Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Shelia Sargent-Martin
Teaching Reading &Language Art (F11104371) No. of responses = 16
Overall indicators
Global Index
1. LEARNING ( = 0.97) 2. ENTHUSIASM ( = 0.88) 3. ORGANIZATION ( = 0.82) 4. GROUP INTERACTION ( = 0.93) 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT ( = 0.82) 6. BREADTH ( = 0.85) 7. EXAMINATIONS ( = 0.79) 8. ASSIGNMENTS ( = 0.9) 9. OVERALL ( = 0.9)
av.=4.68 dev.=0.54 av.=4.44 dev.=1.05 av.=4.8 dev.=0.41 av.=4.63 dev.=0.55 av.=4.84 dev.=0.37 av.=4.75 dev.=0.43 av.=4.69 dev.=0.51 av.=4.65 dev.=0.53 av.=4.56 dev.=0.57 av.=4.81 dev.=0.4
Legend
Question text
Mean 0% 50%
Median 0%
Quantile 25%
Right pole
1 Scale
4 Histogram
1. LEARNING
1.1)
6.3%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
31.3%
62.5%
Strongly agree
1
1.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 75%
Strongly agree
6.3%
Strongly disagree
01/10/2012
Page 1
6.3%
Strongly disagree
0%
12.5%
31.3%
50%
Strongly agree
1
1.4)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 75%
Strongly agree
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
6.3%
Strongly disagree
2. ENTHUSIASM
2.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
18.8%
81.3%
Strongly agree
1
2.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
2.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
2.4)
2 0%
3 0%
4 25%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
3. ORGANIZATION
3.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
12.5%
12.5%
75%
Strongly agree
1
3.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 31.3%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
3.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
0%
Strongly disagree
1
3.4)
2 0%
3 6.3%
4 50%
5 43.8%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
4. GROUP INTERACTION
4.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
12.5%
87.5%
Strongly agree
01/10/2012
Page 2
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
12.5%
87.5%
Strongly agree
1
4.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
0%
Strongly disagree
1
4.4)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Strongly agree
Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
0%
Strongly disagree
5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
5.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
12.5%
87.5%
Strongly agree
1
5.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 25%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
5.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 25%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
5.4)
2 0%
3 0%
4 37.5%
5 62.5%
Strongly agree
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
0%
Strongly disagree
6. BREADTH
6.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
31.3%
68.8%
Strongly agree
1
6.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 25%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
6.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 31.3%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
Instructor presented points of view other than his/ her own when appropriate
0%
Strongly disagree
1
6.4)
2 0%
3 6.3%
4 25%
5 68.8%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
01/10/2012
Page 3
7. EXAMINATIONS
7.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
0%
37.5%
62.5%
Strongly agree
1
7.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 25%
5 75%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
1
7.3)
2 0%
3 6.3%
4 31.3%
5 62.5%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
8. ASSIGNMENTS
8.1)
0%
Strongly disagree
0%
6.3%
37.5%
56.3%
Strongly agree
1
8.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 37.5%
5 62.5%
Strongly agree
0%
Strongly disagree
9. OVERALL
9.1)
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
0%
Very poor
0%
0%
25%
75%
Very good
1
9.2)
2 0%
3 0%
4 18.8%
5 81.3%
Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
1
9.3)
2 0%
3 0%
4 12.5%
5 87.5%
Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
0%
Very poor
Dr. Martin was wonderful, nothing at all I would feel she needed to change. Awesome job Dr. Martin. Great class! Great course, great teacher! I enjoyed the course and was given many ideas to try with my own classroom. I have enjoyed ever course I have taken from this instructor. She is genuine and I feel that is very important in a college professor. She has made an impact in my education. Probably the best professor I had this semester.
01/10/2012
Page 4
The instructor is one of my biggest influences in education. The class has been very fulfilling as an educational experience.
01/10/2012
Page 5
100% 75%
63%
av. = 4.56
75%
100% 75%
dev. = 1.03
50%
50% 31% 13%
50% 25%
31%
n = 16
25%
19%
n = 16
25%
n = 16
You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
av. = 4.56
75%
100% 75%
81%
dev. = 1.03
50%
n = 16
25%
19%
n = 16
25%
av. = 4.75
75%
100% 75%
av. = 4.63
75%
dev. = 0.45
50%
dev. = 0.72 n = 16
13% 13%
n = 16
25%
25%
n = 16
25%
Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100% 75%
69%
100% 75%
50% 25%
31%
50%
50%
44%
n = 16
25%
19%
n = 16
25%
n = 16
Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100%
88%
100%
88%
75% 50%
n = 16
25%
13%
n = 16
25%
01/10/2012
Page 6
Shelia Sargent-Martin, Teaching Reading &Language Art Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/ advice in or outside of class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
100%
88%
av. = 4.75
75%
75% 50%
dev. = 0.45 n = 16
n = 16
25%
13%
n = 16
25%
25%
Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
av. = 4.75
75%
100% 75%
100% 75%
av. = 4.69
69%
dev. = 0.45
50%
63%
dev. = 0.48 n = 16
50%
38%
25%
n = 16
25%
n = 16
25%
31%
Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
av. = 4.75
75%
100% 75%
av. = 4.69
69%
100% 75%
av. = 4.63
69%
dev. = 0.45
50%
dev. = 0.48
50%
dev. = 0.62 n = 16
25%
n = 16
25%
31%
n = 16
25%
25%
100% 75%
63%
av. = 4.75
75%
100% 75%
dev. = 0.45
50%
63%
50%
38%
25%
n = 16
25%
25%
n = 16
25%
31%
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was...
Very poor Very good
100% 75%
100% 75%
100% 75%
av. = 4.75
75%
50%
38%
56%
63%
dev. = 0.45
50%
50%
25%
n = 16
38%
25%
n = 16
25%
25%
n = 16
01/10/2012
Page 7
Shelia Sargent-Martin, Teaching Reading &Language Art Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
Very poor Very good
100%
88%
75% 50%
n = 16
25%
13%
n = 16
01/10/2012
Page 8
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Teaching Reading &Language Art (F11104371)
1. LEARNING
n=16 av.=4.44 n=16 av.=4.56 n=16 av.=4.19 n=16 av.=4.56
1.1)
You found the course intellectually challenging and stimulating You have learned something which you consider valuable Your interest in the subject has increased as a consequence of this course You have learned and understood the subject materials in this course
1.2)
1.3)
1.4)
2. ENTHUSIASM
n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.75
2.1)
Instructor was enthusiastic about teaching the course Instructor was dynamic and energetic in conducting the course Instructor enhanced presentations with the use of humor Instructor's style of presentation held your interest during class
2.2)
2.3)
2.4)
3. ORGANIZATION
n=16 av.=4.63 n=16 av.=4.69 n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.38
3.1)
Instructor's explanations were clear Course materials were well-prepared and carefully explained Proposed objectives agreed with those actually taught so you knew where the course was going Instructor gave lectures that facilitated taking notes
3.2)
3.3)
3.4)
4. GROUP INTERACTION
n=16 av.=4.88 n=16 av.=4.88 n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.81
4.1)
Students were encouraged to participate in class discussions Students were invited to share their ideas and knowledge Students were encouraged to ask questions and were given meaningful answers Students were encouraged to express their own ideas and/or question the instructor
4.2)
4.3)
4.4)
01/10/2012
Page 9
5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT
n=16 av.=4.88 n=16 av.=4.75 n=16 av.=4.75 n=16 av.=4.63
5.1)
Instructor was friendly toward individual students Instructor made students feel welcome in seeking help/advice in or outside of class Instructor had genuine interest in individual students Instructor was adequately accessible to students during office hours or after class
5.2)
5.3)
5.4)
6. BREADTH
n=16 av.=4.69 n=16 av.=4.75 n=16 av.=4.69 n=16 av.=4.63
6.1)
Instructor contrasted the implications of various theories Instructor presented the background or origin of ideas/concepts developed in class Instructor presented points of view other than his/her own when appropriate Instructor adequately discussed current developments in the field
6.2)
6.3)
6.4)
7. EXAMINATIONS
n=16 av.=4.63 n=16 av.=4.75 n=16 av.=4.56
7.1)
Feedback on examinations/graded materials was valuable Methods of evaluating student work were fair and appropriate Examinations/graded materials tested course content as emphasized by the instructor
7.2)
7.3)
8. ASSIGNMENTS
n=16 av.=4.5 n=16 av.=4.63
8.1)
Required readings/texts were valuable Readings, homework, etc. contributed to appreciation and understanding of subject
8.2)
9. OVERALL
n=16 av.=4.75 n=16 av.=4.81 n=16 av.=4.88
9.1)
Compared with other courses you have taken at BSC, this course was... Compared with other instructors you have had at BSC, this instructor was... Compared with other instructors you have had in your major, this instructor was...
9.2)
9.3)
01/10/2012
Page 10
Profile
Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) Education Shelia Sargent-Martin Teaching Reading &Language Art (F11104371)
1. LEARNING 2. ENTHUSIASM 3. ORGANIZATION 4. GROUP INTERACTION 5. INDIVIDUAL RAPPORT 6. BREADTH 7. EXAMINATIONS 8. ASSIGNMENTS 9. OVERALL
+ + + + + + + + +
01/10/2012
Page 11