- ZAXOY-KONTOIANNH

KEAO IOOXOY APIAIO APA *

T K,
.
O K,

19 , , ,
,
,
. E, ,
,
,
. E
.
K
,
,
A. T E.

,
. O ,

M. A,
E, . H 1914
* H K I , 2002.

10

- -

A1 E2. M 1935 T3,

O K
O. E T K4,
. A
,

, 1956. ,
,

T. H
K
5. ,
, 6:
T
B.. e e K, e A
\ []

\
10 e A
\ d A
\ .. d A
\ vac. d E e E d N d
e A
\ d A
\
d A
\ d K e

1. . , AE 1914, 153-160 . , AE 1913, 107 G. Karo,

AA 1916, 151.
2. N. I. 1935 IE EKA A. . E.
3. H. Riemann, AA 1937, 147.
4. Y . A I
M, Z , A
1946, 56 . P. Amandry, BCH 71/72 (1947/48) 384 . 1 Y. Bquignon, BCH 88 (1964)
395 . 3.
5. B. A. T, A 42 (1987) X. 282.
6. J. F. Ussing, Inscriptiones Graecae ineditae (1847) 9 O. Kern, IG IX 2, 1295 II .
A, AE 1913, 170 AE 1916, 28, . 276, . 6-18.

 ^ A

11

15 \A d A
\ d A
\ , a
f .
K. . . 7: \A ed.pr. []| IG AE . . 10: , . . 12:
E (lectio certa!) IG E AE.

T
K,
27 .X. terminum post quem
. Kroog A,
A
.

: A
\ , [|] [],
. 12: E E
, A
: B E . H

McD, 1105 , . 167.
M K
,
A ,
. T
A. M
,
X. A
8:

[M][] [] M[] [][] c c d K .

7. N. V. Sekunda, Lysimachos and Gazaios of Olosson, BSA 93 (1998) 449-452.

8. A. . A, AE 1917, 21, . 311, . 1-5.

12

- -

A. ,
, [K()][] K[][],
A9:

[T - - -][- - - A
\ ][][ c -]
[ d ] K[][] .

,
T,
A
K10:
[T] [][][ ] [Z][][] c [] [d ][]
24 [K?] []e .
[T - - - - - - -] [][, ]e [- - - - - - -],
32 [() K ? e ] .

H A K

O11:
T A
\ [] ^E[]-

33 [], [][ K] e .
K. . . 33: e Woodward.

A,
,
, , ,
K,
9. A. . A, AE 1913, 160 AE 1923, 148, . 380,1-2.
10. A. . A, AE 1924, 174, . 407, . 23-24 32.
11. A. . A, AE 1916, 29, . 278, . 33.

 ^ A

13

A,
14 .X. 40-41 .X. 12. A ,

[][ K?] e ,
Y
13.


, A14. H
(M , .
. 236 : 77 103 43/46 .)
K15 (. 1):

vac. T K
vac. A
\ d K .

H K

A. Y, ,
,
. A
\ () (. 5 13,
K - A
). A , ,

^I (. 10), E
(. 14) A
\ e (. 18),
\A ^I.

12. M.-H. Z-K, T e , A

\ e .
, :
.. (1996-1998), 1
, 2000, 145-149.
13. IG IX 2, 1041 c Br. Helly, Gonnoi II, Amsterdam 1973, 142.
14. H. Kramolisch, Demetrias II: Die Strategen des hessalischen Bundes vom Jahr 196 v.
Chr. bis zum Ausgang der rmischen Republik, Bonn 1978, 137-138.
15. Y. Bquignon, Mlanges Daux, Paris 1974, 4, . 2, . 5.

14

- -

. 1.
.. 236.

K
16, . 12 .X. ,
17, terminum ante quem
K. T
27 12 .X. E
:
(T e ), (I), (M),

16. Br. Helly, BCH 99 (1975) 120, . 3-5.

17. B. , . 14.

 ^ A

15

. 2. .. 745. .

