Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Rajnish Kumar
Professor IT, N.A.I.R.
We begin with
YOUR DOUBTS
Some issues
Suo motu declaration ("on one's own initiative) Huge amount of information Third party information Personal information
Records Management
Creation of information
The judgments illustrate that information submitted to public authorities at any point in time whether
to get admitted to school, to get a license, to pass a public services examination or even file a divorce;
all qualify for access to other people because they have been knowingly submitted to the public domain.
Personal information
HC Ruling : http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Personalinformation-cant-be-disclosed-under-RTI-HC/articleshow/22473980.cms
Justice Vasanti Naik quashed and set aside an order of the state information commissioner, Nashik, directing an information officer to supply personal information, including service record and income tax returns of Subhash Khemnar, the joint director (Pune) in the department of agriculture, to one Dilip Thorat. Still a very grey area.
Personal information
Record not Available Shri V. M. Sharma v. Northern Railway, Baroda House, New Delhi (No. CIC/OK/A/2006/00367-368, dtd 5.2.2007) Bench: Dr. O. P. Kejariwal
Records
Weeded out record: The Commission noted that the records sought, as informed by the respondent, had been weeded out as per the rules the Applicant to take up the issue with the department concerned in case he noticed that any record which did not fall under the weeding out rules had also been destroyed.
Records
Shri Jagdish Ahuja, Delhi v. Central Board of Secondary Education, Delhi (No. CIC/OK/A/2006/00137 dtd. 9.8.2006) Bench: Dr. O. P. Kejriwal
Poor Records: Details regarding those unaided schools which were being run on private land in Delhi sought little authentic information available and that is scattered in various files The Commission held that proper record management is an inherent part of the Right to Information, and so it was important for the CBSE to have its firm database on computer. The Commission directed CBSE to make their record management more systematic and supply the requested information.
Records Management
This is now very important Procedures to be adopted uniformly The Act enjoins upon the public authorities to strengthen their records management systems and use of the latest technology for this purpose in a cost effective manner.
Judgment: In this case the CIC has given a crucial decision that the RTI is not about seeking answers or asking questions. [Section 2 (j)]
The applicant sought among other thing copies of license for certain reference and also the dates of inspection carried out by the Delhi Police. The respondents went into the motive for asking these information for deciding about the response. This issue was examined by the Commission and have clearly rejected the procedure of exploring motives.
Reasons for rejection of requests for information must be clearly provided (Section 8(1) of the RTI Act)
In the case of Dhananjay Tripathi vs. Banaras Hindu University (Decision No. CIC / OK / A/ 00163, dated 7.7.2006), the applicant had applied for information relating to the treatment and subsequent death of a student in the University hospital due to alleged negligence of the doctors attending him. The appellant was, however, denied the information by the PIO of the University .
Reasons for rejection of requests for information must be clearly provided (Section 8(1) of the RTI Act)
Judgement: The Commission held that quoting the provisions of Section 8(1) of the RTI Act to deny the information without giving any justification or grounds as to how these provisions are applicable is simply not acceptable, and clearly amount to malafide denial of legitimate information. The Commission further held that not providing the reasons of how the application for information was rejected according to a particular provision of the Act would attract penalties under Section 20(1) of the Act.
The information which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person.
Exempted Organizations
The List of 22 exempted organizations is given below
Intelligence Bureau, Ministry of Home Affairs Secretariat Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Ministry of Assam Rifles, Ministry of Home Affairs Finance Sashastra Seema Bal, Ministry of Home Affairs Central Economic Intelligence Bureau, Ministry Special Protection Group of Finance Defence Research and Development Directorate of Enforcement, Ministry of Finance Organisation, Ministry of Defence Narcotics Control Bureau Border Road Development Organisation Aviation Research Centre Financial Intelligence Unit, India Special Frontier Force Directorate General Income Tax (Investigation) Border Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs National Technical Research Organisation Central Reserve Police Force, Ministry of Home National Security Council Secretariat Affairs http://rti.india.gov.in/exempted.php Indo-Tibetan Border Police, Ministry of Home Affairs Central Industrial Security Force, Ministry of Home Affairs National Security Guard, Ministry of Home Affairs Research & Analysis Wing of The Cabinet
Some Developments
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/rajkot/RTI-activist-gets-compensationfor-delay-in-information/articleshow/28025738.cms
28-12-13 RAJKOT: Taking Kodinar Taluka Development Officer (TDO) to task for delaying information sought under Right to Information (RTI), Gujarat Information Commission (GIC) has asked him to pay Rs 5,000 as compensation to the applicant Deepak Mori from the Taluka Panchayat funds. A fine of Rs 15,000 has also been imposed on TDO S B Devdhar.
Section 19(8)(b) in The Right To Information Act, 2005 require the public authority to compensate the complainant for any loss or other detriment suffered;
Questions
DOUBTS pit@nair.railnet.gov.in
Thank you