The only changes I would make would include, discussing the credibility of the author and more connection

between the annotations because a lot of yours relate really well. Other than that I thought it was a great paper and very interesting to read. Raquel Scalzo

Framing: The intro is well written however I found a few minor mistakes which could confuse other readers. The title is to the point which lets the reader know what they are about to read a paper on. In the intro I would perhaps talk more in depth about the GI abnormalities that seem to be related to Autism that can be found in some of the annotations that you provided. You only mentioned it once but maybe you could go a little more in depth about it Annotations: You did an excellent job on summarizing the articles. I actually looked up an article myself to obtain some more information on the topic. I would suggest that when using words that are lexis to the medical field that you should define them somewhere in either the annotation or the introduction. I wrote some suggestions through your paper on things that maybe you could include. You discussed the credibility of the authors by discussing the numerous studies they have conducted on the Autism topic. Formatting: The title is to the point and direct to what will be discussed throughout the paper. Make sure you number your pages and also insert a space between each annotation and the corresponding summary so that it can be read easier. Annotation are in alphabetical order and citation are in the correct MLA format. Courtney Moore