([][]), ()
(A
\ ),
(, ,
, , ), , ,
\ ^I .
A
A K,

. T K 18, .
M (. . 745 : 12 20 70 . . .: 2 . () 1, 2 (O), : 0,5 . ), , 19. (. 2):
18. Br. Helly, Chapiteaux et consoles inscripts. Deux exemples thessaliens, :
..., .. (. 12) 154.
19. O ,
,
.

16

- -

. 3.
SEG 29, 531.

K
^I
[] ...

O
A. T K
I,
3 . .X.

 ^ A

17

K, Kramolisch20. A I A
2 . .X. Pouilloux21. K 22.
(. 3):
20 - - - M ()e X ^I
v d A d ^H d
v . vac. \I vac. .

,
, M
: X23 (. K)
^I, A, ,
^H , .
M
K
, fragmentum
:
M , . . 151. T ,
. 13 . K 191820. : 29 26 14, 5 . .: 2-1,5 . : 0,8-0,6 .
A, , (. 4).

A.

[- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -]
[- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -] . .e. [- - - - - - - - -]
[- - - - - - - - d A
\ ?]. . A
\ .[]
[- - - - - - d (?) - - - - - - ]e K d vac.
[^I (?) d A] e
[K d ^H]. d ^I.[]

20. Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 26 ().

21. J. Pouilloux, BCH 79 (1955) 454 . Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 24-25.
22. SEG 29, 531, . 20-22.
23. lapsus, ( , ).

18

- -

. 4.
.. 151.

[d d ] .
[- - - - - - e - - - - - - .] ^I d N vac.
[d - - - - - - - - - ]e ^I d .[][- - - - - - - - - d - - - -] E.
10 [- - - - - - - - d - - - - - -]. e vac.
[d - - - - - - - - - - - -] vac.
[- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -] e M vac.
[- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -].... vac.

[- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -]
K. . . 1: K (H)
. . 2: . A O. . 4: K P. . 5:
. A O. . 6: A N.
. 7: . . 8: A , . . 9: Y. . 10:
. T EIMAKOY (rasura), . . 13: .

,
, . H

 ^ A

19

e
.
T . 4
(, )
K. T K ^I
^I N N, Z ^I ,
, 24, ,
. X , A
K 25. K
, 26, ,
. , K,
, d \ ,
.
O ^H 27, (. 5):
O[] c
d
e 5 d , n ,
M
-------------------------- - - c . A c ^H12 ^H K. .
K. . . 5: ed. pr. d Robert.

24. M.-H. Z-K, IG IX 2, 1232, , , 1975-1990: , , 17-22 1990, A 1994, 301 (SEG 44, 450),
. 11-13.
25. . 7-8.
26. SEG 44, 450, . 34-35.
27. . P. , A 16 (1960) X. 185.

20

- -

. 5.
cD 345.

M ^H K
, ^H 2
.X. , M , d
171 .X., Robert28. H
,
. 5 , ,
,
. M
29, Robert T
28. L. Robert, BE 1964, 227.
29. T. Livius, 42, 57-61.

 ^ A

21

-T. O Helly ,
A, . ,
,
. c (. 2-3)

, O e
, P, , , . ,
M30. 31 , , , , ,
K.
,
, . T
.
A , d e d
d e
, 32, . T ,
,
33, . O c
F , , ,
34,
A35. H , ,

30. Br. Helly, Les Italiens en Thessalie , : Les bourgeoisies municipales

italiennes aux IIe et Ier sicles av. J.-C., Paris - Naples 1983, 374-378 . , H (, , ), , -, 1985, 139.
31. E. Preuner, Griechische Siegerlisten, AM 28 (1903) 370-382 W. Kroog, De foederis
Thessalorum praetoribus, Halis Saxonum 1908, 12.
32. A K (IG IX 2, 459
SEG 23, 437), ,
.
33. LSJ 9, . , 4.
34. IG IX 2, 538 () 34 (Y).
35. . , II, A 1949, 103.

22

- -

( n ),

36.
P ,
37, , ,
( ) ,
, ,
c O .

.
^H ^H,
c 38.
,
. . 7 ,
, 39. Helly40,

,
1 . ..,
^H ,
.
^H, .
41
.
42 ,
.
1 .. ^H.
36. E ( 196 .X. ),
.
37. .. .
38. Robert, .. (. 28) 181. Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 135. Helly, .. (. 30) (1983)
376.
39. . , . 16.
40. . , . 32.
41. Y. Bquignon, BCH 59 (1935) 71-72.
42. Cic. Ad Fam. 13, 25 Caesar, BC 3, 35, 3.

