: CHR- Conical Horn Reflector, FPR- Flat Plate Passive Reflectors. G.S.M.: A- ALLGON, ADC- ADC Dual Polarized. MISC.: S/S- Self Supporting Tower, G/T- Guyed Tower, P/M- Pole Mount. SIZE: Indicate diameter in meters for parabolic (microwave dishes), size for other types. ELEV. Height above ground in meters (Elevation). AZIM. Azimuth: Show antenna orientation in degrees or compass reading (N, NE, E,SE, S, etc.). F/L Indicate antenna mount: Face (F) or leg (L). REMARKS Existing or proposed new antenna(s) designation. FEEDLINES/ LADDER DATA QTY: Quantity. SIZE: Diameter or size in (mm). TYPE: W- Waveguide, C- Coax, H- Heliax, L- Ladder. COMMENTS

Page 10 of 11

LTE Project 2011


Site Survey Report - Tower Antenna Loads Date: 22/05/2009 Site 306-00-000
ANTENNA LOADING DATA No. TYPE SIZE (meter) ELEV. (meter) AZIM. (deg.) F/L QTY

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

FEEDLINES/ LADDER DATA SIZE (mm) TYPE REMARKS

NOTES:

ANTENNA DATA: No. Assign a number to each antenna, starting at top of tower and working down. TYPE Paraboloid (Dish): S- Solid, G- Grid, HP- High Performance (Flat Shielded), R- with Radome T.V.- UHF, BC- Broadcast, Y- Yagi, D- Directional (cellular), O- Omnidirectional, P- Paging Reflectors: CHR- Conical Horn Reflector, FPR- Flat Plate Passive Reflectors. G.S.M.: A- ALLGON, ADC- ADC Dual Polarized. MISC.: S/S- Self Supporting Tower, G/T- Guyed Tower, P/M- Pole Mount. SIZE: Indicate diameter in meters for parabolic (microwave dishes), size for other types. ELEV. Height above ground in meters (Elevation). AZIM. Azimuth: Show antenna orientation in degrees or compass reading (N, NE, E,SE, S, etc.). F/L Indicate antenna mount: Face (F) or leg (L). REMARKS Existing or proposed new antenna(s) designation. FEEDLINES/ LADDER DATA QTY: Quantity. SIZE: Diameter or size in (mm). TYPE: W- Waveguide, C- Coax, H- Heliax, L- Ladder. COMMENTS

Page 10A of 11

LTE Project 2011


TOWER INSPECTION CHECKLIST Existing Tower Tower Manufacturer Light x Medium Al Babtain Le Blanc Heavy Model

ZND090-AMT-Td-0001 Rev.A

None 36.0 M

Tower Base outside width 6.70 m Tower Type Tower Cross-Section Tower Members 25 dia. mm x Self Supporting Triangular Tubular Angle Solid Rd Anchor Bolt Size BasePlate Thickness 4.0 cm Guyed Mast x Rectangular Legs x BasePlate dimensions 40x40 cm Monopole Diagonals x Struts x Tower Conditions: Guy Wires Structural x Good, no visible rust or kinks, straight members Yes No Average, some surface rust, no other damage x Ladder Exists Below Average, rusty, needs maintenance x Enclosed Ladder Poor, severe rust, bent/ missing members, bolts or strands x Painted Red/White, No. of bands 7 Loose or corroded bolts or anchor bolts or Guy Hardware Sagging Guy wires, Tower Out of Plumbness or Twisted Foundation Type Condition Cement Grout Piers x Good, no visible cracks or damage x Good x Raft Average, edges rough, no cracks, edge wear Fair Piles Below Average, surface cracks, edge wear Poor, missing Roof Mount Poor cracks, spalding, deteriorating Others Guy Anchor Size N/A . x Pedestal Size 70 x 70 cm Distance from tower to anchor block N/A Comments :

Page 11 of 11