Rubric Made Using: RubiStar ( http://rubistar.4teachers.

org )

Class Debate: Research and Class Debate

Teacher Name: Mr. Maughmer

Student Name: CATEGORY Statistics and Data Usage

________________________________________ 4 Paraphrases, scientific, environmental and political data was incorporated logically to support policy implementation. 3 Scientific, environmental and political data was incorporated logically to support policy implementation. 2 Environmental and political data was incorporated logically to support policy implementation.

5 Direct quotes, paraphrases, scientific, environmental and political data was incorporated logically to support policy implementation. Thorough analysis of the issue was displayed in presentation notes, and outside research. Various angles considered and supported or refuted.

Analysis of Issue

Good analysis of the issue was displayed in presentation notes, and outside research. Some angles considered and supported or refuted.

Minimal analysis of the issue was displayed in presentation notes, and outside research. Few angles considered and supported or refuted.

Almost no analysis of the issue was displayed in presentation notes, and outside research. Few angles considered and supported or refuted.

Argumentative Made clear and Style concise arguments and suggestions for policy, and allowed others to express whole points and statements without interruption.

Made clear and sometimes concise arguments and suggestions for policy, and allowed others to express whole points and statements without interruption.

Made some what clear and sometimes concise arguments and suggestions for policy, and sometimes allowed others to express whole points and statements without interruption. Functioned poorly as a group; some members contributed to a share of the work and added to the policy and its debate.

Made unclear and unconcise arguments and suggestions for policy, and almost never allowed others to express whole points and statements without interruption.

Team Work

Functioned well as a group; each member contributed their share of the work and added to the policy and its debate.

Functioned decently as a group; each member contributed to some share of the work and added to the policy and its debate. Outline displayed the policy implementation somewhat accurately and logically; evidence was presented in logical order with claims and refutations.

Functioned poorly as a group; few members contributed to a share of the work and added to the policy and its debate.

Outline Quality Outline displayed the policy implementation accurately and logically; evidence was presented in logical order with claims and refutations.

Outline displayed the policy implementation inaccurately and illogically; evidence was presented in a somewhat logical order along with claims and refutations.

Outline displayed the policy implementation inaccurately and illogically; evidence was presented in a somewhat logical order along with claims and refutations.

Date Created: February 25, 2014