Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 374

........


.1 . .

.2 .

.3 . . -

.4 .

.5 . -

.6 . -

2009 2010




.

.

UPMF .

.


II



.


.

( )
.

:
.

III


Rsum
Lducation est un trsor ternel, peu importe la faon dont nous
avons parl de son importance et sa valeur on narrivera jamais
atteindre sa vraie valeur ; parce quelle couvre tous les domaines de la
vie. Elle a t objet dtude et danalyse par les philosophes et les
religieux, par les sociologues et les historiens, les pdagogues et les
politiciens.
Les conomistes pionniers ont toujours parl de limportance
conomique de lducation dune faon thorique, mais ils nont jamais
analys son rle comme un facteur de croissance conomique, car elle a
t vue comme une dpense.
Mais, depuis le milieu du XXe sicle, et avec lchec des thories
conomiques traditionnelles dinterprter ou dexpliquer les grands
dveloppements acclrs et sans prcdent que connait le monde aprs la
seconde guerre mondiale, les conomistes ont modifi leur vision vis-vis de lducation dtant une consommation, on la considre un
investissement productif et stratgique dans le capital humain.
Cette recherche vise donc tudier la relation entre lducation et le
capital humain, et analyser les ressources de financement des
investissements ducatifs et leur volution, ainsi que le rle du capital
humain (accumul par ces investissements ducatifs) dans la croissance
conomique, tout a dans un cadre thorique puis empirique sur le cas de
lAlgrie.
Mots cls : Education, capital humain, consommation,
investissement, financement de lducation, croissance conomique.

IV


Abstract
Education is a treasure forever; no matter how we talked about its
importance and value we'll ever reach its true value because it covers all
areas of life. It has been object of study and analysis by philosophers and
religious, by sociologists and historians, educators and politicians.
The pioneers economists have always spoken of the economic
importance of education in a theoretical manner, but they never discussed
its role as a factor of economic growth, because it was seen as an
expenditure.
But since the mid-twentieth century, with the failure of traditional
economic theories to interpret or explain the major developments
accelerated and unprecedented that knows the world after World War II,
economists have revised their vision screws towards education of being a
consumer, it is considered a productive and strategic investment in human
capital.
The aim of This research is to study the relationship between
education and human capital, and to analyze the resources for financing
educational investments and their trends, together with the role of human
capital (accumulated by the educational investment) in economic growth,
All this in a theoretical framework and empirical case for Algeria.

Keywords: Education, human capital,


financing of education, economic growth.

consumption,

investment,


I ..................................................................................
II ............................................................................
III................................................................................
VI .........................................................................
IX ..........................................................................
XIV .....................................................................
XX .....................................................................

..................................................................

: :
1 ....... ................................
: 3 ........................
: 4 ..................................................
: 20 .................................................
: 34 .....................................

VI

: 45...........
: : 46 .......................................
: 60 .............................
: 79 ....................

:
: 96 ................................
: 98..................
: 99 ...............................
: 115 ........................
:
132 ...................................................................................

: :
152 .................................................
: 153 ................
: 169 ..............................

: 185.......................................

VII

:
: 205 ..... ................................
:
208 ..........................................................
: 209 .................................
: 224 ....................
: 239 .....................

: 255 ....
: 256 .........
: 273 .....
: :
289 ......................................................................................

306 ..............................................................

413........................................................

330...................................................

VIII


.1.1

GDP
OCDE

21

.1.1


()OCDE

26

.4.1

GDP
((WEI

26

.3.1


((WEI

21

.6.1

.2.1

1960
1985

11

.2.1


19601985

13

.1.1

1990
2005

11

.6.1


( )GNP 19902005

61

IX

((WEI

23


.1..1

61

19902005
.1.4

111

.1.4

142

.4.4

131

.3.4

132

.1.3

166

( 1963 )1971
.1.3


( 1963 )197.

162

.4.3


( 1621 )1666

166

.3.3


( 1921 )1966

121

.6.3

126

( 1662 )1..2
.2.3


( 1962 )1..2

122

.2.3

12.

.1.4


( 1... )1..2

124

.6.3

122

( 1662 )1..6
.1..3


( 1662 )1..6

122

.11.3

111

( 1666 )1..6
.11.3

162

.14.3

161

.13.3

1..

.16.3

1.1

.1.6

)(LUCAS, 1988

161

.1.2

162

XI

.1.2

122

.4.2

121

.3.2

126

.6.2

12.

.2.2

126

.2.2


16211..2

122

.1.2

(1621)1..2

11.

.6.2

112

.1..2

112

.11.2


( )

111

.11.2

161

.14.2

163

.13.2

166

XII


.16.2

166

.12.2

166

.12.2

4.1

.11.2

4.3

XIII


.1.1


OCDE 19952004

24

.1.1

()OCDE
1666

22

.4.1

()OCDE
1..6

22

.3.1

( )OCDE
1666

22

.6.1

( )OCDE
1..3

22

.2.1

2.

WEI

.2.1

() GDP
((WEI

24

.1.1

24

((WEI

.6.1

( )WEI

2002

23

.1..1

( )WEI

2004

26

XIV

.11.1

22

.11.1

1960
1985

11

.14.1

1960

11

1985
.13.1


19601985

14

.16.1

13

19601985
.12.1

1990
2005

16

.12.1


19902005

16

.11.1


19902005

6.

.16.1


1990( 2005 )

.1..1


1990( 2005 )

XV

GNP

61

GNP

61


.11.1

64

19902005
( )
.11.1


19902005

64

( )
.1.4

114

.1.4

114

.4.4

142

.3.4

142

.6.4

134

.2.4

134

.1.3


(1624)162.

162

.1.3


(1621)1666

124

.4.3


(1662)1..2

122

XVI

.3.3

(1621)1..2

121

.6.3


(1621)1..2

121

.2.3

121


.2.3

123

.1.3

121


.6.3

121

.1..3

126

.11.3


1995
2005

114

.11.3



19952005

114

XVII


.14.3

113

1995
2005
.13.3

113

19952005
.1.2

121

.1.2

121

.4.2

111

.3.2

111

.6.2

111

.2.2

111

.2.2

114

.1.2

113

.6.2

113

.1..2

161

.11.2

161

XVIII

.11.2

161

.14.2

164

.13.2

166

XIX

.1.1

( ) J EAN H O USS AY E

.1.1

66

.1.4

114

.1.4

111

.1.6

" "SOLOW

116

.1.6

" "SOLOW - SWAN

112

.4.6

""MRW

14.

XX


" " " "
( )1999 "" :

.
:

"
" ) (MARGIRIER, 1999, p. 2
.

( )SMITH, A. " "


( )MARX, C.
.


( )MARSHALL , A.
.

:
( )MARSHALL , A.

" ( )"
:
)(MINCER, 1958
)(SCHULTZ, Capital formation by Education, 1960
)(SCHULTZ, Investment in Human Capital, 1961
)(SCHULTZ, The Economic value of Education, 1963
)(EICHER, 1960
:
)(DENISON, The Sources of Economic Growth, 1962

(DENISON, La mesure de la contribution de l'enseignement a la

)croissance conomique, 1964

:
- (BECKER, Human Capital : A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis
)with Special Reference to Education, 1964
(BECKER, Human Capital and the Personal Distribution of Income:

An Analytical Approach, 1967)...

(
) 1924 :


:

%30
%16 -%12.6 2.6
.
%89
.%235 9
%280 14 .%320
4
8 1622
2000
( 1967 80.)87
" "

( (FERNEX, 1996, p. 7) )VIGEEZI , M., 1983
:
() ( )
() ( )...

...( 1..6 .)46
" "
: ( )MINCER & BECKER

:
) (GRAVOT, 1993, p. 5
( )SCHULTZ( )DENISON
( ) .

) (MARGIRIER, 1999, p. 2 .
) - (BECKER, 1964
- 1661
( )


( ).

(
) :
()GRILICHES, 1970
)(CARRE, DUBOIS, & MALINVAUD, 1972

()JORGENSON, 1984
)... (PSACHAROPOULOS & PATRINOS, 2002.

.

( )

:


.


( )SCHULTZ( )DENISON
) (HARBISON & MEYERS, 1964
)(ROSTOW, 1960

) (DENISON, 1964


()

:
:

( %40 %40
12-6 )
%3 ( %3
18-12)
.

:
:


.
:
%80 6


.
:



.

( " ")



:
)(ROMER, 1986
)(LUCAS, 1988

:
)(BARRO, 1991
)... (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992


( )
()
( )
.


.



.


: :
:
).(KATEB, 2005, p. 54

:



( ) .

.




.

: ) (BARKA, 1988
) (DJOUDI, 1993
) (BENARAB, 1997

) (BOUSLIMANI, 2003

1126 1... ) (MOUSSAOUI, 2003

...

:



.
:
.1

.2


.4

:
.1
.
.1 .
.4
.


( ) (

:
)
() ( 1..6 3. )34 (
1661 .)41


(
)




.


.



( )BERTALANFFY, L., V.
( )la cyberntique ( )WIENER Norbet
).(DONNADIEU G. , 1997, pp. 8-9

:

:
) .(DONNADIEU & KARSKY, 2002, pp. 77-90
( )...

.
(DONNADIEU & KARSKY, 2002, p. 86) :
) (LUGAN, 2004, p. 51

.
"
" ) :(DONNADIEU & KARSKY, 2002) (ROSNAY, 1975

.


...
:
( )
( 1..1 12 )116
.

:




.

( )


.

(
)

.



.


.

:






.




.

: :



(
)...
(
.)...

:

:

:



.



.

.
: .

: .


:


" " .



.

:
""

:
...

:
" :" " " ""

.

:

: : " :
" ( )276 "
3

:
:
" ( 1968 )1573-1572

: " :
" ( )18" :





" ( )24

"
( 2004 )326 "
( 1968
.)1547

:
.
( )Education
( )ESTIENNE, Robert
1549 ( )Nourriture ) (BUISSON, 2007
( )Educare
).(FOULQUIE, 1971, pp. 9-23

:


( 2000 )48
"" :
...
6

:
( )MILL, J.-S.
)(FOULQUIE, 1971, pp. 9-23

.
( )DURKHEIM, E. ( )MILL, J.-S.



( )DURKHEIM, E.
). (DURKHEIM, 1922, p. 9
( )HUBERT, R.

).(CHAMPY & ETEVE, 1995, p. 331

.
( 1997 )10-9
()


.
:
.
2

: (
)
.

:
.

: .

() :

() :

:
() ( )
...
: .

:
"" "" ""
( )RENON
( )GUSDORE

).(FOULQUIE, 1971, pp. 9-23
2

:
) (HOUSSAYE, 2000, p. 40 " "
( ) " "
)
(
" " .

:
. 1.1 ( ) J EAN H OUSSAYE

(HOUSSAYE, 2000, p. 35):

( )
"" .

:

.

:
(
) .

:

:
:
( ).
: : .
:
6

:

.
:

).(BENARD, 1985, pp. 31-33
: : : .
: :
.1 ( :)Lexcluabilit
( . )
.2 ( :)La rivalit ou la divisibilit

).(SAMUELSON, 1986

.

.
.

1.

:
:


.
( 1991 )42-41 ":
() () ()
".
:
:
....
.

.
.
.

.
11

:
:

() ) (FRIEDMAN, 1955
( )
(VAIZEY, 1964, pp. 28-32) :) (PAGE, 1971, pp. 10-12



)(FRIEDMAN

.
:
-

. . ( ). . . - .

11

:
) (SAMUELSON, 1986, p. 4


.


.

:



) (EICHER J. C., 1990, pp. 1307-1340
:
: ( )
.
:
() .
14

:
:



.

:


).(G.R.R.E.C, 1983, p. 199



(
)...
).(HUGON, 2005

).(LESOURNE, 1988, p. 42

13





( 2000 .)45

( )CONFUCIUS ()
) .(HUANYIN, 1993 ) )Aristote
). (HUMMEL, 1993

:
( )SMITH, A.
" "
:
:


16

:




).(SMITH, 1776, p. 15
( )SMITH, A.

) (SMITH, 1776, p. 88
.



).(SMITH, 1776, pp. 57-96 Livre V
( )SAY, J.-B. ) (SAY, 1803, p. 48 livre II

()
.
( )MILL, J.-S. " "

( )SMITH, A. (GRAVOT, Economie de l'ducation,

) 1993, p. VIII ( )MILL, J.-S.


).(VAIZEY, 1964, p. 19
12

:


( )MARSHALL , A.

.
" " ( )MARSHALL , A.
( )SMITH, A.

).(MARSHALL, 1890, p. 76 LivreIV
:

).(MARSHALL, 1890, pp. 73-74 Livre IV
( )MARSHALL , A.
- ( )


.

" " BESSEMER

12

:
" "NEWTON
" "DARWIN" "PASTEUR " "SHAKESPEARE "..."BEETHOVEN
. " "
).(MARSHALL, 1890, pp. 79-80 Livre IV

)(MARSHALL, 1890, p. 12 Livre VI

).(MARSHALL, 1890, p. 197 Livre VI

:

- -
) (MINCER, 1958, pp. 281-302 (Schultz T.W.,

)1960, 1961, 1963, 1983


1961


.

" " BECKER G. S.


1964 " "
11

:
:
:
.
).(BECKER, 1993

16

:


.

.
:
.1

.2

.
.3

.
.4

.
.5

( 2002 .)65

1.

:

"
" 1979
( )SCHULTZ, T., W. ""Investment in Human Capital
"
11 162.
( )MINCER, J. 1958 :
J. MINCER, Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income
Distribution, Journal of Political Economy, August 1958.

11

:


- -
).(OCDE, 1996b
) (LAROCHE, MERETTE, & RUGGERI, 1999

.


) (OCDE, 2001a, pp. 17-43
).(OCDE, 2007b, p. 30
: :

). (YU, 2001, pp. 2-3

) (FLAMHOLTZ & LACEY, 1981
).(OCDE, 1998, p. 9

( 2006 )1
11

:

:

.
) (LUNDVALL & JOHNSON, 1994
:
-

( :)Savoir quoi .

( :)Savoir pour quoi


.

( :)savoir comment
.

( :)Savoir qui . :
: . . . - : .

14

:
...

:
. :
...
. - .

: :
:
: . :
:
.

13

:
:
.
:

.
.
-

. .
(
) ( ).

:


) .(OCDE, 1996b, p. 19

16

:

.
()
) (MACHLUP, 1984, pp. 430-431


).(AGHION & HOWITT, 2000, pp. 467-482
:

... ).(OCDE, 1998, pp. 12-13


.




.

....

12

:


:

( )






:
(PSACHAROPOULOS & ARRIAGADA, 1986),
(KYRIACOU, 1991),
(LAU, BHALLA, & LOUAT, 1991),
(BARRO & LEE, 1993), (BARRO & LEE, 1996), (BARRO
& LEE, 2001),
(NEHRU, SWANSON, & DUBEY, 1995),
) (DE LA FUENTE & DONENECH, 2000
(COHEN & SOTO, 2001) etc.
(BARRO & LEE, 2001):

) (HANUSHEK & KIMKO, 2000


.

12

:
( )BECKER, G., S.

( )SCHULTZ, T.,W.(.)MINCER, J.

: SCHULTZ
) (SCHULTZ, 1961, p. 1

" "
"
"
11 162.:

()SCHULTZ, T.,W.

11

:

.




(
2002 .)66
( )SCHULTZ, T.,W. :
.1

.
.1
.
.4
( ).
) (SCHULTZ, 1961, pp. 9-11
:
.1
.1
.4
16

:
.3
.6 .




" : ( )
"). (SCHULTZ, 1961
" " T. SCHULTZ
:
-1
.
-1
.
( )SCHULTZ, T.,W.

:



.

4.

:
: BECKER
( )BECKER, G., S. ()SCHULTZ, T.,W.
( )MINCER, J. .
) (BECKER, 1993, p. 1

:
.1
.1
.4
.3
.6.

) (BECKER, 1964
()

.

:


.
41

) (BECKER, 1993, pp. 8-29



. : .
:



( )BECKER, G., S.


.
41

:
:

:

.... .

.
( )BECKER, G., S.

.


( )
.

44

:


.

:

.

:

) (BLAUG, 1992, p. 202
.
:
)188

p.

1979,

AL.,

&

LEVY-GARBOUA,

).(JAROUSSE & MINGAT, 1986


43

(EICHER,

:

) (CAYETTE, 1983, p. 32 " :

".

:

:
-1 .
-1 .
-4 .

:


) (EICHER J.-C. , 1973 1956
( ) $ 371$ 2350
BECKER $ 371 SHULTZ $ 2003
BLITZ $ 2350 MACHLUP .$ 2049

46

:
:

: ( )
.
:

)(CAYETTE, 1983

: ( ) (: )
() :

...
.

.

42

:

.

: ""la theorie des attitudes


) "(GINTIS, 1971
()
()
.
( )GINTIS, H.

.
( )GINTIS, H.
:
: . : .
: .
42

:
(
)
.
(
)
.


( )WEBER .
( )GINTIS, H. ( )
.


.

: ""La thorie du signal


) (SPENCE, 1973
" ":
: ...
41

:
: () ...
" " ) (SPENCE, 1973

.
" "



.

.

: ""La thorie du filtre


) (ARROW, 1973

.
.

46

:
( )BECKER, G., S.


:
.

()
.
""



.
:

" Le modle de concurrence pour

: "l'emploi ) (THUROW, 1975



()


"."Background characteristics" " L. THUROW
3.

:

( ) (
)

(
)
.
(
) .

(: )Thorie de la reproduction

) (BOURDIEU & PASSERON, 1970


""Classes dominantes
" "Classes domines
-
.-


:

( : ). : . : . :
31

. - ( - )

.
- .

31


:

.

( )
:
-

)

(
.
-

:
.




34

:




.

33


.
:





.

36

: :

:

.



.

32

:


.
)(BENARAB A. , 2010, pp. 17-21

()SISDE
( )
()
:
: (
)

).(UISUNESCO, 1998, pp. 17-20

:
.
.
.

:

(- )SISDE -
32

:
" " ""Centre de dpense "
"

:
:
" " SNC93 1993 :


:
() :
.
().
.
:

( )
....
:
.
: ()ISBL

31

:
:
(...)ONG.
:
.
:

(
...).
:
.

:



(
)
(
1..6 )16
:
36

:
:

.:
: (

)

:
() ( ) .
:


....
. ::
: :
....
: ( ) :

6.

:
( ...)
....
: :
....
: :
....
. .... .

(
)....
: ( )
:
:


....

.
61

:

) (UISUNESCO, 1998, pp. 39-48
.
:
( )SISDE
:
.1
.1
.4
.3
.6
.6 : (
...) (
) ( )
.
: .

:

61

:
.1
:

:
.

:
...
.

....

( ).
.2 ::
().
( ).
.3 ::
.

.4
( )1662 97
. 2

64

:

:
.0
() .1
.2
() 3.4
5.6

:

:
().
( ).
() ( 2007 40.)41

:
()


63

:
( )
( )
.
) (OCDE, 2007c, pp. 75-83
:
:
:


....

