Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
For any further information about the project, please contact the project leader: Associate Professor Richard Tucker (richard.tucker@deakin.edu.au).
Project Team:
Dr Neda Abbasi, Project Manager & Research Fellow Professor Graham Thorpe, Partner Investigator Professor Tony Williams, Partner Investigator Professor Michael Ostwald, Partner Investigator Dr Louise Wallis, Partner Investigator
1. Is there still, or was there ever, a place for the individual in contemporary design practice? 2. Should a team member stand out from the rest of the team and be acknowledged for their contribution? 3. What are the boundaries that differentiate between the memberships of teams and groups? 4. Are students today more able to communicate and work in parallel than collaborate? 5. Is teamwork only learned through experiential learning, or can it be taught?
Teaching & Assessing Team & Group Learning in Architecture & related Design Disciplines
Is there still, or was there ever, a place for the individual in contemporary design practice?
Four key themes emerged from participants answer to the question of individual versus team in the design practice:
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
1.1 Tendency to stress individuality in architectural practice and education (3 references); 1.2 Essentiality of individuals in design practice (4 references); 1.3 Finding the balance between asserting individual identity and collaborative practice (3 references); and 1.4 The influence of nature of practice and project on the place of individual in the design practice (2 references).
Teaching & Assessing Team & Group Learning in Architecture & related Design Disciplines
Should a team member stand out from the rest of the team and be acknowledged for their contribution?
Four key themes emerged from participants answer to the question of individuals standing out in a team:
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
2.1 Acknowledging individual contribution as a characteristic of an effective team (2 references); 2.2 Challenging individualised marks (1 reference); 2.3 Means of acknowledging individual contributions to a team (1 reference); and 2.4 The influence of CONTEXT, PROCESS and HIERARCHY in defining contribution and acknowledging the place of individuals in a team (2 reference).
Teaching & Assessing Team & Group Learning in Architecture & related Design Disciplines
What are the boundaries that differentiate between the memberships of teams and groups?
Key differences of a 'group' and a 'team' lay in four categories of factors:
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
Teaching & Assessing Team & Group Learning in Architecture & related Design Disciplines
Are students today more able to communicate and work in parallel than collaborate?
Key differences of a 'group' and a 'team' lay in four categories of factors:
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
4.1.1 Team formation strategies 4.1.2 The context of teamwork 4.1.3 The nature of team assignment or project 4.1.4 Ownership of the project and discernible competition between teams
11
Teaching & Assessing Team & Group Learning in Architecture & related Design Disciplines
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
13
ONLINE SURVEYS of Student Teamwork Experiences in Design and Teaching Teamwork in Design ANZAScA 2012 Paper: Conceptualizing Teamwork and Group-Work in Architecture and Related Design Disciplines Project Website National Teaching Symposium 1: Conceptualising Team- and Groupwork in Design First version of MANUALS ON TEAMWORK IN DESIGN: (1) Manual on Teamwork in Design for Students and (2) Manual for Teachers to Support Conflict Resolution in Student Teams
Year 1
Project Dissemination
14
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
Sample Book Chapter: Volume 1-Conceptualising Team and Group Learning in Architecture and Design Education Project Team Workshop: suggestions on how to redesign pilot units Table of Content for the two volume books: the main project dissemination Journal Paper No.1: Student Experiences of Designing in Teams: How Teachers Can Make a Difference National Teaching Symposium No.2: Curriculum Level Approach to Teaching Teamwork
Project Dissemination
15
Expected Dissemination
16
A Project Funded by Australian Government Office for Learning and Teaching, 2011-2013
Book Chapter V.2: Evaluation and Assessment of Teamwork Book Chapter V.2: Teaching Teamwork Framework for Team Effectiveness in Student Design Teams: exploring 24 challenges of effective teamwork OLT final report narrative Book Chapter V.2: Conclusion Book Chapter V.2: Learning in Teams: Team Processes Book Chapter V.2: Teamwork in the Curriculum Case Studies of Good Practices (Teaching Teamwork in Design) Journal Paper no.3: Students Experiences of Teamwork in Design: findings of a national survey Book Chapter V.2: Learning in Teams: Task Design, Team Level and Individual Level Factors
Year 3
Expected Dissemination
17
THANK YOU
School of Architecture & Built Environment DEAKIN UNIVERSITY
Associate Professor Richard Tucker, Project Leader, richard.tucker@deakin.edu.au Dr Neda Abbasi, Project Manager, neda.abbasi@deakin.edu.au