 ^ A

23

:
,

43.

2 .. , , ,
^H
, Kramolisch.
^H
44, ,
, :
^H
K
, .

O ^I K K,
45,
E E, ^I (. 6):
^O E E[], b ^I K[], b A
\ A
\ [],
.
K. . . 3-4: A
\ [ ]| vac. ed. pr.

43. . , 1915, 172: \E b e c

K, d c X F, d T [ M] d X [ K], d c , , a c
, , , a
d d , e , 22
, , F \AF F
, d e \A, r e [ ] K e e A
\ , e A
\ d
IG IX 2, 460 461 . ..
44. IG IX 2, 1252.
45. N. I. , A 1927/28, 55-56, . 1.

24

- -

. 6. cD 370. .

OA
\ A
\ , ^I K46,
A
\ d ^I, IG IX 2,
541, . 5-6, ,
E e , A
\ A
\
A (M
, . . 91/17, . 5-6 7-8)47,
^I E E
48.
46. O P. Clement, AC 3 (1934) 405 . . 2, , .
47. T McD 1105, 23 , . H A
\ [ - - - - ]| []
Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 26 . 17 IG IX 2,
1293, . 15-16, , , \ [d - - -]| N.
A
48. IG IX 2, 541, . 11. E E, McD 349, . 16 , E A
\ , IG IX 2, 549, . 5-8, d
. M.-H. Z-K, , . ., 1998, 12, .

 ^ A

25

K , 49.
, , (. 7-8):
K, b A
\ E|, , .

. 7.
G 2, 784.

49. IG IX 2, 784.

26

- -

. 8. . 7.

, A
\ ,
E. T
50,
. H E
. H
E ,
60 .X.51, ,
Kramolisch . E
, ,
E ,
,
^H, 52.
K,
.
E ,
50. Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 34 ().
51. Kramolisch, .. (. 14) 99 (F 6).
52. IG IX 2, 531, . 32-34.

 ^ A

27

,
K
A.
K. E , ,

^I. ,
K
A , ,
,
.
E
. K
.
A , , , .
, :
1. K A, ,
K ^I,
\ , , ^I A
, .
2. E K , . )
^H, K 2 .X. .,
- ,
,
)
K ) ^H, ,
.
3. A
,
4. A K,

, .

28

- -

KEPHALOS HIPPOLOCHOU,
A GENERAL FROM LARISSA DURING THE IMPERIAL ERA

MIRI-ELEKTRA ZCHOU-KONTOGIANNI
This work attempts to sketch the personality of K, general of the
Thessalian federal state during the imperial era. It re-examines the relative epigraphical material and edits an inscription from Larissa, which, despite the
dramatically fragmentary state it is found in, proves to be extremely revealing.
The study leads to the following conclusions:
1. General K, dated to the Augustan period with no other dues to
his identity up to now is identified as his contemporary K
^I from Larissa, connected thus to the eminent family ^I\ being indisputably a distinguished member of it.
and A
2. The reformation of the K family stem from Larissa is proved indispensable and leads to the omission of some intrusive members such as
a) ^H, , coming from Krannon and dated to the second half
of the 2nd century B.C., due to the archaeological facts which unquestionably prove the origin of the decree, in which he is mentioned, to be
Krannon and not Larissa
b) General K himself and
c) ^H, the generals son, winner at the local games in Larissa.
3. It throws light on scientific obscurities concerning prosopographical and
chronological matters. It interprets correctly the meaning of the formulation c omitting the geographical feature attributed to
it. The misinterpretation of this term has led research to pragmatological
and historical inaccuracies. It brings forward and certifies the local and
especially that of Larissas character of the games which included c c ^H in which ^H K, the
generals son was made known as winner.
4. Finally, it reveals the natural and adopted children of general K
leading safely to the conclusion that they shared equivalent legal rights at
least within range of the institution of slave manumissions.