0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
16 vues54 pages
This is the response brief filed by John Marshall Law School Chicago to the appeal of Jorie Johnson. Ms. Johnson sued John Marshall and alleged that John Marshall violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud act and committed common law fraud with respect to employment statistics. John Marshall disputed the allegations and the trial court dismissed the action. John Marshall's lawyers are Joseph A. Strubbe, Travis Quick and Bruce R. Alper of the law firm of Vedder Price, P.C.
Titre original
Response Brief and Argument of the John Marshall Law School
This is the response brief filed by John Marshall Law School Chicago to the appeal of Jorie Johnson. Ms. Johnson sued John Marshall and alleged that John Marshall violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud act and committed common law fraud with respect to employment statistics. John Marshall disputed the allegations and the trial court dismissed the action. John Marshall's lawyers are Joseph A. Strubbe, Travis Quick and Bruce R. Alper of the law firm of Vedder Price, P.C.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
This is the response brief filed by John Marshall Law School Chicago to the appeal of Jorie Johnson. Ms. Johnson sued John Marshall and alleged that John Marshall violated the Illinois Consumer Fraud act and committed common law fraud with respect to employment statistics. John Marshall disputed the allegations and the trial court dismissed the action. John Marshall's lawyers are Joseph A. Strubbe, Travis Quick and Bruce R. Alper of the law firm of Vedder Price, P.C.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd