Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Case Description Case ID: Case Caption: Filing Date: Court: Location: Jury: Case Type: Status: Related Cases No related cases were found. Case Event Schedule No case events were found. Case motions No case motions were found. Case Parties Seq # 1 Address: STEIN&SILVERMAN PC 230 S BROAD ST 18TH FL PHILADELPHIA PA 19102 (215)985-0255 Assoc Expn Date 21-JUL2005 Type ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Name LAPAT, ANDREW 031100946 NEVYAS ETAL VS MORGAN Friday , November 07th, 2003 MAJOR NON JURY City Hall NON JURY EQUITY - NO REAL ESTATE (TRO) FINDING FOR PLAINTIFF
Aliases: none
13
PLAINTIFF
NEVYAS MD,
13
PLAINTIFF
Aliases: none
13
15
MORGAN, DOMINIC
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
NEVYAS, HERBERT J
NEVYASWALLAC, ANITA
11
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
11
ALBERT, JEFFREY B
12
19-OCT2005
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
Aliases: none
13
SILVERMAN, LEON W
Aliases: none
28-SEP2010
JUDGE
MAIER, EUGENE E
Aliases: none
15
HANZELIK, CARL
16
HOFFMAN, PETER J
Address: ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN MELLOTT TWO LIBERTY PLACE 50 SOUTH 16TH ST 22ND FLOOR PHILADELPHIA PA 19102 (215)851-8400
17
16
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
28-SEP2010
JUDGE
FOX, IDEE C
Aliases: none
28-SEP2010
JUDGE
ROGERS, PETER F
Aliases: none
MANFREDI, WILLIAM J
19107 (215)686-2606
MOSS, SANDRA M
Docket Entries Filing Date/Time Docket Type Filing Party LAPAT, ANDREW Disposition Amount Approval/ Entry Date 10-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
LAPAT, ANDREW
10-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
Docket COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE TO DEFEND WITHIN TWENTY (20) Entry: DAYS AFTER SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 1018.1 FILED.
07-NOV-2003 SHERIFF'S SURCHARGE LAPAT, 11:37 AM 1 DEFT ANDREW Docket none. Entry:
10-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
LAPAT, ANDREW
10-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
07-NOV-2003 01:47 PM
LAPAT, ANDREW
10-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
Docket 09-03110609 EMERGENCY PETITION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY Entry: INJUNCTION FILED.
10-NOV-2003 09:47 AM
Docket 09-03110609 EMERGENCY PETITION FOR TRO AND PRELIMINARY Entry: INJUNCTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE SYLVESTER, 11-10-03.
12-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
Docket PROTHONOTARYS ENTRY....PLEASE DISREGARD ABOVE ENTRY Entry: OF SHERIFF SURCHARGE ENTERED IN ERROR. MFS
SYLVESTER, ESTHER R
18-NOV-2003 12:15 PM
09-03110609 UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' VERIFIED COMPLAINT, PLAINTIFFS' PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, Docket DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS ORDERED AND Entry: DECREED THAT THESE PETITIONS FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ARE DENIED. BY THE COURT...SYLVESTER, J. 11/17/03
28-NOV-2003 12:00 AM
28-NOV-2003 12:26 PM
Docket 81-03112181 PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE SYLVESTER ON 12-1-03.
03-DEC-2003 12:51 PM
04-DEC-2003 12:00 AM
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE TO DEFEND WITHIN Docket TWENTY(20) DAYS AFTER SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE Entry: 1018.1 FILED.
08-DEC-2003 01:39 PM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
10-DEC-2003 12:00 AM
Docket ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF STEVEN A. FRIEDMAN FILED ON Entry: BEHALF OF DFT DOMINIC MORGAN.
08-DEC-2003 03:46 PM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
15-DEC-2003 12:00 AM
Docket ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITH NEW MATTER AND Entry: COUNTERCLAIM FILED BY DEFENDANT DOMINIC MARGAN.
12-DEC-2003 03:57 PM
CORRECTIVE ENTRY
12-DEC-2003 12:00 AM
PROTHONOTARY CORRECTIVE ENTRY: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE Docket AMENDED COMPLAINT ENTERED ON 12/3/03 WAS ENTERED IN Entry: ERROR, THE AMENDMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN REJECTED UNDER RULE 1033...RFW
15-DEC-2003 01:41 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
16-DEC-2003 12:00 AM
19-DEC-2003 10:18 AM
05-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
13-JAN-2004 10:50 AM
15-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
14-JAN-2004 08:48 AM
14-JAN-2004 08:48 AM
16-JAN-2004 01:00 AM
NOTICE GIVEN
16-JAN-2004 01:00 AM
23-JAN-2004 01:18 PM
REPLY FILED
LAPAT, ANDREW
23-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
26-JAN-2004 08:51 AM
LAPAT, ANDREW
27-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
Docket ORDER TO DISCONTINUE PLTFS' CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Entry: FILED BY PLAINTIFF(S) ATTORNEY.
27-JAN-2004 12:10 PM
ANSWER (MOTION/PETITION)
MORGAN, DOMINIC
27-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
FILED Docket 81-03112181 ANSWER TO SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR Entry: RECONSIDERATION FILED.
27-JAN-2004 01:44 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
27-JAN-2004 12:00 AM
02-FEB-2004 04:27 PM
MOTION TO STRIKE
MORGAN, DOMINIC
03-FEB-2004 12:00 AM
06-FEB-2004 01:00 PM
REPLY FILED
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
09-FEB-2004 12:00 AM
DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' NEW Docket MATTER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES WHICH PLAINTIFFS Entry: INCLUDEED IN THEIR ANSWER TO DEFENDANT'S NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM
09-FEB-2004 10:26 AM
09-FEB-2004 10:26 AM
09-FEB-2004 04:28 PM
11-FEB-2004 12:00 AM
11-FEB-2004 01:00 AM
NOTICE GIVEN
11-FEB-2004 01:00 AM
Docket none.
Entry:
13-FEB-2004 11:31 AM
SYLVESTER, ESTHER R
13-FEB-2004 11:32 AM
81-03112181 AND NOW, THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2004, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT DEFENDANT'S CROSS Docket MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION Entry: FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. ...BY THE COURT: ESTHER SYLVESTER, J. 2-2-04
24-FEB-2004 09:54 AM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
24-FEB-2004 09:55 AM
It is hereby ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. Development of Joint Statement of Uncontested and Contested Facts. (a) Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Legal Issues for Trial. By 8/25/04, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a narrative statement listing all facts proposed to be proved by him or her at trial in support of his or her claim(s) as to liability and damages. Additionally, plaintiff shall provide the Court with all relevant conclusions of law based upon his or her proposed findings of fact and any and all legal issues presented thereto. (b) Defendant's Response and Proposed Facts. By 9/25/04, defendant shall provide the Court a statement: (1) indicating the extent to which defendant contests and does not contest the plaintiff's proposed facts: (2) listing all additional facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in opposition to, or in special defense of, the plaintiff's claim(s) as to liability and damages; (3) listing all facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in support of any counterclaim(s), and/or third-party Docket claim(s) if such claims exist; (4) listing any and all conclusions of law which Entry: arise from all contested and uncontested facts as proposed by the plaintiff; and, (5) listing for the Court all legal issues presented based upon proposed facts and conclusions of law. (c) Statement of Uncontested Facts. By 8/25/04, the same date as that listed in paragraph 1 (a) of this order, the parties shall submit a joint statement of uncontested facts. This statement is separate and distinct from any other submitted. As such, agreement or disagreement, which terms are defined below, with any proposed fact by a defendant does not obviate the requirements of this paragraph. 2. Identification of Witnesses and Exhibits. (a) Plaintiff's Witnesses. By 8/25/04, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (b) Plaintiff's Exhibits. By 8/25/04, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of trial. (c) Defendant's Witnesses. By 9/25/04, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses,
including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (d) Defendant's Exhibits. By 9/25/04, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of the trial. 3. Definitions. (a) Narration of Proposed Facts. In stating facts proposed to be proved, counsel shall do so in simple, declarative, self contained, consecutively numbered sentences. In a case with multiple parties, if a fact is to offered against fewer than all parties, counsel shall indicate the parties against which the fact will (or will not) be offered. (The facts to be set forth include not only ultimate facts, but also all subsidiary and supporting facts except those offered solely for impeachment purposes.) (b) Agreement and Disagreement. Defense counsel shall indicate that he or she does not contest a proposed fact if at trial they will not controvert or dispute that fact. In indicating disagreement with a proposed fact, defense counsel shall so set forth those disagreement(s) as explained above. (c) Objections. Objections to the admissability of a proposed fact (either as irrelevant or on other grounds) may not be used to avoid indicating whether or not the party contests the truth of that fact. (Counsel shall, however, indicate any objections, both to the facts which they contest and those which they do not contest.) (d) Individual Positions. To the extent feasible, counsel with similar interests are expected to coordinate their efforts and express a joint position with respect to the facts they propose to prove and to the facts other parties propose to prove. Subject to the time limits above, each party may, however, list additional proposed facts to cover positions unique to it. 4. Annotations. For each proposed fact, the parties shall, at the time of proposing to prove the fact, list the witnesses (including expert witnesses), documents, and (with line-by-line references) any depositions and answers to interrogatories or requests for admissions that they will offer to prove that fact. In his or her response, defense counsel shall, if he or she objects to any such proposed fact or proposed proof, state precisely the grounds of their objections and, if they will contest the accuracy of the proposed fact, similarily list the witnesses, documents, depositions, interrogatories, or admissions that they will offer to controvert that fact. Except for good cause shown, a party will be precluded at trial from offering any evidence on any fact not so disclosed and from making any objection not so disclosed. 5. Effect. (a) Preclusion of other facts. Except for good cause shown, parties shall be precluded at trial from offering proof of any fact not disclosed in their listing of proposed facts (except purely for impeachment purposes). 6. Sanctions. Unjustified refusal to admit a proposed fact or to limit the extent of disagreement with a proposed fact shall be subject to sanctions. Excessive listing of proposed facts (or of the evidence to be submitted in support of or denial of such facts) which imposes obvious burdens on opposing parties shall also be subject to sanctions. BY THE COURT: Norman Ackerman, Coordinating Judge
24-FEB-2004
LISTED FOR
24-FEB-2004
09:55 AM
SETTLEMENT CONF
09:55 AM
24-FEB-2004 09:56 AM
24-FEB-2004 09:56 AM
27-FEB-2004 09:28 AM
03-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
Docket 10-0312510 ANS FILED TO MOITON TO STRIKE (FILED BY HERBERT Entry: J. NEVYAS, M.D. AND DR. ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE)
MORGAN, DOMINIC
02-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
02-MAR-2004 MOTION ASSIGNED 12:29 PM Docket 10-04012510 MOTION TO STRIKE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: CARRAFIELLO ON 3-3-04
02-MAR-2004 12:29 PM
04-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
Docket 10-04012510 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO IN SUPPORT TO PETITION TO Entry: STRIKE OFF DISCONTINUANCE FILED.
MORGAN, DOMINIC
09-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
LAPAT, ANDREW
12-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
17-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
16-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
15-MAR-2004 02:51 PM
Docket 93-04020393 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 3-16-04
25-MAR-2004 12:00 AM
Docket 55-04032355 RESPONSE DATE 4-13-04. FILED BY PLAINTIFFS, Entry: NEVYAS ETAL/PLAINTIFFS.
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
31-MAR-2004 11:37 AM
10-04012510 IT IS ORDRED THAT THE DEFENDANT'S PETITION TO Docket STRIKE OFF PLAINTIFF'S DISCONITUANCE, AND PLAINTIFF'S Entry: RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS DENIED. ....BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO,
J. 3-30-04.
01-APR-2004 01:51 PM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
01-APR-2004 01:52 PM
93-04020393 IT IS ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR Docket SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE THERETO, Entry: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS DENIED. ....BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 3-31-04.
12-APR-2004 12:34 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
12-APR-2004 12:00 AM
15-APR-2004 12:55 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
15-APR-2004 12:55 PM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
19-MAY-2004 10:38 AM
55-04032355 AND NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF MAY, 2004, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS DR. HERBERT NEVYAS AND DR. ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE'S MOTION TO REINSTATE CLAIM AND AMEND COMPLAINT, AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS Docket GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE Entry: REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO REINSTATE IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MUST FORMALLY REINSTATE THEIR COMPLAINT. 2. THE REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO AMEND IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO REQUEST RELIEF UNDER PA.R.C.P. 2232. ...BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 5-17-04
21-MAY-2004 12:00 AM
COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE TO DEFEND WITHIN TWENTY (20) Docket DAYS AFTER SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 1018.1 Entry: REINSTATED.
