Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
sweet.arum@gmail.com
3G
Introduction 3G Power Control 3G Mobility Management 3G Call Process Signaling 3G Radio Interface Channel 3G Radio Interface Protocol 3G Handover 3G Optimization Concept 3G Formula and Counter 3G KPI analyze How to choose WPC candidate
Increase
Source
Increase
Make
Tx More Reliable by put more redundant bits Use for overcoming Interference/Fading Use Interleaving for serious fading
We
For CS Service use convolution code (1/2, 1/3) For PS Service use Turbo code (1/3) Add Interleaving Code Sent as
11 22 33 44 Convolutional Code 1/2 1234 Convolutional Code 1/3 1234 111 222 333 444 1234 123 124 134 234 Interleaving
Increase
Different service, different PG PG low = UE Tx Power high PG low = Coverage is much more smaller
Make
Tx more secure!
Digital
is wave-length Wave-length affecting antenna dimension The more high freq (f), antenna dimension will be smaller
Too Weak!
Louder Plz!
Still Weak!!
Louder Plz!
Good!
Tx
power cannot be set to be as high as possible. It will waste the power and Will cause extra interference to other users.
WCDMA system, Each user is an interference source to other users. So, each users Tx power should be minimized.
In
So,
the main purpose of Power Control is to adjust users Tx power to be just enough (adaptive following radio propagation environment)
Quality
UTRAN
doesnt know anything about UE but CORE knows LAC/RAC of UE No RRC Connection Still receive Paging (PCH) Process
RRC Connection active UTRAN allocated Dedicated Channel Use on CS PS service with High data Rate (Traffic volume is high) Paging only sent to this cell RRC Connection active UTRAN allocated Common Channel Use for signalling with PS service (Low data Rate, Traffic volume is not too high)
Cell_PCH
RRC Connection active UE connected but no data transmit UE only monitor PICH
URA = UTRAN Registration Area Change state from Cell_PCH to Cell_FACH (cell update) that happens too fast URA defined from several different of NodeBs. There is a threshold timer to decide the state changes from Cell_PCH to Cell_FACH (if cell_PCH happens for x time, then change to URA_PCH) Why have to change to URA_PCH? because too many changes from Cell_PCH to Cell _FACH are not good for system capacity
URA_PCH
Logical
Channel
Transport
Channel
Physical
Channel
Intra-Frequency
(SHO)
Inter-Frequency
3G to DCS 3G to GSM
Database
Cross check 2G CFGMML with External 2G on 3G CFGMML (parameter check on 2G: MCC, MNC, LACCI, NCC, BCC, BCCH, RAC) Old database still not yet erased
Failure
Failure
Optimizing
Do
scanning (via drive test) Locate pollutant area Do Neighbor list verification
Remove nbr that is not measured but in Nbr list Add missing neighbor
Check
pollutant, whether its from overshooting site or site nearby Check and Adjust physical configuration Check and Adjust CPICH Power
TP
RTWP
can be caused by bad weather, feeder broken, port feeder broken, or traffic fluctuation (load).
CSSR
DCR
SHO,
IFHO, IRATHO
Related
to RRC Reject / RRC Failure Related to RAB Failure Counter RRC Fail Related:
Measurement Item Sub Items VS.RRC.Rej.ULIUBBand.Cong, VS.RRC.Rej.DLIUBBand.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.ULPower.Cong, VS.RRC.Rej.DLPower.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.ULCE.Cong, VS.RRC.Rej.DLCE.Cong VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong
RRC.FailConnEstab.Cong
Counter
Measurement Item Level 1 VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.RNL
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.UuFail VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.IubFail
VS.RAB.FailEstabCS.TNL
Measurement Item
VS.FailEstabCS.CfgUnsup VS.FailEstabCS.PhyChFail VS.FailEstabCS.IncCfg VS.FailEstabCS.NoReply
Counter
Measurement Item Level 1 VS.RAB.FailEstPS.RNL
VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.UuFail VS.RAB.FailEstabPS.IubFail
VS.RAB.FailEstPS.TNL
Measurement Item
VS.FailEstabPS.CfgUnsup VS.FailEstabPS.PhyChFail VS.FailEstabPS.IncCfg VS.FailEstabPS.NoReply
Related
VS.RAB.AbnormRel.CS.IuAAL2
Related
Counter
Failure Indicator VS.SHO.FailASU.NoReply.NCell VS.SHO.FailRLAddIur.OM.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLAddIur.TransCong.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLAddIur.HW.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLAddIur.Cong.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLAddIur.CfgUnsRx VS.SHO.FailRLRecfgIur.NoReply VS.SHO.FailRLRecfgIur.OM.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLRecfgIur.HW.Rx VS.SHO.FailRLRecfgIur.Cong.Rx
VS.SHO.FailRLRecfgIur.CfgUnsupp.Rx
VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.HW.Tx VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CongTx VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.CfgUTx VS.SHO.FailRLSetupIur.TransCongTx
Counter
Failure Indicator
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InterRNC.InvCfg
VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InterRNC.CellUpdt VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.InterRNC.NoReply VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.NoReply VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.PrepFail VS.HHO.FailInterFreqOut.RLSetupFail
Counter
Failure Indicator VS.IRATHO.FailInCS.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.Abort VS.IRATHO.FailOutCS.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInCS.Abort VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInCS.ResUnavail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInCS.TgtHighLoad VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInCS.TRNCSysFailReloc VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInCS.TRNCSysRelocUnsupp VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.Abort VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.Cancel VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.CNNoReply VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.ReqInfoNotAvail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TAlExp.GCell VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.TgtFail.GCell IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.ReloNoSup(none) IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.NoResAvail(none) IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.HigherTrafficLod(none) IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutCS.UKnowRNC(none) IRATHO.FailOutCS.CfgUnsupp(none) IRATHO.FailOutCS.PhyChFail(none)
Counter
Failure Indicator VS.IRATHO.FailOutPS VS.IRATHO.FailOutPS.Abort VS.IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailRelocInPS.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailRelocOutPS.CfgUnSupp VS.IRATHO.FailRelocOutPS.NoReply VS.IRATHO.FailRelocOutPS.PhyChFail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInPS.ReloUnSupp VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInPS.ResUnavail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInPS.TgtFail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepInPS.TgtHighLoad VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.NoResAvail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.ReloUnSupp VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TAlExp VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtFail VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.TgtHighLoad VS.IRATHO.FailRelocPrepOutPS.UnKnowRNC IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.CfgUnsupp(none) IRATHO.FailOutPSUTRAN.PhyChFail(none)
See
See
from which side (RRC or RAB) the failure cause contribute the most (in this case RRC)
See
See
See
See
from which side (RRC or RAB) the failure cause contribute the most (in this case RAB)
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
See
Do
Look KPI degradation in RNC Daily/BH Level Get the highest failure cause in RNC daily/BH Level Get failure cause counter per cell daily/BH Level
Select Rate below threshold Sort Failure number in descending (Higest to Lowest) Do weighting process to choose the cell with high attempt and bad rate [weighting = (rate*fail number)] Get your Top5 or Top10 candidate to optim