Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
When Cops are Criminals
By Jane F. Gilgun, Ph.D.
Once in a while, there are dirty cops, no different from the crooks they are
supposed to protect the public from. A case in point is the conduct of several
members of the Metro Gang Strike Force in Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. The
conduct of these cops was appalling. They stole seized property, such as jewelry,
laptop computers, and televisions for their own use or gave them to relatives. They
raided homes, arrested persons for whom they had no evidence of gang
membership, and seized their property. A state commission investigated, and now
the Strike Force is now under FBI investigation which began in 2009.
What happened? How can men who swore to serve and protect turn into
criminals themselves? Among the possible responses is that most cops in the Strike
Force were honest. They upheld the law and respected property rights. This
suggests that there was something special about the cops who crossed the line.
With more than 25 years experience in interviewing convicted felons, I have
a few ideas about what happened. The cops who were criminals had criminal
tendencies before they were cops. This is no surprise because a lot of us have
criminal tendencies. Many people commit petty crimes when they think they can
get away with them. Many of us would dominate others if we met no resistance.
Access
That is the situation of these criminal cops. They could push around people
they said were gang members. They could confiscate the property of innocent as
well as people later found to be guilty. They had access to goods they seized.
Apparently, there was nobody to stop them. They may have stolen a few small items
and got away with it. That emboldened them to steal more items. They did. So it
went until they were caught and brought disgrace upon the Strike Force and the
entire police department.
Contempt for Owners of Record
The thieving cops may have regarded the actual property owners with
contempt, making the owners into persons who did not deserve to own such valued
goods. They may have believed the owners got the goods through stealing them or
that they bought the goods through drug money. Whatever the particulars, it is
likely that the cops disrespected owners and owners’ rights to the goods. Some of
these beliefs clearly are racist.
Entitlement
The criminal cops may have believed they were entitled to compensation for
the many sacrifices they made as cops. Cops don’t get paid much. Their jobs can be
dangerous. Being a cop is tough on family life. These cops may have feel angry,
deprived, depressed, and anxious. They believed they deserved these goods and the
owners of record did not.
No
Punking
Out
Being men and then cops, there is a code that says you do not admit
weakness. Depression, anxiety, and even feelings of deprivation are signs of
weakness for many people, women and men included. If they admitted they were
hurting, they were punking out.
Strategies for Prevention
The thievery continued for years. Three strategies may have prevented these
shameful behaviors and saved the police force from public shame and
condemnation, which few cops actually deserve. The three strategies are
supervision, holding each other accountable, and redefining manhood and punking
out.
Supervision
Had someone who had power over the cops who stole had caught them in the
act and had they been punished, that might have stopped the problem immediately.
There would have had to have been support at the supervisory and rank and file
levels for the punishment. What happened instead was a lack of supervision.
Accountability
The police in general need to hold each other accountable. Instead they have
a “no squeal” code of conduct, similar to the “no snitch” codes in prisons. I believe
non‐criminal cops knew some of their colleagues were stealing, but they turned the
other way. They didn’t want to squeal. Some may have told the criminal cops to
stop.
When
the
stealing
continued,
they
did
nothing
further.
The
no
squeal
code
works
most
of
the
time,
but
when
officers’
conduct
is
reprehensible
and
also
threatens the reputation of all cops, the no squeal code has to be suspended.
In short, cops should police other cops. For the sake of public trust and the
oath they took to serve and protect, cops must break the code at times for the public
good and for their own good. Cops must be educated to understand that any cop
behaviors that threaten their mission must be held to account. Cops must hold each
other accountable for behavior that threatens harm to the public and to cops
themselves.
Manhood
Real men do not abuse their power over others. They do whatever it takes to
contribute to the public good and to the welfare of friends and families. The police
officers’ oath places special responsibilities on them. It takes a real man to admit
that his state of mind is threatening his capacities to live up to his own oath. This
state of mind includes grappling with racist beliefs, which for many, are outside of
their awareness. Cops, like all of us, need to figure out how to deal with racist
beliefs.
Besides racist beliefs, cops must grapple with their own anger, depression,
anxiety, and a sense of deprivation that leads to entitlement. These states of mind
are not unusual in the general population and not unusual with cops. If cops do not
deal with these states of mind, they may not be able to live up to their oaths. Out of
anger, diminished capacities related to depression and anxiety, and entitlement,
they
do
things
they
would
not
do
if
they
were
in
good
states
of
mind.
The
stressful
and
sometimes
traumatic
nature
of
their
jobs
makes
cops
especially vulnerable to anger, depression, anxiety, and deprivation. Some cops have
untreated post‐traumatic stress disorder. Cops, however, have a code that they
must not show vulnerability. If they do, they are punking out and subject to ridicule,
humiliation, and self‐contempt. The belief that punking out is disgraceful is short‐
sighted. Such short‐sighted beliefs must be replaced with the belief that it takes a
real man to admit vulnerability. Only by dealing courageously with vulnerability
can men be strong.
Summary
Criminal cops harm the public and other cops. Holding each other to account
is a simple and direct solution. This requires challenging the “no snitch” code in any
situation where officers’ conduct undermines the oath to protect and serve.
Supervisors and rank and file must support this kind of accountability.
Cops must grapple with racist beliefs that many people hold, as well as with
beliefs about anger, depression, anxiety, and deprivation. Such beliefs in times of
stress and hopelessness guide otherwise good cops to act badly and to harm the
general public, themselves, and the men and women with whom they serve.
About the Author
Jane F. Gilgun, Ph.D, LICSW, is a professor, School of Social Work, University
of Minnesota, Twin Cities, USA. She does research on the meanings of violence to
perpetrators
and
how
persons
overcome
risks
for
violence.
Her
articles
and
books
are
available
on
Amazon
Kindle,
scribd.com,
and
lulu.com.
She
also
has
videos
on
http://www.youtube.com/jgilgun.