....
:

( ) .
:


.
:
:
66

:
: ....
(
...).
: :
.
....

:

.
:

:

62

:
:
:
... .
:


....
:
:
:

( )
.... :

:



62

:


:
.
:
(.)UNDP
(.)Unicef
(.)UNESCO
:
(.)IDB
(.)AsDB
(.)ADB
(.)CDB
.
(.)EDF
.
.
.
:
(
)


61

:

(
) (
) .
.
. 1.2

66





:

.

( )OCDE
( ) (.)WEI

:
()OCDE


()
.
2.

:
()OCDE

( )OCDE ( )2004-1995
%5
%5.3 1995 %5.1 % 5.5 2000 2004
%5.3
1995 2000 2004
.%5.8

:
%4.1 %3.4 %4.6 2004
. :
%7.4 %8.0 %7.2
( .2004 )

21

:
. 1.2 GDP OCDE

1995

2000

2004

5.5%
6.1%

5.6%
5.5%
6.1%
5.9%
4.2%
6.6%
5.6%

5.9%
5.4%
6.1%

7.0%
5.1%
6.2%
6.3%
5.4%
2.3%
5.3%

3.1%
4.9%
6.1%
4.5%
4.8%
4.8%
7.1%

5.2%
4.7%

4.9%
7.2%
6.1%
6.1%
5.2%
3.4%
5.6%
8.0%
4.6%
4.9%
4.8%
7.2%

5.6%
4.8%

5.5%
4.5%

6.3%

5.4%
5.6%
5.4%
4.0%
4.8%
6.4%
5.8%
3.4%
5.0%
7.0%

6.4%
5.1%
6.9%
6.2%
6.0%
5.4%
4.8%
4.7%
6.7%
6.2%
4.1%
5.9%
7.4%

5.3%

5.3%

5.8%

5.1%

5.5%

5.0%
4.6%
5.3%
6.2%
6.0%
2.4%
5.5%
6.6%

OCDE
20 ( OCDE
2004 2000 1995
5.3%
)
19

5.4%

(OCDE, 2007a, pp. 212-213):

21

:
: . 1.2 OCDE
1995 2004
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
3.0

1995

2.0

2000

1.0

2004

0.0

: .

:
( )OCDE

( )OCDE
(
).

24

:
16661..3
( )OCDE
2004 %87 %13
2004 1995
%1.2 10.

2004 %2.1 %39.5
( )%39.5.. )%31.6( . ( )%27.0 ( )%25.8

: ( )%97.9 ( )%97.5
( )%97.0 ( )%95.6 ()%95.3
%6 ( :
.1.1 .1.2 .2.4 .3.2).6.2

23

:
. 2.2 ( ) OCDE
2004

1995

78.9%
93.4%

21.1%
6.6%

73.0%
92.8%
94.3%

27.0%
7.2%
5.7%

81.2%
87.2%
96.5%
98.1%

18.8%
12.8%
3.5%
1.9%

82.3%

17.7%

89.0%

11.0%

89.8%

10.2%

89.8%

10.2%

82.6%
90.2%

17.4%
9.8%

94.1%

5.9%

OCDE
20 OCDE
( )

87.3%
95.6%
97.9%
91.2%
82.3%
95.3%
90.7%
90.6%
92.9%
90.4%
74.2%
60.5%

12.7%
4.4%
2.1%
8.8%
17.7%
4.7%
9.3%
9.4%
7.1%
9.6%
25.8%
39.5%

80.5%
90.1%
80.7%

19.5%
9.9%
19.3%

99.4%
97.2%
84.2%
98.3%

0.6%
2.8%
15.8%
1.7%

90.1%
97.5%
84.0%
87.1%
97.0%

9.9%
2.5%
16.0%
12.9%
3.0%

87.3%
71.0%

12.7%
29.0%

92.6%
83.9%
68.4%

7.4%
16.1%
31.6%

88.2%

11.8%

87.0%

13.0%

88.3%

11.7%

86.8%

13.2%

91.1%

8.9%

19

(OCDE, 2007a, p. 215):

26

:
. 2.2 ( ) OCDE 1995
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%

1995 %

30%

1995 %

20%
10%

0%

: .
. 3.2 ( ) OCDE 2005
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%

2004 %

30%

2004 %

20%
10%
0%

: .

22

:
. 4.2 ( ) OCDE 1995

11.8
1995 %
1995 %

88.2

: .
. 5.2 ( ) OCDE 2004
2004 %
13.0
2004 %

87.0

: .


(.)OCDE

22

:
()WEI

( )OCDE

( )OCDE( )UNESCO
1997 ( )WEI :

:
). (UNESCO-UIS/OCDE, 2005, p. 5

: ()WEI

( %5 2002 )2004 (( %12.1 ))2002
(( %7.5 ))2002 ( ))2002( %6.6
: ( ))2002( %1.9 ( ))2002( %2.8
( ))2002( %4.6 .

( . )

21

:
. 3.2 GDP ( (WEI

1995

2002

2004

4.7%

4.6%

5.1%

7.5%

6.4%

3.5%

4.8%
1.9%
12.1%

4.9%
1.5%

6.6%
4.6%
5.2%

5.9%
3.4%
4.6%

5.7%
2.8%

WEI

5.6%

4.3%

( WEI
2002 2004)

5.0%

4.6%

4.5%

:
(UNESCO-UIS/OCDE, 2005),

UNESCO/UIS WEI (www.uis.unesco.org/publications/wei2007).

26

:
. 6. 2. WEI
14
12
10
8
1995
2002

2004
4
2
0

: .

( )OCDE 2004
WEI
()OCDE %1 %5.5
.%4.5

2.

: ()WEI

19
1995

2002 9 2004 8
.
( WEI
)2004 % 3.2
%1.5

:
%79.4 %82.6 .%73.5

%41.3 %48.4 :( .%33.3
)

21

:
. 4 . 2 ( (WEI

1995

2002

2004

3.9%
4.1%
4.3%

0.8%
3.2%

3.8%
3.9%
3.3%

3.4%
1.2%
6.1%

1.4%
0.6%
5.9%

4.5%
3.1%

8.1%
4.5%
2.7%
3.1%
3.7%

2.1%
1.9%
2.0%

3.6%
0.9%
5.0%
4.2%
5.8%
4.3%
2.7%
2.7%
3.6%

4.0%
6.6%
3.3%

3.3%
2.9%

2.2%

3.3%

0.2%

3.3%

3.0%

WEI

3.7%

( WEI
2002 2004)

3.1%

1.2%
1.2%

0.8%
3.1%

1.2%
0.5%

1.6%
0.7%
1.9%

4.6%
6.4%
2.6%

0.2%

3.9%
7.3%
2.7%

4.2%

2.0%

3.8%

1.5%

2.0%

3.2%

1.5%

4.2%

1.8%

:
)(UNESCO-UIS/OCDE, 2005

UNESCO/UIS WEI (www.uis.unesco.org/publications/wei2007).

21

:
. 7 . 2 () GDP ( (WEI
4.3

4.5

3.9

3.8

3.6
3.3
3.1
2.7
2004

3.5

2.7

3
2.5

1.9

1.8

1.6

2004

1.2

1.5

0.9
0.5

0.7

0.8

1
0.5
0

: .
. 8 . 2 ((WEI
82.6

79.4
68.4

80.0

73.5

72.9

70.0

60.0

58.7

60.0

51.6
48.4
2004 %

2004 %

50.0

41.3

40.0

33.3

31.6

27.1

20.6

90.0

24.5

30.0
17.4

20.0
10.0

0.0

: .

24

:

2002 2004
%0.6 )%67.9( 2002 2004
(( .)68.5 .4.2 .9.2 ).2.10

. 5 . 2 ((WEI

2002
2004

67,9
68,5

32,1
31,5

:
. 9.2 ( ) WEI 2002

2002
32.1
%
%

67.9

: .

23

:
. 10.2 ( ) WEI 2004

2004
31.5
%
%

68.5

: .

( )OCDE 2004
WEI
()OCDE %31.5 .%13

:



) (ORIVEL, 2005, p. 4 %1

:

26

:

%2 .
%0.6


%1

.
) (O'ROURKE, 2000
() 26 28 2000
%63
% 35 :
%2 ( . ).2
. 11.2
2%

35%

63%

: .

22

:


(
) (
1991 41 )42 :



( )...
.

( )
.




.
.


.
22

:
) (ROEMER, 1998, pp. 10-25





.

.

21

%1
) (ORIVEL, 2005, pp. 4-5





.%5
( )

:
1960
55.78 %3.8

26

:
%13.5
%91.9 ( )%8.1 .
1965 %85.1
103.27 95.34
%4.9 %15.5
.
1970 158.3
145.9
%5.4 %17.3
.
1975
330.2 %88.7
%11.3 %5.7 %14.7
.
1980
%71.9 567.6
407.8 ( )%71.8 159.8
( )%28.2
%4.9
.% 14.6
1985
606.7 - %6.9 -
1.

:
444.4
%4.8
.%14.1
( .2.6 : .2.7 )

. 6.2 1960 1985

1960

55.78

51.25
4.53

1965

1975

1970

1980

( )
567.6
330.2
158.3
103.27
407.8
293
145.9
95.34
159.8
37.2
12.4
7.93

1985

606.7
444.4
162.3

()%
73.2%
71.8%
88.7%
92.2%
92.3%
91.9%
26.8%
28.2%
11.3%
7.8%
7.7%
8.1%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%

()%
71.9%
108.6%
53.3%
85.1%
39.2%
100.8%
53.0%
86.0%
329.6%
200.0%
56.4%
75.1%

6.9%
9.0%
1.6%

()%( )GNP
4.8%
4.9%
5.7%
5.4%
4.9%
3.8%

4.9%
5.1%
6.1%
5.7%
5.2%
4.0%
3.9%
3.8%
4.0%
3.3%
3.0%
2.3%

: :
(UNESCO, Etude statistique sommaire sur lducation dans le monde de

a-

1960 1975, 1977, pp. 45-50).


)b- (HEROLD, KHAN, & REIFF, 1983, p. 11

c- (UNESCO, 2000, p. 118).


11

:
. 12.2 1960 1985

606.7

700
567.6

600

500
400

330.2

)PEE (US$

300
158.3

200

103.27
55.78

100
0

1985

1980

1970
1975

1960

1965

: .
. 13.2 1960 1985

11.3%
26.8%

7.8%

7.7%

8.1%

100%
90%

28.2%

80%
70%
60%

88.7%
73.2%

92.2%

92.3%

91.9%

50%
40%

71.8%

30%
20%
10%
0%
1985

1980

1970
1975

: .

11

1965

1960

:
. 14.2 1960 1985
700
600

500

300


200
100

1990

1985

1980

1970
1975

: .

14

1965

1960

0
1955

)PEE (US$

400

:
. 7.2
1960 1985
1960a

1965a

1975b

1970b

1985b

1980b

()%( )TPE
14.1%
14.6%
14.7%
17.3%
15.0%
13.5%

15.2%
13.6%
13.1%
13.2%

: :
a- (UNESCO, 1971, p. 78).
b- Estimation de lauteur partir de la base de donnes de lUNESCO (mise
jour Sep. 2008).

. 2.15
1960 1985
17.3

14.1

14.6

14.7

18.0
15.2
15.0
13.1

13.6
13.5 13.2

16.0

14.0
12.0

8.0

6.0
4.0
2.0
0.0

1985

1980

1970
1975

: .

13

1965

1960

PEE % TPE

10.0

: 2005-1990


( )1985-1960
124
:
( 8).
( 16).
( 7).
( 14).
( 21).
( 22).
( 6).
( 30).

1990 997.1
%4.8 ( )GNP
( %12.9 )GNP ( %0.9 )GNP
( %6.1 )GNP
( %3.6 .)GNP
( )TPE ( %13.8 )TPE
16

:
( %35.6 )TPE ( %1.6 )TPE
( %20.5 )TPE ( %9.0 .)TPE
%36.6 1990
1995 1361.9
( %4.9
)GNP ( %4.8 )GNP 1990 (%9.9
)GNP ( %1.0 )GNP
( %6.4 )GNP
( %3.3 .)GNP
( %15.2 )TPE
( %33.1 )TPE ( %1.6 )TPE
( %17.3 )TPE
( %11.6 .)TPE

2000
%8.75 1995 1479.9
%4.9
( %9.9 )GNP
( %1.0 )GNP ( %5.2
)GNP ( %3.5 .)GNP
%14.7
( %31.0 )TPE ( %1.6 )TPE
12

:
( %18.1 )TPE
( %12.4 .)TPE

2005
%38.4 2047.8
( %4.9
1995 )2000 ( %11.3 )GNP
( %1.0 )GNP ( %6.2 )GNP
( %2.7 .)GNP
( %29.8 )TPE
( %14.7 )TPE (%4.0
)TPE ( %21.6 )TPE
( %12.5 ( .)TPE
)

12

:
. 8.2 1990 2005

1990

11.7
38.8
2.3
162.1
35.4
697.9
18.7
30.2
997.1

1995

2000

2005

( )

14.7
40.1
1.3
253.5
71.7
926.7
18
35.8
1361.9

20.9
35.5
1.1
242.1
79.7
1035
27.3
38.3
1479.9

33.8
92.1
2.2
273
102.8
1440.5
39.8
63.5
2047.8

()%

1.2%
3.9%
0.2%
16.3%
3.6%
70.0%
1.9%
3.0%
100%

1.1%
2.9%
0.1%
18.6%
5.3%
68.0%
1.3%
2.6%
100%

1.4%
2.4%
0.1%
16.4%
5.4%
69.9%
1.8%
2.6%
100%

1.7%
4.5%
0.1%
13.3%
5.0%
70.3%
1.9%
3.1%
100%

()%
61.5%
42.0%
25.5%
159.4%
-11.6%
3.6%
110.3%
-18.6%
-42.6%
12.8%
-4.5%
56.4%
29.0%
11.2%
102.3%
39.2%
11.7%
32.8%
45.7%
52.2%
-3.8%
65.8%
7.0%
18.7%
38.4%
8.7%
36.6%

: ( .)2008

11

:
. 16.2 1990 2005

2 500.0

2 047.8

2 000.0

1 479.9
1 361.9
997.1

1 000.0

PEE US$

1 500.0

500.0
2005

1995

2000

1990

: .
. 17.2
1990 2005

100%
90%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
2005

1995

2000

: .

16

1990

PEE % REGION

80%

:
. 18.2
1990 2005
2 500.0

2 000.0

1 000.0

500.0

2010

2005

1995
2000

: .

6.

1990

1985

PEE US$

1 500.0

:
. 9 . 2 ( ) GNP
1990 2005
1990

1995

2005

2000


()%( )GNP







5.3%
3.8%
5.0%
4.1%
3.6%
5.1%
3.7%
6.1%
4.8%

5.2%
4.1%
4.2%
3.7%
4.5%
5.4%
3.3%
6.4%
4.9%

6.2%
4.5%
2.7%
3.8%
4.6%
5.3%
3.4%
5.3%
4.9%

5.5%
3.9%
3.5%
3.8%
4.4%
5.4%
4.0%
5.4%
4.9%

: ( .)2008
. 19.2 GNP 1990 2005
( )
7.0%

6.0%

5.0%

3.0%

2.0%

1.0%

0.0%
2005

1995

2000

: .

61

1990

PEE % GNP

4.0%

:
. 20.2 GNP 1990 2005
( )
7.0%
6.0%

5.0%
1990

3.0%

1995

2.0%

2000

1.0%

2005

0.0%

: .
. 10.2
1990 2005

1990

1995

2000

2005


()%( )TPE







13.0%
14.2%
20.5%
15.9%
13.8%
11.5%
9.0%
16.7%

16.5%
14.9%
17.0%
15.9%
15.3%
11.6%
11.9%
17.3%

17.1%
14.4%
12.1%
15.4%
14.7%
12.4%
12.9%
18.1%

21.6%
12.8%
15.1%
15.3%
16.0%
12.5%
14.6%
17.7%

13.8%

15.2%

14.7%

14.7%

: ( .)2008

61

PEE % GNP

4.0%

:
. 21.2
1990 ( 2005 )
25.0%

20.0%

10.0%

PEE % TPE

15.0%

5.0%

0.0%
2005

1995

2000

1990

: .
. 22.2
1990 ( 2005 )
25.0%

15.0%
10.0%

1990

5.0%

1995

0.0%

2000

2005

: .

64

PEE % TPE

20.0%




:
()
() ()TPE
()
(.)GDP, GNP




.
(
) :
%87 ( )OCDE 2004 %68.5
WEI 2004
%63
%35 %2 .

63

:




%5 .



.

66

:

:

62

:



.

.
( )
( )
"" ) (ROSNAY, 1975 .

( )
. :
) (POCZTAR, 1989 ""
) (BERTALANFFY, 1968
) (PORCHER, 2008 .


:
:
: :
.

62


.
"" ) (LUGAN, 2004, p. 39
) (MORIN, 1991 :

61


" " .

:
"
()" .

:

:




66

:

.

. " "
) (ROSNAY, 1975 ).(DONNADIEU & KARSKY, 2002


... :



( )...


...



...
()
.

1..

:
""

) (LESOURNE, 1988" :
".
:
( (1661
))1.4 : ( )
.
.
( .)...

( ) .

) (JACQUIER, 1993 .




.
: :
....
1.1

:
( )Louis Legrand

).(BENGHABRIT-REMAOUN, 2001, p. 300


.


): (DANDURAND, 1971
: ( ) .
: ( )
.
: .
:
( )
).(LESOURNE, 1988, p. 42

: :
1.1

:

).(FERNEX, 1996, p. 13


( )

) (POCZTAR, 1989, pp. 73-81
.

) (FERNEX, 1996, p. 14
.

:

):(LUGAN, 2004, p. 57
.1 : ...
.1 :
...
.

1.4

:

) (LUGAN, 2004, pp. 51-61
:
.
.1 :

. :
(
).
.1 :

....

.
.4 ( ) :



.
.
.3 :
:
( )
1.3

:

:
( .)...
.
(/ ) :
( ) (
) .

:
) (POCZTAR, 1989, p. 129

:
:
() ( )

...
""

.
:

1.6

:
:
:
() ( ).

:



5 7 20 25
(.)1662 62
:


:
.
:
: .
: ( )
.
: :
.

1.2

:
:
()1662 62


().
"
" ( )1662 62


...
.




.

1.2

:

:
.

:

.

:
( ) 1950 9-5 1990.
1954 20 1956 1962 1964 - 1976 1986

1.1

:
( 1963 1976 1989 1996 03-02 27 1423 10 2002
19-08 17 1429
15 2008 )
35-76 16 1396 16 1976 (
33 23 1396 23 1976)
05-99 18 1419 4 1999 (
04-2000 6 2000 10 27
2000 06-08 23
2008 10 27 2008)
04-08 15 1429 23 2008 (
04 19 1429 27 2008)
07-08 16 1429 23 2008 (
11 24 1429 2 2008).
265-08 17 1429 19 2008
( 48 22
1429 24 2008).

1.6

:


( 1 .).3/.1

:
.

:
.1 :
-
-
-
- :

- ...
.1 :
- :
( 53 1. ).3/.1
.
( :)1950
:



11.

:

6... 6.... ( 11 .).3/.1
- :

... .4 :
-

-
- ...
.3
:
-
- ...
.6 :
-
-
...

111

:
( 2006 )171

.

:
()
. :
- .

111

:
. 1.3


:
.1 :
. .1

.
.4 :
114

:
( . 1612 -4
.)3

:
: (
)

:
:162.

.
:1621 .
:1622 .
:1621 .
:1..4 .
:
. (
).

113

: ()
48
1963/1962 2010 /2009
:
()1976 -1962 ()2003 -1976 - ( -2003 ).

116

: (:)1976 -1962


.

: : 500 :
%9228 %8224
) .(AGERON, 1999, p. 76
1954 1000 : 354 :
165 185 30
) .(PERVILLE, 1984 .
-1962
1963
: ( )
.


).(KATEB, 2005, pp. 20-65


(
112

:
) . 1962
:
.
:
- (

. )2005

:
- : .
- : :

: 4 ) (BEG .
: 3 .

112

:
: 3 .
- : :

: 3 ( ) (
).
: 5
.

: 3 .

: ()2003-1976
35-76 16 1976
.1623


:
.

111

:
" "
6
( .)2005
:
:

.
: 3
.

: ( -2003 )



).(AREZKI, 2004, pp. 155-160

.1... 14 1...
1..1
.1..3 -1..4

116

:

1621
(1621 )1624 222242
4.26. 6...
. 166.1 1311
1112 . 1124 () 423 () 46
( ).

.
162. 1126161
%6181 %11.1
( )
.
161.
162. 4611466
%1..2 %44..
11.164 1.416
.

11.

:
166.
%66.3 161.
216..11 126222 162..
%61..
.%2..6

1... %14.1
2221.14
%1.. %1.4.1
.%26..


%1.. 1..6
1..1 (%4.4)
( )saturation %1.2.4 :
( )1..6( %1.3.1 ( .)1..1 ).

111

:
. 1.3 :

621965 1963

1970

1980

1990

2000

2005

2008


808426

777636
30790

7741099 7661023 6190081 3982359 1879851 1313617


4361744 4843313 4027612 3061252 1689023 1215037
2256232 1895751 1408522 737902 162198
89549
1123123 921959 753947 183205
28630
9031

7485166
3942242
2599866
943058

()%

80.7%
33.0%

92.0%
60.9%

103.1%
75.0%

107.3%
83.2%

104.1%

32.3%
7.0%

58.2%
11.2%

23612
19908
2488
1216

31140
26969
2597
1574

49176
39666
6387
3123

2666
2263
364
39

4528
4065
418
45

5832
5263
502
67

34800000 32854159 30506054 25282515 18811202 13746184 11923001 11209844


120893
84698
26830
9365

265667
144945
79783
40939

326584
170562
101261
54761

339905
171471
108249
60185


10315
9034
1073
208

15700
12694
2248
758

20029
15729
3319
981

22311
17041
3847
1423

( )%



62.5%
31.9%
69.8%

43.1%
57.9%
28.8%

111.8%
145.8%
76.9%

55.4%
119.8%
52.2%

23.8%
22.9%
27.6%

1.0%
4.1%
11.4%

-3.3%

6.4%

15.3%

36.8%

34.4%

20.7%

7.7%

5.9%

: .

111

:
. 1.3
9000000
8000000
7000000
5000000

4000000

3000000

2000000

1000000

6000000

: .

. 2.3
160.0%
140.0%
120.0%
100.0%

60.0%

40.0%

20.0%
0.0%
-20.0%

: .

114

80.0%

:

.

:


( 1 14 1..1 .3\.1 :
.3 12 1..1 16 1316).
:


1954 ...
.
113

:

() : .
:
:


.

:






:

116

:

( )...
( )

...
:

.
:
:

: .
:

112

:
. ( )
:

:
( . .).3/.1

:

.
.
112

:
:
.1 :


:
:
.
:
.
:


:
( ) .
:
.
. 2.3

: .

111

:
.1 :

:
:

:
.

:


.
.4 :
:





: ...
.3 :
: ( ).

116

:
.6 :
:
:
: ( )
...

:


:
.
.6 :

:
( 12 :).3/.1
.1 ( )5
( )6

( )3 ( )6.
14.

:
.1 ()9
:

( )6 ( )5

( )4


( )16

( )3

.

141

:

.

: ()
:
: ()1971-1962
1962 (
)1907

.
141

:
: ()2004 -1971


.
1971/07/23" :
" ) .(HENNI, 1987, p. 69
1971
. :
-

. :

...
( )2004-1971
:
1999
...
144

:
:
: :-1

:
()DEUA

-2

: : 4

. : 5
.
: :-1

-2

: .

: ( -2004 )
2004
" - -) .
:

(1962 2725 )1963
298 1965
5636 211
%0.8 .
1970 1965
12243
143

:
317 842 759
%1 .%1.8
1980
(
) 57445 3965
( ) 6207
6963 .%5.9

.
1990
1980
181350
( 13967) 14536 .%11.8
2000 407795 20846
17460 52804
.% 15.1
.
/2007 2008
901562 30510 120168
%23.9
( 2009 )( .
)
146

:
. 2.3 :
621965 1963

2725
93

1970

1980

5636
179
211

12243
759
317


901562 721833 407795 181350
57445
120168 106000 52804 22917
6963
33630 20846 13967
3965

0.8%

1.8%

842

298

1990

()%
11.8%
5.9%

14536
6207

2000

2005

15.1%

17460

2008

21.3%

25229

23.9%

30510

()%

24.9% 77.0% 124.9% 215.7% 369.2% 117.2% 106.8%


13.4% 100.7% 130.4% 229.1% 817.4% 324.0% 92.5%
61.3% 49.3% 252.3% 1150.8% 50.2%
20.9% 44.5% 20.1% 134.2% 637.2% 182.6%

:
.
. 3.3

: .

142

1000000
900000
800000
700000
600000
500000
400000
300000
200000
100000
0

:
. 4.3
1400.0%
1200.0%
1000.0%

600.0%

800.0%

400.0%

200.0%

0.0%

: .

)
:)2009
: 43 : 1. 12
6 1 2
:


.
10 : 4 3
.
: ( )648
.
: :
142

:
.1 .
.2 .

:


.
:

:




.
:
:
:


141

:

.
:
:




( . 2
.4/124 14 1..4
63 13
1..4 16 1313).

:
2004
( ) ( )3 :
.
.1
:
( )3 ( )6
( )
.
146

:
.1
:
( )2 ( )4
( )
.
.4 ( )3 .

:

.

:







13.

:
72
) (Fondation europenne pour la formation, 2001, p. 4
( 1979 )1980
80663 10129 2665 ( )%26.3

).(ONS, 1985, pp. 69-70



1982 272
) (Fondation europenne pour la formation, 2001, p. 4 :
-

.


1990 : 2004 1131.1
344413
3.. ( )166. 11611 (
) 1..3
166. 4.1.. 1..3
14221(. ).

131

:
.3.4 :

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998


264377 253874 251347 241143 222905 196421 228414 212203 214102

139783 132372 128338 121448 120552 108841 101364 91298 97619



103828 102983 104223 102051 97939 83092 81266 80136 85283
11284 11862 13321 13700- 41500 40277 30800

9482
6657
5465
3944
4414
4488
4284
492
400

-0.9%
-6.5%
-6.0%
30.8%
23.0%

13.5% -14.0%
10.8%
7.4%
17.9%
2.2%

7.6%
11.0%
1.4%
3.0%
4.8% 770.7%

-1.6%

()%
4.1%
1.0%
4.2%
8.2%
5.6%
3.1%
5.7%
0.7%
0.8% -1.2%
2.1%
4.2%
-4.9% -11.0% -2.8%
42.4% 21.8% 38.6% -10.6%

: )( (www.ons.dz )1.1.

131

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

433384 323432 338797 333501 303564 269625


225723 171043 185980 187413 162025 146844
170968 120900 120165 119144 113141 103053
13771 14853 14938 10334 13501 10189
22922 16636 17714 16610 14897
9539

2.0%
5.1%
-0.7%
-9.7%
0.6%

12.6%
10.3%
9.8%
32.5%
56.2%

1.6%
9.9%
-0.8% 15.7%
0.9%
5.3%
44.6% -23.5%
6.6% 11.5%

-4.5%
-8.0%
0.6%
-0.6%
-6.1%

34.0%
32.0%
41.4%
-7.3%
37.8%

:
. 5.3

500000
450000
400000
350000
300000
250000
200000
150000
100000
50000
0

: .

. 4.3
900.0%
800.0%
700.0%
600.0%

500.0%

300.0%

200.0%

100.0%
0.0%
-100.0%

: .

134

400.0%

:
:
:

:
.1
.1
.4
.3


( . 4 -.1
.2 12 1316 14 1..1
11 13
1316 1 1..1)

:

() : .

133

:
.1 : :
.
:

:


.
.1 :
.

.

. :

:
-

:
136

:
-

:
.

:

:
:

:
.3.3 :

132

:
:


:
.1 ( :)la formation rsidentielle

.
.
.1 ( :)la formation par apprentissage


16 1.
16 4..
.4 (:)la formation distance


.
:
.4 :

.

132

:

:
:

:
: .
613 ( 31)
1 3 11..
:
( 3 )6
21 11.
: :
:
:
. .
2
:

:
.

:

131

:
:

.
:
.
- :

. 14... .
- :

14... .
.1 :
1666 621
46611 .

136




.
( )162.

.
:

:

.



2

.

( )
16.

:

.


.

161

161


.

.

:
: 1963 1970
: 1971 1995
: 1996 2007

: (1963 )1970



... .

164

:
( )
.

1624 411.216
( 1621 )
%11.1
%2..1 631.6
%1..6
12..1 %16.3
216.2
%16.1 %6..
(.)GDP
1968
%22.7
1969 ( %7.2
).

163

:
. 1 . 4 ( 1963 ) 1971

1963

1964

1965

1966

322.7
322.7

719.7
548.9
170.8

731.3
497.1
234.2


880.0
930.0
680.0
630.0
200.0
300.0

2912.7
2912.7

3740.9
2632.2
1108.7

3956.0
3052.6
903.5

4945.7
3200.0
1745.7

13344.8

14363.5

15484.0

15008.0

123.0%
70.1%

1.6%
-9.4%
37.1%

()%
-5.4%
27.2%
7.9%
26.7%
-33.3%
28.1%

28.4%
-9.6%

5.8%
16.0%

25.0%
4.8%

-18.5%

93.2%

-21.2%

7.8%

-3.1%

10.9%

7.6%

: .

166

1968

1969

1970

1967

923.3
775.5
147.9

1510.7
896.7
614.0

1687.4
1033.4
654.0

4707.0
3332.0
1375.0

4076.2
2539.2
1537.0

7899.0
3890.0
4009.0

8020.0
4447.0
3573.0

16642.2

19018.3

21018.3

24011.5

4.9%
14.0%
-26.1%

63.6%
15.6%
315.3%

11.7%
15.2%
6.5%

-4.8%
4.1%

-13.4%
-23.8%

93.8%
53.2%

1.5%
14.3%

11.8%

160.8%

-10.9%

14.3%

10.5%

14.2%

. 2.4 ( 1963 ) 1970

1963

1964

1965

100%
100%
0.0%

100%
76.3%
23.7%

( )%
100%
100%
100%
100%
84.0%
77.3%
67.7%
68.0%
16.0%
22.7%
32.3%
32.0%

100%
59.4%
40.6%

11.1%
11.1%

19.2%
20.9%
15.4%

18.5%
16.3%
25.9%

( )%
22.7%
18.7%
18.8%
30.5%
20.4%
19.7%
9.6%
14.5%
17.2%

19.1%
23.1%
15.3%

21.0%
23.2%
18.3%

2.4%
2.4%
0.0%

5.0%
3.8%
1.2%

4.7%
3.2%
1.5%

7.2%
4.3%
2.9%

7.0%
4.3%
2.7%

: .1.4

162

1966

1967

( )%
5.3%
6.2%
4.1%
4.2%
1.2%
2.0%

1968

4.9%
4.1%
0.8%

1969

1970

100%
61.2%
38.8%

:

(1623 %2..6 )162.
.%16.6
%16.2 %6.1
( ).

. 1.4 ( 1963 ) 1970

29.5%

70.5%

: .

162

: ( 1971 )1995
( 1621 )162.
( 1621 )1666
1621 1.4
1623 1.3..2 %12.4
%1.1 .


( %12.6 )1614
( %11.3 )1661
( %6.2 )1661( %6.3 ( .)1612 )

161

:
. 3.4 ( 1971 ) 1995

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

1976

2040.6

1215.6

825.0

2335.8
1454.8
881.0

2669.8
1727.8
942.0

3365.4
2000.4
1365.0

4478.6
2681.6
1797.0


6351.4
4983.9
3681.4
3128.9
2670.0
1855.0

7750.0
4915.0
2835.0

8935.0
5500.0
3435.0

10620.0
6430.0
4190.0

14173.0
7673.0
6500.0

21853.8
13168.8
8685.0

23285.0
14600.0
8685.0

24942.4

30318.5

34504.8

55227.2

61444.5

73817.3

14.5%
19.7%
6.8%

14.3%
18.8%
6.9%

26.1%
15.8%
44.9%

33.1%
34.1%
31.6%

()%
27.4%
11.3%
17.7%
16.7%
43.9%
3.2%

15.3%
11.9%
21.2%

18.9%
16.9%
22.0%

33.5%
19.3%
55.1%

54.2%
71.6%
33.6%

6.5%
10.9%
0.0%

21.6%

13.8%

60.1%

11.3%

20.1%

166

1978

1979

1980

1981

1982

1977

7806.6
4469.6
3337.0

9246.4
5696.4
3550.0

11936.3
6821.3
5115

15468.4
8968.4
6500

18137.7
10437.7
7700

27750.0
15850.0
11900.0

32465.0
18165.0
14300.0

36881.0
20621.0
16260.0

50897.8
27775.8
23122.0

67788.3
36195.3
31593.0

84842.2
42238.2
42604.0

86966.3

104558.9

128096.9

162500.0

191400.0

207600.0

22.9%
21.4%
25.0%

18.4%
27.4%
6.4%

29.1%
19.7%
44.1%

29.6%
31.5%
27.1%

17.3%
16.4%
18.5%

19.2%
8.6%
37.0%

17.0%
14.6%
20.2%

13.6%
13.5%
13.7%

38.0%
34.7%
42.2%

33.2%
30.3%
36.6%

25.2%
16.7%
34.9%

17.8%

20.2%

22.5%

26.9%

17.8%

8.5%

:
. 3.4 ( 1971 ( ) 1995)

1983

16717.9

10267.9

6450.0

1989

1990

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

21700.7
13520.7
8180.0

23859.0
15189.0
8670.0

28287.6
18260.6
10027.0

28796.0
20942.0
7854.0


39712.0 30870.0 29415.5
31662.0 23740.0 22315.5
8050.0
7130.0
7100.0

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

48003.0
39003.0
9000.0

67191.2
56191.2
11000

88126.6
73626.6
14500

105887.3
88487.3
17400

126804.5
108304.5
18500

503950.3
303950.3
200000.0

535272.9
323272.9
212000.0

734876.0
437976.0
296900.0

98667.0
50421.0
48246.0

1990600.0 1491500.0 1166000.0 1048200.0 844500.0 555800.0 423300.0 349500.0 323700.0 299500.0 291300.0 267600.0 233700.0

327900.0 195300.0 140012.0 121400.0 113000.0 108000.0 128000.0 116986.4 105735.0


203900.0 118300.0 84000.0 71900.0 65500.0 63000.0 67000.0 64186.4 59709.0
124000.0 77000.0 56012.0 49500.0 47500.0 45000.0 61000.0 52800.0 46026.0

-7.8%
-1.6%
-16.2%

29.8%
31.7%
26.8%

9.9%
12.3%
6.0%

18.6%
20.2%
15.7%

()%
4.9%
2.2%
1.8%
6.4%
6.6%
14.7%
0.4%
-9.6%
-21.7%

28.6%
33.4%
12.9%

20.9%
23.2%
11.8%

40.0%
44.1%
22.2%

31.2%
31.0%
31.8%

20.2%
20.2%
20.0%

16.3%
19.4%
13.2%

7.2%
18.4%
-4.6%

10.6%
7.5%
14.7%

9.4%
4.4%
15.5%

-15.6%
-6.0%
-26.2%

4.6%
4.0%
5.6%

7.4%
9.8%
4.2%

15.3%
16.8%
13.2%

39.5%
40.8%
37.5%

67.9%
72.4%
61.0%

53.7%
49.1%
61.3%

6.2%
6.4%
6.0%

37.3%
35.5%
40.0%

12.6%

14.5%

8.9%

2.8%

8.1%

8.0%

21.1%

31.3%

51.9%

24.1%

11.2%

27.9%

33.5%

: .

12.

:
. 4.4 ( 1971 ) 1995

1971

1972

1973

1974

1975

100%
59.6%




40.4%

100%
62.3%

100%
64.7%

100%
59.4%

( )%
100%
100%
100%
100%
57.3%
58.0%
62.8%
59.9%

37.7%

35.3%

40.6%

40.1%

26.3%
24.7%

26.1%
26.5%

25.1%
26.9%

23.7%
26.1%

( )%
24.0%
22.9%
21.4%
20.5%
24.6%
23.2%
21.4%
20.4%

25.1%
27.6%

25.6%

22.5%

21.0%

20.7%

23.3%

21.8%

22.1%

7.7%
4.8%

7.7%
5.0%

6.1%
3.6%

( )%
7.5%
7.3%
6.8%
7.3%
4.3%
4.2%
4.2%
4.4%

7.2%
4.4%

7.3%
4.2%

8.1%
4.7%

2.9%

2.7%

2.5%

3.2%

2.8%

3.1%

3.4%




29.1%




3.3%

8.2%
4.9%

2.9%

1976

37.2%

21.4%

2.5%

121

1977

42.0%

22.4%

3.1%

1979

1980

1981

1982

1978

100%
61.6%

100%
57.1%

100%
58.0%

100%
57.5%

42.7%

38.4%

42.9%

42.0%

42.5%

23.5%
24.6%

22.8%
24.8%

21.4%
24.7%

20.6%

18.1%

8.7%
5.0%
3.7%

:
. 4.4 ( 1971 ( ) 1995)

1984

1985

1986

1983

100%

61.4%

38.6%

100%
62.3%
37.7%

100%
63.7%
36.3%

100%
64.6%
35.4%

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

( )%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
81.3%
79.7%
76.9%
75.9%
72.7%
18.7%
20.3%
23.1%
24.1%
27.3%

100%
83.6%
16.4%

100%
83.5%
16.5%

100%
83.6%
16.4%

100%
85.4%
14.6%

16.9%

20.4%

13.4%

20.5%
22.6%
17.8%

20.4%
23.7%
16.4%

22.1%
27.3%
16.4%

( )%
28.4%
25.4%
26.0%
26.7%
37.7%
33.0%
34.1%
33.2%
14.4%
14.4%
14.9%
17.5%

24.6%
33.0%
11.7%

20.5%
27.6%
8.9%

17.5%
24.2%
7.3%

19.8%
27.4%
8.2%

17.3%
24.7%
6.2%

7.2%

4.4%

2.8%

8.1%
5.1%
3.1%

8.2%
5.2%
3.0%

9.4%
6.1%
3.3%

( )%
7.1%
7.3%
8.4%
8.9%
5.7%
5.6%
6.4%
6.5%
1.4%
1.7%
2.0%
2.4%

5.7%
4.6%
1.1%

6.4%
5.4%
1.0%

7.6%
6.3%
1.2%

7.1%
5.9%
1.2%

6.4%
5.4%
0.9%

: .3.4

121

:

(1621 % 22.2 )1666
.%41.4
%11.1 %2.6 ( .
)

. 2.4 ( 1971 ) 1995

32.3%

67.7%

: .

124

: 1996( : )2007

1621 1666 %2.4
16621..2 ( %6.3 )1..6( %2.1 .)1..2

( 1621 )1666 %11.1 %11.1
)%16.6( 1..3 .)%13.1( 1..2
12.123.4 1662
662633.4 4.6 11 1..2
%32.3
1..6 1..2 ( .%2.4 )

123

:
. 5.4 ( 1996 ) 2007

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

160874.3

173504.7

192985.8

212245.2

225511.5

274009.3

296139.5

337694.1

381244.8

403375.1

594478.9

556944.3

136674.3

144804.7

156385.8

175050.2

182591.5

211020.3

229351.5

268565.1

295702.8

311983.1

325110.2

390473.3

28700.0

36600.0

37195.0

42920.0

62989.0

66788.0

69129.0

85542.0

91392

269369

166471

848600.0

946217.1

3946748.6 3555428.1 2302983.0 1920000.0 1811109.9 1602344.2 1452360.0 1176094.8 1098576.7 1022696.7

547000.0

664717.1

760321.7

817692.7

830084.8

948760.0

1652698.3 1439548.8 1255273.0 1200000.0 1141685.9 1053366.2

301600.0

281500.0

262375.0

280884.0

346010.0

503600.0

2294050.4 2115879.3 1047710.0

9306253.7 8381520.2 7458461.8 6126700.1 5264299.8 4546100.2 4260800.0 4123500.0 3238200.1 2830500.1 2780199.9 2570000.0

24200.0

548978.0

669424.0

720000.0

()%

7.9%

11.2%

10.0%

6.3%

21.5%

8.1%

14.0%

12.9%

5.8%

47.4%

-6.3%

5.9%

8.0%

11.9%

4.3%

15.6%

8.7%

17.1%

10.1%

5.5%

4.2%

20.1%

18.6%

27.5%

1.6%

15.4%

46.8%

6.0%

3.5%

23.7%

6.8%

194.7%

-38.2%

11.5%

8.1%

7.4%

7.1%

23.5%

10.3%

13.0%

6.0%

19.9%

54.4%

11.0%

21.5%

14.4%

7.5%

1.5%

14.3%

11.0%

8.4%

5.1%

4.6%

14.7%

14.8%

-6.7%

-6.8%

7.1%

23.2%

45.5%

9.0%

21.9%

7.6%

45.5%

102.0%

8.4%

8.2%

1.8%

14.4%

27.3%

3.3%

6.7%

15.8%

16.4%

21.7%

12.4%

11.0%

: .

126

:
. 6.4 ( 1996 ) 2007

1996

2004

1997

1998

1999

100%

85.0%

15.0%

100%
83.5%
16.5%

100%
81.0%
19.0%

100%
82.5%
17.5%

2003
2002
2001
2000
( )%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
77.6%
79.5%
77.4%
77.0%
81.0%
22.4%
20.5%
22.6%
23.0%
19.0%

100%
77.3%
22.7%

19.0%

25.0%

8.0%

18.3%
21.8%
10.2%

18.9%
20.6%
13.9%

19.3%
21.4%
13.2%

( )%
18.6%
18.5%
18.9%
19.2%
23.5%
21.8%
22.2%
22.0%
10.3%
12.2%
12.5%
12.4%

19.9%
24.6%
11.9%

17.5%
24.9%
8.7%

6.3%

5.3%

0.9%

6.2%
5.2%
1.0%

6.8%
5.5%
1.3%

6.6%
5.4%
1.1%

( )%
6.4%
6.5%
6.4%
5.5%
5.1%
5.0%
5.0%
4.4%
1.3%
1.5%
1.5%
1.0%

6.2%
4.8%
1.4%

: .5.4

122

2005

2006

2007

100%
54.7%
45.3%

100%
70.1%
29.9%

16.7%
22.6%
12.7%

14.1%
23.6%
7.3%

5.4%
4.2%
1.2%

7.1%
3.9%
3.2%

6.0%
4.2%
1.8%

:

(1662 % 21.6 )1..2
( %11.6 ).
. 3.4 ( 1996 ) 2007

21.5%

78.5%

: .


%16.. 1662 %4.
1..2 % 63.2
)%16( 1662 .)%36.4( 1..2

(
)
( ) ( ).

122

:
. 4.4 ( 1962 ) 2007
700000.0
600000.0

500000.0

300000.0

200000.0

400000.0

100000.0

2010

2000

1980 1990

1970

0.0
1960

: .
. 5.4
( 1962 ) 2007
10000000
9000000
8000000
7000000

5000000

4000000
3000000

2000000
1000000
2010

2000

1980 1990

: .

121

1970

0
1960

6000000

:


.

:

( )
1....1..2

:
(
: )
1... 1..2 %11.6
)%11.1( 1..1 1..6

126

:
( )%13.6 %12.3
.%11..


( ) %12..
( %16.. )1..6( %12.4 )1..1
)%12.4( 1..4 .)%12.4( 1..6
( ) %6.2
( %3.2 )1...( %2.4 )1..2
%1.1
( %1.. )1... ( % 1.4 ( .)1..6 )

. 7.4 ( 2000 ) 2007

2000

2001

2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
( )%

2007

0.3%

0.3%

0.2%

0.3%

0.3%

0.4%

0.3%

0.3%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.1%

0.1%

17.1%

16.9%

15.9%

15.0%

16.8%

17.1%

15.6%

16.5%

9.0%

11.0%

11.6%

12.8%

12.0%

11.9%

13.0%

14.8%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

1.3%

1.9%

2.3%

1.9%

1.2%

1.2%

1.1%

1.3%

1.3%

1.5%

1.4%

1.5%

2.2%

2.3%

2.1%

2.1%

2.2%

2.2%

1.8%

2.0%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

1.4%

0.3%

0.3%

0.3%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.3%

0.6%

12. ( 2000 ( ) 2007)


. 7.4

2000

2001

2002

2003

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.4%

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.6%

0.5%

0.6%

7.2%

10.8%

10.2%

9.1%

8.7%

8.8%

7.7%

0.0%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.3%

1.3%

0.1%

0.4%

0.5%

16.4%

16.2%

15.0%

16.3%

15.6%

17.3%

15.5%

16.3%

1.9%

1.8%

1.6%

1.7%

0.8%

0.8%

1.5%

1.4%

0.3%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

0.2%

4.2%

4.8%

4.7%

5.3%

5.3%

5.0%

4.9%

6.7%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.5%

0.4%

0.2%

0.5%

0.5%

0.1%

0.3%

0.3%

. . 0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.1%

4.7%

5.0%

5.6%

6.0%

5.5%

6.3%

6.0%

6.3%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.0%

1.1%

1.2%

1.2%

1.2%

1.3%

1.2%

1.2%

2.6%

2.0%

1.8%

3.5%

0.3%

0.4%

0.4%

0.4%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

4.9%

5.1%

2.3%

2.0%

1.2%

1.7%

1.4%

2.2%

0.0%

0.0%

2.9%

3.8%

2.6%

3.4%

5.3%

4.1%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.6%

0.7%

0.6%

0.8%

0.6%

0.8%

0.8%

1.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

0.1%

77.4%

83.0%

80.6%

85.3%

81.0%

83.1%

81.9%

86.9%

22.6%

17.0%

19.4%

14.7%

19.0%

16.9%

18.1%

13.1%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

22.0%

22.2%

21.8%

23.5%

22.3%

24.9%

22.6%

23.8%

2004

121

2005

2006

2007

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

0.2%

0.2%

0.3%

0.6%

0.6%
6.5%

:
. 6.4

17.4%

22.9%

17.6%
16.4%

5.1%
12.0%

8.6%

: .

:

1... 1..2

%11.. ( %2.4 )1..2 ( %11.7
)1..2
%11.2 %14.2 .%14.2


121

:
( .
)
. 8.4 ( 2000 ) 2007

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

8130

7875

8415

8822

500

313

1325.5

50385

75136

97083

91641

85115

133638

278033.9

237156

3827

7087

15497

20297

18075

25283

55122.8

38747.5

66846

105857

110059

118116

119807

250485

544862.6

661146.7

42920

62989

66788

69129

85542

91392

269369

166471

14005

23607

29820

38152

48733

51285

90518

89796

72777

90363

98410

93282

78973

70765

172690.25

303490.16

22500

27100

26806

28510

39200

130960

200877

197900

32000

36975

42007

45697

36645

38100

118158

105700

313390

436989

494885

513646

512090

792408

1801732.86 1729944.21

32620.0

66611.0

54093.0

155778.0

207910.0

255302.0

346010.0

669424.0 548978.0 503600.0

720000.0

2115879.3 1047710.0

385935.1

492317.5
1163.6..3

()%

-8.2%

-3.1%

6.9%

4.8%

-100.0%

24.0%

49.1%

29.2%

-5.6%

-7.1%

57.0%

85.2% -13.3%

-10.9%

39.9%

118.0%

16.0%

58.4%

4.0%

7.3%

1.4%

109.1%

117.5%

21.3%

15.4%

46.8%

6.0%

3.5%

23.7%

6.8%

194.7%

-38.2%

36.2%

68.6%

26.3%

27.9%

27.7%

5.2%

76.5%

-0.8%

16.0%

24.2%

8.9%

-5.2%

-15.3%

-10.4%

144.0%

75.7%

19.8%

20.4%

-1.1%

6.4%

37.5%

234.1%

53.4%

-1.5%

32.6%

15.5%

13.6%

8.8%

-19.8%

4.0%

210.1%

-10.5%

18.4%

39.4%

13.2%

3.8%

-0.3%

54.7%

118.3%

4.1%

33.5% 188.0% -18.8% 104.2% 101.4%

22.8%

51.2%

27.6%

45.5%

102.0%

8.4%

23.2%

45.5%

31.0% 118.7%

9.0%

21.9%

124

7.6%

-37.4%

323.5%

108.1%

-14.7%
-29.7%

. 8.4

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

( 2000 ( ) 2007)
2005

2006

2007

()%

2.3%

1.6%

1.5%

1.3%

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

0.1%

14.6%

14.9%

17.7%

13.7%

11.8%

12.8%

13.1%

10.3%

1.1%

1.4%

2.8%

3.0%

2.5%

2.4%

2.6%

1.7%

19.3%

21.0%

20.0%

17.6%

16.6%

23.9%

25.8%

28.8%

12.4%

12.5%

12.2%

10.3%

11.9%

8.7%

12.7%

7.3%

4.0%

4.7%

5.4%

5.7%

6.8%

4.9%

4.3%

3.9%

21.0%

17.9%

17.9%

13.9%

11.0%

6.8%

8.2%

13.2%

6.5%

5.4%

4.9%

4.3%

5.4%

12.5%

9.5%

8.6%

9.2%

7.3%

7.7%

6.8%

5.1%

3.6%

5.6%

4.6%

90.6%

86.8%

90.1%

76.7%

71.1%

75.6%

81.8%

78.5%

13.2%

9.9%

23.3%

28.9%

24.4%

18.2%

21.5%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

9.4%

100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

: 2000 2006 2005 2007 .


. 7.4

5.0% 2.2% 0.9%

6.2%

18.6%

7.1%

11.0%

21.6%

13.7%

: .

123

13.6%

:


( )
1662( .1..6 )

%21.1

%11.4 .%2.2

( %26.2 )1662 ( %23.6 )1..6
( %13.2 )1662 ( %12.3 )1..6
( %6.4 )1662 ( %2.2 .)1..6

( %23.2 %62.1
) ( %1..2 %11.6
) ( %3.2 %13.3
) (
).

126

:
. 9.4 ( 1996 ) 2005

1996

1997

1998

1999

160874.3
128133.3
23688.0
9053.0

173504.7
138192.5
26061.7
9250.4

192985.8
146553.4
35974.3
10458.1

( )
296139.5
274009.3
225511.5
212245.2
193685.3
188098.8
161240.0
153936.2
79715.2
65652.3
49562.1
46135.5
22739.0
20258.3
14709.5
12173.5

337694.1
220516.9
92002.5
25174.7

136674.3
111394.3
19559.0
5721.0

144804.7
118194.5
21280.7
5329.4

156385.8
124701.4
25004.3
6680.1

( )
229351.5
211020.3
182591.5
175050.2
158109.3
153248.8
135820.0
132753.2
58743.2
47122.3
38703.1
34857.5
12499.0
10649.3
8068.5
7439.5

268565.1
186105.9
68282.5
14176.7

24200.0
16739.0
4129.0
3332.0

28700.0
19998.0
4781.0
3921.0

36600.0
21852.0
10970.0
3778.0

( )
66788.0
62989.0
42920.0
37195.0
35576.0
34850.0
25420.0
21183.0
20972.0
18530.0
10859.0
11278.0
10240.0
9609.0
6641.0
4734.0

69129.0
34411.0
23720.0
10998.0

122

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

381244.8
256518.1
96811.1
27915.6

403375.1
261957.9
110435.4
30981.9

295702.8
214402.1
66497.1
14803.6

311983.1
216908.9
78671.4
16402.9

85542.0
42116.0
30314.0
13112.0

91392.0
45049.0
31764.0
14579.0

. 10.4 ( 1996 ) 2005

1996

1997

1998

1999

100.0%
79.6%
14.7%
5.6%

100.0%
79.6%
15.0%
5.3%

100.0%
75.9%
18.6%
5.4%

()%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65.4%
68.6%
71.5%
72.5%
26.9%
24.0%
22.0%
21.7%
7.7%
7.4%
6.5%
5.7%

100.0%
65.3%
27.2%
7.5%

100.0%
81.5%
14.3%
4.2%

100.0%
81.6%
14.7%
3.7%

100.0%
79.7%
16.0%
4.3%

()%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
68.9%
72.6%
74.4%
75.8%
25.6%
22.3%
21.2%
19.9%
5.4%
5.0%
4.4%
4.2%

100.0%
69.3%
25.4%
5.3%

100%
69.2%
17.1%
13.8%

100%
69.7%
16.7%
13.7%

100%
59.7%
30.0%
10.3%

()%
100%
100%
100%
100%
53.3%
55.3%
59.2%
57.0%
31.4%
29.4%
25.3%
30.3%
15.3%
15.3%
15.5%
12.7%

100%
49.8%
34.3%
15.9%

122

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

100.0%
67.3%
25.4%
7.3%

100.0%
64.9%
27.4%
7.7%

100.0%
72.5%
22.5%
5.0%

100.0%
69.5%
25.2%
5.3%

100%
49.2%
35.4%
15.3%

100%
49.3%
34.8%
16.0%

:
. 8.4

6.6%

22.3%

71.1%

: .

. 9.4

4.7%
20.7%


74.6%

: .

121

. 10.4

14.4%

28.5%

57.2%

: .

126



: ()
() ()
( GDP,

.)GNP

1626 162.
1626
( %16.. )
( %11.6 ) %12.4 162.
.%11

1626 :162.
%2.. ( %6.3 ).
: %62
16231..2
.

11.

:

1616 161. 1626166.

( %11.3 %1..3 %14.6 %1..6
%13.1 %13.2 %13.2 %14.1 ).
( )

1616 161. 1626%2.4( 166.
%2.1 %1.1 %2.4 %2.3 %3.1 %3.6 %6.2%3.1
)
( )

.
.


:

1... 1666 :( .1..6
)

111

:
. 11.4 ( 1995 ) 2005

1995

2000

2005

( )%








16.5%
14.9%
17.0%
15.9%
15.3%
11.6%
11.9%
17.3%
15.2%
17.3%

17.1%
14.4%
12.1%
15.4%
14.7%
12.4%
12.9%
18.1%
14.7%
19.2%

21.6%
12.8%
15.1%
15.3%
16.0%
12.5%
14.6%
17.7%
14.7%
17.5%

()GNP








5.2%
4.1%
4.2%
3.7%
4.5%
5.4%
3.3%
6.4%
4.9%
6.7%

5.5%
3.9%
3.5%
3.8%
4.4%
5.4%
4.0%
5.4%
4.9%
5.8%

6.2%
4.5%
2.7%
3.8%
4.6%
5.3%
3.4%
5.3%
4.9%
5.7%


( %12.4 )1666
( %16.1 )1...( %12.6 )1..6
1666 1...
( )%11.2 ( )%12.2
.1..6

111

:

( )GNP
( %2.2 ( %6.1 )1666 )1...( %6.2 .)1..6
1..6
( .%2.1 )
. 11.4
1995 2005
25.0%
20.0%
15.0%
%
10.0%
5.0%
0.0%

1995
2000
2005

: .
. 12.4
1995 2005

25.0%

20.0%


15.0%

10.0%

5.0%

0.0%
2000

2005

: .

114

1995

:
. 13.4
1995 2005
7.0%
6.0%
5.0%
4.0%
%
3.0%
2.0%
1.0%
0.0%

1995
2000
2005

: .

. 14.4
1995 2005
7.0%

6.0%

5.0%


4.0%

3.0%

2.0%

1.0%

0.0%
2000

2005

: .

113

1995

:






.

:

) (PAUL, 2008

) (FREEMAN, 1986) (BECKER, 1967
)(TCHIBOZO, 1999

)(HECKMAN, LOCHNER, & TODD, 2006

.

()
116

:

%63
% 35 :
%2
) (O'ROURKE, 2000
:
) (CASTLES, 1989
1981-1960
:
.
) (POTERBA, 1997

1960 1990
65 ()

.
) (FERNANDEZ & ROGERSON, 1997

1950 1990 (
65
() - )
.
112

:
) (VERBINA & CHOWDHURY, 2004
: 88
1999 2000 :



.
) (BILEK, 2004, 2006
: (
)
()
.
) (De MERDEIROS & BARCELOS, 2007
2000
:
. :

15
15
.2000

.
112


(
).

( ).


: .

111

:
: ( )


:
.1 ( )


:


.

( 6 5
4 7)

.
( )



.


116

:
( )

.
.2 (62
)1662

( )
.
.4 :

:

.
.
.
.3

.
.5
(

) :

16.

:

( )...
.6


... .

: ( )
:
.3 :

:


.

.

.
.6 :
...

161

:

.
.2
( )
( 1..4
)12 (
) (
)
) (Garant & Scieur, 2001
:

...

.
.2 ( )

.....
.1 :
.
.9 ( )...
) (BILEK, 2006 ( )

)(FALCH & RATTSO, 1999) (FALCH & RATTSO, 1997


.
161

:


( )1999 :
.

:

.
:

:
....
:




) (FAURE & al., 1972

164

:
( )1968-1960 %17
.%20
:





...

163

:




.


( )
( )
( .)2008

( )
1621
.1..6

166



2005 -1971 :
:
])[log(DFmen

( ):
]) [log(DFgouv
( )

]) [log(ENSG

])[log(SNMG

:
(

( )MCO
11.3 :
)

162

:
. 12.4

)l(DFmen

1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005

20.76
20.93
21.08
21.20
21.47
21.60
21.74
21.93
22.17
22.32
22.63
22.79
22.71
23.04
23.12
23.33
23.49
23.56
23.61
23.94
24.14
24.51
24.78
24.96
25.19
25.44
25.50
25.55
25.61
25.63
25.76
25.79
25.95
26.09
26.10

)ln(DFgouv
22.32
22.43
22.58
22.76
23.30
23.40
23.49
23.62
23.75
24.05
24.31
24.47
24.64
24.81
24.89
24.93
24.87
24.91
25.00
25.15
25.50
26.04
26.44
26.50
26.81
27.03
27.22
27.36
27.43
27.44
27.58
27.68
27.76
27.81
27.86

)ln(ENSG

)ln(SNMG

10.91
11.03
11.08
11.15
11.24
11.34
11.43
11.55
11.63
11.71
11.76
11.85
11.94
12.05
12.13
12.24
12.34
12.40
12.44
12.49
12.54
12.56
12.58
12.64
12.66
12.67
12.69
12.69
12.69
12.70
12.70
12.71
12.71
12.73
12.74

8.01
8.34
8.34
8.48
8.48
8.59
8.59
9.04
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.17
9.39
10.03
10.26
10.31
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.89
11.12
11.18
11.18
11.47
11.47
11.47
11.70
11.70

: SNMG .
162

:
. 13.4
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

-2.322989

0.516637

-4.496368

0.0001

)Ln(DFgouvt

0.494342

0.091086

5.427181

0.0000

)Ln(ENSGt

0.849425

0.115444

7.357894

0.0000

)Ln(SNMGt

0.323176

0.097437

3.316774

0.0023

R-squared

0.996883

Mean dependent var

23.66928

Adjusted R-squared

0.996581

S.D. dependent var

1.731734

S.E. of regression

0.101259

Sum squared resid

0.317856

: .EViews 5.0
) (t
%99 ) (F %99


( %66.2 ).


( )..136
( )0.463 ( )0.314

.
161

:


:
:

( ) ]).[log(DEmen
( ):
( ])[log)DEgouv
])[log(ETAB ( [p] )2000
:
(

( )MCO
13.3 :
)

166

:
. 14.4

1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005

)ln(DEmen
20.32
20.08
20.32
20.32
18.64
19.79
20.75
19.48
19.57
19.26
19.47
19.18
19.35
22.59
22.60
22.73
22.78
22.68
22.69
22.24
22.36
22.94
23.09
23.05
23.22
23.47
23.61
23.71
23.76
23.82
24.12
23.91
24.17
24.36
24.41

)ln(DEgouv
21.77
21.96
22.16
22.60
22.88
22.88
23.20
23.38
23.51
23.86
24.18
24.48
24.60
24.55
24.69
24.83
24.53
24.58
24.63
24.75
25.07
25.54
26.02
26.08
26.42
26.43
26.36
26.29
26.36
26.57
26.95
27.03
27.23
27.30
27.68

)ln(ETAB
8.86
8.87
8.94
8.99
9.05
9.06
9.12
9.16
9.19
9.24
9.27
9.29
9.35
9.39
9.44
9.50
9.54
9.58
9.63
9.67
9.70
9.73
9.77
9.82
9.83
9.86
9.88
9.89
9.90
9.92
9.95
9.97
9.98
10.00
10.01

: : .

1..

)P (2000=100
4.27
4.43
4.70
4.92
5.32
5.83
6.53
7.67
8.54
9.35
10.72
11.42
12.32
13.10
14.46
16.49
17.46
18.49
20.19
22.06
27.77
36.58
44.07
56.86
73.80
87.60
92.59
97.17
99.70
100.00
104.20
105.66
108.39
112.25
114.09

:
. 15.4
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

-26.66886

8.038434

-3.317668

0.0023

)ln(DEgouvt

-1.136190

0.433638

-2.620134

0.0135

)Ln(ETABt

8.010432

1.746445

4.586707

0.0001

Pt

0.014883

0.007244

2.054646

0.0484

R-squared

0.844505

Mean dependent var

21.96667

Adjusted R-squared

0.829458

S.D. dependent var

1.855147

S.E. of regression

0.766116

Sum squared resid

18.19494

: .EViews 5.0

%96 . : ]) [log(ETAB
( [p] )2000 %95


.
( ]) [log)DEgouv


( )
%11.6 .
1.1

:
( )
( )1..1.
(.)0.016

1971 2005


: (
)

.

1.1




( )

:
1624 162. 1621 1666 .1662
( )

( )
.


( )1..6 1... 1666
.1..6

1.4

:

.

:

.



.

1.3

:

:

1.6

:


" "D. RICARDO ""T. MALTHUS
.

" "J. SCHUMPETER " "L. KONDRATIEFF
" "Innovation
""Destruction Catrice ( 2003 .)176-61
" "HARROD & DOMAR
( .)Steady Stat Growth

) (SWAN, 1956) (SOLOW, 1956 )(SOLOW, 1957

.

" "
).(GUELLEC & RALLE, 2001

) : (SCHULTZ, 1961

( )

1.2

:
) " :(SCHULTZ, 1961 ( )
" ( ).


.

:
: .

1.2



.


.

1.1

:

( :)GNP
(
)GDP
" "SOLOW - SWAN
.

: ""SOLOW - SWAN
""SOLOW - SWAN
.

:

:
:
) ( ]) ( ) ( [

1.6

) (

:
:
:)Y(t)( .t
:)K(t)( .
:)L(t)( .
:


) () (

:
(

) (

:
:k .
:y .
:f(k) (.)forme intensive
"COBB-

"DOUGLAS :
) (

: : 0.1

: ""SOLOW - SWAN
" "SOLOW - SWAN
):(SOLOW R. M., 1972, pp. 19-24
.
11.

:
.
.
.
( )S ( )I
( )Y
( )s " "SOLOW - SWAN
:
)
)

(
(

n
.

: " "SOLOW - SWAN


" "SOLOW - SWAN
.

111

: " "SOLOW - SWAN


" "SOLOW - SWAN
" "COBB - DOUGLAS:
) (

:
) (
( )s ( )
()
:

) (
:

: ( )K ( )t :

:s 0.1
: .
( )6
:
) (

) (

) (


n
) (JOHES, 2000, p. 32 :
111

) (

) (

( )2 :

) (

( )8( )9 ( )7:
)

()

( )10:
)

( )11 :
( )

( )12 ()
()) (JOHES, 2000, p. 33:
(.)sy
() (.)k
114

:
(.)n

: " "SOLOW
" : "SOLOW - SWAN ( )5 ()12
() .
"( " SOLOW )
:
(.)y=k
( )sy
(.)s
(.)(n+)k

113

:
. 1.5 " " SOLOW

::
http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/pp/yildi/croissance/croissanceweb/node8.html
)(Yildizoglu Murat, 2001-12-15

( )k0
( )sy=sf(k0

() )sf(k0() )f(k0 ( )k0
(* )k
" "). (SOLOW R. M., 1972, p. 32
( )k0
() ( )k1 " "SOLOW - SWAN
( )sy=sf(k1
(*.)k
116

:
" "SOLOW - SWAN

" "SOLOW - SWAN
( )n ( )s
).(JOHES, 2000, pp. 35-36
) (k 0

)

)(k 0

(* )k ()7
:
)

( )14

.

112

: " "SOLOW-SWAN
" "SOLOW - SWAN
( )13 ( )k:
)

()

( :)g ( )gk
.
( )16 ( )k ( ) ( )n+
.
. 2.5 " " SOLOW - SWAN

n+


)(sy/k

*k0 k

( )sy/k ( )n+ :
112

:
(* :)k0<k ( )k
(*)k ( )y
(* )y .
(* :)k0>k ( )k
(*)k ( )y
(*)y .

: " "SOLOW - SWAN



) (BARRO & SALA-I-MARTIN, 1996, p. 5
" "SOLOW - SWAN.
" "SOLOW
)(SOLOW R. , 1957

)17-19

pp.

1996,

SALA-I-MARTIN,

&

(BARRO

).(AGHION & HOWITT, 2000, p. 12




2010

111

:
1962
2010 1962 .

: " "SOLOW - SWAN

" " SOLOW ()6


( )A :

(
)
)

(
(

]) ( ) ( [ ) (
) (
) (
) (
) (

) (
{

" "R. M. SOLOW ( )A ( )L "


"HARROD
( (AGHION & HOWITT, 2000, pp. 16-18) : (LECAILLON, LE

) ) PAGE, OTTAVJ, & GRANGEAS, 1995, p. 97


" "COBB - DOUGLAS
:
:Y=F(K,AL) "."HARROD
:Y=F(AK,L) " :"SOLOW
(.)w
116

:
:Y=AF(K,L) " :"HICKS

( )k (.)w/r
) (SOLOW R. M., 1972, pp. 52-55
() .
( )12 :
)

:
" "SOLOW - SWAN
:
)
)

( )

()

( )17 :
)

(
11.

:
( )11 ( ):
)

( )

( )21 ( )gk
( )y/k ( ) . :
(

( )13 ()24 :

)
)



(.)gy=gk=0

: " "SOLOW- SWAN

" "SOLOW - SWAN


( )k
.
111

:
:
( ) :
:

( )k ( )A ) ( : .

:
(

:
(

:
( )

( / ) ( ) k~0

( ) s~y (n g )k~0
( / ) ( ) k~0
( * ) k~0 .
( ) :
)

( )28
( )28 ( )25:

111

( )29 :
)

[) (

) (



( ) " "SOLOW - SWAN
).(JOHES, 2000, p. 44

114


" ."SOLOW-SWAN

1661

) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992


.

: ""SOLOW-SWAN
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
"."SOLOW-SWAN

: ""SOLOW-SWAN
" "SOLOW-SWAN
()30
:

113

( )

]) ( [

) (

) (

:
{
) (

) (
( )41 :
)

( )

]) ( [

) (

( )32 :

( ) (1

) (

( )n+g+ .

( )=1/3

( ) (1

%50 ( )n+g+
( )%50 %10 %5.
" "SOLOW-SWAN
( )g( ) 0.05
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
:
)

) (

) (

: a .
( )33 ( )31 " "SOLOW :
)

) (

116

) (

) (

])

) ( [

) (

) (

: ""SOLOW-SWAN
""SOLOW-SWAN 98
( :
)
" "SUMMERS & HESTON 1988
( )y (
) 1960 1985
( )s (.)n
:
: ( 98 ):
(34) ln( y) 5.48 1.42 ln( s) 1.97 ln( n g ); R 0.59; s.e.e 0.69.
(35) ln( y ) 6.87 1.48 [ln( s) ln( n g ).R 0.59; s.e.e 0.69.

1.48 0.60.
1

: ( 75):
(34) ln( y) 5.36 1.31 ln( s) 2.01 ln( n g ); R 0.59; s.e.e 0.61.
(35) ln( y ) 7.10 1.43 [ln( s) ln( n g ).R 0.59; s.e.e 0.61.

1.43 0.59.
1

112

:
: ( OCDE 22):
(34) ln( y) 7.97 0.50 ln( s) 0.76 ln( n g ); R 0.01; s.e.e 0.38.
(35) ln( y ) 8.62 0.56 [ln( s) ln( n g ).R 0.06; s.e.e 0.37.

0.56 0.36.
1

" "SOLOW
:
: ( ) ) ln(s( ) ) ln(n g .
: ( ) ) ln(s( ) ) ln(n g .
: ( ) R 0.59 .
( )=1/3
.

"."SOLOW

112

:
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
( ) ""SOLOW


.-

:
" "SOLOW
:
)

]) ( ) ( [ ) (

) (

)(

H : ""SOLOW
.:

111

{
:
)

( )(

)(

) (

: ( )
( )sk ( )sh
:
)

() ( )

) (

) (

() ( )

) (

) (


) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
" "SOLOW .

116

:
""SOLOW-SWAN
( ):

]
(

[
*

. 3.5 )(MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992

k
h 0

k 0

::
http://www.vcharite.univ-mrs.fr/pp/yildi/croissance/croissanceweb/node8.html
)(Yildizoglu Murat, 2001-12-15

14.

:
)40( :( )41 ()37
:
)

()42
):(MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
)
)

]) ( [

( ) (

) (
)
) (

) (

==1/3 ::

( )n+g+ ( )2- ()sk


( )sh .
:
( )sh ( )41 ()43 :
) (

]) ( [

(
)

( ) (

141

) (
)
) (

:
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
""SOLOW )g( :( ) 0.05
:
)

) (

) (

: a.
( )33 ( )43
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992 :
)

) (

(
)
])

(
])

) (
) ( [

) (
)
) (

) (
)
) (

) ( [

" "SOLOW-SWAN
( )sh ) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
( )sh
1960( 1985 ( )sh ()UNECO
12 17
(.))19-15
:
141

:
:) 98 (:
(45) ln( y ) 6.89 0.69 ln( s k ) 1.73 ln( n g ) 0.66 ln( s h );
R 0.78; s.e.e 0.51.
(46) ln( y ) 7.86 0.73 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] 0.67 [ln( s h ) ln( n g )];
R 0.78; s.e.e 0.51.


1 0.73. 0.31.

0.28.

0.67
1

:) 75 (:
(48) ln( y ) 7.81 0.70 ln( s k ) 1.50 ln( n g ) 0.73 ln( s h );
R 0.77; s.e.e 0.45.
(49) ln( y ) 7.97 0.71 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] .74 [ln( s h ) ln( n g )];
R 0.78; s.e.e 0.51.

1 0.71. 0.29.

0.30.

0.74
1

:) 22 (OCDE :
(45) ln( y ) 8.63 0.28 ln( s k ) 1.07 ln( n g ) 0.76 ln( s h );
R 0.24; s.e.e 0.33.
(46) ln( y ) 8.71 0.29 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] 0.76 [ln( s h ) ln( n g )];
R 0.28; s.e.e 0.32.


1 0.29. 0.14.

0.37.

0.76
1

" MANKIW, ROMER & WEIL"


:

144

:
: () )ln(sh () )ln(sk
) ln(n g

: () )ln(sh () )ln(sk
) ln(n g .
: ( ) R 0.78 .
: ( )( ) ( ) 1 3
.

:
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
.

:

:
( )27 ()30 :
)

( )

143

:
:
)

) ()

) (

" "TAYLOR :

~ ~
*k k

( ) k~:
)

( )

()

()

) (

( )48( )50 ()49 :


)

( )

()

()

( )51 ( )
( ) .
:
)

()

(
(

:
: .
: ( ~ ) k( * ~.) k
( )51:
)

(
146

:
( )52:
) (
(

()

) (

) ( [

) (

( ) ( ) ( )
( ) :
(

()

) ( [

) (


:
( ])) ( (

]) ( [

) ( [

:
)

]) ( [

( ]]) ( [

) ( )

) ( [)

(
(

]) ( [
]) ( [

]) ( [

( )0.04 ( )
( ) %4 . :
(

18 .
( )0.05 14 .

:
)

()

()
142

:
:
(

0.02
35.
(* )y ()57 :
]) ( [

) (

) (

) ( ]) ( [ )

]) ( [

]) ( [
])

) ( [

])

) ( [

) ( ]) ( [ )

]) ( [

:
( )60
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992 :

142

:
: ( 98 ):
;]) (60) ln( y ) 2.46 0.299 ln( y 60 ) 0.5 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] 0.238 [ln( s h ) ln( n g
R 0.46; s.e.e 0.33.

0.48.
0.0142
0.23.

: ( 75):
;]) (60) ln( y ) 3.09 0.372 ln( y 60 ) 0.506 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] 0.266 [ln( s h ) ln( n g
R 0.44; s.e.e 0.30.
0.44.
0.0186
0.23.

: ( OCDE 22):
;]) (60) ln( y ) 3.55 0.402 ln( y 60 ) 0.396 [ln( s k ) ln( n g )] 0.236 [ln( s h ) ln( n g
R 0.66; s.e.e 0.15.
0.38.
0.0206
0.23.

( ) 0.02
()OCDE
( ) .

" "SOLOW-SWAN

.

141

" "SOLOW-SAWAN -


) (BARRO & SALA-I-MARTIN, 1996, p. 157
.
" "SOLOW-SAWAN
( AK " "P. ROMER
)1612 " : "
.
) (AGHION & HOWITT, 2000, pp. 354-355

:
: ) (LUCAS, 1988
1666 ) (BECKER, 1964

.
: ) (NELSON & PHELPS, 1966

146

:

) (ROMER, 1990 .



.

:
)(LUCAS, 1988
) (LUCAS, 1988 ) (SOLOW, 1957
" "DENISON
" "G. BECKER "ARROW (1962)" :")"UZAWA (1965
") "ROMER (1986
).(MAYEUR, 2005, pp. 300-308

: ""R. E. LUCAS
) (LUCAS, 1988 :
.1 .
.1 ( )L ( )t (.)n
13.

:
.4 () )c(t ().
.3 (

Constant Inter temporal Elasticity of

)CIES( )Substitution :

)( [

(]

]) ( [

.6 ( )h ( )t
:
)

) (

.2 () )u(h () )1-u(h
()Le :
)

) ( ) (

" "LUCAS
-
.

131

:
.2 ( )t ( )h
()h/2
.
.1 : .

( )
" "
" "LUCAS
:
)

) (

) (

: )(LUCAS, 1988
) (LUCAS, 1988 :
)

(]

) (LUCAS, 1988 :
)

(]

131

:
:
-

:h .

:ha
.

:u () ( )u-1
.

