Standing Army Aff Index Page ‘Argument em 1a nL ICC add-on 123, No standing army now 15. US is blocking the standing army 6. US-UN relations arc low now 17.20, ‘SQ UN PKOs are lacking troops a. SHIRBRIG fails 2 ‘A2; Standing army is inevitable 2B. UN PKOs fail without an array 227. Lack of political wil! guts PKOs 28. ‘Many conflicts now 29-34. LUN fails to prevent genocide now 3538. SQ reaction time too slow 39.88, SQ UN PKOs fail 49, UN Credibility low now 50453. Genocide impacts 54-60. US support Key toa standing army 61-65, ‘Other nations will support the army 67-88. Modeling solvency 69-72. General solvency 73-83, Standing army solves genocide ~ -, 491, Standing army solves conflicts 92.95, Standing army effective/eficient 96-101 Standing army fixes PKOs 102-106. Implementation solvency cards 107. Army key to UN reforms 108-109, ‘Army key to regional interventions Host, ‘Army key to human rights 112 ‘Anmty key to world stability 113. A2: Army undermines SQ efforts 8, ‘AZ: Language barriers us A2: Poor training, U6. A2: Poor UN op: panning nv. Now is a key time fora UN army GDI 2004 Apel, Singh, Symonds ANSWERS TO NEG ARGUMENTS: 118. SHIRBRIG makes it all non-unique 119. ‘A2: Army causes world govt 120, A2: Politics links (21-128. ‘A2: Eoonomy/Spending DAs 129-130. ‘AZ; Hegemony DAS 131-134, 42; UNSAS/standby forces CP 135-136. ‘A2: Unilateral US CP 137, ‘A2: Regional actors CP 138, ‘A2: Mercenaries CP 139, ‘AZ: Reform the UN type CPs 140-142, A2; Nonviolence K 143-146, ‘A2: Imperialism KGDI 2004 0 Standing Army CORSERNATION ONE: No Amy fer Me ON We US 6 te lat menawninos cbtade fe a thacdina, ON. areny Thompson, Director of Advocacy at Refugees International, July 12, 2000 (Larry, Christian Science Monitor, seww alobalpolicy org/securitylpeacekpalreformirt him, July 2004) Slessed golvhes in oes a cegproMe c absence a sterdina, on enh, ‘Sverhaul of the creaking machinery of Police experis as well as diplomats should take a Co’netia and Kaight, Co-direcior’ of the Project dn Defense Alieraiivea (PDA), 1998 (Carl and Charles, Milling o do much move (and probably spend much mors) presently willing to contemplate, (Regarding foreign intervention generally, Americans are far more inclined than their present leadership to get involved and then “stay the course” despite casualties in military efforts that they consider worthwhile.) Polls i r i yan, and Frans ‘encouraging is the fact that offical policy in three of the PS countries and in most of the OECD states is more friendly to substantial UN development than is current US policy.GDI 2004 A C Standing Army PLAN TEXT: