0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
21 vues2 pages
Decision in another court may not be used to prove that the accused is guilty of a crime charged in a subsequent case. Executive Order No. 111 empowered the Regional Directors to resolve uncontested money claims of workers. The court upheld proceedings before the Regional Director involving money claims of employees.
Decision in another court may not be used to prove that the accused is guilty of a crime charged in a subsequent case. Executive Order No. 111 empowered the Regional Directors to resolve uncontested money claims of workers. The court upheld proceedings before the Regional Director involving money claims of employees.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
Decision in another court may not be used to prove that the accused is guilty of a crime charged in a subsequent case. Executive Order No. 111 empowered the Regional Directors to resolve uncontested money claims of workers. The court upheld proceedings before the Regional Director involving money claims of employees.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme DOC, PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
SC Declares Marriage Null and Void; Holds Petitions for Nullity of
Marriage Due to Psychological Incapacity Should be Treated on
Case-to-Case Basis, Not Bound by ‘Molina’ Straitjacket – GR No. 161793, Te v. Te, February 13, 2009
forcible entry, Preliminary mandatory injunction must be filed
within 5 days [2005R307] Ma. Teresa D. Columbres vs Judge Aniceto L. Madronio
BP 22, elements, estafa, elements
[2002V1034] Ben B. Rico vs PP substantial and formal amendments, distinguished [2006V1022EC] [1/2] People of the Philippines Vs. Elberto Tubongbanua y Pahilanga.
venue and jurisdiction distinguished
[2005V1094] Armand Nocum, et al. Vs. Lucio Tan
elements of malversation of public funds or property
[2006V1375] Lacepi T. Magnanao Vs. People of the Philippines.
lifetime of search warrant
[1994V255ECD] [1/3] Elizalde Malaloan, Et Al. Vs. Court Of Appeals, Et Al.
Decisions in another court may not be used to prove that the
accused is guilty of a crime charged in a subsequent case. [1997V728] PP vs. Lanie Ortiz-Miyake
life imprisonment and reclusion perpetua, distinguished
[1995R203] Archimedes P. Cardines, Et Al. Vs. Gregorio L. Rosete
The Court upheld proceedings before the Regional Director
involving money claims of workers because Executive Order No. 111 empowered the Regional Directors to resolve uncontested money claims in cases where employer-employee relationship exists. It conferred on the Secretary of Labor, the Regional Directors, and the Labor Arbiters concurrent jurisdiction over employees' wages and money claims under Art. 217 of the Labor Code [1989V518] Maternity Children's Hospital vs. Sec. Of Labor