07-JUN-2004 03:54 PM
08-JUN-2004 12:00 AM
87-04060587 RESPONSE DATE 6-28-04. (FILED BY PLFS, HERBERT J. Docket NEVYAS, M.D., ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EYE Entry: ASSOCIATES, P.C.)
28-JUN-2004 03:07 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
28-JUN-2004 12:00 AM
30-JUN-2004 03:41 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
30-JUN-2004 03:41 PM
Docket 87-04060587 MOTION TO JOIN ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 7-1-04
09-JUL-2004 10:47 AM
MOTION-JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS
MORGAN, DOMINIC
12-JUL-2004 12:00 AM
09-JUL-2004 02:07 PM
SHERIFF'S SERVICE
09-JUL-2004 12:00 AM
Docket DEPUTIZED SERVICE OF COMPLAINT UPON DOMINIC MORGAN BY Entry: SHERIFF OF DELAWARE COUNTY ON 15-JUN-04.
09-JUL-2004 04:42 PM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
09-JUL-2004 04:44 PM
Docket 87-04060587 AND NOW, THIS 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2004, UPON
Entry: CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 2232(C) TO JOIN ADDITIONAL DEFENDANT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN, AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS MAY FILE THEIR AMENDED COMPLAINT (ATTACHED TO THE MOTION AS EXHIBIT 3) WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 7/9/04.
13-JUL-2004 03:01 PM
14-JUL-2004 12:00 AM
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE TO DEFEND WITHIN Docket TWENTY(20) DAYS AFTER SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE Entry: 1018.1 FILED.
16-JUL-2004 10:30 AM
20-JUL-2004 12:00 AM
46-04073946 RESPONSE DATE 7-26-04. FILED BY PLAINTIFFS, Docket HERBERT NEVYAS, MD, ANITA NEVYAS, MD AND NEVYAS EYE Entry: ASSOCIATES, PC.
27-JUL-2004 10:35 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
05-AUG-2004 12:00 AM
28-JUL-2004 09:41 AM
29-JUL-2004 12:00 AM
47-04073347 ANS TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS Docket FILED. (FILED BY PLFS, HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D. AND ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D.)
28-JUL-2004 12:26 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
28-JUL-2004 12:26 PM
Docket 46-04073946 PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE ACKERMAN ON 7-29-04.
02-AUG-2004 09:05 AM
Docket 47-04073347 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 8-3-04.
MORGAN, DOMINIC
05-AUG-2004 12:00 AM
05-AUG-2004 10:36 AM
Docket 39-04074939 MOTION TO WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE ACKERMAN ON 8-6-04.
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
06-AUG-2004 12:00 AM
AND NOW, THIS 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2004, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT A RULE RETURNABLE IS SCHEDULED ON AUGUST 18, 2004, AT 10:00 A.M. IN COURTROOM 696 CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO SHOW CAUSE WHY STEVEN FRIEDMAN, ESQUIRE, SHOULD NOT WITHDRAW AS COUNCEL OF RECORD OF THE DEFENDANT IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD THAT STEVEN FRIEDMAN, ESQUIRE, SHALL Docket NOTIFY THE DEFENDANT BY CERTIFIED AND REGULAR MAIL OF Entry: SAID HEARING ADVISING THAT THEY MUST APPEAR AND FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS AND/OR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. FURTHER, ALL COUNSEL INVOLVED IN THIS INSTANT MATTER MUST ALSO APPEAR AND STEVEN FRIEDMAN, ESQUIRE, IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO SERVE APPROPRIATE NOTICE ON SAID COUNSEL. BY THE COURT: ACKERMAN, J. 8-6-04.
BERNSTEIN, MARK I
19-AUG-2004 02:50 PM
39-04074939 IT IS ORDERED THAT STEVEN FRIEDMAN ESQ IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DEFT, DOMINIC Docket MORGAN. ALL PROCEEDINGS ARE STAYED FOR 60 DAYS IN Entry: ORDER TO ALLOW SAID DEFT TO OBTAIN NEW COUNSEL. BY THE COURT ...BERNSTEIN,J 8/18/04
BERNSTEIN, MARK I
19-AUG-2004 02:52 PM
46-04073946 IT IS ORDERED THAT PLTFS' MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IS GRANTED. THE NEW SCHEDULED DATES FOR THIS MATTER ARE: PLTFS' PROPOSED FINDINGS, Docket WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS - 12/18/04; DEFTS' PROPOSED Entry: FINDINGS, WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LISTS - 1/18/05; SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE - 2/8/05 AT 10:30 IN ROOM 622; AND TRIAL - 2/22/05 AT 9:30 AM IN COURTROOM 696, CITY HALL. BY THE COURT ...BERNSTEIN,J 8/18/04
19-AUG-2004 02:52 PM
19-AUG-2004 02:52 PM
19-AUG-2004 02:53 PM
19-AUG-2004 02:53 PM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
26-AUG-2004 10:35 AM
47-03073347 UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND ANY Docket RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED Entry: THAT THE MOTION IS DENIED. ...BY THE COURT, JUDGE CARRAFIELLO, 8-24-04.
21-SEP-2004 11:07 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
22-SEP-2004 12:00 AM
22-SEP-2004 11:12 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
22-SEP-2004 11:12 AM
Docket 72-04092272 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: CARRAFIELLO ON 9/23/04.
23-SEP-2004 09:09 AM
23-SEP-2004 12:00 AM
Docket 72-04092272 MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: BERNSTEIN ON 9-24-04
27-SEP-2004 04:47 PM
27-SEP-2004 12:00 AM
72-04092272 MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF PROCEEDINGS Docket REASSIGNED TO JUDGE ACKERMAN ON 9/28/04 PER JUDGE Entry: BERNSTEIN.
28-SEP-2004 02:52 PM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
28-SEP-2004 12:00 AM
47-04073347 AND NOW, TO WIT, THIS 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2004, UPON FURTHER CONSIDERATION, THE AUGUST 24, 2004 ORDER DEALING WITH DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS RESCINDED AND VACATED. DEFENDANT FILED HIS MOTION JULY Docket 9, 2004, AND THE MOTION CONCERNED PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL Entry: COMPLAINT. DEFENDANT'S MOTION BECAME INOPERATIVE WHEN PLAINTIFFS CHANGED THEIR COMPLAINT BY AMENDMENT FILED JULY 13, 2004. FURTHER, ON AUGUST 18, 2004, THIS COURT ORDERED A SIXTY (60) DAY STAY OF ALL PROCEEDINGS. ...BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 9-24-04
04-OCT-2004 11:22 AM
05-OCT-2004 12:00 AM
Docket 72-04092272 ANS FILED TO MOTION TO STAY (FILED BY PLFS, Entry: HERBERT NEVYAS AND ANITA WALLACE)
04-OCT-2004 11:42 AM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
04-OCT-2004 11:44 AM
72-04092272 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT A RULE RETURNABLE IS ENTERED IN THE ABOVE MATTER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS FILED IN THE ABOVE MATTER SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. RULE RETURNABLE THE 15TH DAY Docket OF OCTOBER, 2004, AT 10:00 A.M. IN COURTROOM 696, CITY HALL, Entry: PHILADELPHIA, PA. ALL COUNSEL ARE DIRECTED TO APPEAR. FAILURE TO APPEAR MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR PRECLUSION. BY THE COURT...ACKERMAN, J. 10/4/04
04-OCT-2004 12:02 PM
CORRECTIVE ENTRY
04-OCT-2004 12:00 AM
ORDER DATED 10/4/04 SHOULD READ "RULE RETURNABLE THE Docket 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2004 AT 10:00 A.M. IN COURTROOM 696, Entry: CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA, PA.
13-OCT-2004 11:09 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
14-OCT-2004 12:00 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:10 AM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
21-OCT-2004 12:00 AM
72-04092272 IT IS ORDERED THAT MOTION OF STEVEN FRIEDMAN ESQ, COUNSEL FOR DEFT, FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED AND ALL PROCEEDINGS ARE STAYED FOR 30 DAYS TO Docket ALLOW DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN TO OBTAIN NEW COUNSEL. ALL Entry: DEADLINES ARE EXTENDED 30 DAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ATTACHED PRE-TRIAL ORDER. BY THE COURT ...ACKERMAN,J 10/13/04
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:12 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:13 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:13 AM
21-OCT-2004 10:13 AM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
21-OCT-2004 12:00 AM
It is hereby ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. Development of Joint Statement of Uncontested and Contested Facts. (a) Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Legal Issues for Trial. By 1/21/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a narrative statement listing all facts proposed to be proved by him or her at trial in support of his or her claim(s) as to liability and damages. Additionally, plaintiff shall provide the Court with all relevant conclusions of law based upon his or her proposed findings of fact and any and all legal issues presented thereto. (b) Defendant's Response and Proposed Facts. By 2/21/05, defendant shall provide the Court a statement: (1) indicating the extent to which defendant contests and does not contest the plaintiff's proposed facts: (2) listing all additional facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in opposition to, or in special defense of, the plaintiff's claim(s) as to liability and damages; (3) listing all facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in support of any counterclaim(s), and/or third-party claim(s) if such claims exist; (4) listing any and all conclusions of law which arise from all contested and uncontested facts as proposed by the plaintiff; and, (5) listing for the Court all legal issues presented based upon proposed facts and conclusions of law. (c) Statement of Uncontested Facts. By 1/21/05, the same date as that listed in paragraph 1 (a) of this order, the parties shall submit a joint statement of uncontested facts. This statement is separate and distinct from any other submitted. As such, agreement or disagreement, which terms are defined below, with any proposed fact by a defendant does not Docket obviate the requirements of this paragraph. 2. Identification of Witnesses and Entry: Exhibits. (a) Plaintiff's Witnesses. By 1/21/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (b) Plaintiff's Exhibits. By 1/21/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of trial. (c) Defendant's Witnesses. By 2/21/05, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (d) Defendant's Exhibits. By 2/21/05, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of the trial. 3. Definitions. (a) Narration of Proposed Facts. In stating facts proposed to be proved, counsel shall do so in simple, declarative, self contained, consecutively numbered sentences. In a case with multiple parties, if a fact is to offered against fewer than all parties, counsel shall indicate the parties against which the fact will (or will not) be offered. (The facts to be set forth include not only ultimate facts, but also all subsidiary and supporting facts except those offered solely for impeachment purposes.) (b) Agreement and Disagreement. Defense counsel shall indicate that he or she does not contest a proposed fact if at trial they will not controvert or dispute that fact. In indicating disagreement with a proposed fact, defense counsel shall so set forth those disagreement(s) as explained above. (c) Objections. Objections to the admissability of a proposed fact (either as irrelevant or on other grounds) may not be used to avoid indicating whether or not the party contests the truth
of that fact. (Counsel shall, however, indicate any objections, both to the facts which they contest and those which they do not contest.) (d) Individual Positions. To the extent feasible, counsel with similar interests are expected to coordinate their efforts and express a joint position with respect to the facts they propose to prove and to the facts other parties propose to prove. Subject to the time limits above, each party may, however, list additional proposed facts to cover positions unique to it. 4. Annotations. For each proposed fact, the parties shall, at the time of proposing to prove the fact, list the witnesses (including expert witnesses), documents, and (with line-by-line references) any depositions and answers to interrogatories or requests for admissions that they will offer to prove that fact. In his or her response, defense counsel shall, if he or she objects to any such proposed fact or proposed proof, state precisely the grounds of their objections and, if they will contest the accuracy of the proposed fact, similarily list the witnesses, documents, depositions, interrogatories, or admissions that they will offer to controvert that fact. Except for good cause shown, a party will be precluded at trial from offering any evidence on any fact not so disclosed and from making any objection not so disclosed. 5. Effect. (a) Preclusion of other facts. Except for good cause shown, parties shall be precluded at trial from offering proof of any fact not disclosed in their listing of proposed facts (except purely for impeachment purposes). 6. Sanctions. Unjustified refusal to admit a proposed fact or to limit the extent of disagreement with a proposed fact shall be subject to sanctions. Excessive listing of proposed facts (or of the evidence to be submitted in support of or denial of such facts) which imposes obvious burdens on opposing parties shall also be subject to sanctions. BY THE COURT: Norman Ackerman, Coordinating Judge 10/13/04
ALBERT, JEFFREY B
30-NOV-2004 12:00 AM
Docket ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF JEFFREY B. ALBERT ESQ. FILED ON Entry: BEHALF OF DFT STEVEN A. FRIEDMAN.
ALBERT, JEFFREY B
30-NOV-2004 12:00 AM
Docket PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED Entry: COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT STEVEN FRIEDMAN.
01-DEC-2004 12:00 AM
LAPAT, ANDREW
01-DEC-2004 12:00 AM
PRAECIPE FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED. JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF(S) AGAINST DEFENDANT, DOMINIC MORGAN, Docket ONLY, FOR FAILURE TO FILE ANSWER TO THE AMENDED Entry: COMPLAINT WITHIN REQUIRED TIME. PRO-PROTHONOTARY NOTICE UNDER RULE 236. NOTICE UNDER 237.5. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE FILED .
06-DEC-2004 04:59 PM
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
MORGAN, DOMINIC
07-DEC-2004 12:00 AM
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED Docket COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN. PLEASE Entry: NOTE THE ABOVE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS WERE FILED ON 11/29/04 BUT WERE NOT DOCKETED...RFW
07-DEC-2004 09:42 AM
CORRECTIVE ENTRY
07-DEC-2004 12:00 AM
PROTHONOTARY CORRECTIVE ENTRY: PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DEFAULT JUDGMENT ENTERED ON 11/30/04 AS TO DEFENDANT Docket DOMINIC MORGAN WAS ENTERED IN ERROR, DEFENDANT'S Entry: PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WERE FILED ON 11/29/04 BUT WERE NOT DOCKETED...RFW
28-DEC-2004 02:59 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
28-DEC-2004 12:00 AM
29-DEC-2004 09:54 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
03-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
10-JAN-2005 11:21 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
11-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
10-JAN-2005 11:44 AM
11-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH NOTICE TO DEFEND WITHIN Docket TWENTY (20) DAYS AFTER SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE Entry: 1018.1 REINSTATED.
18-JAN-2005 10:37 AM
19-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
18-JAN-2005 10:37 AM
19-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
18-JAN-2005 03:47 PM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
21-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
18-JAN-2005 03:57 PM
PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS
ALBERT, JEFFREY B
19-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
Docket PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED Entry: COMPLAINT FILED BY DEFENDANT STEVEN FRIEDMAN.
19-JAN-2005 09:36 AM
RIZZO, ANNETTE M
19-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
AND NOW, THIS 14TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2005, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT EDWARD L. EDELSTEIN, ESQ., IS HEREBY APPOINTED AS DISCOVERY MASTER IN THE ABOVEDocket CAPTIONED MATTER. THE FEES AND COSTS INCURRED AS A Entry: RESULT OF HIS SERVICES SHALL BE PAID IN EQUAL PART BY ALL PARTIES. THE DISCOVERY MASTER WILL CONTACT COUNSEL TO SCHEDULE ALL NECESSARY CONFERENCES.....BY THE COURT RIZZO,J. 1-14-05
20-JAN-2005 02:41 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
20-JAN-2005 02:41 PM
Docket 16-04121916 MOTION TO DETERMINE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 1-21-05.
20-JAN-2005 02:41 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
20-JAN-2005 02:41 PM
Docket 28-04122028 MOTION TO DETERMINE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 1-21-05.
21-JAN-2005 09:51 AM
REPLY FILED
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
24-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
21-JAN-2005 12:08 PM
24-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
28-JAN-2005 09:46 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
31-JAN-2005 12:00 AM
31-JAN-2005 09:18 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
01-FEB-2005 12:00 AM
02-FEB-2005 11:39 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
02-FEB-2005 11:39 AM
Docket 97-05011697 MOTION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE ACKERMAN ON 2-3-05.
02-FEB-2005 12:06 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
02-FEB-2005 12:06 PM
Docket 63-05010663 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE MANFREDI ON 2-3-05.
03-FEB-2005 11:29 AM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
03-FEB-2005 11:32 AM
16-04121916 AND NOW, THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2005, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT MORGAN'S MOTION TO DETERMINE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED Docket THAT SAID PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. Entry: DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN IS GRANTED TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF DOCKETING OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. ...BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 2-2-05
04-FEB-2005 02:39 PM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
04-FEB-2005 02:42 PM
97-05011697 IT IS ORDERED THAT ALL DEADLINES IN THIS Docket MATTER ARE EXTENDED FOR AN ADDITIONAL 120 DAYS. THERE Entry: WILL BE NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES. CASE MANAGEMENT
04-FEB-2005 02:43 PM
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
04-FEB-2005 12:00 AM
It is hereby ORDERED and DECREED as follows: 1. Development of Joint Statement of Uncontested and Contested Facts. (a) Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Legal Issues for Trial. By 5/25/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a narrative statement listing all facts proposed to be proved by him or her at trial in support of his or her claim(s) as to liability and damages. Additionally, plaintiff shall provide the Court with all relevant conclusions of law based upon his or her proposed findings of fact and any and all legal issues presented thereto. (b) Defendant's Response and Proposed Facts. By 6/25/05, defendant shall provide the Court a statement: (1) indicating the extent to which defendant contests and does not contest the plaintiff's proposed facts: (2) listing all additional facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in opposition to, or in special defense of, the plaintiff's claim(s) as to liability and damages; (3) listing all facts proposed to be proved by defendant at trial in support of any counterclaim(s), and/or third-party claim(s) if such claims exist; (4) listing any and all conclusions of law which arise from all contested and uncontested facts as proposed by the plaintiff; and, (5) listing for the Court all legal issues presented based upon proposed facts and conclusions of law. (c) Statement of Uncontested Facts. By 5/25/05, Docket the same date as that listed in paragraph 1 (a) of this order, the parties shall Entry: submit a joint statement of uncontested facts. This statement is separate and distinct from any other submitted. As such, agreement or disagreement, which terms are defined below, with any proposed fact by a defendant does not obviate the requirements of this paragraph. 2. Identification of Witnesses and Exhibits. (a) Plaintiff's Witnesses. By 5/25/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (b) Plaintiff's Exhibits. By 5/25/05, plaintiff shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of trial. (c) Defendant's Witnesses. By 6/25/05, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible witnesses, including a brief narrative of each respective witness's expected testimony. (d) Defendant's Exhibits. By 6/25/05, defendant shall provide the Court with a list of all possible exhibits which he or she may use during the course of the trial. 3. Definitions. (a) Narration of Proposed Facts. In stating facts proposed to be proved, counsel shall do so in simple, declarative, self contained, consecutively numbered sentences. In a case with multiple parties, if a fact is to offered against fewer than all parties, counsel shall indicate the parties against which the fact will (or will not) be offered. (The facts to be set forth include not only ultimate facts, but also all subsidiary and supporting facts
except those offered solely for impeachment purposes.) (b) Agreement and Disagreement. Defense counsel shall indicate that he or she does not contest a proposed fact if at trial they will not controvert or dispute that fact. In indicating disagreement with a proposed fact, defense counsel shall so set forth those disagreement(s) as explained above. (c) Objections. Objections to the admissability of a proposed fact (either as irrelevant or on other grounds) may not be used to avoid indicating whether or not the party contests the truth of that fact. (Counsel shall, however, indicate any objections, both to the facts which they contest and those which they do not contest.) (d) Individual Positions. To the extent feasible, counsel with similar interests are expected to coordinate their efforts and express a joint position with respect to the facts they propose to prove and to the facts other parties propose to prove. Subject to the time limits above, each party may, however, list additional proposed facts to cover positions unique to it. 4. Annotations. For each proposed fact, the parties shall, at the time of proposing to prove the fact, list the witnesses (including expert witnesses), documents, and (with line-by-line references) any depositions and answers to interrogatories or requests for admissions that they will offer to prove that fact. In his or her response, defense counsel shall, if he or she objects to any such proposed fact or proposed proof, state precisely the grounds of their objections and, if they will contest the accuracy of the proposed fact, similarily list the witnesses, documents, depositions, interrogatories, or admissions that they will offer to controvert that fact. Except for good cause shown, a party will be precluded at trial from offering any evidence on any fact not so disclosed and from making any objection not so disclosed. 5. Effect. (a) Preclusion of other facts. Except for good cause shown, parties shall be precluded at trial from offering proof of any fact not disclosed in their listing of proposed facts (except purely for impeachment purposes). 6. Sanctions. Unjustified refusal to admit a proposed fact or to limit the extent of disagreement with a proposed fact shall be subject to sanctions. Excessive listing of proposed facts (or of the evidence to be submitted in support of or denial of such facts) which imposes obvious burdens on opposing parties shall also be subject to sanctions. BY THE COURT: Norman Ackerman, Coordinating Judge 2/4/05
04-FEB-2005 02:44 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:44 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
04-FEB-2005 02:45 PM
09-FEB-2005 11:43 AM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
09-FEB-2005 11:54 AM
28-04122028 AND NOW, THIS 2ND DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2005, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN'S MOTION TO DETERMINE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS AND PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED IN PART AND MOOT IN PART AS FOLLOWS: 1. DEFENDANT'S PRELIMINARY Docket OBJECTION FOR IMPROPER SERVICE UNDER PA. R.C.P. 400.1 IS Entry: MOOT. DFEFENDANT FRIEDMAN ADMITS PROPER SERVICE OCCURRED ON OR ABOUT JANUARY 13, 2005. 2. DEFENDANT'S REMAINING PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED. DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN IS GRANTED TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF DOCKETING OF THIS ORDER TO FILE AN ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. ...BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 2-2-05
09-FEB-2005 01:00 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
09-FEB-2005 01:00 PM
Docket 50-05011350 MOTION TO DETERMINE PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 2-10-05.
11-FEB-2005 11:12 AM
REPLY FILED
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
14-FEB-2005 12:00 AM
15-FEB-2005 09:50 AM
16-FEB-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 50-05011350 ANS FILED TO PO'S (FILED BY PLFS, DRS. NEVYAS Entry: AND NEVYAS-WALLACE)
16-FEB-2005 10:05 AM
MANFREDI, WILLIAM J
16-FEB-2005 10:06 AM
63-05010663-IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: 1. PETITIONER BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED WITHOUT PAYING THE COSTS OF THIS PROCEEDING OR POSTING A BOND. 2. PETITIONER BE PERMITTED TO OBTAIN SERVICE OF THE PAPERS FILED WITHOUT COST. 3. PETITIONER BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS TO ANY ADDITIONAL COSTS WHICH ACCRUE IN THE COURSE OF THIS PROCEEDING. 4. IF THERE IS A MONETARY RECOVERY BY JUDGMENT OR SETTLEMENT IN Docket FAVOR OF THE PARTY PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA Entry: PAUPERIS, THE EXONERATED FEES AND COSTS SHALL BE TAXED AS COSTS AND PAID TO THE PROTHONOTARY BY THE PARTY PAYING THE MONETARY RECOVERY. 5. PETITIONER HAS A CONTINUING OBLIGATION TO INFORM THE COURT OF ANY IMPROVEMENT IN PARTY'S FINANCIAL CIRCUMSTANCES THAT WILL ENABLE THE PARTY TO PAY COSTS. BY THE COURT: WILLIAM J. MANFREDI, SUPERVISING JUDGE, TRIAL DIVISION CIVIL, 02-15-05.
28-FEB-2005 02:21 PM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
01-MAR-2005 12:00 AM
ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH NEW Docket MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM FILED BY DEFENDANT DOMINIC Entry: MORGAN.
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
22-MAR-2005 11:02 AM
Docket 50-05011350 AND NOW, THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2005, UPON
Entry: CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT STEVEN FRIEDMAN'S AMENDED PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS, FILED ON JANUARY 18, 2005, AND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID OBJECTIONS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FILED IN VIOLATION OF PA R.C.P.1033. DEFENDANT SHALL PLEAD OVER WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS. PA R.C.P.1028(d). DEFENDANT SHALL FILE NO FURTHER PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 3/17/05
18-APR-2005 03:55 PM
19-APR-2005 12:00 AM
Docket DEFENDANT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' Entry: AMENDED CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT WITH NEW MATTER.
09-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
Docket DEPUTIZED SERVICE OF COMPLAINT UPON STEVEN A. FRIEDMAN Entry: BY SHERIFF OF DELWARE COUNTY ON 01/13/2005.
LAPAT, ANDREW
13-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
13-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
44-05051144 EMERGENCY MOTION TO REQUIRE STEVEN A. Docket FRIEDMAN, ESQ., TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR DOMINIC Entry: MORGAN FILED.
13-MAY-2005 02:00 PM
Docket 44-05051144 EMERGENCY MOTION TO REQUIRE COUNSEL TO Entry: WITHDRAW APPEARANCE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ACKERMAN ON
5/13/05.
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
16-MAY-2005 04:05 PM
44-05051144 IT IS ORDERED THAT A RULE RETURNABLE IS SCHEDULED ON MAY 18, 2005 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 696 CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA, PA TO SHOW CAUSE WHY LEON SILVERMAN, ESQUIRE SHOULD NOT WITHDRAW AS COUSNEL OF RECORD OF THE PLAINTIFF IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT LEON SILVERMAN, ESQUIRE Docket SHALL NOTIFY THE PLAINTIFF BY CERTIFIED AND REGULAR Entry: MAIL OF SAID HEARING ADVISING THAT THEY MUST APPEAR AND FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS AND/OR DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE. FURTHER, ALL COUNSEL INVOLVED IN THIS INSTANT MATTER MUST ALSO APPEAR AND LEON SILVERMAN, ESQUIRE IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO SERVE APPROPRIATE NOTICE ON SAID COUNSEL. ...BY THE COURT; ACKERMAN, J. 5-16-05
17-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 44-05051144 PLEASE DISREGARD THE RULE ENTERED UNDER SAID Entry: CONTROL NUMBER. IT WAS ENTERED IN ERROR.
ACKERMAN, NORMAN
17-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
44-05051144 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE EMERGENCY PETITION TO REQUIRE STEVEN A. FRIEDMAN, ESQ TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL Docket FOR DOMINIC MORGAN IS DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO FILE Entry: MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL. ...BY THE COURT; ACKERMAN, J. 5-17-05
18-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
26-MAY-2005 12:00 AM
Docket PLTFS' PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Entry: FILED
07-JUN-2005 10:41 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
08-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
07-JUN-2005 03:10 PM
MOTION TO COMPEL
MORGAN, DOMINIC
17-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
20-JUN-2005 10:44 AM
RIZZO, ANNETTE M
20-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
40-05051540 STIPULATION. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES TO THE ACTION CAPTIONED ABOVE THAT: AS TO PLAINTIFFS' PETITION TO DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN AS COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT MORGAN, IT IS AGREED THAT: (a) THE COURT WILL NOT IMMEDIATELY RULE ON THE PETITION; (b) ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN WILL BE GRANTED TWENTY (20) DAYS FROM JUNE 7, 2005 TO FILE AN ADDITIONAL OR NEW RESPONSE DIRECTED TO HIS DISQUALIFICATION AS IT RELATES TO TRIAL; (c) ATTORNEY SILVERMAN WILL BE GRANTED TEN (10) DAYS TO Docket RESPOND TO ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN'S RESPONSE AS REFERRED Entry: TO IN (b) ABOVE; (d) ATTORNEY SILVERMAN'S REQUEST FOR DISQUALIFICATION OF ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN IS WITHDRAWN AS IT RELATES TO ALL PRE-TRIAL ACTIVITIES BUT NOT AS IT RELATES TO TRIAL; AND (e) DEFENDANT MORGAN'S OBJECTIONS AS TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE WITH RESPECT TO COMMUNICATIONS WITH ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN CONCERNING THE CREATION, MAINTENANCE AND CONTENT OF THE WEBSITES ARE WAIVED FOR PURPOSES OF THIS LITIGATION ONLY. (f) ANY FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS STIPULATION MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS. ...BY THE COURT: RIZZO, J. 6-16-05
20-JUN-2005 10:44 AM
20-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 40-05051540 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL RESPONSE DATE Entry: UPDATED TO 7-7-05 PER STIPULATION ENTERED ON 6-16-05.
24-JUN-2005 03:11 PM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
27-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
27-JUN-2005 11:41 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
28-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
27-JUN-2005 04:20 PM
28-JUN-2005 12:00 AM
06-05060206 ANSWER FILED TO MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Docket AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS. ANSWER FILED BY Entry: PLAINTIFFS, HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., AND DR. ANITA NEVYASWALLACE.
30-JUN-2005 09:30 AM
MOTION IN LIMINE
01-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
77-05062277 MOTION IN LIMINE FILED RE: DEFENDANTS FROM OFFERING EVIDENCE CONCERNING THE CONTENT OF THE Docket WEBSITE AT ISSUE DUE TO DEFENDANT MORGANS Entry: DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE; ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ACKERMAN FOR 07/05/05.(FILED BY PLAINTIFF, STEIN & SILVERMAN).
30-JUN-2005 11:06 AM
REPLY FILED
MORGAN, DOMINIC
01-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
05-JUL-2005 11:04 AM
06-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 17-05070117 RESPONSE DATE 7-25-05. (APLF, STEIN & SILVERMAN, Entry: P.C.)
06-JUL-2005 09:35 AM
RIZZO, ANNETTE M
06-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
06-05060206 AND NOW, THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE, 2005, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AND PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER THERETO, A Docket RULE IS HEREBY ISSUED TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE WITHIN Entry: RELIEF SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED. RULE RETURNABLE THE 11TH DAY OF JULY, 2005, AT 2:00 P.M. IN COURTROOM 275, CITY HALL. ALL PARTIES INVOLVED IN THIS MATTER ARE REQUIRED TO ATTEND. ... BY THE COURT: RIZZO, J. 30-JUN-2005
06-JUL-2005 09:38 AM
06-JUL-2005 09:38 AM
06-JUL-2005 11:12 AM
07-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 04-05070204 RESPONSE DATE 7/26/05. FILED BY STEIN & Entry: SILVERMAN, P.C., PLAINTIFFS.
13-JUL-2005 11:11 AM
MOTION/PETITION WITHDRAWN
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
15-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
14-JUL-2005
MOTION TO COMPEL
MORGAN,
15-JUL-2005
11:06 AM
DOMINIC
12:00 AM
18-JUL-2005 10:04 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
19-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
18-JUL-2005 10:04 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
19-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
18-JUL-2005 10:04 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
19-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
18-JUL-2005 10:39 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
19-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
18-JUL-2005 11:08 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
18-JUL-2005 11:08 AM
Docket 40-05051540 MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 7-19-05.
19-JUL-2005
ORDER ENTERED/236
RIZZO,
19-JUL-2005
02:22 PM
NOTICE GIVEN
ANNETTE M
02:32 PM
06-05060206 AND NOW, THIS 19TH DAY OF JULY, 2005, DUE TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE MOTION TO COMPEL (CONTROL NO. 060206) BY ATTORNEY FRIEDMAN ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN (SEE ATTACHED PRAECIPE), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THE PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED HEARING SET FOR JULY 14, 2005 WAS HEREBY CANCELLED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND DECREED THAT: 1. DISCOVERY IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER IS HEREBY CLOSED; AND 2. EDWARD L. EDELSTEIN, Docket ESQ., IS RELEASED AS DISCOVERY MASTER IN THE ABOVEEntry: CAPTIONED MATTER. AS PREVIOUSLY ORDERED, ALL FEES AND COSTS INCURRED AS A RESULT OF MR. EDELSTEIN'S SERVICES SHALL BE PAID IN EQUAL PART BY ALL PARTIES. SAID PAYMENT SHALL BE REMITTED WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS OF RECEIPT OF MR. EDELSTEIN'S BILL; AND 3. THE REMAINING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (CONTROL NO. 070204) FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF IS TO BE REFERRED TO THE TRIAL JUDGE AS IT IS NOT A MOTION REGARDING PRE-TRIAL DISCOVERY; 4. TRIAL DATE OF JULY 25, 2005 IS TO REMAIN. ...BY THE COURT: RIZZO, J. 7-19-05
19-JUL-2005 03:25 PM
CONFERENCE CANCELLED
19-JUL-2005 03:25 PM
20-JUL-2005 11:22 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
20-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
21-JUL-2005 11:24 AM
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
22-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 78-05071578 RESPONSE DATE 8/10/05. DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN'S Entry: MOTION FOR SEVERANCE AND TO BIFURCATE FILED.
21-JUL-2005 02:52 PM
WITHDRAWAL/ENTRY OF APPEARANCE
SILVERMAN, LEON W
22-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE OF ANDREW J LAPAT AND Docket ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF LEON W SILVERMAN ON BEHALF OF Entry: PLAINTIFFS HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., NEVYAS EYE ASSOCIATES P.C. AND ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. FILED.
22-JUL-2005 08:50 AM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
22-JUL-2005 08:53 AM
40-05055140 UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY STEVEN A. FRIEDMAN, ESQ., AS COUNSEL FOR Docket DOMINIC MORGAN AND DEFENDANT MORGAN'S RESPONSE Entry: THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT SAID MOTION TO DISQUALIFY IS DENIED. ..BY THE COURT, JUDGE CARRAFIELLO, 7-20-05.
22-JUL-2005 01:54 PM
MOTION IN LIMINE
22-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
32-05071632 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE DEFENDANTS FORM OFFERING EVIDENCE CONCERNING MATTERS ESTABLISHED BY THE DOCTRINES OF RES JUDICATA AND/ OR Docket COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL ASSIGNED TO JUDGE ACKERMAN ON 7Entry: 25-05. MOTION FILED BY PLAINTIFFS HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EYE ASSOCIATES, P.C.
25-JUL-2005 09:17 AM
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
25-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
25-JUL-2005 09:34 AM
26-JUL-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 68-05061868 ANS FILED TO SJ (FILED BY PLFS, STEIN & SILVERMAN Entry: P.C.)
27-JUL-2005
MOTION ASSIGNED
27-JUL-2005
01:14 PM
01:14 PM
Docket 68-05061868 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE CARRAFIELLO ON 7/28/05.
28-JUL-2005 11:09 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
28-JUL-2005 11:09 AM
Docket 17-05070117 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: ACKERMAN ON 7-29-05.
29-JUL-2005 10:39 AM
29-JUL-2005 10:39 AM
29-JUL-2005 10:40 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
29-JUL-2005 10:40 AM
29-JUL-2005 03:25 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
29-JUL-2005 03:25 PM
Docket 04-05070204 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAIER Entry: ON 8-1-05.
MORGAN, DOMINIC
03-AUG-2005 12:00 AM
CARRAFIELLO, MATTHEW D
02-AUG-2005 03:07 PM
Docket 68-05061868 AND NOW, THIS 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2005, UPON Entry: CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT STEVEN FRIEDMAN'S MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLANTIFFS' RESPONSE THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECRRED THAT SAID MOTION IS DENIED. BY THE COURT: CARRAFIELLO, J. 7/29/05
MORGAN, DOMINIC
08-AUG-2005 12:00 AM
05-AUG-2005 02:08 PM
08-AUG-2005 03:08 PM
Docket DEFENDANT MORGAN'S MOTION FOR POST-TRIAL RELIEF Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAIER, 8-8-05.
10-AUG-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 60-05070860 MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY REASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE MAIER ON 8/10/05.
12-AUG-2005 01:51 PM
GLAZER, GARY S
16-AUG-2005 03:57 PM
78-05071578 AND NOW, THIS 15TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2005, UPON Docket CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN'S MOTION FOR Entry: SEVERANCE AND TO BIFURCATE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT
SAID MOTION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RAISE BEFORE TRIAL JUDGE. BY THE COURT: GLAZER, J. 8/15/05
19-OCT-2005 02:10 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
19-OCT-2005 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT STEVEN FRIEDMAN ESQ'S PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW, DATE-STAMPED 9/27/05 AND CONSISTANT WITH Docket JUDGE BERNSTEIN'S 11/18/04 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO Entry: WITHDRAW, SHALL BE DOCKETED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/18/05
19-OCT-2005 02:11 PM
PRAECIPE TO WITHDRAW
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
19-OCT-2005 12:00 AM
19-OCT-2005 02:13 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
19-OCT-2005 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT, ON COUNT III OF THE COMPLAINT, THE AGREEMENT WHICH WAS ENTERED INTO BY DEFT, MORGAN AND PLTFS ON OR ABOUT THE PERIOD 7/30/03 THROUGH 8/4/03 IS ENFORCED AND DEFT, MORGAN WILL NOT MENTION DR NEVYAS OR HIS PRACTICE OR ANYTHING CONCERNING PAST ITEMS FROM Docket DR NEVYAS OR HIS PRACTICE IN DEFT'S WEBSITE. DEFT, Entry: MORGAN IS ORDERED TO OPERATE HIS WEBSITE AND ANY WEBSITE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 8/4/03 AGREEMENT. THE DEFAMATION ACTION BY DR NEVYAS AGAINST MR MORGAN IS DISMISSED AS AGREED TO IN THE 7/30/03 THROUGH 8/4/03 AGREEMENT. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 9/29/05
28-OCT-2005 04:23 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
28-OCT-2005 12:00 AM
************************************************* NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN APPEALS Docket FROM THE ORDER DATED 9-29-05 AND DOCKETED ON 10-19-05 BY Entry: JUDGE MAIER. ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT FILED. PROOF OF SERVICE FILED. TB ***************************************************
MAIER, EUGENE E
14-NOV-2005 10:44 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
22-NOV-2005 12:00 AM
PURSUANT TO PA.R.A.P. 1925(d), YOU ARE DIRECTED TO FILE WITHIN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS OF THE ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, A CONCISE, SELF-CONTAINED AND INTELLIGIBLE STATEMENT OF MATTERS COMPLAINED OF IN THIS APPEAL, INDICATING SPECIFIC PAGE REFERENCES TO THE NOTES OF TESTIMONY, WHERE APPLICABLE. THE ORIGINAL STATEMENT SHALL BE Docket FILED OF RECORD AND A COPY SHALL BE HAND-DELIVERED Entry: CONCURRENTLY WITH HONORABLE EUGENE EDW. J. MAIER, ROOM 392, CITY HALL, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107. YOUR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THIS ORDER WILL BE DEEMED A WAIVER OF ALL OBJECTOINS TO THE ORDER OR OTHER MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL. BY THE COURT: HON. EUGENE EDWARD J. MAIER, 11-21-05.
01-DEC-2005 01:03 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
02-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
Docket APPELLANTS' STATEMENT OF MATTERS COMPLAINED OF ON Entry: APPEAL PURSUANT TO PA.R.C.P. 1925(B) FILED.
02-DEC-2005 12:00 PM
05-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 42-05111942 RESPONSE DATE 12/22/05. FILED BY STEIN & Entry: SILVERMAN, P.C., PLAINTIFFS.
12-DEC-2005 09:50 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
14-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
19-DEC-2005 02:31 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
19-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT A RULE IS ISSUED UPON PETITIONER, DOMINIC MORGAN TO SHOW CAUS WHY THE PETITIONER IS NOT ENTITLED TO THE RELIEF REQUESTED; RESPONDENT, MORGAN Docket SHALL FILE AN ANSWER WITHIN 20 DAYS; A HEARING OR Entry: ARGUMENT SHALL BE SCHEDULED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE ASSIGNED JUDGE; AND NOTICE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER SHALL BE PROVIDED IMMEDIATELY TO ALL PARTIES BY THE PETITIONER. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 12/13/05
20-DEC-2005 09:49 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
22-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
22-DEC-2005 11:19 AM
SILVERMAN, LEON W
23-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
27-DEC-2005 01:51 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
27-DEC-2005 01:51 PM
Docket 42-05111942 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: GLAZER ON 12/28/05.
27-DEC-2005 04:38 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
27-DEC-2005 04:38 PM
Docket 57-05120657 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE MANFREDI ON 12/28/05.
30-DEC-2005 10:13 AM
30-DEC-2005 12:00 AM
Docket 42-05111942 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT REASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: MAIER ON 1/3/06, PER JUDGE GLAZER'S REQUEST.
06-JAN-2006 02:11 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
06-JAN-2006 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT MORGAN SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO PROCEEDIN FORMA PAUPERIS IN THIS ACTION Docket UNLESS AND UNTIL HE PROVIDES ADEQUATE SHOWING TO THIS Entry: COURT THAT HE IS IN FACT IN FORMA PAUPERIS. ....BY THE COURT; MAIER, J. 12-27-05
11-JAN-2006 12:32 PM
REPLY FILED
MORGAN, DOMINIC
12-JAN-2006 12:00 AM
13-JAN-2006 12:33 PM
HANZELIK, CARL
13-JAN-2006 12:00 AM
Docket PRAECIPE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO PA Entry: R.C.P. 240(D) FILED.
13-JAN-2006 12:34 PM
HANZELIK, CARL
13-JAN-2006 12:00 AM
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF CARL HANZELIK ESQ. FILED ON Docket BEHALF OF DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN NO FEE PAID IFP Entry: FILED.
17-JAN-2006 02:48 PM
MANFREDI, WILLIAM J
17-JAN-2006 02:49 PM
57-05120657 UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S PETITION Docket TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND PLAINTIFFS' RESPONSE Entry: THERETO, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THIS MOTION IS
REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE EUGENE E.J. MAIER. SEE ORDER FOR FOOTNOTE. BY THE COURT...MANFREDI, J. 1/17/06
22-FEB-2006 11:50 AM
23-FEB-2006 12:00 AM
Docket 57-05120657 ANS FILED TO IFP (FILED BY STEIN & SILVERMAN. Entry: P.C.)
MAIER, EUGENE E
02-MAR-2006 12:00 AM
Docket 57-05120657 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, MORGAN'S MOTION FOR Entry: RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 3/1/06
25-APR-2006 04:10 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
25-APR-2006 12:00 AM
09-MAY-2006 12:00 AM
09-MAY-2006 RECORD 09:50 AM MAILED/TRANSMITTED Docket RECORD SENT TO SUPERIOR COURT VIA UPS. Entry:
09-MAY-2006 12:00 AM
14-JUL-2006 01:28 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
17-JUL-2006 12:00 AM
Docket 80-06070980 MOTION FOR SUPERSEDEAS (MOTION FOR STAY Entry: PENDING APPEAL) FILED.
17-JUL-2006 01:30 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
17-JUL-2006 01:30 PM
Docket 80-06070980 MOTION FOR SUPERSEDEAS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: MAIER ON 7/18/06.
24-JUL-2006 09:36 AM
26-JUL-2006 12:00 AM
Docket 80-06070980 ANS FILED TO MOTION TO STAY PENDING SPPEAL. Entry: (FILED BY PLAINTIFF, STEIN AND SILVERMAN).
MAIER, EUGENE E
17-AUG-2006 11:25 AM
80 06070980 AND NOW, THIS 25 DAY OF JULY, 2006, UPON Docket CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY IS Entry: DENIED.....JUDGE EUGENE E. MAIER
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
08-MAY-2007 12:00 AM
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE OF MAUREEN P FITZGERALD ESQ AND Docket PETER J HOFFMAN ESQ FILED ON BEHALF OF DFT STEVEN A Entry: FRIEDMAN.
11-MAY-2007 12:00 AM
ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AT 3084 EDA 2005 THAT THE Docket ORDER OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IS VACATED AND Entry: CASE IS REMANDED FOR PROCEEDINGS. JURISDICTION RELINQUISHED......3/9/07 RECORD RETURNED.
FRIEDMAN, STEVEN A
23-MAY-2007 12:00 AM
05-JUN-2007 09:58 AM
07-JUN-2007 12:00 AM
76-07051276 ANSWER OF PLAINTIFF'S HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., Docket ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. & NEVYAS EYE ASSOCIATES, P.C. Entry: TO MOTION TO RECUSE.
15-JUN-2007 11:01 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
15-JUN-2007 11:01 AM
11-JUL-2007 10:20 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
11-JUL-2007 10:21 AM
Docket 76-07051276 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN'S Entry: MOTION TO RECUSE IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 7/2/07
12-JUL-2007 12:19 PM
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
MORGAN, DOMINIC
13-JUL-2007 12:00 AM
Docket 02-07070902 RESPONSE DATE 8-1-07 (PRO SE DEFENDANT DOMINIC Entry: J. MORGAN'S MOTION TO RECUSE JUDGE EUGENE MAIER FILED).
18-JUL-2007 02:02 PM
SILVERMAN, LEON W
18-JUL-2007 12:00 AM
02-07070902 ANSWER OF PLAINTIFFS' HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., Docket ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EVE ASSOCIATES, Entry: P.C. TO MOTION TO RECUSE.
23-JUL-2007 11:37 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
24-JUL-2007 12:00 AM
30-JUL-2007 10:31 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
02-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
30-JUL-2007 05:08 PM
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
MORGAN, DOMINIC
13-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
Docket 45-07072345 CROSS MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Entry: FILED. RESPONSE DATE: 08/20/07.
03-AUG-2007 10:18 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
20-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
13-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
97-07071697 ANSWER OF PLAINTIFFS' HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., Docket ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EYE ASSOCIATES, Entry: P.C. TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.
13-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
45-07072345 PLEASE NOTE THE MOTION DOCKETED ON 07/30/07 Docket SHOULD READ AS A MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT Entry: FILED NOT AS A MOTION FOR INFORMA PAUPERIS. MXG@CIVIL.
MORGAN,
15-AUG-2007
03:10 PM
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DOMINIC
12:00 AM
21-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
54-07080054 ANSWER OF PLAINTIFFS' HERBERT J. NEVYAS, M.D., Docket ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EYE ASSOCIATES, Entry: P.C. TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS.
MORGAN, DOMINIC
23-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
23-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
23-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
23-AUG-2007 02:29 PM
Docket 45-07072345 MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE GREENSPAN ON 8-24-07.
24-AUG-2007 03:02 PM
Docket 97-07071697 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE MAIER ON 8-27-07.
24-AUG-2007 03:04 PM
Docket 97-07071697 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Entry: ASSIGNMENT DATE UPDATED UNTIL 9-13-07.
24-AUG-2007 12:00 AM
Docket 45-07072345 MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT REEntry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAIER ON 8-27-07.
30-AUG-2007 02:05 PM
Docket 54-07080054 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADINGS ASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE MAIER ON 8-31-07.
11-SEP-2007 02:30 PM
13-SEP-2007 12:00 AM
12-SEP-2007 11:44 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
13-SEP-2007 12:00 AM
19-SEP-2007 02:11 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
19-SEP-2007 02:11 PM
Docket 97-07071697 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE MAIER ON 9-20-07.
19-SEP-2007 02:16 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
19-SEP-2007 02:16 PM
Docket 35-07080835 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE MAIER ON 9-20-07.
12-OCT-2007 10:37 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
12-OCT-2007 10:37 AM
45-07072345 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S Docket MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. BY THE Entry: COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
12-OCT-2007 10:39 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
12-OCT-2007 10:39 AM
Docket 02-07070902 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S Entry: MOTION TO RECUSE IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
12-OCT-2007 10:39 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
12-OCT-2007 10:40 AM
97-07071697 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S IN Docket FORMA PAUPERIS CROSS-MOTION FOR DECLARATORY Entry: JUDGMENT IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
12-OCT-2007 10:40 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
12-OCT-2007 10:42 AM
54-07080054 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S IN Docket FORMA PAUPERIS CROSS-MOTION FOR DECLARATORY Entry: JUDGMENT IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
12-OCT-2007 10:42 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
12-OCT-2007 10:43 AM
Entry: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
16-OCT-2007 09:23 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
16-OCT-2007 12:00 AM
45-07072345 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE CROSS-MOTION FOR Docket DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. SEE ORDER FOR TERMS. Entry: BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/4/07
16-OCT-2007 09:24 AM
MAIER, EUGENE E
16-OCT-2007 12:00 AM
45-07072345 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE ORDER GRANTING CROSSDocket MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT WAS SIGNED IN ERROR Entry: AND IS THEREFORE RECONSIDERED AND DENIED. BY THE COURT ...MAIER,J 10/15/07
16-OCT-2007 04:16 PM
17-OCT-2007 12:00 AM
61-07101461 RESPONSE DATE 11-5-07. (PLFS, HERBERT J. NEVYAS, Docket M.D., ANITA NEVYAS WALLCE, M.D. AND NEVYAS EYS Entry: ASSOCIATES, P.C.)
MORGAN, DOMINIC
05-NOV-2007 12:00 AM
Docket 61-07101461 ANS FILED TO MOTION FOR JUDGMENT FOLLOWING Entry: REMAND.
08-NOV-2007 09:51 AM
Docket 61-07101461 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAIER Entry: ON 11-9-07.
31-DEC-2007 01:53 PM
MAIER, EUGENE E
31-DEC-2007 01:54 PM
61-07101461 AND NOW, THIS 28TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2007, UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON Docket REMAND AND DEFENDANT MORGAN'S RESPONSE, THE MOTION Entry: IS DENIED. BY THE COURT: HON. EUGENE EDWARD J. MAIER, 1228-07.
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
13-JUN-2008 12:00 AM
66-08060766 MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON REMAND IN Docket ACCORD WITH THE ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT. RESPONSE Entry: DATE 06-30-08.
30-JUN-2008 04:09 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC
07-JUL-2008 12:00 AM
66-08060766 PRO SE DEFENDANT DOMINIC J. MORGAN'S RESPONSE Docket TO PLAINTIFFS NEVYASES' MOTION FOR AN EVIDENTIARY Entry: HEARING FILED.
16-JUL-2008 12:31 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
16-JUL-2008 12:31 PM
66-08060766 MOTION FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON Docket REMAND IN ACCORD WITH THE ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT Entry: ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MAIER ON 07-17-2008.
10-MAR-2009 01:46 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:46 PM
Entry:
10-MAR-2009 01:47 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:47 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:47 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:47 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:48 PM
Docket 17-05070117 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS REASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: ROGERS 3/10/09
10-MAR-2009 01:49 PM
Docket 04-05070204 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS REASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: ROGERS 3/10/09
10-MAR-2009
01:49 PM
01:49 PM
10-MAR-2009 01:50 PM
Docket 42-05111942 MOTION FOR CONTEMPT REASSIGNED TO JUDGE Entry: ROGERS 3/10/09
10-MAR-2009 01:51 PM
Docket 66-08060766 MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING REASSIGNED Entry: TO JUDGE ROGERS 3/10/09
10-MAR-2009 01:52 PM
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
18-JUN-2009 09:18 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTMIS_260.pdf MTMIS_260_001.pdf MTMIS_260_002.pdf MTMIS_260_003.pdf MTMIS_260_005.pdf MTMIS_260_006.pdf MTMIS_260_007.pdf MTMIS_260_008.pdf MTMIS_260_009.pdf MTMIS_260_010.pdf MTMIS_260_011.pdf MTMIS_260_012.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTMIS_260.pdf
01-09062101 RESPONSE DATE 07/08/2009. MOTION TO DETERMINE Docket PLAINITFF'S PUBLIC FIGURE STATUS (FILED ON BEHALF OF Entry: STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
09-JUL-2009 10:17 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTANS_261.pdf MTANS_261_008.pdf MTANS_261_009.pdf MTANS_261_010.pdf MTANS_261_011.pdf MTANS_261_012.pdf MTANS_261_013.pdf MTANS_261_014.pdf MTANS_261_015.pdf MTANS_261_016.pdf MTANS_261_017.pdf MTANS_261_018.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTANS_261.pdf
Docket 01-09062101 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MISCELLANEOUS Entry: MOTION FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
10-JUL-2009 11:17 AM
01-09062101 PRAECIPE TO SUPPLEMENT/ATTACH RE: Docket MISCELLANEOUS MOTION FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC Entry: MORGAN)
14-JUL-2009 01:48 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
14-JUL-2009 01:48 PM
Docket 01-09062101 MISCELLANEOUS MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: FOX, Entry: IDEE C. ON DATE: JULY 14, 2009
15-JUL-2009 01:25 PM
15-JUL-2009 01:25 PM
SILVERMAN, LEON W
17-JUL-2009 02:21 PM
01-09062101 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MISCELLANEOUS Docket MOTION FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE Entry: ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
20-JUL-2009 10:28 AM
Docket 01-09062101 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF MISCELLANEOUS MOTION Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
27-JUL-2009 02:02 PM
Docket 01-09062101 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MISCELLANEOUS MOTION Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
SILVERMAN, LEON W
04-AUG-2009 09:49 AM
Documents:
01-09062101 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF MISCELLANEOUS MOTION Docket FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
06-AUG-2009 09:15 AM
Docket 01-09062101 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MISCELLANEOUS MOTION Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
02-NOV-2009 08:58 AM
Docket PRAECIPE AMEND PARTY'S ADDRESS. (FILED ON BEHALF OF Entry: DOMINIC MORGAN)
ROGERS, PETER F
09-NOV-2009 11:13 AM
THE COURT FINDS THAT PLTFS ARE "LIMITED PURPOSE PUBLIC Docket FIGURES" RELATIVE TO THE INSTANT DEFAMATION CASE. BY Entry: THE COURT ...ROGERS,J 10/14/09
12-NOV-2009 11:58 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 12-NOV-2009 OF FINDING FOR DEFENDANT Entry: ENTERED ON 09-NOV-2009.
SILVERMAN, LEON W
13-NOV-2009 10:02 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTCIA_273.pdf MTCIA_273_001.pdf MTCIA_273_002.pdf MTCIA_273_003.pdf MTCIA_273_004.pdf MTCIA_273_005.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTCIA_273.pdf
66-09111466 MOT-CERTFY ORDER INTERLOC APPL (FILED ON Docket BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYASEntry: WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
23-NOV-2009 03:07 PM
Docket 66-09111466 MOT-CERTFY ORDER INTERLOC APPL ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE: ROGERS, PETER F. ON DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2009
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
30-NOV-2009 12:12 PM
66-09111466 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MOT-CERTFY ORDER Docket INTERLOC APPL FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A Entry: FRIEDMAN)
02-DEC-2009 02:19 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
02-DEC-2009 02:36 PM
Documents:
Docket 66-09111466 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MOT-CERTFY ORDER Entry: INTERLOC APPL FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
SILVERMAN, LEON W
09-DEC-2009 10:20 AM
66-09111466 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MOT-CERTFY ORDER Docket INTERLOC APPL FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE Entry: ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
24-DEC-2009 09:23 AM
66-09111466 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF MOT-CERTFY ORDER Docket INTERLOC APPL FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A Entry: FRIEDMAN)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
24-DEC-2009 11:32 AM
Docket 66-09111466 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF MOT-CERTFY ORDER Entry: INTERLOC APPL FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
28-SEP-2010 04:10 PM
CORRECTIVE ENTRY
28-SEP-2010 12:00 AM
THE FINDING FOR DEFT DOCKETED 11/9/09 WAS INCORRECTLY Docket SUBMITTED AS A TRIAL WORKSHEET. THIS DETERMINATION Entry: WAS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF THE CASE AND THE CASE IS RESTORED TO ACTIVE STATUS.
28-SEP-2010 04:12 PM
CASE REACTIVATED
28-SEP-2010 04:12 PM
28-SEP-2010 04:12 PM
ACTIVE CASE
28-SEP-2010 12:00 AM
28-SEP-2010 04:12 PM
ASSIGNED TO JUDGE
28-SEP-2010 12:00 AM
Docket THIS CASE IS ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DINUBILE FOR FINAL Entry: DISPOSITION.
ROGERS, PETER F
20-OCT-2010 11:29 AM
66-09111466 IT IS ORDERED THAT PLTFS' MOTION TO AMEND Docket ORDER TO CERTIFY FOR APPEAL IS DENIED. BY THE COURT Entry: ...ROGERS,J 10/14/10
20-OCT-2010 11:29 AM
21-OCT-2010 01:05 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 21-OCT-2010 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 20-OCT-2010.
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
29-NOV-2010 11:10 AM
Docket OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE 4009.21 FILED. Entry: (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
OBJECTIONS FILED
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
02-DEC-2010 10:57 AM
Docket DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE Entry: 4009.21 FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
OBJECTIONS FILED
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
09-DEC-2010 07:54 AM
Docket DEFENDANTS OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENA PURSUANT TO RULE Entry: 4009.21 FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
09-DEC-2010 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS MATTER IS LISTED FOR TRIAL ON Docket 3/7/11 AT 9:30 AM IN COURTROOM 253 CITY HALL. THE PARTIES Entry: SHALL SUBMIT PRETRIAL MEMORANDA CONTAINING ALL TRIAL WITNESSES AND DOCUMENTS TO BE INTRODUCED INTO
EVIDENCE AT THE TRIAL BY 1/31/11. PRETRIAL MEMORANDA SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIVE PAGES. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 12/7/10
09-DEC-2010 11:15 AM
10-DEC-2010 09:16 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 10-DEC-2010 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 09-DEC-2010.
09-DEC-2010 11:16 AM
09-DEC-2010 11:16 AM
11-DEC-2010 12:30 AM
NOTICE GIVEN
11-DEC-2010 12:30 AM
14-DEC-2010 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT, PLTFS IN PREPARATION FOR TRIAL, MAY SUBPOENA THE MEDICAL RECORDS OF DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN FROM WILLS EYE INSTITUTE LIMITED AS FOLLOWS: THE Docket MEDICAL RECORD OF DEFT, MORGAN'S EYE EXAMINATION OF Entry: 4/23/10 AS WELL AS ANY RECORDS REFLECTING DEFT, MORGAN'S PRESENT OCULAR DIAGNOSIS, PRESENT VISUAL ACUITY AND PRESENT HOLE POINT VISUAL ACUITY. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 12/14/10
14-DEC-2010 11:18 AM
15-DEC-2010 10:54 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
06-JAN-2011 02:46 PM
Docket 07-11010607 RESPONSE DATE 01/18/2011. (FILED ON BEHALF OF Entry: DOMINIC MORGAN)
24-JAN-2011 11:54 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
24-JAN-2011 11:54 AM
Docket 07-11010607 MOT-PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ASSIGNED TO Entry: JUDGE: MANFREDI, WILLIAM J. ON DATE: JANUARY 24, 2011
MANFREDI, WILLIAM J
10-FEB-2011 04:05 PM
07-11010607 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION TO PROCEED IN Docket FORMA PAUPERIS IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SEE ORDER DATED Entry: FEBRUARY 16, 2005. ...BY THE COURT; MANFREDI, J. 2-10-11
10-FEB-2011 04:06 PM
11-FEB-2011 11:03 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 11-FEB-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 10-FEB-2011.
MOTION IN LIMINE
MORGAN, DOMINIC
22-FEB-2011 12:00 AM
Docket 91-11025191 PRO SE DEFENDANT DOMINIC J. MORGAN'S MOTION Entry: IN LIMINE FILED.
22-FEB-2011 04:55 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
22-FEB-2011 04:55 PM
Docket 91-11025191 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: FEBRUARY 22, 2011
MOTION IN LIMINE
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
28-FEB-2011 12:17 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTLIM_301.pdf MTLIM_301_001.pdf MTLIM_301_002.pdf MTLIM_301_003.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTLIM_301.pdf
93-11023493 MOTION IN LIMINE PREDICATED UPON THE Docket ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL PRIVILEGE (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A Entry: FRIEDMAN)
MOTION IN LIMINE
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
01-MAR-2011 09:12 AM
17-11030017 MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE DUE TO LACK Docket OF ACTUAL MALICE EVIDENCE (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A Entry: FRIEDMAN)
MOTION IN LIMINE
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
01-MAR-2011 09:13 AM
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
01-MAR-2011 09:15 AM
Docket 20-11030020 RESPONSE DATE 03/21/2011. (FILED ON BEHALF OF Entry: STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
01-MAR-2011 08:59 AM
Docket 93-11023493 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 01, 2011
MORGAN, DOMINIC
01-MAR-2011 12:00 AM
50-11025250 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM Docket PRESENTING ANY UNANSWERED REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND Entry: SIMILAR DOCUMENTS SERVED BY PLAINTIFFS FILED.
01-MAR-2011 12:02 PM
01-MAR-2011 12:02 PM
02-MAR-2011 08:58 AM
Docket 50-11025250 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 02, 2011
02-MAR-2011 10:50 AM
Docket 17-11030017 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 02, 2011
02-MAR-2011 10:50 AM
Docket 19-11030019 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 02, 2011
SILVERMAN, LEON W
02-MAR-2011 12:02 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTANS_312.pdf MTANS_312_001.pdf MTANS_312_002.pdf MTANS_312_003.pdf MTANS_312_004.pdf MTANS_312_005.pdf MTANS_312_006.pdf MTANS_312_007.pdf MTANS_312_008.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTANS_312.pdf
91-11025191 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF MOTION IN LIMINE FILED. Docket (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
MORGAN, DOMINIC
02-MAR-2011 12:00 AM
Documents:
Docket 08-11035008 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OR Entry: DISMISS CASE FILED.
03-MAR-2011 09:13 AM
Docket 08-11035008 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 03, 2011
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
04-MAR-2011 10:42 AM
36-11030636 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM Docket INTRODUCING ANY EVIDENCE RELATED TO THE UNDENIED Entry: REQUEST FOR ADMISSION DIRECTED TO FRIEDMAN DATED AUGUST 2, 2004 (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
04-MAR-2011 10:45 AM
38-11030638 MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE ANY CLAIMS FOR Docket DAMAGES FOR LOW EMPLOYEE MORALE AND TO PRECLUDE Entry: PLAINTIFF FROM INTRODUCING EVIDENCE AND/OR TESTIMONY REGARDING SAME (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
04-MAR-2011 02:29 PM
MTLIM_317.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTLIM_317.pdf
44-11030744 MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE Docket ANY SPECULATIVE EVIDENCE OF DAMAGES (FILED ON BEHALF Entry: OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
04-MAR-2011 02:32 PM
Docket 36-11030636 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 04, 2011
04-MAR-2011 02:32 PM
Docket 38-11030638 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 04, 2011
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
04-MAR-2011 03:09 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTLIM_320.pdf MTLIM_320_001.pdf MTLIM_320_002.pdf MTLIM_320_003.pdf MTLIM_320_004.pdf MTLIM_320_005.pdf MTLIM_320_006.pdf MTLIM_320_007.pdf MTLIM_320_008.pdf MTLIM_320_009.pdf MTLIM_320_010.pdf MTLIM_320_011.pdf MTLIM_320_012.pdf MTLIM_320_013.pdf MTLIM_320_014.pdf MTLIM_320_015.pdf MTLIM_320_016.pdf MTLIM_320_017.pdf Motion_CoverSheet_MTLIM_320.pdf
55-11030755 MOTION IN LIMINE PRECLUDE PLAINTIFFS FROM Docket PURPORTING MORGAN'S WEBSITE IS DEFAMATORY. (FILED ON Entry: BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
07-MAR-2011 09:16 AM
80-11030880 MOTION IN LIMINE MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE Docket PLAINTIFFS' WITNESS DR. AMOS WILLIS, M.D. TO TESTIFY (FILED Entry: ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
07-MAR-2011 08:54 AM
Docket 44-11030744 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 07, 2011
07-MAR-2011 08:59 AM
Docket 55-11030755 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 07, 2011
07-MAR-2011 03:27 PM
Docket 80-11030880 MOTION IN LIMINE ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: MOSS, Entry: SANDRA M. ON DATE: MARCH 07, 2011
17-MAR-2011 03:59 PM
FINDING IN FAVOR OF PLTFS, HERBERT NEVYAS MD AND ANITA Docket NEVYAS-WALLACE MD AND NEVYAS EYE ASSOC PC ("PLTFS") Entry: AND AGAINST DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN AND GRANTS
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. FINDING IN FAVOR OF DEFT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN AND AGAINST PLTFS. SEE COURT'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 3/16/11
21-MAR-2011 10:48 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 21-MAR-2011 OF FINDING FOR PLAINTIFF Entry: ENTERED ON 17-MAR-2011.
17-MAR-2011 12:00 AM
Docket FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ENTERED. SEE Entry: FINDING. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 3/16/11
17-MAR-2011 12:00 AM
IT IS ORDERED THAT THE FOLLOWING EQUITABLE RELIEF IS GRANTED IN FAVOR OF PLTFS AND AGAINST DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN: SAID DEFT IS PRECLUDED FROM PAST OR FUTURE PUBLISHING OF ANY DEFAMATORY MATERIAL PERTAINING TO AND AGAINST PLTFS, PARTICULARLY REGARDING THEIR PROFESSIONAL ACTIONS AS OPTHALMOLOGISTS AND LASIK SURGEONS ON ANY WEBSITE OWNED, OPERATED, CONTROLLED OR POSSESSED BY DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN; DEFT, DOMINIC Docket MORGAN IS PRECLUDED FROM PUBLISHING THE LETTERS OF Entry: 12/20/01, 1/4/02, 8/10/02 AND 12/4/03 SENT BY DEFT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN TO THE FDA; DEFT IS ALSO PRECLUDED FROM FURTHER PUBLICATION OF HIS LETTER OF 7/15/03 TO THE HONORABLE FREDERICA MASSIAH-JACKSON, THEN PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILA COUNTY. ANY FUTURE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER, AFTER DUE NOTICE TO DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN AND AFTER HEARING BEFORE THIS COURT IN WHICH A FINDING IS MADE THAT THERE IS SUCH A
VIOLATION, SHALL RESULT IN A FINDING OF CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT AND IMPOSITION OF APPROPRIATE SANCTIONS. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE TERMS. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 3/16/11
21-MAR-2011 10:49 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 21-MAR-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 17-MAR-2011.
23-MAR-2011 04:23 PM
Docket 20-11030020 SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE TERMS. BY THE COURT Entry: ...DINUBILE,J 3/16/11
SILVERMAN, LEON W
28-MAR-2011 04:51 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Notice 032811 FINAL.pdf Order 1 PostTria 032811 FINAL.pdf Order 2 PreTrial 032811 FINAL.pdf PostTrial Motion 032811 FINAL.pdf Verification 032811.pdf Certificate of Service 032811.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
20-11034120 POST TRIAL MOTION (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS Docket EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J Entry: NEVYAS)
29-MAR-2011 11:25 AM
Docket 20-11034120 POST TRIAL MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: DINUBILE, Entry: JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: MARCH 29, 2011
06-APR-2011 02:28 PM
06-APR-2011 12:00 AM
Documents:
IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S REQUEST FOR TRIAL TRANSCRIPT IS GRANTED BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND POST TRIAL MOTIONS HAVE BEEN FILED. HE IS PRECLUDED, HOWEVER, FROM DISSEMINATING THESE NOTES IN ANY FORM TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OFFICIAL COURT REPORTERS, NAMELY JANET MANSFIELD AND Docket JAMIE WIESE, OR THEIR SUPERVISOR. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL Entry: BE IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER AS WELL AS PA R.J.A. 5000.7 AND 18 C.P.S.A. 3926, WHICH PROVIDE THAT UNAUTHORIZED PHOTOCOPYING OR DUPLICATION WITHOUT EXPRESS APPROVAL BY THE COURT REPORTER SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ALL APPROPRIATE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CIVIL ACTION OR MONETARY SANCTIONS. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 4/6/11
06-APR-2011 02:28 PM
06-APR-2011 04:46 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 06-APR-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 06-APR-2011.
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
07-APR-2011 11:42 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Response and Cross Motion to PLTF PTM Cover.pdf Response and Cross Motion to PLTF PTM.pdf Response and Cross Motion to PLTF PTM Verif and Cert of Service.pdf Response and Cross Motion to PLTF PTM Exbibits.pdf
Docket 20-11034120 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF POST-TRIAL MOTION Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
12-APR-2011 11:55 AM
ANSWER (MOTION/PETITION)
MORGAN, DOMINIC
12-APR-2011 12:00 AM
FILED Documents:
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MTANS_336.pdf
MORGAN, DOMINIC
12-APR-2011 12:00 AM
12-APR-2011 01:37 PM
12-APR-2011 01:37 PM
Docket 54-11045254 POST TRIAL MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: DINUBILE, Entry: JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: APRIL 12, 2011
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
13-APR-2011 03:38 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents NEVYAS -FRIEDMAN POST TRIAL MOTION.PDF Motion CoverSheet Form
84-11041384 POST TRIAL MOTION (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A Docket FRIEDMAN) MOTION WAS ORIGINALLY FILED ON 04/07/2011 BUT Entry: REJECTED BECAUSE BRIEF WAS ATTACHED (DAP)
13-APR-2011 04:41 PM
13-APR-2011 04:41 PM
Docket 84-11041384 POST TRIAL MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: DINUBILE, Entry: JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: APRIL 13, 2011
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
15-APR-2011 01:31 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT FRIEDMAN (M0919559).PDF exhibits a and b.PDF
Docket 20-11034120 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF POST-TRIAL MOTION Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
SILVERMAN, LEON W
28-APR-2011 09:31 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Resp Corrected Cross Post Trial.pdf Order Corrected Cross Post Trial.pdf COS Resp Corrected Post Trial.pdf
54-11045254 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF POST-TRIAL MOTION Docket FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
SILVERMAN, LEON W
28-APR-2011 09:32 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents RespFriedman Cross.pdf RespFriedOrders.pdf RespFriedman Cross COS.pdf
84-11041384 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF POST-TRIAL MOTION Docket FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
28-APR-2011 11:26 AM
Entry: TRIAL MOTIONS OF ALL PARTIES ARE DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED ON THE COURT'S FINDINGS IN FAVOR OF DEFT, STEVEN FRIEDMAN AND AGAINST HERBERT NEVYAS MD AND ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE MD, AND NEVYAS EYE ASSOC PC. ADDITIONALLY, THIS COURT AFFIRMS ITS 3/16/11 ORDER OF INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, GRANTED IN FAVOR OF PLTFS AND AGAINST DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN. THESE JUDGMENTS ARE BASED ON THIS COURT'S FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW OF 3/16/11. MEMORANDUM OF LAW ENTERED. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 4/28/11
28-APR-2011 11:26 AM
29-APR-2011 02:11 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 29-APR-2011 OF ORDER AND MEMORANDUM Entry: FILED ENTERED ON 28-APR-2011.
28-APR-2011 11:27 AM
28-APR-2011 11:27 AM
28-APR-2011 11:28 AM
28-APR-2011 11:28 AM
SILVERMAN, LEON W
24-MAY-2011 02:45 PM
************************************************** NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE DECISION DATED 04/28/2011 AND DOCKETED Docket ON 04/28/2011 BY JUDGE DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR. PROOF OF Entry: SERVICE FILED. ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPTS FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYASWALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
*************************************************CYS
MORGAN, DOMINIC
31-MAY-2011 12:00 AM
02-JUN-2011 10:00 AM
02-JUN-2011 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
03-JUN-2011 10:51 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents 060311 Morgan Notice of Cross Appeal.pdf
*************************************************** NOTICE OF Docket APPEAL FROM THE DECISION DATED AND DOCKETED ON 4/28/11 Entry: BY JUDGE DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR. PROOF OF SERVICE FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)****************
06-JUN-2011 02:50 PM
17-11055317 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PLTFS' REQUEST TO SEAL THE RECORD IS DENIED. THERE IS NO COMPELLING REASON TO SEAL THIS RECORD. THE TRIAL WAS A MATTER OF PUBLIC Docket RECORD. THE PLTFS ARE SUFFICIENTLY PROTECTED DUE TO Entry: THIS COURT'S INJUNCTIVE ORDER OF 3/16/11, AS WELL AS ITS ORDER OF 4/6/11 RESTRICTING DISSEMINATION OF THE NOTES OF TESTIMONY OF THE TRIAL. DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S MOTION
TO QUASH PLTFS' APPEAL WAS IMPROPERLY FILED WITH THIS COURT. IN ANY EVENT, THERE IS NO MERIT TO THE MOTION, SINCE THIS COURT, IN GRANTING INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, CONSIDERED THE ISSUES CONTAINED IN WHAT THE DEFT TERMS HIS "NEW MATTER AND COUNTERCLAIM". IN ANY EVENT, SINCE DEFT FAILED TO RAISE THIS ISSUE IN HIS POST TRIAL MOTION, THE APPELLATE COURT MAY DEEM IT WAIVED ON APPEAL. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 6/6/11
06-JUN-2011 02:50 PM
08-JUN-2011 09:55 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 08-JUN-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 06-JUN-2011.
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
07-JUN-2011 03:26 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents NEVYAS - NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL OF DEF FRIEDMAN.PDF
****************************************************** NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE DECISION DATED AND DOCKETED ON Docket 4/28/11 BY JUDGE DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR. PROOF OF SERVICE Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)****************
15-JUN-2011 03:01 PM
15-JUN-2011 12:00 AM
20-JUN-2011 12:00 AM
Entry:
20-JUN-2011 02:23 PM
22-JUN-2011 09:16 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 22-JUN-2011 OF OPINION FILED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 20-JUN-2011.
SILVERMAN, LEON W
10-AUG-2011 10:49 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Exhibit 3 080911.pdf Exhibit 4 080911.pdf Exhibit 5 080911.pdf Exhibit 6 080911.pdf Exhibit 2 080911.pdf Exhibit 1 080911.pdf Exhibit 7 080911.pdf Exhibit 8 080911.pdf PetitionContempt-1.pdf Verification 080911.pdf Memo of Law Contempt 080911.pdf Order 080911.pdf Rule 080911.pdf Cert Service 081011.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
51-11081051 RESPONSE DATE 08/30/2011. (FILED ON BEHALF OF Docket NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND Entry: HERBERT J NEVYAS)
11-AUG-2011 12:00 AM
Docket PURSUANT TO PA. R.A.P. 1931 (d) APPEAL INVENTORY SENT. Entry:
11-AUG-2011 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
29-AUG-2011 09:11 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Morgan Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Contempt.pdf Morgan Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Contempt Exhibit 1.pdf Morgan Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Contempts Exhibits 2-4.pdf Morgan Response to Plaintiffs Motion for Contempt Exhibit 5.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 51-11081051 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
01-SEP-2011 04:48 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
01-SEP-2011 04:48 PM
Docket 51-11081051 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: Entry: DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: SEPTEMBER 01, 2011
12-SEP-2011 02:42 PM
51-11081051 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT AND SANCTIONS IS DENIED AT THIS TIME WITHOUT PREJUDICE. THIS COURT IS PRECLUDED FROM TAKING ANY ACTION ON THE MERITS OF THE PETITION SINCE THE MATTER IS Docket ON APPEAL. PA R.A.P. 1701(A). DEFT, MORGAN, HOWEVER, IS Entry: LEGALLY OBLIGATED TO FOLLOW THE DICTATES OF THIS COURT'S INJUNCTIVE ORDER, PENDING A DECISION BY THE SUPERIOR COURT. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE ORDER, AND TO PRESERVE THE STATUS QUO PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE APPEAL, DEFT, MORGAN IS PRECLUDED FROM THE PUBLICATION
OF ANY DEFAMATORY MATERIAL AGAINST PLTFS, WHETHER THAT MATERIAL IS NEW OR PRE-EXISTING. PA R.A.P. 1701(B)(1). BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 9/12/11
12-SEP-2011 02:42 PM
13-SEP-2011 03:45 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 13-SEP-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 12-SEP-2011.
MISCELLANEOUS MOTION
SILVERMAN, LEON W
14-OCT-2011 02:56 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents MotSuppRecord_101411.pdf Order MotSuppRecord_101411.pdf Verif MotSuppRecord.pdf COS MotSuppRecord_101411.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
01-11101501 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD Docket ON APPEAL AS TRANSMITTED BY THE TRIAL COURT (FILED ON Entry: BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYASWALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
14-OCT-2011 04:41 PM
MOTION ASSIGNED
14-OCT-2011 04:41 PM
Docket 01-11101501 MISCELLANEOUS MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: Entry: DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: OCTOBER 14, 2011
FITZGERALD, MAUREEN P
22-NOV-2011 03:54 PM
79-11113179 STIPULATION TO CORRECT/SUPPLEMENT THE Docket RECORD ON APPEAL AS TRANSMITTED BY THE TRIAL COURT Entry: FILED. AWAITING JUDICIAL APPROVAL (FILED ON BEHALF OF STEVEN A FRIEDMAN)
23-NOV-2011 11:51 AM
Docket 79-11113179 STIPULATION FILED ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: DINUBILE, Entry: JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: NOVEMBER 23, 2011
23-NOV-2011 12:04 PM
79-11113179 IT IS ORDERED THAT THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES IS APPROVED AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD ON Docket APPEAL BY TRANSMITTING CERTAIN DOCUMENTS TO THE Entry: PROTHONOTARY SUPERIOR COURT WITHIN 20 DAYS. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE LIST OF DOCUMENTS. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 11/23/11
28-NOV-2011 02:12 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 28-NOV-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 23-NOV-2011.
SILVERMAN, LEON W
29-NOV-2011 02:17 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents PetitionContempt 112911.pdf Verification 112911.pdf Order 112911.pdf Rule 112911.pdf Memo of Law Contempt 112911.pdf Cert Serv 112911.pdf Exhibit 1 080911.pdf Exhibit 2 080911.pdf Exhibit 3 080911.pdf Exhibit 4 080911.pdf Exhibit 5 080911.pdf Exhibit 6 080911.pdf
63-11113763 RESPONSE DATE 12/19/2011. (FILED ON BEHALF OF Docket NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND Entry: HERBERT J NEVYAS)
29-NOV-2011 02:26 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
19-DEC-2011 10:32 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents 121611 Morgan Response to Petition for Contempt.pdf 121611 Morgan Response to Pet. Contempt Exhibits 1.pdf 121611 Morgan Response to Pet. Contempt Exhibits 2.pdf 121611 Morgan Response to Pet. Contempt Exhibits 3.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 63-11113763 ANSWER IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
21-DEC-2011 11:48 AM
MOTION ASSIGNED
21-DEC-2011 11:48 AM
Docket 63-11113763 PETITION FOR CONTEMPT ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: Entry: DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: DECEMBER 21, 2011
28-DEC-2011 01:01 PM
63-11113763 IT IS ORDERED THAT PLTFS' COUNSEL PROVIDE THIS COURT WITH ANY DEFAMATORY STATEMENTS ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN MADE BY DEFT, MORGAN SUBSEQUENT TO THE ISSUANCE AND IN VIOLATION OF THIS COURT'S INJUNCTIVE Docket ORDER OF 3/16/11. THIS SUBMISSION MUST CONTAIN AN Entry: ENUMERATION OF EACH INSTANCE OF VIOLATIONS OF THIS COURT'S INJUNCTIVE ORDER OCCURRING AFTER 3/16/11, THE DATE OF ISSUANCE. IT SHALL BE LIMITED TO 2 PAGES IN LENGTH. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 12/28/11
28-DEC-2011 01:01 PM
30-DEC-2011 02:48 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 30-DEC-2011 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 28-DEC-2011.
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
10-JAN-2012 10:44 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Morgan Reply to Plaintiffs Response of Courts 122811 Order.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 63-11113763 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
SILVERMAN, LEON W
18-JAN-2012 09:06 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents ReplyContemptStatementViolations 011712.pdf Cert Service 011712.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
63-11113763 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Docket FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA Entry: NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)
01-MAR-2012 12:00 AM
63-11113763 IT IS ORDERED THAT, UPON REVIEW OF PLTFS' Docket MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND DEFT, MORGAN'S REPLY, A Entry: HEARING WILL BE HELD ON 4/18/12 AT 9:30 AM IN COURTROOM 253 CITY HALL. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 3/1/12
05-MAR-2012 10:02 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 05-MAR-2012 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 01-MAR-2012.
09-MAR-2012 12:00 AM
Docket 1573 EDA 2011 NOVEMBER 18, 2011 THE COURT HEREBY GRANTS Entry: THE MOTION TO QUASH. PER CURIAM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
17-APR-2012 04:39 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Supplemental Reply to Pet for Contempt Response Part1.pdf Supplemental Reply to Pet for Contempt Response Part2.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 63-11113763 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
18-APR-2012 11:04 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
19-APR-2012 07:34 AM
Documents:
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents Def Morgans 4182012 Second Supplemental Response to Plts PET for Contempt.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 63-11113763 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
19-APR-2012 12:00 AM
63-11113763 ORDER ARISING FROM CONTEMPT HEARING ENTERED. THIS COURT FOUND THAT THE DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN, THROUGH THE PUBLICATIONS FROM CERTAIN WEBSITES ON OR ABOUT 7/27/11, VIOLATED THE SPIRIT OF THIS COURT'S ORIGINAL INJUNCTIVE ORDER. THERE EXISTS A FINE LINE BETWEEN FAIR AND REASONABLE CRITICISM OF PLTFS' PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, WHICH THE DEFT HAS A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO DO AS A MATTER OF FREE SPEECH, Docket AND CROSSING THIS LINE BY INFRINGING UPON PLTFS' Entry: PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION. DEFT HAS EVERY RIGHT TO CRITICIZE THE MEDICAL SERVICES RENDERED TO HIM BY PLTFS, BUT CANNOT DEFAME THEM. WITH THIS CONCEPT IN MIND, THIS COURT ENTERS THIS ORDER PERTAINING TO CERTAIN WEBSITES. SEE ORDER FOR TERMS. IT IS ORDERED THAT THE DEFT SHALL PUBLISH THIS COURT'S INJUNCTIVE ORDER OF 3/16/11 ON EACH OF THE FOUR WEBSITES REFERENCED HEREIN. DEFT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE DICTATES OF THIS ORDER BY 4/30/12. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 4/19/12
19-APR-2012 11:52 AM
23-APR-2012 09:38 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 23-APR-2012 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 19-APR-2012.
19-APR-2012 11:52 PM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
20-APR-2012 07:40 AM
Documents:
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents 041912 3rd Suppl Response to Pet for Contempt.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 63-11113763 REPLY IN OPPOSITION OF PETITION FOR CONTEMPT Entry: FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN)
09-MAY-2012 12:00 AM
AND NOW, TO WIT, THIS 9TH DAY OF MAY, 2012, UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT DOMINIC MORGAN'S REQUEST FOR THE CONTEMPT HEARING TRANSCRIPT OF APRIL 18, 2012 IN THE ABOVE MATTER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT HIS REQUEST IS GRANTED BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN PERMITTED TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. HE IS PRECLUDED, HOWEVER, FROM DISSEMINATING THESE NOTES IN ANY FORM TO ANY THIRD PARTY WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN Docket CONSENT OF THE OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER, NAMELY Entry: MARGARET CLARK, OR HER SUPERVISOR. FAILURE TO COMPLY WILL BE A DIRECT VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER AS WELL AS PA.R.J.A 5000.7 AND 18 C.P.S.A.3926, WHICH PROVIDE THAT UNAUTHORIZED PHOTOCOPYING OR DUPLICATION WITHOUT EXPRESS APPROVAL BY THE COURT REPORTER SHALL BE SUBJECT TO ALL APPROPRIATE LEGAL PROCEEDINGS, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, CIVIL ACTION OR MONETARY SANCTIONS. BY THE COURT: JUDGE VICTOR J. DINUBILE, JR.
10-MAY-2012 11:35 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 10-MAY-2012 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 09-MAY-2012.
14-MAY-2012 12:00 AM
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
17-MAY-2012 02:40 PM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents 051712 Morgan Notice of Appeal.pdf 041912 Order.pdf
************************************************ NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE DECISION DATED 04/19/2012 AND DOCKETED Docket ON 04/19/2012 BY JUDGE DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR. PROOF OF Entry: SERVICE FILED. ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPTS FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC MORGAN) ************************************************CYS
MORGAN, DOMINIC J
18-MAY-2012 10:37 AM
Click link(s) to preview/purchase the documents 051712 Morgan Post Trial Motion.pdf Motion CoverSheet Form
Docket 74-12052374 POST TRIAL MOTION (FILED ON BEHALF OF DOMINIC Entry: MORGAN)
18-MAY-2012 01:58 PM
Docket 74-12052374 POST TRIAL MOTION ASSIGNED TO JUDGE: DINUBILE, Entry: JR., VICTOR J. ON DATE: MAY 18, 2012
SILVERMAN, LEON W
23-MAY-2012 12:23 PM
Docket ******************************************************* NOTICE Entry: OF APPEAL FROM THE DECISION DATED 04/19/2012 AND
DOCKETED ON 4/19/12 BY JUDGE DINUBILE, JR., VICTOR. PROOF OF SERVICE FILED. (FILED ON BEHALF OF NEVYAS EYE ASDSOCIATES, ANITA NEVYAS-WALLACE AND HERBERT J NEVYAS)***********************************
31-MAY-2012 FEE PD PURSUANT TO 10:44 AM ORDER Docket HIGHER COURT FEE PAID TO SUPERIOR COURT Entry:
31-MAY-2012 12:00 AM
05-JUN-2012 10:15 AM
74-12052374 IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFT, DOMINIC MORGAN'S Docket "POST HEARING MOTION" ARISING FROM THIS COURT'S 4/19/12 Entry: ORDER, IS DENIED. SEE THIS COURT'S OPINION TO THE SUPERIOR COURT, TO BE FILED ON 6/5/12. BY THE COURT ...DINUBILE,J 6/4/12
05-JUN-2012 10:15 AM
07-JUN-2012 10:19 AM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 07-JUN-2012 OF ORDER ENTERED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 05-JUN-2012.
05-JUN-2012 12:00 AM
05-JUN-2012 11:20 AM
05-JUN-2012 02:03 PM
Docket NOTICE GIVEN ON 05-JUN-2012 OF OPINION FILED/236 NOTICE Entry: GIVEN ENTERED ON 05-JUN-2012.
19-JUL-2012 12:00 AM
Docket PURSUANT TO PA. R.A.P. 1931 (d) APPEAL INVENTORY SENT. Entry:
19-JUL-2012 12:43 PM
RECORD MAILED/TRANSMITTED
19-JUL-2012 12:00 AM
01-AUG-2012 12:00 AM
4 VOLUMES OF NOTES TAKEN 3/7/11 TO 3/11/11 BEFORE JUDGE Docket DINUBILE FORWARDED TO SUPERIOR COURT AS A Entry: SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD.
04-MAR-2013 12:00 AM
ORDER OF THE SUPERIOR COURT AT 1470 & 1715 EDA 2012 THAT Docket THE ORDER OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS IS Entry: AFFIRMED......1/23/13. RECORD RETURNED.