) (LUCAS, 1988 :
)

)n (: .
) (LUCAS, 1988
:
)

()

" "LUCAS " "UZAWA


:



:
134

)(

: (.)taux dactualisation

: )(LUCAS, 1988
) (LUCAS, 1988 ()21
( )22()21 ) (LUCAS, 1988 :
)

)(

)
)

(
(

" "le Hamiltonien ""LUCAS :


)
]

[
)

( ])

133

( [

:
( ) ha h (:
):
)
)

(
)

()

(
(

()

)
)

()

()

(
)

([

( )/ ()21 ( )23:
(

( )21:
)

) (

136

(
)

:
) (

) (

:
)

( )

( )24 ()26 :
)
)

:gc : .
( )24 ()22 :
)

( )21 ()22 :
)

( )26 :
)

:
132

:
: .
: .
) ( :( ) ()c/k
(

).(AGHION & HOWITT, 2000, p. 657


( )23 :
(

( )23 ()11 :
)

( )26 :
)

( )14()11( )11( )23 :


)

()

( )13
(.)

132

:

) )(LUCAS, 1988

( )13 (:)11
)

()

( ( )21

:
)
)

(
(

( )12 :
)

()

( [

( )12
( )

:
:
=. : :

131

:
)
)

()

)
(

)
}

()

:
)ha( :
:
(

)
)

:
)
)

)
)

(
)
)

()
(
(

()
(

:
: .
:

( )16 :
.

136

: )(LUCAS, 1988
" "LUCAS

) (LUCAS, 1988
.

: )(LUCAS, 1988
" "LUCAS
"( "DENISON)1621 ( )1662-16.6
" )1929-1909(( : "DENISON(-1929
.))1957
:
-

.:

.%..6 :

16.

:
" "LUCAS
" "SOLOW :
) (

) (

) (

" "LUCAS " "SOLOW


( )1957-1909 :

: .:)

" "LUCAS
:

: .:)

( )11 .

:
-

( )11 ( )13
)

:
161

)() ( )13

( )
:
-

(
) :
""LUCAS

"."DENISON
-

1 1 4
" "LUCAS
(

( ).)(LUCAS, 1988
. 1.5 )(LUCAS, 1988

*g h

*u

*g c

0.024

0.52

0.037

0.016

0.68

0.025

0.014

0.72

0.022

(LUCAS, 1988, p. 307) :

161

: ""LUCAS
" "LUCAS
" "SOLOW
" "LUCAS " "SOLOW

""SOLOW
.
" "LUCAS


"."SOLOW-SOWAN
" "LUCAS
" "LUCAS
(
) .

164




"SOLOW-

"SWAN .


(MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992) :
) (ROMER, 1990)...(LUCAS, 1988.


) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992

" "SOLOW-SWAN
.

) (LUCAS, 1988
1666
%32.6

.

163

166



()



).(BAKOUCHE, 2009, pp. 7-11
( )
) (SCHULTZ, 1960

1900 1956 ()
%3.5
%1
%22 1900 %42
(SCHULTZ, 1983, p. 104)1957
) (EICHER, 1960
1929 1952

.
162

:
(
) )(BECKER, 1964


( )PSACHAROPOULOS ( )
.
( )
. 1.6 ( )
%

20

15.8

18.2

16.2

11.1

11

/ / *

13.8

13.6

18.8

15.6

9.7

9.9

26.6

17

19.5

17.4

12.9

12.3

13.4

11.3

11.6

8.5

9.4

8.5

37.6

24.6

27.8

25.4

18.4

11.3

26.6

17

19

18.9

13.1

10.8

(PSACHAROPOULOS & PATRINOS, 2002) :

()

:
( )Growth Accounting : - .

162

: ( )


( )
.
) (SOLOW , 1957
( )
:

.
( )SOLOW
.

.



(
.)1..2

161

:



()1..2



( 1..2 .)3

) . (OCDE, 2001

.

:
... .
.
( )

166

:

.



.

:


) (GRILICHES, 1996
:

( )Paul DOUGLAS .
) (GRILICHES, 1996
)SCHMOOKLER, 1952( )STIGLER, 1947( )TINBERGEN,1942(:
( ...)ABRAMOVITZ, 1956( )KENDRICK, 1955.

(SWAN, 1956) (SOLOW, 1956) :
(SOLOW R. , Technical change and the

12.

:
) aggregate production function, 1957
.
" "SOLOW
:

:A ( )HICKS
" "SOLOW : .
:

()
" "
" ".")rsidu de SOLOW( "SOLOW
:
= +.

121

:
""

.
" "SOLOW
1636- 16.6 % 11
16.6 1636 %11
.
) (DENISON, 1964, pp. 5-59
( )
( 1910
.)1957
" "E. F. DENISON
:

.
.
" "E. F. DENISON ( )
1929 1957 % 23
1909 1929
% 12
121

:
% 20
161. .1662

) (CARRE, DUBOIS, & MALINVAUD, 1972, pp. 94-105
( ) %0.45 %5
1969 1945 %2.5 .
(
)



( )
.

.




()KREUGMAN, 1994
( )YOUNG, 1995 ( :
)

124

:
( )
( .)2007


. %49
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
%29 .%22
%19 ( )JONES & HALL, 1999 %6
%12 (.)KLENOW & RODRIGUEZ, 1997

:

()




.
:

123

:
- .

: ()Ad hoc growth equations



.

:
-

: i t

: .

:
()
(
.)...
126

:

( . )
. 2.6
R

Sk

h0

y0

...41

..411

162. 26161.

1
162.(BAUMOL, 1611
.4
BATEY

& BLACKMAN,
)WOLF, 1989

..11

..121 ...66

()3.12
()1.42( )1.46

()3.1.

..112

1.216

1.32

()6...

()1.32

..12

....21

()3..6

..21

....3 ...23
()1...( )4..2

(LANDAU,
)1986

1
....6
162.(KYRIACOU, 1616

6
)1991
()1.34

6
....22
...1
162.(BARRO R. , 1616

1
Economic
()1.62
()1.16
growth in a
()1..2
cross-section of
)countries, 1991

) (BARRO R. J., 2000


.

122

:
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992

( )
:

]) ( [

) (

) (

]) ( [ )

]) ( [

]) ( [
])

) ( [

])

) ( [

]) ( [ )

]) ( [

:
)

()


( )TEMPLE, 1998

122

:
) (MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
( ).

. 3.6
(TEMPLE,
)1998

(MRW,
)1992

(TEMPLE,
)1998

(MRW,
)1992

(TEMPLE,
)1998

(MRW,
)1992

21

22

69

75

92

98

()OCDE

()OCDE

19601985

19601985

19601985

19601985

19601985

19601985

0.015

0.0206

0.014

0.0186

0.014

0.0142

0.44

0.38
0.23

0.48
0.23

*0.13

0.396

0.66

0.506

0.59

0.500

*0.13

0.236

*0.00

0.266

*-0.01

0.238


) (ISLAM, 1995 :

121

:
. 4.6
(ISLAM,
)1995

(ISLAM, 1995) (ISLAM, 1995) (ISLAM,


)1995

79

79

22 ()OCDE

22 ()OCDE

19601985

19601985

19601985

19601985

Fixed effect

Pooled ols

Fixed effect

Pooled ols

0.0375
)(4.03

)0.0069 (2.76

)0.0913 (5.71

)0.0162 (2.95

0.5224
)(8.14

0.8013
)(15.01

)0.2074 (1.97

)0.6016 (5.93

-0.199
)(1.81

)0.0544 (0.53

)-0.045 (0.31

)0.0174 (0.10

(BARRO & LEE, International comparaisons of Educational


)attainments, 1993

:



:

126

:
. 5.6
(Pritchett,
)1999

(Pritchett,
)1999

B & S, 1994

(KYRIACOU,
Level and growth
effects of human
capital, A crosscountry study of the,
)1991

79

91

78

87

19601987

19601987

19651985

19701985

0.501
)(15.4

)0.524 (12.8

)0.457 (5.38

)0.449 (5.05

)0.209 (1.01

)0.261 (0.90

-0.104
)(2.07

)-0.049 (1.07

)0.063 (0.80

)-0.152 (1.68

(NSD,
)1995

& (BARRO
)LEE, 1993

(KYRIACOU,
(KYRIACOU,
Level and growth
Level and growth
effects of human
effects of human
capital, A crosscapital, A crosscountry study of the, country study of the,
)1991
)1991



( )COHEN & SOTO

12.

(COHEN & SOTO, Growth and Human Capital: Good Data, Good

).Results, 2001


:
(DE LA FUENTE & DONENECH, Human Capital in Growth
Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality Make,
; )2000
;) (KRUEGER & LINDAHL, 2001
(COHEN & SOTO, Growth and Human Capital: Good Data,
;)Good Results, 2001
(DE LA FUENTE & DOMENECH, Human Capital in
Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data
;)Quality Make?, 2006
(COHEN & SOTO, Growth and human capital: good data,
good results, 2007) update ...

) (DE LA FUENTE & DOMENECH, 2006


( )OCDE

( ).

121

:
. 6.6

(D. &D.,
)2001

)(D. &D., 2000

(BARRO & LEE,


)1993

)(NSD, 1995

()OCDE

()OCDE

()OCDE

()OCDE

19601990

19601990

19601990

19601985

)0.345 (6.83

)0.373 (7.15

)0.409 (6.12

)0.510 (8.30

)0.394 (4.57

)0.271 (2.53

)-0.057 (0.88

)-0.148 (2.62

0.828

0.809

0.811

0.840

Adj. R

: ( ))(DE LA FUENTE & DOMENECH, 2006

) (COHEN & SOTO, 2007 24


(162. )166.
%66 ..111
( 16 23) 1..1 .


1%6
).(DEBANDE & VANDENBERGHE, 2008, pp. 68-69


.

121


( 1621 )1..2 :

)
) (

) (

) ( () (

) (

) (

)
) ( ) (

( )

) (

) (

)(

) (

:
) ( : "COBB-DOUGLAS124

:
) ( : ) ( : ) ( : : : . 1
: -

L :s :E - .

: :

:
)

:
-

: .

123

:
:

:
)

( )
.

:
:
() ) (HESTON, SUMMERS, & ATEN, 2009
2009 2005
1960
2007
() ) (COHEN & SOTO, 2007 ( )BARRO & LEE,
1960 2007
126

:
:
: 0.8 1 : ( 1.2 1 )
: 0.35 : () 0.4 0.7 0.5
: s ) (PSACHAROPOULOS & PATRINOS, 2002
( 1.6 )
MENA %10
.


1..6 .

122

:
. 7.6 1968 2007

1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007

)( Yst1
1.615
1.675
1.736
1.843
1.956
2.076
2.203
2.338
2.482
2.634
2.795
2.967
3.149
3.289
3.435
3.588
3.747
3.914
4.088
4.27
4.459
4.658
4.865
4.997
5.132
5.271
5.414
5.561
5.712
5.867
6.026
6.189
6.357
6.44
6.523
6.608
6.694
6.78
6.868
6.957

)(ht2
1.175
1.182
1.190
1.202
1.216
1.231
1.246
1.263
1.282
1.301
1.322
1.345
1.370
1.389
1.410
1.432
1.455
1.479
1.505
1.533
1.562
1.593
1.627
1.648
1.671
1.694
1.718
1.744
1.770
1.798
1.827
1.857
1.888
1.904
1.920
1.936
1.953
1.970
1.987
2.005

)rgdpworkt3($
15598.020
16763.481
18279.435
15434.695
18991.794
18832.725
19025.520
18289.918
18766.911
19686.633
21242.488
22352.612
21434.974
20766.639
21665.228
21986.441
22487.774
22396.083
21850.484
21117.999
20053.665
19670.291
19077.353
18183.262
17427.395
16243.458
15247.036
15094.432
15182.761
14681.629
14943.520
14826.750
14551.486
14381.186
14495.422
15117.669
15408.961
15799.030
15522.071
15630.233

)SKt4(%
27.281
31.035
35.452
37.541
32.530
37.680
49.581
57.018
51.962
60.615
63.842
54.749
56.486
60.476
57.039
56.630
55.236
56.095
47.139
37.141
40.166
41.006
38.471
34.941
31.889
30.570
32.323
31.368
28.658
27.274
31.080
29.545
26.979
30.059
32.566
32.503
34.465
35.099
34.477
36.742

)Kt5($
1053.628
1265.693
1548.780
1383.107
1477.495
1702.567
2268.325
2515.980
2350.703
2886.955
3288.700
2961.615
2935.608
3071.650
3024.315
3055.746
3057.786
3112.266
2609.658
2032.728
2137.558
2194.406
2046.829
1815.023
1625.785
1492.095
1523.572
1505.272
1424.845
1347.072
1603.352
1547.067
1418.231
1605.812
1790.140
1894.937
2084.351
2208.153
2167.516
2359.419

)( YSdt6
1.4430
1.5260
1.6150
1.7080
1.8060
1.9100
2.0200
2.1360
2.2650
2.4030
2.5480
2.7030
2.8670
3.0050
3.1500
3.3020
3.4620
3.6290
3.7870
3.9530
4.1250
4.3060
4.4940
4.6100
4.7290
4.8520
4.9770
5.1060
5.2280
5.3520
5.4800
5.6110
5.7440
5.8160
5.8890
5.9620
6.0360
6.1110
6.1870
6.2650

)( hdt7
1.1552
1.1649
1.1753
1.1862
1.1979
1.2104
1.2238
1.2381
1.2543
1.2716
1.2903
1.3103
1.3320
1.3505
1.3703
1.3913
1.4136
1.4375
1.4604
1.4848
1.5106
1.5381
1.5673
1.5856
1.6047
1.6244
1.6449
1.6663
1.6867
1.7078
1.7298
1.7525
1.7762
1.7889
1.8019
1.8152
1.8287
1.8425
1.8566
1.8710

:)1( (COHEN & SOTO, 2007) :)1(: ()1


((HESTON, SUMMERS, & ATEN, 2009) :)6 3 4 ( )2 ( )2 (.)2

122

:
. 1.6

YSdt
7
6

4
3
YSDt
2

1
0
2006

2004

2002

2000

1998

1996

1994

1992

1990

1988

1986

1984

1982

1980

1978

1976

1974

1972

1970

1968

: .
. 2.6
25.000

20.000

)rgdpworkt($

10.000

)Kt($
5.000

0.000
1968
1970
1972
1974
1976
1978
1980
1982
1984
1986
1988
1990
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006

: .

121

15.000

:

1621 1..2
( )%6.12
( )%11.31 %6.13


.
1622

%64.62
%12.22 %11843
.1621
1612 ()+%41.43
( )+%4.62
1612
(% 142.41)
(%4.46) .
1662
1664

126

:
(% 4.4.)
( )+%13.2. %1. .1612
( )1..2
()+%..26 ( ) %23.12
%21.11
(%32.32)( . )

. 8.6 ( 1968 ) 2007

1968

()%

9.8651

1977
4.9008

1987
-3.3523

1997
-3.3007

2007
0.6968

()%

0.6343

2.6450

0.1332

-0.4616

0.5176

0.5080

0.8989

1.0842

0.8154

0.5030

8.7228

1.3569

-4.5697

-3.6545

-0.3238

100

100

100

100

100

()%

6.4301

53.9714

3.9740

-13.9848

74.2798

5.1493

18.3412

32.3428

24.7037

72.1810

88.4207

-46.4608 -110.7189 -136.3168 27.6873

: .

11.

:
. 3.6
25.00

20.00
15.00
10.00
%

5.00
GDP per worker growth
2010

2005

2000

1995

1990

1980

1985

1975

1970

0.00
1965
-5.00

-10.00
-15.00
-20.00

: .
. 4.6
3.50
3.00
2.50
2.00
Cap Stock Growth
1.00

Human Capital Growth

0.50

2010

2000

1990

1980

: .

111

1970

0.00
1960
-0.50
-1.00

1.50

:
. 5.6
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
Cap Stock Growth
Human Capital Growth

TFP growth

2010

2000

1990

1980

1970

0.00
1960
-5.00

5.00

-10.00
-15.00
-20.00

: .
. 6.6
2006
2003
2000
1997
1994
1991

Cap Stock Growth

1988

Human Capital Growth

1985

TFP growth

1982
1979
1976
1973
1970
1967
100%

50%

: .

111

0%

-50%

-100%

:
. 7.6
2006
2003
2000
1997
1994
1991
Cap Stock Growth

1988

Human Capital Growth

1985

TFP growth

1982
1979
1976
1973
1970
1967
30.00

20.00

10.00

0.00

-10.00

-20.00

: .


(1621 )1..2

%1.21 % 1621 %121.26 .1616

114

:
. 8.6
1.40
1.20

1.00

0.60

Human Capital Growth

0.80

0.40
0.20

2010

2000

1980
1990

1970

0.00
1960

: .
. 9.6
300.00
275.00
250.00
225.00
200.00
150.00
Human Capital Growth

125.00
100.00
75.00
50.00
25.00
0.00
2010

2000

1980
1990

: .

113

1970

-25.00 1960

175.00

:

1621 1..2

( ).

( 4. %26
) %6. %1. %1.
% 16 %1. %4. %12.6.
%3. %6.% %. %1. %11.6. %2.6.
%4..%3.
%6.
1. ( %16 )
%11.6. :
%6. %6 %26 %26 %1.. % 2.6 ( %1.. 4
: 1616 %121.26 1662
%142..6 1666 .%1.6.32

116

:
. 9.6

0 %00

12.50%

12.50%

00 %00

10

25.00%

37.50%

00 %00

17.50%

55.00%

00 %00

7.50%

62.50%

00 %00

12.50%

75.00%

00 %00

2.50%

77.50%

10

00 %00

5.00%

82.50%

00 %00

5.00%

87.50%

00 %00

5.00%

92.50%

00 %000

0.00%

92.50%

11

%000

7.50%

100.00%

40

100%

. 10.6 ()

0 %00

18

45.00%

45.00%

00 %00

12

30.00%

75.00%

00 %00

12.50%

87.50%

00 %000

5.00%

92.50%

%000

7.50%

100.00%

40

100%

112

:

( 1621 )1622 %4.22
%33.22
%42.14 .%12.61

( 1621 )1612
% ..21
(%112.14) .

(1611 )1662
(%4.63)

(%..12) (%3826)
(%111..6)
%16.13
.
( 1661 )1..2
%..23
%61.11 %11.21
(%3.61).

112

:
. 11.6 ( )

00000000

()%

3.7692

00000000
0.7800

00000000
-3.5454

00000000
0.6465

()%

1.6878

1.5362

-0.1699

0.0823

0.6780

1.0154

0.9163

0.5960

1.4034

-1.7716

-4.2918

-0.0318

100

100

100

100

()%

44.7781

196.9546

-4.7930

12.7266

17.9880

130.1808

25.8452

92.1883

37.2339

-227.1354

-121.0522

-4.9149





( 1..2 )11

111

:
:

:
)(LUCAS, 1988


(LUCAS,

) 1988 :
)

( : ( ).

) (LUCAS, 1988 :
)

116

:
(

( .

)(modle 1
)

:
:
: )%10( 0.1
.

16.

:
. 12.6
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

0.011637

0.001986

5.860081

0.0000

lnyst

0.001358

0.001375

0.988010

0.3294

R-squared

0.025045

Mean dependent var

0.013497

Adjusted R-squared

-0.000612

S.D. dependent var

0.003979

S.E. of regression

0.003980

Sum squared resid

0.000602

: .EViews 5.0
. 10.6
2.5

1.5
lnYSt
lnYSt

0.5

2010

2000

1980

1990

: .

161

1970

0
1960

:
. 11.6
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
lnht 0.4
lnht

0.3
0.2
0.1

2010

2000

1980

1990

1970

0
1960

: .
. 12.6
0.025

0.02

0.015
dlnht
lnht

0.01

0.005

2010

2000

1980

1990

: .

161

1970

0
1960

:
. 13.6
0.025

0.02

0.015

y = 0.0014x + 0.0116
R = 0.025

dlnht

lnht

0.01

)Linaire (lnht

0.005

0
2

2.5

1.5

0.5

: .



) (LUCAS, 1988
:
)

:
)

:
)(modle 2

164

:

%66
.
. 13.6
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

0.003489

0.001342

2.600530

0.0133

lnyst

0.040269

0.004015

10.02932

0.0000

lnht

-0.104311

0.010583

-9.856077

0.0000

R-squared

0.731082

Mean dependent var

0.013497

Adjusted R-squared

0.716545

S.D. dependent var

0.003979

S.E. of regression

0.002118

Sum squared resid

0.000166

hg

: .EViews 5.0

:
)

(
))(FLDVRI & VAN LEEUWEN, 2006
)


%66
.
)) (modle 3

163

:
. 14.6
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

-0.013607

0.002907

-4.680590

0.0000

lnyst

0.048119

0.005045

9.537154

0.0000

(lnyst)

-0.018605

0.001985

-9.374443

0.0000

R-squared

0.711136

Mean dependent var

0.013497

Adjusted R-squared

0.695522

S.D. dependent var

0.003979

S.E. of regression

0.002195

Sum squared resid

0.000178

: .EViews 5.0

[ ( )-0.104311

( ])-0.018605
"
) (LUCAS, 1988
.
. 14.6
0.025
0.02
0.015
dlnht

lnht
)Poly. (lnht

0.01
-0.0186x2

+ 0.0481x - 0.0136
R = 0.7111

=y
0.005
0

2.5

1.5

: .

166

0.5

:


.


" "
( )X( )Y

( )X( )Y

( )X( )Y

) (MIGNON, 2008, p. 306
).(ARAUJ, BRUN, & COMBES, 2008, pp. 136-146

. ()
()Unit Root
) I(0
162

:
( )d ()d
)(MIGNON, I(d

).2008, pp. 268-276



( )Augmented Dickey-Fuller test :ADF, 1981
.
( )ADF
:
: :

: :

: .
: :


:
162

:
( ) : (
( ) : (

.)
.)

( )ADF
McKinnon 1996



.

2005
(

) (

( )ADF %1 %5 %10
:

161

:
. 15.6
ADF

0.6027

0.0007

-0.213704

-5.365928

lnrgdpwork

0.8077

*prob

-0.800037

Test Statistic values


Test critical values at:

-2.627238

-4.273277

-3.615588

1% level

-1.949856

-3.557759

-2.941145

5% level

-1.611469

-3.212361

-2.609066

10% level

: )*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.( EViews 5.0


. 16 . 6

ADF

0.3934

0.9815

0.0013

-0.730666

-0.455507

-4.37606

lnys

*prob
Test Statistic values
Test critical values at:

-2.627238

-4.219126

-3.615588

1% level

-1.949856

-3.533083

-2.941145

5% level

-1.611469

-3.198312

-2.609066

10% level

: )*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.( EViews 5.0


166

:
( I).

.

( )Johansan Cointegration Test,1988, 1991, 1995
()
( )Maximum Likelihood :
( )Trace test " " ( ) test :
)

) (

()
( )q
( )q ()r
( Maximal

)Eigen value test :


)


( )r
(.)r+1
( )lnrgdpwork
( )lnYS 1621 1..2
4..

:
). %5
)
. 17 . 6
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)

Prob.**

0.05
Critical Value

Trace
Statistic

Eigenvalue

Hypothesized
No. of CE(s)

0.0000
0.0073

15.49471
3.841466

75.61536
7.197558

0.826972
0.168524

None *
At most 1 *

Trace test indicates 2 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level


* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values
Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)

Prob.**

0.05
Critical Value

Max-Eigen
Statistic

Eigenvalue

Hypothesized
No. of CE(s)

0.0000
0.0073

14.26460
3.841466

68.41780
7.197558

0.826972
0.168524

None *
At most 1 *

Max-eigenvalue test indicates 2 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level


* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level
**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

EViews 5.0 :

) lnrgdpwork(
: 1..2 1621 ) lnYS(

:
4.1

:

:
:
:
)

:
: .
4.1

:

) (TOPEL, 1999) (COHEN & SOTO, 2007
)

( :
)

:
)

).(COHEN & SOTO, 2007

)(modle 4

(1621)1..2
( )1..6
( )1..6
) (HESTON, SUMMERS, & ATEN, 2009
(16 23) ) (COHEN & SOTO, 2007 :

4.4

:

(( )0.247 )
( )=0.33

( )0.495
(1968 . )2007
. 18.6
Coefficient

Std. Error

t-Statistic

Prob.

9.981242

0.146690

68.04298

0.0000

-0.039204

0.020036

-1.956641

0.0582

Lnskt

0.495649

0.067875

7.302399

0.0000

YSt

0.247466

0.136306

1.815513

0.0778

R-squared

0.759433

Mean dependent var

9.784612

Adjusted R-squared

0.739386

S.D. dependent var

0.152928

S.E. of regression

0.078071

Sum squared resid

0.219421

: .EViews 5.0

4.3



()

(1968 )2007 .


%2.78 % 1972 %268.75 .1985
()lnrgdpwork
( )lnYS 1621 1..2
.%5

( )0.247
( )=0.33

( )0.495

( 1968 .)2007

4.6





( ).
) (SCHULTZ, 1961, pp. 9-11
:



" :
( )
"). (SCHULTZ, 1961

:

4.2

:
-


( )

:









.



...
.

4.2

:


.
( )

.






.
(
) %87 :
( )OCDE 2004 %68.5 WEI 2004

%63 %35
%2 .

:

4.1

:



( )...


( )






.


.



( )162.

.
4.6

:
:
:

.

:

:
1621 162. 1621 1666 .1662
( )

(
)


( )1..6 1... 1666
.1..6

41.

:




.


:



.

.


:

) (LUCAS, 1988

(BARRO R. , 1991) (LUCAS, 1988) :
)(MANKIW, ROMER, & WEIL, 1992
411

& (BASSANINI

:
) (COHEN & SOTO, 2007) SCARPETTA, 2001
)PRITCHETT( (BENHABIB & SPIEGEL, 1994
(ISLAM, 1995) )1666



1%6

&

(DEBANDE

)VANDENBERGHE, 2008, pp. 68-69



1968 2007
:


%2.78 % 1972
%268.75 1985

( )lnrgdpwork ( )lnYS
1621 1..2
%5




411

:
( )0.247

( )0.495
(1968.)2007





(
) ( )
.



( )

.

414


:
.1 .)1997( .97 .
(www.uis.unesco.org/publications/isced97) .

.2 .)2007( .
. . : .
.3 .)1999( . .
: .

.4 .)2005( . .
.5 .)1999( . (
) . :.

.6 .)1..2( . : .
: .

.7 .)2002( . .:
.

.8 .)1967( . :
( )( .
) : .

.9 .)2000( . . :
.
413

:
.10 .)1991( . .
()
( .)42-41 : .

.11 .)2008( .
( ) . : .
.12 .)2005( . . :
.

.13 .)2002( .
. : .
.14 .)2004( . (
) . : .
.15 .)1968( . ( ) . :
.
.16 .)2003( . . :
.

.17 .)2003( . :
- - . : .
.18 .)1992( . : .
: .

.19 .)2000( . : .
: .

.20 ( . .)2007 2 . )61( 6


1.11

416

.21 .)2007( . : 2007


. . :
.

.22 .)2005( .
. :.
.23 01( . .)2009 2
. .

.24 .)1986( . (.)1986-1984


.

.16 .)1991( . : ( .
) )1( 20 99 .108

:
1. AGERON, C. R. (1999). Histoire de l'Algrie contemporaine,
1830-1999 (d. 11me dition corrig, (1re dition,1964)). Paris,
France: ditions Presses Universitaires de France.
2. AGHION, P., & HOWITT, P. (2000). Thorie de la croissance
endogne. (F. MAZEROLLE, Trans.) Paris, France: Les ditions
Dunod.
3. ARAUJ, C., BRUN, J. F., & COMBES, J. L. (2008). Economtrie
(d. 2 dition). (M. MONTOUSSE, d.) Rosny, France: Les
Editions Bral.
4. AREZKI, D. (2004). L'enseignement en Algrie : l'envers du
dcor. Paris, France: dition Atlantica-Sguier.
5. ARROW, K. J. (1973). Higher education as a filter. Journal of
Public Economics , 2 (3), 193-216.

412

6. BAKOUCHE, S. (2009). La relation ducation-dveloppement.


Alger, Algrie: Office des Publications Universitaires.
7. BARKA, M. Z. (1988). Dpenses publiques et dveloppement: le
cas de l'Algreie. Paris: Universit Paris 10.
8. BARRO, R. (1991). Economic Growth in a Cross Section of
Countries. Quarterly , 151 (2), 407-443.
9. BARRO, R. J. (2000). Les facteurs de la croissance conomique.
(S. PFLIEGER, & X. GREFFE, Trads.) Paris, France: ditions
Economica.
10. BARRO, R., & LEE, J. (1993). International comparaisons of
Educational attainments. Journal of Monetary Economics , 32 (3),
363-394.
11. BARRO, R., & LEE, J. (1996, May). International measures of
schooling years and schooling quality. American Economic
Review, 218-223.
12. BARRO, R., & LEE, J. (2001, July). International Data on
Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications. Oxford
University Press , 53 (3), pp. 541-63.
13. BARRO, R. J., & SALA-I-MARTIN, X. (1996). La croissance
conomique. (F. MAZEROLLE, Trad.) Paris: Les ditions
Ediscience International et McGraw-Hill Book.
14. BASSANINI, A., & SCARPETTA, S. (2001). Does Human
Capital Matter for Growth in OECD Countries?: Evidence from
Pooled Mean-Group Estimates. OECD Economics, Department
Working Papers. Paris: OECD.
15. BAUMOL, W., BATEY BLACKMAN, S. A., & WOLF, E.
(1989). Productivity and American leadership: the long view. MIT
Press.
16. BECKER, G. S. (1964). Human Capital : A Theoretical and
Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education (d. 1er
2dition). New York: ditions Columbia University Press.
17. BECKER, G. S. (1967). Human Capital and the Personal
Distribution of Income: An Analytical Approach. (U. o. Press, d.)
Michigan: Institute of Public Administration.

412

18. BECKER, G. S. (1993). Human Capital: A Theoretical and


Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
19. BENARAB, A. (1997). Etude des couts de lefficacit du systme
universitaire algrien : le cas de luniversit de Constantine. Thse
de doctorat, Dijon.
20. BENARAB, A. (2010). Le cout de l'ducation de l'lve en
Algerie. Constantine, Algerie: BAHAEDDINE EDITIONS.
21. BENARD, J. (1985). Economie Publique. Paris: Economica.
22. BENGHABRIT-REMAOUN, N. (2001). Ecole & Religion. Dans
A. Mahiou, & J.-R. Henry, Ou va l'Algrie (p. 300). Paris:
KARTHALA.
23. BENHABIB, J., & SPIEGEL, M. M. (1994). The Role of Human
Capital in Economic Development : Evidence from Aggregate
Cross-Country Data. Journal of Monetary Economics , 34, 143179.
24. BERTALANFFY,
L.
V.
(1968).
General
syteme
theory:Foundation,
Developpement
Applications.
(G.
BRAZILLER, Trad.) New York: ditions DUNOD.
25. BILEK, A. (2006). conomie politique des dterminants des
dpenses publiques d'ducation : analyses thoriques et empiriques
appliques au cas franais. (U. P. 1, d.) Paris, Paris, France: non
publier.
26. BLAUG, M. (1992). La mthodologie conomique (d. 2). Paris,
France: Les ditions Economica.
27. BOURDIEU, P., & PASSERON, J.-C. (1970). La Reproduction.
Elments pour une thorie du systme d'enseignement. Paris,
France: ditions de Minuit.
28. BOUSLIMANI, A. (2003). Elments pour une caractrisation
conomique du contenu qualitatif du dveloppement. Une analyse
partir de la relation ducation-croissance en Algrie (18752000). Montpellier: Universit de Montpellier I.
29. BUISSON, F. (2007, 06 01). Nouveau dictionnaire de pdagogie et
d'instruction primaire - Edition de 1911. (INRP, d.) France:
INRP.

411

30. CARRE, J.-J., DUBOIS, P., & MALINVAUD, E. (1972). La


croissance franaise, un essai d'analyse conomique causale de
l'aprs-guerre. Paris, France: Les Editions du Seuil.
31. CASTLES, F. G. (1989). Explaining public education expenditure
in OECD nations. European Journal of Political Research , 17 (4),
pp. 431-448.
32. CAYETTE, J. L. (1983). Qualification et hirarchie des salaires;
Ed. ECONOMICA, 1983, P. 32. Paris, France: Les ditions
Economica.
33. Champy, P., & Eteve, C. (1995). Dictionnaire encyclopdique de
l'ducation et de la formation (d. 3). Avon, France: Retz.
34. COHEN, D., & SOTO, M. (2001). Growth and Human Capital:
Good Data, Good Results. Paris: OCDE.
35. COHEN, D., & SOTO, M. (2007). Growth and human capital:
good data, good results. (Springer, Ed.) Journal of Economic
Growth , 12 (1), 51-76.
36. DANDURAND, P. (1971, Novembre). Essai sur l'ducation et le
pouvoir. Sociologie et socit , 3 (2), pp. 12-20.
37. DEBANDE, O., & VANDENBERGHE, V. (2008). Investir dans le
capital humain: comprendre les ressorts d'une dcision
individuelle & sociale. Louvain-la-neuve, Belgique: Les ditions
Bruylant-Academia.
38. DE LA FUENTE, A., & DONENECH, R. (2000). Human Capital
in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality
Make. OECD , OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
Paris: OECD.
39. DE LA FUENTE, A., & DOMENECH, R. (2006). Human Capital
in Growth Regressions: How Much Difference Does Data Quality
Make? Journal of the European Economic Association , 4 (1), 136.
40. De MERDEIROS, O. R., & BARCELOS, C. L. (2007, January
25). Explaining Public Expenditures in Education: An Empirical
Analysis in Brazilian Municipalities. (SSRN, Ed.) Retrieved juin
08,
2008,
from
SSRN:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID958852_code35
5686.pdf?abstractid=958852&mirid=1

416

41. DENISON, E. F. (1962). The Sources of Economic Growth.


Washington: The Brooking Institution.
42. DENISON, E. F. (1964). La mesure de la contribution de
l'enseignement a la croissance conomique. Paris, France: OCDE.
43. DJOUDI, K. (1993). La politique de l'enseignement suprieur en
Algrie: analyse conomique. Dijon: Universit de Bourgogne.
44. DONNADIEU, G. (1997). Maneger avec le social l'approche
systmique applique l'entreprise. Paris, France: ditions
Liaisons.
45. DONNADIEU, G., & KARSKY, M. (2002). La systmique, penser
et agir dans la complixit. Paris, France: ditions Liaisons.
46. DURKHEIM, E. (1922). ducation et sociologie. Paris, France.
47. EICHER, J.-C. (1960). La rentabilit de linvestissement humain.
Revue conomique (4), pp. 577-608.
48. EICHER, J.-C. (1973, Mai-Juin). L'ducation comme
investissement, la fin des illusions. Revu de l'conomie politique ,
pp. 416-419.
49. EICHER, J. C. (1990). l'Education de l'Education. Dans
Encyclopdie conomique (Vol. 2, pp. 1307-1340). Paris:
Economica.
50. EICHER, J.-C., LEVY-GARBOUA, L., & AL. (1979).
Economique de l'Education. Paris, France: Les ditions
Economica.
51. FALCH, T., & RATTSO, J. (1997). Political economic determinant
of school spending in federal states: Theory and time-series
evidence. European Journal of Political Economy , 13, pp.299314.
52. FALCH, T., & RATTSO, J. (1999). Local public choice of school
spending:. disaggregating the demand function for educational
services. Economics of Education Review , 18, 361-373.
53. FAURE, E., & al. (1972). Apprendre etre. Paris: Unesco.
54. FERNANDEZ, R., & ROGERSON, R. (1997). The Determinants
of Public Education Expenditures: Evidence from the States, 19501990. C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York

41.

University. 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138,


U.S.A.: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
55. FERNEX, A. (1996, Decembre 23). Relations conomiques
systme ducatif / systme productif. thse de doctorat en sciences
conomiques UPMF sous la direction de Michel VIGEZZI .
Grenoble, France.
56. FLAMHOLTZ, E., & LACEY, J. (1981). Personnel Management,
Human Capital Theory, and Human Resource Accounting.
Industrial Relations Monograph Series (27) . California, Los
Angles: University of California.
57. FOULQUIE, P. (1971). Dictionnaire de la langue pdagogique.
Paris, France: PUF.
58. Fondation europenne pour la formation. (2001). Pratiques et
dispositifs de formation des formateurs en Algrie. EU, Rgion
Mditerrane. Turin: Fondation europenne pour la formation.
59. FREEMAN, R. B. (1986, march). Demand for Education. (O. A.
Layard, Ed.) Handbook of Labor Economics , Vol.I (1), pp. 357386.
60. FRIEDMAN, M. (1955). The Role of Government in Education.
(R. U. Press, d.) Economics and Public Interst , 123-144.
61. G.R.R.E.C. (1983). Crise et rgulation. Recueil de textes.
Grenoble: D.R.U.G.
62. Garant, M., & Scieur, P. S. (2001). Organisation & systeme de
formation (d. Premire dition ). Bruxelles, Belgique: De Boeck
Universit.
63. GINTIS, H. (1971). Education, technology and worker
productivity. American Economic Review , 61 (2), 266-271.
64. GRAVOT, P. (1993). Economie de l'ducation. Paris, France:
ECONOMICA.
65. GRILICHES, Z. (1996). The discovery of the residual: A historical
note. Journal of Economic Literature , 34 (3), 1324-1330.
66. GUELLEC, D., & RALLE, P. (2001). Les nouvelles thories de la
croissance (d. 4e dition, Vol. 161). (Repres, d.) Paris, France:
Les ditions La decouverte.

411

67. HANUSHEK, E. A., & KIMKO, D. D. (2000). Schooling, LaborForce Quality, and the Growth of Nations. American Economic
Review , 90 (5), 1184-120.
68. HARBISON, F., & MEYERS, C. A. (1964). Education, manpower
and economic growth. strategies of human resource development.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
69. HECKMAN, J. J., LOCHNER, L. J., & TODD, P. E. (2006).
Earnings Functions, Rates of Return, and Treatment Effects: The
Mincer Equation and Beyond. (E. Hanushek, & F. Welch, Eds.)
Handbook of the Economics of Education , 01, pp. 307-458.
70. HENNI, A. (1987). La mise en oeuvre de l'option scientifique et
technique en Algerie: le systme d'enseignement et de formation.
(C. d. Dveloppement, d.) Alger: C.R.E.A.D.
71. HEROLD, P., KHAN, Q., & REIFF, H. (1983). Public Expenditure
on Education in Countries of Asia and the Pacific: Goals, Trends:
1970-1980 and future Prospects. UNESCO. Paris: UNESCO.
72. HESTON, A., SUMMERS, R., & ATEN, B. (2009). Penn World
Table Version 6.3. Income and Prices at the University of
Pennsylvania, Center for International Comparisons of Production.
Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania.
73. HOUSSAYE, J. (2000). Thorie et pratiques de l'ducation
scolaire: le triangle pdagogique (d. 3). Berne: Peter Lang.
74. HUANYIN, Y. (1993, mars-juin). Confucius. (B. I. l'ducation,
d.) Perspectives , XXIII (1-2), pp. 215-223.
75. HUGON, P. (2005). La scolarisation et lducation : facteurs de
croissance ou catalyseurs du dveloppement ? Mondes en
dveloppement , 33 (132), pp. 13-18.
76. HUMMEL, C. (1993, mars-juin). Aristote. (B. i. d'ducation, d.)
Perspectives , XXIII (1-2), pp. 37-50.
77. ISLAM, N. (1995). Growth Empirics : A Panel Data Approach.
Quarterly Journal of Economics , 110 (4), 1127-1170.
78. JACQUIER, J. Y. (1993). L'espace national, un espace de
rgulation spcifique. In M. BEL, & R. s. TORTAJADA, Europe,
formation & citoyennet d'entreprise. Paris: ditions Minerve.

411

79. JAROUSSE, J.-P., & MINGAT, A. (1986). Un rexamen du


modle de gains de Mincer. Revue conomique (6), pp. 999-1031.
80. JOHES, C. I. (2000). Thorie de la croissance endogne. (F.
MAZEROLLE, Trad.) Bruxelles, Belgique: Les ditions De Boeck
Universit.
81. KATEB, K. (2005). Ecole, Population et socit en Algrie. Paris,
France: ditions L'Harmattan.
82. KRUEGER, A. B., & LINDAHL, M. (2001). Education for
Growth: Why and for Whom? (A. E. Association, d.) Journal of
Economic Literature , 39 (4), 1101-1136.
83. KYRIACOU, G. (1991). Level and growth effects of human
capital, A cross-country study of the. New York: New York
University.
84. LACOSTE, I. (2005). Education et croissance: une tude
emprique partir de donnes franaises au XXe sicle. Paris,
France: Les ditions ECONOMICA.
85. LANDAU, D. (1986). Government and economic growth in the
less developed countries: an empirical study for 196080.
Economic Development and Cultural Change (35), 3575.
86. LAROCHE, M., MERETTE, M., & RUGGERI, G. C. (1999). On
the Concept and Dimensions of Human Capital in a Knowldge
Based Economy Context. (C. U. Montral, d.) Canadian Public
Policy , 25 (1), 87-100.
87. LAU, L., BHALLA, S., & LOUAT, F. (1991). Humanand physical
capital stock in developing countries:construction of data and
trend. Woeld Bank.
88. LECAILLON, J. D., LE PAGE, J. M., OTTAVJ, C., &
GRANGEAS, G. (1995). MACRO-DYNAMIQUE : La croissance
cours et exercices corrigs. Paris, Paris: Les Editions CUJA.
89. LESOURNE, J. (1988). Education & societ: les dfis de l'an
2000. paris: La Decouverte.
90. LUCAS, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic
development. Journal of Monetary Economics , 22 (1), 3-42.
91. LUGAN, J. C. (2004). La sytmique sociale (d. 4 dition). Paris:
dition PUF collection Que sais-je?

414

92. LUNDVALL, B. A., & JOHNSON, B. (1994). The Learning


Economy. Journal of Industry Studies , 1 (2), 23-42.
93. MACHLUP, F. (1984). KNOWLEDGE: ITS CREATION,
DISTRIBUTION, AND ECONOMIC The Economics of Information
and Human Capital. (P. U. Press, Ed.) USA: Princeton University
Press.
94. MANKIW, N. G., ROMER, D., & WEIL, D. N. (1992). A
contribution of empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journa of
Economivsl , Vol. 107 (Issue 2), 407-437.
95. MARGIRIER, G. (1999). Introduction l'conomie de l'ducation.
Grenoble, France.
96. MARSHALL, A. (1890). Principes d'conomie politique (Vol.
livres IV). (F. Savaires Jurdan, Trad.) Qubec, Qubec, Canada:
Universite de Chicoutimi.
97. MICHEL, S. (1999). Education et croissance conomique en
longue priode. Paris, France: Les ditions L'HARMATTAN.
98. MIGNON, V. (2008). ECONOMETRIE: Thorie & application.
(H. KEMPF, d.) Paris, France: Les ditions ECONOMICA.
99. MINCER, J. (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal
Income Distribution. Journal of Political Economy , 66, 281-302.
100.
MOUSSAOUI, A. (2004). La gouvernance des systmes
universitaire : le cas de lAlgrie. Thse de doctorat, Constantine.
101.
MORIN, E. (1991). La mthode (d. 2e dition, Vol. IV).
Paris, France: ditions Seuil.
102.
NEHRU, V., SWANSON, E., & DUBEY, A. (1995). A new
data base on human capital stock in developing and indistrial
countries: sources, methodology and reults. Journal of development
Economics , 46 (2), 379-401.
103.
OCDE. (1996a). Measuring what people Know: Human
Capital Accounting for The Knowledge Economy. Paris: Editions
de lOCDE.
104.
OCDE. (1996b). Mesurer le capital humain: Vers une
comptabilit du savoir acquis. Paris: OCDE.
105.
OCDE. (1998). L'investissement dans le capital humain: une
comparaison internationale. Paris: Editions de l'OCDE.

413

106.
OCDE. (2001a). Du bien tre des nation: le rle du capital
humain et social -enseignement et comptences -. Paris: Editions de
l'OCDE.
107.
OCDE. (2001b). Mesurer la productivit: MESURER LA
CROISSANCE, DE LA PRODUCTIVIT PAR SECTEUR ET
POUR LENSEMBLE DE LCONOMIE. Paris: OCDE.
108.
OCDE. (2007a). Regards sur lducation : Les indicateurs
de lOCDE. Paris: OCDE.
109.
OCDE. (2007b). Le capital humain: comment le savoir
dtermine notre vie. (B. EELEY, Ed.) Paris, France: Les ditions
de l'OCDE.
110.
OCDE. (2007c). Guide de lOCDE pour ltablissement de
statistiques internationalement comparables dans le domaine de
lducation
:CONCEPTS,
NORMES,
DFINITIONSET
CLASSIFICATIONS. Paris: OCDE.
111.
ONS. (1985). Lencadrement
professionnelle en 1980. Statistique .

dans

la

formation

112.
ORIVEL, F. (2005). Les conomistes et lducation . Dans J.
BEILLEROT, & N. MOSCONI, Trait des Sciences et des
Pratiques de lEducation. Paris: les ditions Dunod.
113.
O'ROURKE, M. (2000, avril 28). WEF ( Dossier de Presse :
SUJETS BRULANTS : Qui finance l'ducation). Consult le mars
23, 2005.
(sur site : www.unesco.org: http://www.unesco.org/education/wef/frpress/fr_press-kit_eco.shtm#top).
114.
PAGE, A. (1971). L'conomie de l'ducation. Paris: Presses
Universitaires de France.
115.
PAUL, J. J. (2008). l'conomie de l'ducation permet-elle de
ligitimer l'obligation des rsultats. Dans C. Lessard, & P. Meirieu,
L'obligation de rsultats en ducation: volutions, perspectives et
enjeux internationaux (d. 2me dition, pp. 79-88). Bruxelles,
Belgique: De Boeck Universit.
116.
PERVILL, G. (1984). Les tudiants algeriens de l'universit
franaise: 1880-1962. Paris, France: ditions du centre national de
la recherche scientifique.

416

117.
POCZTAR, J. (1989). Analyse systmique de l'ducation.
Paris, France: Les ditions ESF.
118.
PORCHER, L. (2008). L'ducation compare pour
aujourd'hui et pour demain. Paris, France: ditions L'harmattan.
119.
POTERBA, J. M. (1997). Demographic Structure and the
Political Economy of Public Education. Journal of Public Policy
and Management , 16 (1), pp. 48-66.
120.
PRITCHETT, L. (1995). Where has all Education Gone?
Washington: The World Bank.
121.
PSACHAROPOULOS, G., & ARRIAGADA, A. M. (1986,
September-October). The Educational Composition of the Labour
Force: An International Comparison. International Labour Review
, 125 (5), pp. 561-574.
122.
PSACHAROPOULOS, G., & PATRINOS, H. (2002).
Returns to investment in education: a further update. World Bank
Policy Research . Washington: World Bank.
123.
ROEMER, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge:
Harvard University. Press.
124.
ROMER, P. (1990). Endgenous Technological Change.
Journal of Political Economy , 98 (5, part 2), 71-102.
125.
ROMER, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run
Growth. Journal of Political Economy , 94 (5), 1002-1037.
126.
ROSNAY, J. d. (1975). Le macroscope : Vers une vision
globale. Paris, France: ditions Le Seuil.
127.
ROSTOW, W. W. (1960). The stages of economic growth : a
non-Communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
128.
SAMUELSON, P. A. (1986). L'conomique (Vol. 1). (c. U,
d.) Paris: ditions Armand Colin.
129.
SAY, J. B. (1803). Trait d'conomie politique. Qubec,
Qubec, canada: Universit de Chicoutimi.
130.
SCHULTZ, T. W. (1960). Capital formation by Education.
Journal of Political Economy (6).

412

131.
SCHULTZ, T. W. (1961). Investment in Human Capital.
American Economic Review , 51 (1), 1-17.
132.
SCHULTZ, T. W. (1963). The Economic value of Education.
New York: Columbia University Press.
133.
SCHULTZ, T. W. (1983). Il n'est de richesse que l'homme:
Investissement humain et qualit de la population. Paris: Bonnel.
134.
SMITH, A. (1776). Recherches sur la nature et les causes de
la richesse des nations. (G. Garnier, Trad.) Qubec, Qubec,
Canada: Univesrit Chicoutimi.
135.
SOLOW, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of
Economic Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics , 70, 65-94.
136.
SOLOW, R. (1957). Technical change and the aggregate
production function. Review of Economies and Statitics , 39, 312320.
137.
SOLOW, R. (1972). Thorie de croissance conomique,
(1972), Ed. LIBRAIRIE ARMAND. (M. DESHONS, M.
GARRABE, J.-M. LAPORTE, & P. VIGNAU, Trads.) Paris,
France: Les ditions Librairie Armand Colin.
138.
SPENCE, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. Quarterly
Journal of Economics , 87 (3), 355374.
139.
SWAN, T. W. (1956). Economic Growth and Capital
Accumulation. Economic Record (32), 334-361.
140.
TCHIBOZO, G. (1999). UNE ACTUALISATION DE
LANALYSE DES DTERMINANTS DE LA DEMANDE
DDUCATION. Consult le janvier 25, 2005, sur http://cournot.ustrasbg.fr/beta/publications/1999/9916.pdf
141.
TEMPLE, J. (1998). Robustness tests of the augmented
Solow model. Journal of Applied Econometrics (13), 361375.
142.
THUROW, L. C. (1975). Generating Inequality:
Mechanisms of Distribution in the U.S. Economy . New York:
Basic Books.
143.
UISUNESCO. (1998). SISDE - Systme d'information
statistique sur les dpenses de l'ducation -. UNESCO, UIS. Paris:
UNESCO.

412

144.
UNESCO. (1971). World Survey of Education V. :
Educational policy, legislation and administration. Paris: UNSCO.
145.
UNESCO. (1977). Etude statistique sommaire
lducation dans le monde de 1960 1975. Paris: UNESCO.

sur

146.
UNESCO. (2000). World Education Report 2000 :The right
to education towards education for all throughout life. UNESCO.
Paris: UNESCO.
147.
UNESCO-UIS/OCDE. (2005). Education trends in
perspective: analysis of the world education indicators. Paris:
OCDE.
148.
UNESCO-UIS. (2007). Education Counts Benchmarking
Progress in 19 WEI Countries: World Education Indicators 2007
Monteral.UNESCO
Institute
for
statistics.
(www.uis.unesco.org/template/pdf/.../2007/WEI2007report.pdf)
149.
VAIZEY, J. (1964). Economie de l'ducation. Paris, France:
LES EDITION OUVRIERES.
150.
VERBINA, I., & CHOWDHURY, A. (2004). What
determines public education expenditures in Russia? (T. E.
Development, Ed.) Economics of Transition , 12 (3), pp. 489-508.
151.
YU, W. (2001). Examen des indicateurs de capital humain
existant. New Brunswick: Universite du New Brunswick.

:
1. Site de la banque mondiale : www.worldbank.org
2. Site de lUNESCO : www.unesco.org
3. Site de linstitut des statistiques de lUNESCO :
www.uis.unesco.org
4. Site de la FMI : www.fmi.org
5. Site de LONU : www.un.org
6. Site de lOCDE : www.ocde.org
7. Site du Ministre de lducation Nationale :
www.meducation.edu.dz/

411

:
8. Site du Ministre de lEnseignement Suprieur et de la
Recherche Scientifique : www.mesrs.dz/
9. Site du Ministre de la Formation et de l'Enseignement
Professionnels : www.mfp.gov.dz
10. Site du Journal Officiel de la Rpublique Algrienne
Dmocratique et Populaire : www.joradp.dz
11. Site de lONS : www.ons.dz

416

I ..................................................................................
II ............................................................................
III................................................................................
IV .................................................................
V ..................................................................
VI .........................................................................
IX ..........................................................................
XIV .....................................................................
XX .....................................................................

..................................................................

: :
1 ....... ................................
: 3 ........................
4 ..............................................................................
: 4 ..................................................

44.

:
: 3 ......................................
: 3 ..............................................
: 6 ...................................
: 2 ................................
: 6 ..........................................
: 6 .......................
: 14 ......
: 13 ......
: 16 .....
: 16 ............................
: 12 ..........................
: 11 ................................
: 20 .................................................
: 11 .........................................
: 11 .......................................
: 14 ............................
: 13 ....................... :
: 16 ................................
: 11 .................................
: 11 .......SCHULTZ

441

:
: BECKER

41 .....................................................................................
: 34 .....................................
: 43 .....................
: 43 ..............
: 46 ..................................................
: 42 ............................................
: "42 ............... "la theorie des attitudes
: "41 ..................... "La thorie du signal
: "46 ..................... "La thorie du filtre
34 ............................................................

: 45...........
45 ..................................................................................
: : 46 .......................................
: 32 .
: 32 ...............................
: 36 .............................
: 61 ..............................
: 63 ..................................
: 63 .....................
: 62 ...........................
441

:
: 62 ....................
: 60 .............................
:
(2. ............................................................................. )OCDE
:
(21 .............................................................. )OCDE
:
( )OCDE 24 ........................................
:
(21 ........................................................................ )WEI
: (21 .... )WEI
: (21)WEI
:
26 ....................................................................
: 79 ....................
: 26 .............................................
: 16 ................................ 2005-1990
94 ............................................................

444

:
: 96 ................................
: 98..................
61 ............................................................................
: 99 ...............................
: 66 ...........................................
: 66 ................................................
: 1.1 ...................................
: 1.4 ..........................
: 1.6 ..........................................
: 1.1 ...................
: 1.1 ...............
: 111 ................
: 113 .........................
: 115 ........................
: () 116 ............
: (112 ........................... :)1976 -1962
: (111 .............................. )2003-1976
: ( -2003 ) 116 ......................
443

:
: 11. ........................
: 113 .............
: 113 ......................
: 116 ...................
: 112 .......................
: 112 ......................
: 14. ................
:
132 ...................................................................................
: 141 ..................
: () 141 ...
: 141 .........................
: 141 ........
: 13. ...............
: 13. .....
: 133 ....
: 132 ...............
16. .........................................................

446

: :
152 .................................................
161 ..........................................................................
: 153 ................
: (1963164 ................................ )1970
: (1971161 .................................)1995
: 1996( :123 .............................. )2007
: 169 ..............................
: 126
: 126 ...........
: 121 .......
: 126 ..........
: 11. ..
: 185 .......................................
: 116 ...............................
:
111 ...............................................................................
:
111 ....................................................
:
164 .............................................................
442

:
: 166 .........
:
162 ............................................................................
:
166 ............................................................................
1.4 ..........................................................

:
: 205 ..... ................................
:
208 ..........................................................
1.1 ..........................................................................
: 209 .................................
: "1.6 ............... "SOLOW - SWAN
: 1.6 ......................................
: "11. ...... "SOLOW - SWAN
: " "SOLOW - SWAN 111 ....................
: " "SOLOW - SWAN
111 ...................................................................................
: " "SOLOW 113 .......................
: " "SOLOW-SWAN 112
442

:
: " "SOLOW - SWAN 111 ...........
: " "SOLOW - SWAN
116 ..............................................................................
: 11. .................................
: " "SOLOW- SWAN
111 ..............................................................................
: 224 ....................
: "113 ............ "SOLOW-SWAN
: "113 ............"SOLOW-SWAN
: "112 ..... "SOLOW-SWAN
: 111 .................
: 111 .................................................
: ( )116 ......................
: 141 ........................
: 143 .........
: 143 ................
: 142 .................
: 239 .....................
: (LUCAS,

)13. .............................................................................. 1988


: "13. ......................... "R. E. LUCAS
: )131 ................ (LUCAS, 1988
441

:
: )133 ............................ (LUCAS, 1988
: )16. ................. (LUCAS, 1988
: )16. ....... (LUCAS, 1988
: 161 .......................................
: "164 "LUCAS
163 ........................................................

: 255 ....
166 ..........................................................................
: 256 .........
: ( ) 161 .....................
: 166 .......................................
:
12. ........................................................................
: 123 ......................................
: (126 ... )Ad hoc growth equations
: 122 ................................
: 126 ....................
: 273 .....
:
124 .............................................................................
: 126 ...................................
446

:
: 126 .........................................................
: 116 ......................................
: :
289 ......................................................................................
:
)116 ................................................................ (LUCAS, 1988
:
162 ..............................................................
: 4.1 ..........
4.6 .......................................................

306 ..............................................................
314 ................................................
: 413 ..............................................................
: 412 ...........................................................
: 411 ........................................................
330 ..............................................................................

43.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi