*f cvt?

nAj

GUIDANCE ON CLASS LOOKOUT SYSTEM Q-. -ft w ^ ^ c^

STATE 210733

/ZCZCFS0813
*RRUEHFSI
DE RUEHC #0733/01 3 1 10342
ZNRUUUUUZZH /
R.070339ZNO£97 V
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO ALL DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR POSTS
SPECIAL EMBASSY PROGRAM
RUEHJB/AMEMBASSY BUJUMBURA 3217
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO 0446
BT
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 STATE 210733

VISAS INFORM CONSULS

E.0. 12958: N/A

TAGS: CLOK, CVIS, KCSY, CMGT
SUBJECT: GUIDANCE ON USE OF THE CLASS VISA LOOKOUT SYSTEM

SI JRY. THE CLASS VISA LOOKOUT SYSTEM IS ONE OF THE BEST

SCREENING TOOLS WE HAVE IN THE VISA ADJUDICATION PROCESS.
PRESENT VISA LOOKOUT ACCOUNTABILITY REQUIREMENTS UNDERLINE
THE CRUCIAL IMPORTANCE OF PERFORMING LOOKOUT CHECKS AND
RESOLVING HITS FOR EVERY VISA APPLICANT. THIS CABLE
BEVffiWS GENERAL GUIDANCE FOR MAKING AND' REMOVING CLASS
ENTRIES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE THE USEFULNESS OF THE DATABASE.
IT ALSO DESCRIBES COMMON ERRORS UNCOVERED DURING VARIOUS
REVIEWS OF LOOKOUT DATA, END SUMMARY

i. CLASS.THE CONSULAR LOOKOUT AND SUPPORT SYSTEM,

CONTAINS jjEAPI.Y 5 Mtt J JONINDEXRECQRDS ON FOREIGN
NATIONALS KNOWN OR BELIEVED TO BE INELIGIBLE FOR VISAS TO \E UNITED STATES. ALTHOUGH MOST OF TH

ORIGINATE WITH OUR EMBASSIES AND CONSULATES ABROAD THROUGH

THE VISA APPLICATION PROCESS, OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES ALSO
CONTRIBUTE LOOKOUTS TO OUR SYSTEM, THE IMMIGRATION AND
NATURALIZATION SERVICE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE EXCHANGE
LOOKOUT INFORMATION ELECTRONICALLY VIA THE TREASURY
ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATION SYSTEM (TECS), WHICH IS
ADMINISTERED BY THE CUSTOMS SERVICE AND WHICH IS ACCESSIBLE
BY NUMEROUS AGENCIES IN THE INTERAGENCY BORDER INSPECTION
SYSTEM (IBIS). THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY PROVIDES A
MONTHLY TAPE OF NEW INFORMATION ON DRUG OFFENDERS FOR
DP"'NLOADING INTO CLASS. THE FEDERAL MARSHALS SERVICE AND
:DERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION PROVIDE NAMES BY
I- JRANDUM OR TELEGRAM FOR ENTRY INTO CLASS. INTERPOL ALSO
FOi- WARDS ITS NOTICES FOR ENTRY INTO THE SYSTEM. AS
EXTRADITION REQUESTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ARE
CABLED TO POSTS, THE NON-CITIZEN SUBJECTS OF THESE REQUESTS
 ALso ARE INCLUDED IN CLASS.

2. ITIS CLEAR THE CLASS DATABASE PLAYS A CENTRAL ROLE IN

OUR SCREENING EFFORTS AND, INCREASINGLY, THOSE OF OTHER
AGENCIES. IT IS CRITICAL THEREFORE THAT THE INFORMATION IN
CLASS BE AS ACCURATE AND USEFUL AS WE CAN MAKE IT. THIS
CABLE OFFERS GUIDANCE ALONG THESE LINES AND, POINTS OUT
COMMON ERRO1RS THE DEPARTMENT HAS ENCOUNTERED IN REVIEWS OF
THE DATA. RULES FOR ENTERING REFUSALS INTO CLASS ARE
DESCRIBED IN 9 FAM 41.121PN (FORNIVS) AND 9 FAM 42.81 PN '
(FOR IVS). 9 FAM PART IV, APPENDIX D, AUTOMATED SYSTEMS
CONTAINS GUIDANCE ON MAKING AND DELETING CLASS ENTRIES.

REVIEW OF CLASS ENTRIES

3. MANY ERRORS IN CLASS ENTRIES CAN BE AVOIDED IF POSTS

SIMPLY REVIEW THE ENTRIES THEY MAKE. THIS IS MANDATORY FOR
CATEGORY I REFUSALS. THE CLASS ENTRY SHOULD ALWAYS BE
PRINTED OUT AND REVIEWED BY THE SUPERVISING OFFICER, THEN
STAPLED TO THE CATEGORY 1 FILE. . ENTRIES MADE BY POST MAY
BE MISTYPED OR GARBLED IN TRANSMISSION, OR MAY CONTAIN
CHARACTERS THAT DO NOT READ. USE OF THE "SLASH" CHARACTER
IN ANY FIELD, FOR EXAMPLE, WILL CAUSE AN ENTRY TO BE
T 'TIED. IN A RECENT REVIEW OF DATES OF BIRTH OF CLASS
IBS, THE DEPARTMENT DISCOVERED OVER 10,000 CATEGORY I
RtxX>RDS ON CHILDREN UNDER 16, ALTHOUGH THESE SHOULD BE
QUITE RARE. NEARLY 3,000 OF THE ENTRIES SHOW DATES OF
BIRTH IN THE SAME YEAR OR LATER THAN THE REFUSAL YEAR.
REVIEW OF CLASS ENTRIES AS THEY ARE MADE IS A SIMPLE BUT
EFFECTIVE INTERNAL CONTROL TO ENSURE THAT AN ENTRY HAS BEEN
MADE AND THAT IT HAS BEEN MADE CORRECTLY.

CLASS ENTRIES LACKING BIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

4. CLASS HAS OVER27.000 ENTRIES WTTHNO'DATE OF BIRTH,

NOT COUNTING 00 ENTRIES. OFFICERS WHO MUST REVIEW THESE .
FREQUENTLY APPEARING ENTRIES KNOW THE FRUSTRATION OF TRYING
TO EVALUATE A CLASS HIT WITH MINIMAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
THE DEPARTMENT STRONGLY DISCOURAGES ENTRY INTO CLASS OF
SUBJECTS WITH INCOMPLETE IDENTIFYING DATA. CLASS ENTRIES
SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST A YEAR OF BIRTH AND PREFERABLY
COMPLETE DOE. IN FACT, THE PC-NV AND MODERNIZED SYSTEMS
WELLNOT ALLOW AN ENTRY TO BE MADE LACKING THIS BASIC
BIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION. IF POSTS BELIEVE THEY HAVE
INFORMATION THAT SHOULD BE ENTERED INTO CLASS EVEN THOUGH
THERE IS INCOMPLETE DATA AVAILABLE, THEY SHOULD CABLE THE
DEPARTMENT WITH DETAILS FOR FURTHER EVALUATION. THE VISAS
VIPER CHANNEL CURRENTLY EXISTS FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO
TERRORISTS, WHICH REPRESENT THE BULK OF SUCH ENTRIES.
QUESTS FOR ADDITION TO CLASS OF NON-TERRORIST ENTRIES
CKJNG COMPLETE BIOGRAPHIC DATA SHOULD BE FORWARDED VIA
VISAS CLOK.

5. CLASS ALSO REFLECTS MANY ENTRIES WITH MADE-UP DATES OF

BIRTH. THE YEAR 1900 HAS BEEN USED FREQUENTLY. SINCE

26
 X
CLASS WILL ONLY RETURN HITS WHICH FALL AT MOST WITHIN 5
YEARS OF THE DATE OF BIRTH QUERIED, A MADE-UP DATE OF BIRTH
SET TO THE CENTURY MARK WILL MOST OFTEN BE USELESS. AN
ESTIMATED YEAR OF BIRTH, ON THE OTHER HAND, MAY BE HELPFUL
IN SOME LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES - E.G., WHEN AN EXACT DATE
OF BIRTH IS UNAVAILABLE ON A SERIOUS OFFENDER, BUT
SUFFICIENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AT HAND TO MAKE FOLLOW
UP OF A POSSIBLE HIT WORTHWHILE. (NOTE: POSTS THAT STILL
USE THE "CX" SYSTEM TO ENTER CLASS LOOKOUTS SHOULD USE THE
LETTER "X" IN FRONT OF THE YEAR OF BIRTH TO INDICATE IT IS
ESTIMATED. THIS IS THE ONLY SYSTEM THAT ALLOWS THIS
INDICATOR. ALL OTHERS SHOULD USE FREE FIELD TEXT TO
IDENTIFY AN ESTIMATED YEAR OF BIRTH.)

6. COUNTRY OF BIRTH (COB) IS ALSO A KEY DATA ELEMENT FOR

CLASS SEARCHES. POSTS THAT HAVE NATIONALITY INFORMATION
SHOULD CONSIDER USING THIS IN THE COUNTRY OF BIRTH FIELD
WHEN THAT INFORMATION IS LACKING, BUT A STRONG ASSUMPTION
CAN BE MADE THAT THE NATIONALITY IS THE SAME AS THE COB. ^

7. COMPLETE NAME INFORMATION IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT. A

SURNAME AND GIVEN NAME ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY CLASS ENTRY.
THE FORMULATION "FNU" (FIRST NAME UNKNOWN) MAY BE USED FOR
TRIES IN WHICH THE SUBJECT HAS ONLY ONE NAME OR IN WHICH
^E FIRST NAME IS UNKNOWN, BUT IT SHOULD BE USED SPARINGLY.
CLASS MATCHES ANY FIRST NAME WITH "FNU" WHEN RESPONDING TO
QUERIES. ANY OTHER FORMULATION SUCH AS "FIRST NAME
UNKNOWN" OR "NO FIRST NAME" WILL BE TREATED AS IF IT WERE
THE REAL NAME. THERE IS NO PROVISION FOR ENTRIES IN WHICH
A LAST NAME IS NOT KNOWN. USE OF "LNU" OR ANY SIMILAR
FORMULATION WHICH DOES SHOW UP IN CLASS WILL BE TREATED AS
A REAL NAME.

IMPROPER USE OF ALIAS FIELD

8. MANY POSTS HAVE MISUSED THE ALIAS FIELD IN CLASS TO

ENTER COMMENT ORDESCRIPTTVE INFORMATION. DEPARTMENTHAS
NOTICED FOR EXAMPLE, SUCH INFORMATION AS THE FOLLOWING IN
THE ALIAS NAME FIELD: "SEE LETTER IN AZ UNDER V" OR "WIFE
STUDENT VISA ISS IN, FAKE." SEARCHES AGAINST AN ALIAS ARE
CONDUCTED BY CLASS IN THE SAME MANNER AS SEARCHES AGAINST A
PRIME NAME, AND THE SAME DEGREE OF SIMILARITY MUST BE
ACHIEVED FOR THE ALIAS TO BE RETURNED AS A HIT. CURRENTLY,
AN ALIAS ENTRY WILL NOT BE RETURNED AUTOMATICALLY WITH THE
ORIGINAL OR PRIME NAME (ALTHOUGH THE REVERSE IS TRUE - THE
PRIME NAME WILL BE RETURNED WITH AN ALIAS WHENEVER THE
ALIAS "HITS" ON A QUERY). THEREFORE, SUCH ENTRIES ARE
FUTILE. AT THIS POINT, ONLY THE 20-CHARACTER PROVINCE OF
-MRTH FIELD (ALSO KNOWN AS THE "COMMENT" OR "REFUSAL
3MMENT" FIELD) IS AVAILABLE FOR COMMENT INFORMATION IN
v,LASS, ALTHOUGH WE HAVE NOTED A NEED TO EXPAND THIS
CAPABILITY IN THE NEXT GENERATION OF CLASS.

9. DEPARTMENT HAS NOTICED OTHER CASES IN WHICH THE EXACT

SAME NAME IS ENTERED INTO THE PRIME AND ALIAS FIELDS. THIS

27
WILL CREATE TWO REDUNDANT HITS AND SHOULD BE AVOIDED.

INCORRECT USE BF CLASS CODES

10. MANY POSTS STILL USE AND REFER TO REFUSAL CODES THAT
ARE OBSOLETE. THE MOST COMMON EXAMPLE IS "6C" IN LIEU OF
"6Cl" (IN FACT, DEPARTMENT HAS NOTED SOME CABLES THAT STILL
REFER TO THE EVEN OLDER CODE "19").' SOME OLDER CODES DO
STILL APPEAR IN CLASS BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT YET BEEN ABLE TO
PROGRAM CONVERSION SOFTWARE, OR IN SOME CASES (FOR EXAMPLE,
CODE "23") THERE IS NO AUTOMATED CONVERSION POSSIBLE. ALL
POSTS HAVE RECEIVED A LIST OF THE CURRENT CLASS CODES BY
ALDAC (97 STATE 118816, WITH GARBLES CORRECTED IN 97 STATE
122140). THESE ARE THE ONLY REFUSAL CODES THAT SHOULD BE
USED BY POST. THESE ALDACS ALSO IDENTIFY THE CATEGORY
LEVEL AND RETENTION PERIOD FOR CLASS ENTRIES.

11. POSTS SHOULD DISTINGUISH BETWEEN LOOKOUTS THAT

INDICATE REFUSALS AND THOSE THAT DO NOT. THE FORMER (SUCH
AS 2A1, 6C1,4), REFLECT REFUSAL OR REVOCATION OF A VISA
AND SHOW THE GROUNDS UNDER WHICH THE RE FUSAL OR REVOCATION
WAS MADE. THE LATTER, ON THE OTHER HAND, (SUCH AS L.SL,
AND ALL THE QUASI OR "P" CODES) ARE USED IN THE ABSENCE OF
A VISA APPLICATION TO INDICATE RELEVANT INFORMATION
AVAILABLE AT POST. THE QUASI OR P CODES SHOULD ONLY BE
USED WHEN THE EVIDENCE AT HAND IS PROBABLY SUFFICIENT TO
RESULT IN REFUSAL OF A VISA WHEN AN APPLICATION IS MADE.
THEY SHOULD NOT BE USED TO INDICATE VAGUE SUSPICIONS THAT A
SUBJECT IS INELIGIBLE AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE USED TO
REFLECT ACTION ON AN ACTUAL VISA APPLICATION. THE P CODE
HAS THE SAME LEVEL OF SERIOUSNESS AND RETENTION PERIOD IN
CLASS AS THE HARD REFUSAL CODE. CATEGORY 1 LOOKOUTS USING
THE P CODE ARE REQUIRED TO BE BACKED UP BY CATEGORY 1
LOOKOUT FILES, THE SAME AS FOR CATEGORY 1 REFUSALS. THE P
CODE SHOULD BE DELETED FROM CLASS IN FAVOR OF A HARD
REFUSAL CODE WHENEVER THE SUBJECT SUBSEQUENTLY APPLIES FOR
A VISA, IF THE REFUSAL HAS BEEN CONFIRMED. IFTHEREFUSAL
IS NOT CONFIRMED. THE LOOKOUT SHOULD SIMPLY BE DELETED.

MAKING CLASS ENTRIES

•

12. ALL POSTS NOW HAVE DIRECT COMMUNICATIONS WITH CLASS

AND THE CAPACITY TO MAKE ON-LINE ENTRIES. HOW THEY MAKE
ENTRIES, HOWEVER, DEPENDS ON THE TYPE OF SYSTEM THEY HAVE.
MOST POSTS WITH A VS SYSTEM HAVE THE OLDER WANG APPLICATION
-MISCELLANEOUS CONSULAR SYSTEMS" (CX). THIS APPLICATION IS
INDEPENDENT OF VISA SYSTEMS AT POST AND CAN BE USED TO
QUERY CLASS OR MAKE CLASS ENTRIES. POSTS WITH MODERNIZED
OR PC-NV SYSTEMS MUST USE THE REFUSAL FUNCTIONS OF THOSE
SYSTEMS TO ENTER NAMES IN CLASS. IF POST USES A REFUSAL
CODE THE SYSTEM COUNTS THE ENTRY AS A REFUSAL FOR
STATISTICAL PURPOSES. IF POST USES A NON-REFUSAL LOOKOUT
CODE (SUCH AS AN L OR P CODE), THE ENTRY WILL NOT BE
COUNTED IN POSTS VISA REFUSAL STATISTICS, ALTHOUGH "L" AND
*P" REFUSALS WILL SHOW ON REPORTS INDICATING WORK DONE BY

28
 DIVIDUAL FSNS OR OFF! ~RS. (NOTE: CA/EX/CSDIS
CURRENTLY REVIEWING T 3 NEED FOR A MODERNIZED CX TO ALLOW
LOOKOUT AND QUASI-REF 5ALS TO BE ENTERED OUTSIDE OF A
SPECIFIC APPLICATION.)

13. WHEN ENTERING NIV : JFUSALS IN ANY OF THE SYSTEMS, A

COPY OF THE ENTRY IS KE T IN POSTS "LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE."
IF CLASS SHOULD BE DOWN, NAMECHECKS ARE RUN AGAINST THE DNC
SUPPLEMENTED BY THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE, WHICH ASSURES THAT
RECENT REFUSALS MADE BY POST WILL NOT BE MISSED IF THEY
HAVE NOT YET MADE IT ONTO THE DNC. THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE
IS SENT MONTHLY TO THE DEPARTMENT. WHERE IT IS COMPARED
WITH MAINFRAME CLASS AND ANY ENTRIES NOT ALREADY APPEARING
IN CLASS ARE ADDED FROM THE FILE. THIS IS A BACKUP
MECHANISM FOR ASSURING THAT NIV REFUSALS ARE ADDED TO CLASS
EVEN IF -THE TELECOMMUNICATION LINE IS DOWN. WHEN THE
MONTHLY DNC LOOKOUT CD IS FORWARDED TO POST, A SIMILAR
COMPARISON IS MADE MATCHING THE DATA ON THE CD AGAINST THE
EXISTING LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE. ENTRIES IN THE LOCAL LOOKOUT
FILE ARE PURGED IF A CORRESPONDING ENTRY IS FOUND ON THE
CD, LEAVING ONLY THE MOST RECENT REFUSALS IN THE LOCAL
FILE. SENDING THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE PROMPTLY TO THE
DEPARTMENT EACH MONTH IS A KEY PART OF MAINTAINING THE
C* TRRENCY OF THE CLASS LOOKOUT DATABASE. LOADING NEW DNC CD
S PROMPTLY AS THEY ARE RECEIVED FROM THE DEPARTMENT IS
. .J ESSENTIAL TO THIS EFFORT. •

14. THE MODERNIZED IV SYSTEM ALLOWS CLASS ENTRIES FROM

WITHIN THE SYSTEM. USERS OF IVACS MAY USE THE CX
APPLICATION, IF AVAILABLE AT POST, TO MAKE ENTRIES OR MAY
SEND REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONS TO THE DEPARTMENT VIA CLOK
CABLE. IT IS NOT WORTHWHILE, HOWEVER, TO ENTER221G
REFUSALS IN THIS FASHION. THOSE REFUSALS SHOULD BE
MAINTAINED LOCALLY. SIMILARLY, THE MODERNIZED IV SYSTEM
ALLOWS CLASS ENTRY FOR DV REFUSALS. POSTS NOT YET
MODERNIZED MAY USE THE CX APPLICATION OR SEND A CLOK CABLE.

REQUESTING CLASS DELETIONS

15. ONLY THE DEPARTMENT CAN DELETE AN ENTRY FROM CLASS.

POSTS SHOULD REQUEST DELETION VIA CLOK CABLE. SEND CABLES

IN ERROR OR OVERCOME, OR WHEN AN IMMIGRANT VISA WAIVER HAS

BEEN APPROVED AND AN IV ISSUED. (FORWARDING A COPY OF THE
.IVACS REPORT47, STAMPED AND SIGNED BY THE IV CHIEF, IS AN
ALTERNATE METHOD OF REQUESTING DELETION OF THE LATTER
ENTRIES.) IT IS NOT WORTHWHILE TO REQUEST DELETION OF
CERTAIN CATEGORY TWO REFUSALS SUCH AS R OR G AS THESE FALL
OUT OF THE SYSTEM AUTOMATICALLY AFTER ONE YEAR.

VHEN REQUESTING A DELETION, PLEASE CITE THE HIT THAT

i~ i O BE DELETED EXACTLY AS IT APPEARS IN CLASS. IN MANY
CASES HITS ARE SO SIMILAR THAT IT IS DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE
WHICH IS TO BE DELETED UNLESS THE ACTUAL CITATION IS
AVAILABLE. PROVIDE A BRIEF EXPLANATION AS TO THE REASON

29
FOR THE DELETION IN YOUR CABLE TO THE DEPARTMENT.
COORDINATE WITH OTHER POSTS BEFORE REQUESTING DELETION OF
ENTRIES MADE BY THEM AND INDICATE THEIR CONCURRENCE ON THE
DELETION REQUEST, OR, PREFERABLY, PROPOSE THAT THEY
INITIATE THE CLOK REQUEST FOR THEIR OWN HITS. THE
DEPARTMENT DOES NOT RESPOND BY CABLE TO ROUTINE DELETION
REQUESTS UNLESS THERE IS A PROBLEM. POSTS MAY WISH TO
CHECK CLASS AFTER A COUPLE OF WEEKS TO CONFIRM THE DELETION
HAS TAKEN PLACE. ALTHOUGH THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT TO DO
SO, POSTS MAY WISH TO HOLD ON TO FILES FOR SDC MONTHS TO A
YEAR FOLLOWING CLASS DELETION IN CASE ANY SUBSEQUENT
QUESTIONS ARISE.

17. CLASS ENTRIES CANNOT BE CHANGED. IF A CORRECTION TO

AN ENTRY IS NECESSARY, MAKE A NEW ENTRY WITH THE CORRECT
INFORMATION AND REQUEST DELETION OF THE INCORRECT ENTRY VIA
CLOKCABLE.

18. INS HITS IN CLASS CANNOT BE DELETED VIA THE CLOK

MECHANISM. SINCE THEIR APPEARANCE IN CLASS IS DIRECTLY
TIED TO THE SOURCE SYSTEM (THE NATIONAL AUTOMATED
IMMIGRATION LOOKOUT SYSTEM - NAILS), ONLY THE INS CAN
DELETE SUCH ENTRIES PERMANENTLY. THEREFORE, DELETION
REQUESTS FOR INS ENTRIES SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO THAT AGENCY.

19. REQUESTS FOR DELETION OF VERY RECENT CLASS ENTRIES ARE

COMPLICATED BY THE FUNCTIONING OF THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE.
IF A CLASS ENTRY IS DELETED BEFORE PURGING THE SAME ENTRY
FROM THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE, THE NAME WILL BE RE-ADDED TO
CLASS THE NEXT TIME THE LOCAL FILE IS SUBMITTED TO THE
DEPARTMENT. POSTS SHOULD BE AWARE OF THIS ANOMALY AND
EITHER REQUEST ASSISTANCE FROM THE DEPARTMENT (CA SUPPORT
DESK) TO DELETE THE NAME FROM THE LOCAL LOOKOUT FILE OR •
WATT TO REQUEST THE DELETION FROM CLASSUNTIL THE NAME HAS
BEEN PURGED FROM THE LOCAL FILE AS A RESULT OF A MONTHLY
UPDATE OF DNC (ASSUMING THE NAME HAS MADE IT ON TO THE
DNC).

20. POSTS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CONDUCT REVIEWS OF THEIR

CATEGORY 1 FILES AGAINST EXISTING CLASS ENTRIES ON A
REGULAR BASIS. ANY POST DESIRING A PRINTOUT OF ITS
CATEGORY 1 REFUSALS IN CLASS OR ANY PORTION OF THEM MAY
CONTACT CA/VO/F/S,ATTN: FRANK TURLEY, BY CABLE OR E-MAIL.

21. MINIMIZE CONSIDERED.

ALBRIGHT
BT
#0733

30