Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
199 West 8th Avenue, Ste. 3, Eugene, OR 97401 Telephone (541) 344-1528 Fa x (541) 344-1506 Visit our Web site at w w w.wipfa ndstock.com
Fallen Angels & The Mother of the Son of Man Fallen Women R O B I N J A R R E L L
e strange and enigmatic title son of man has intrigued biblical scholars for millennia. What does it mean and how does it describe Jesus in his role as the Christian messiah? Robin Jarrell surveys the mythological roots of the phrase in the ancient Mesopotamian Epic of Gilgamesh and traces its development from the mythology of the Egyptian queen Hatshepsuts birth narrative, to the to the story of Pandora, and nally to the story of creation found in the book of Genesis. e key to unlocking the mystery of the phrase son of man is embedded in the story of the rst son of manNoahwith the reference to the sons of God who found wives among the daughters of men and whose ospring brought devastation to the earth and the reason for the ood. In the hands of the Christian gospel writers, the parallel son of man gure found in the Dead Sea Scrolls reemerges in the identity of the last son of manJesus of Nazareth.
Robin Jarrell
FALLEN ANGELS AND FALLEN WOMEN The Mother of the Son of Man
Copyright 2013 Robin Jarrell. All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in critical publications or reviews, no part of this book may be reproduced in any manner without prior written permission from the publisher. Write: Permissions, Wipf and Stock Publishers, 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401. Wipf & Stock An imprint of Wipf and Stock Publishers 199 W. 8th Ave., Suite 3 Eugene, OR 97401 www.wipfandstock.com isbn 13: 9781-60899405-2
Contents
Acknowledgments/ix Chapter One / 1 Chapter Two / 49 Chapter Three / 86 Chapter Four / 114 Chapter Five / 142 Bibliography/175 Index/189
Acknowledgments
gratefully acknowledge the support of K. C. Hanson, whose mentorship guided my initial quest to understand Hagars theophany in Genesis 16 and whose gift of Margaret Barkers The Older Testament continues to enlighten me. I owe a debt to Gregory C. Riley who taught me to trust my work. I am grateful to the entire staff of Bertrand Library at Bucknell University, including James Van Fleet and Bud Hiller for their invaluable technical assistance. To Mary Neidig, Dan Heuer, Lona Sholly, and especially to Mary Jane Moser, librarian par excellence, who routinely went above and beyond the call of duty to assist me with this project. Thank you to Stephanie Larson, Matthew Adams, and Mia Rikala for personally sharing their scholarship. To my family who has always given me support: To June and Pod, Robert and Pat, Kelly and Gary, Gaffney and Amos who have lovingly put up with me. And to my adopted family whose gifts I cherish: To Sis, Kim, and Nancy. To Chris Boyatzis, for his expert editorial assistance, and to Sedona, Janine, and Alan who waited patiently while I labored upstairs to write this book. I am especially grateful to my colleague, mentor, and soul-friend Kerry, who continually inspires me with his loving devotion to his craft and who by his faith in action demonstrates that the vocation of writing is indeed a blessed path.
ix
Chapter One
n this chapter, we explore and analyze various myths from ancient Sumer, Ugarit, Egypt, and Greece in an attempt to bring to light those mythological antecedents that form the basis for the mythologies employed by the writers of noncanonical material of Qumran and the composers of the New Testament. We will briefly survey each geographical region in order to investigate those ancient cosmogonies, myths, and stories that function as the foundational background surrounding the highly complex and theologically significant interaction between fallen angels found in Genesis 6:4 and the daughter(s) of men. The ultimate goal of this book is to understand the full significance of the term daughter of man (in the singular) and to illuminate more fully the concept that continues to intrigue biblical scholars and those interested in the person of Jesus of Nazareth and his connection to the epithet Son of Man. Beginning with analysis of the myths of Sumeria, our aim in this chapter is to examine the structures that exist between the divine and human worlds as they are portrayed within the literary genres of both myth and epic. More specifically, we will concern our examination with how these worlds are gendered and how gender dictates the transversal of the boundaries between divine and human.1 The way in which gendering and
1. The anthropologist Edmund Leach is helpful in establishing criteria for examining myths without discounting their religious significance. He also contends that The central problem of religion is then to re-establish some kind of bridge between Man and God ... the myth first discriminates between gods and men and then becomes preoccupied with the relations and intermediaries which link men and gods together ... so too with sex relations ... (Leach, Essential Edmund Leach, 31). This is the purpose for the chapter.
Introduction
Chapter One
Lincoln makes the claim that of all the categories listed above, myth is the only classification type that possesses both credibility and authority and explains that a narrative possessed of authority is one for which successful claims are made not only to the status of truth, but what is more, to the status of paradigmatic truth.3
Chapter One
however, is far less certain. Almost none of the scholarly literature focuses extensively on the transversal of the sacred and inviolate boundary between divine and human by means of sexual intercourse, both reproductive and nonreproductive.12 We will examine the transversal of such divine/human boundaries in the case of certain demigods such as Lugalbanda and Gilgamesh. And we also discuss the boundary transversal process by which the gods bestow their imprimatur of kingship to their human servants, who are not of divine heritage but who are adopted by the gods for the very human purpose of ruling and administration.13 Sumerian myths of origin reveal an overarching focus on combat (where the world comes into existence through the divines ability to vanquish chaos).14 But there are other typologies that exist in Sumerian cosmogonies. Creation of the world may extend from the activities of the deity who inundates the earth with water (the chthonic myth).15 The water used by Sumerian god Enki (who is the god of water and one of the creator gods in the Sumerian pantheon) in Enki and Ninhursaga may allude to a third type of creation myththe marriage typology.16 In the earliest forms of Sumerian creation typologies, the unitary creator exists in a timeless and sexless state. The unitary becomes binary and sex occurs between the binary pair for the purposes of reproduction. With one rare exception, the gods do not speak of love or emotion ... the texts instead emphasize that male orgasm is an act of creation.17 This
12. Dickson discusses boundary crossings of the god Enki (in the myth of Enki and Ninhursaga) solely in the divine realm and not as it pertains to humans. See Dickson, Enki and Ninhursag. 13. The adoption of humans by the Deity for the purpose of kingship occurs also in Israel, for example, in Psalm 2:7. 14. See Forsyth, Old Enemy. 15.Daise, Biblical Creation Motifs, 300. 16. Translated from Kramer Maier in Leick, Sex and Eroticism, 31. In Enki and Ninhursaga, creation begins with the sexual union between heaven and earth since Enkis promise to provide the origins of the city of Dilmun with sweet fresh ponds include his phallus fill[ing] the ditches with semen. Leick also notes that the double meaning of the Sumerian sign a [can denote] sperm as well as water (39). There could also be a fourth type of Sumerian/Mesopotamian creation motifthat of creation from the elements of earth (clay, etc.) through the craftmanship of the deity who may also use the blood of slain evil and/or chaos-like deitiesfor instance, in the Enuma Elish, Marduk creates the universe from the corpse of Tiamat and the blood of Quingu. See Dalley, Myths from Mesopotamia, 4. 17. Leick, Sex and Eroticism, 55. In the myth of Enki and Ninhursaga, Ninhursaga impregnates herself with Enkis semen. Enki deceives Ninhursaga and has sex with
his first daughter, his offspring, and this sequence continues. 18. The creation of time gives way to the chaos of birth, which is not painful for Sumerian female deities (Dickson, Enki and Ninhursag, 12). Whether we can make a distinction between the painful birth of humans in the Genesis story and the easy birth of the Sumerian female deities will be discussed later. 19.As Leick notes, Mesopotamian systems have a strong anthropomorphic component and with this conceptual framework the most persistent pattern is that of sexual reproduction (Sex and Eroticism, 12). 20. See Bottro, Religion in Ancient Mesopotamia, 98, who remarks that in the Mesopotamian legends the eternal question, why do human beings exist? appears in few mythological writings with the exception of the Atrahasis myth. 21. In the Gilgamesh epic, however, the tavern keeper Shiduri tells Gilgamesh, You will not find the eternal life you seek. / When the gods created mankind / They appointed death for mankind, / Kept eternal life in their own hands (Dalley, Myths from Mesopotamia, 150).