Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.
2013 (1st session)
Instructor: D. L. Dillard (Don) Class Location: HSS 70 Office Hours: (MTWRF) 11:20-11:50, or by apt. Class Hours: (MTWRF) 9:45-11:15 Location: Hodges Library (next to Starbucks) Class Location: HSS 70 Contact: ddillar1@utk.edu
[I.] INTRODUCTION In many ways, Professionalism is an activity that reinforces the legitimacy of Professions. When an individual who acts as the representative of a given profession acts in a decidedly un-professional way to a patient or client, then there is a real sense in which that oneunprofessional act may taint the entire profession. A reasonable question can be drawn from this: Is there a duty to conduct oneself in a professional way for the sake of preserving the legitimacy of a profession? Or to express this otherwise, does Professional Responsibility entail a duty to other professionals, to the client/patients, or even the profession itself? It is tempting to think that the answer is obvious: of course one ought to act professionally! However, there are many cases where acting professionally may conflict with other moral duties, religious or political beliefs, or ones conscience, and in such cases one may strongly feel morally obliged to act in ways that are un-professional. And here the answer is not so clear: Does professional responsibility always and in every case trump all other considerations? Thus, the aim of this course is to develop a better understanding of what being a Professional entails by exploring the ethical dimensions of such cases, and thereby develop a better and more complete understanding of the self as a future (or current) professional. [II.] Course Description & Prerequisites Prerequisite(s): While students who have taken Philosophy (101) previously will have a slight advantage over those who have not, there are no prerequisites for taking this course. Catalogue Description: Critical analysis of selected classic texts from philosophy, religious studies, and social sciences dealing with responsibility and the nature of professionalism. Theoretical principles and analytical skills applied to selected case studies and other detailed descriptions of professional practice from engineering/architecture, business/accounting, and at least one of law/politics, the helping professions (social work, human services, ministry), or teaching. Levels: Undergraduate (3.000 Credit hours) Schedule Types: Lecture Course Attributes: Satisfies GenEd - Arts/Humanities (AH), GenEd - Oral Communication (OC) [III.] REQUIRED READINGS No textbook required; all readings will be posted on Blackboard (online.utk.edu) [IV.] COURSE OBJECTIVE(S) 1. Because completion of this course may satisfy either the (OC) oral communication or the (AH) arts and humanities General Education requirement, emphasis is placed on oral presentation with respect to the arts and humanities in the context of Professional Responsibility. 2. In this regard, the instructor is not insensitive to the fact that public speaking is very often a source of psychological discomfort (if not horror) for some individuals. Furthermore, because so much Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.2013 (1st session)
communication today occurs via electronic media (email, facebook, twitter, etc.), being able to communicate effectively requires proficiency in both the real world and in cyberspace. 3. To this end, the electronic portion of this course (via Blackboard) has a dual role: first, to help you develop effective electronic communication, and second, to help you develop your communication skills in a safe place for your later oral presentation. Thus, you will be evaluated not only with respect to how well you are able to communicate orally, but also with respect to how well you are able to communicate electronically. 4. Finally: As an educational philosophy, I employ the concept of relevance as an educational tool. While epistemic binging and purging (i.e., memorizing for a test then purging it immediately thereafter) is a standard adaptive strategy for students to make the grade, there is a very real sense in which this impoverishes rather than enriches students. Learning and understanding occurs best when the subject matter is relevant to the student as a person which is to say, the phenomenological self which includes the background beliefs, perceptions, desires, and goals of a person as oriented to some future state of Being. Thus, your final project will not be on professional responsibility per se, but on professional responsibility with respect to the kind of person you are(e.g., if your major is psychology, then professional responsibility with respect to psychology, etc.). [V.] CLASSROOM POLICIES, RULES & PROCEDURES 1. Academic Honesty Statement a. Each student is responsible for his/her own personal integrity in academic life. While there is no affirmative duty to report the academic dishonesty of another, each student, given the dictates of his/her own conscience, may choose to act on any violation of the Honor Statement. b. Students are also responsible for any acts of plagiarism. Plagiarism is using the intellectual property of someone else without giving proper credit. The undocumented use of someone elses words or ideas in any medium of communication (unless such information is recognized as common knowledge) is a serious offense, subject to disciplinary action that may include failure in a course and/or dismissal from the university.
Specific examples of plagiarism are i. Copying without proper documentation (quotation marks and a citation) written or spoken words, phrases, or sentences from any source. ii. Summarizing without proper documentation (usually a citation) ideas from another source (unless such information is recognized as common knowledge). iii. Borrowing facts, statistics, graphs, pictorial representations, or phrases without acknowledging the source (unless such information is recognized as common knowledge). iv. Collaborating on a graded assignment without instructors approval. v. Submitting work, either in whole or part, created by a professional service and used without attribution (e.g., paper, speech, bibliography, or photograph). 2. Classroom Conduct a. This course covers a variety of hot button social issues with regard to professional responsibility, and thus there is a predictable tendency for discussion to become heated. However, this tendency is not a license to cultivate indecency, or to act in an uncivil and aggressive way to your fellow students (or the instructor!). Please keep the discussion pleasant; unpleasant people may be asked to leave. b. Because giving oral presentations are always psychologically discomforting, students are expected and required to be maximally respectful during the presentations of their fellow students. While I am flexible with many policies and rules, this particular rule of conduct is a zero tolerance policy such that you will be asked to leave and will not be welcomed back without some form of sincere compensatory act (e.g., an apology to the student and class, etc). Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.2013 (1st session)
c. During class you may experience a near overwhelming compulsion to check e-mail, twitter, text message, facebook, myspace, etc., on a laptop or other multimedia device dont panic! Recent studies have indicated that while this is a symptom of habitual rudeness, it is a condition that can nevertheless be reversed by simply resisting the urge. Students who are unableto resist this urge may be asked to leave in order to contemplate appropriate uses of electronic devices. 3. Make-ups a. Because life is often unpredictable, and because what happens to us is sometimes beyond our control, missing vital dates or being unable to finish an assignment on time may warrant a make- up at the discretion of the instructor. 4. Disability Statement a. In accordance with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, The University of Tennessee affirmatively states that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, or disability in its education programs and activities, and this policy extends to employment by the University. b. Any student who feels s/he may need an accommodation based on the impact of a disability should contact me privately to discuss your specific needs. For more information, contact the Office of Disability Services at 865-974-6087 in 2227 Dunford Hall. 5. Syllabus Caveat a. This syllabus is, in essence, a contract between you (the student) and me (the instructor). However, while I will make every reasonable effort to provide sufficient notice for changes that are in my judgment ceteris paribus necessary, I nevertheless reserve the right to change the syllabus for any reason at any time. [VI.] GRADE DISTRIBUTION 1. In-class participation & attendance (10 points each) 2. On-line discussion participation as Responder & Poster (20 points each) 3. Peer Review & Commentary (10 points each) 4. Research Project Thesis & Draft (40 points each) 5. Discussion Presentation (100 points) 6. Persuasive Speech Presentation (150 points) [VII.] GRADING SCALE (out of 400 points) A (376-400) A- (360-372) B+ (348-356) B (332-344) B- (320-328) C+ (308-316) C (292-304) C- (280-288) D+ (268-276) D (252-264) D- (240-248) F (00-236) [VIII.] COURSE REQUIREMENTS & WEIGHTED TOTALS [VIII.a] Class Attendance & Participation Requirement (5%) To earn full credit, the student must: (i.) attend all classes, and (ii.) participate in a lively but civil manner to class discussions & presentations. [VIII.b] Discussion Board & Oral Presentation Requirement (35%) Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.2013 (1st session)
To earn full credit, the student must: (i.) summarize the daily reading on the discussion board (once, as a Poster), and (ii.) respond to the discussion board post (once per week, as a Responder), and (iii.) perform an oral presentation (once, as an Advocate or Detractor). [VIII.c] Research Project & Persuasive Speech (60%) To earn full credit, the student must: (i.) provide one peer review for a fellow students research project OR provide one peer commentary for a fellow students Persuasive Speech, and (ii.) submit a thesis for instructor review on the intended research topic, and (iii.) submit a draft for instructor review on the selected research topic, and (iv.) provide a Persuasive Speech to the class on the selected research topic.
[IX.] CLASS SCHEDULE Date Daily Discussion Topic / Due Date Daily Discussion Presenter(s) Assignment for next class session Discussion Poster on Assignment May 30 th Week 1 Orientation & Introductions No discussion presentations Read: Carnegie and Einswein The Art of Public Speaking (chapters 1-3) No required posts or responses May 31 st The Art of Public Speaking (part 1) No discussion presentations Read: Carnegie and Einswein The Art of Public Speaking (chapters 4-6) No required posts or responses June 3 rd Week 2
The Art of Public Speaking (part 2) No discussion presentations Read: Joan Callahan Basics and Background (pp. 1-14) Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (A) June 4 th Moral Theories (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Joan Callahan Basics and Background (pp. 15-25) Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (B) June 5 th Moral Theories (part 2) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Bernard Barber Professions and Emerging Professions Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (C) June 6 th Professions & Professionals (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Paul Faber Client & Professional Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (D) June 7 th Professions & Professionals (part 2) Thesis Due Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: J. Angelo Corlett Collective Moral Responsibility Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (A) June 10 th Week 3
Professions & Professionals (part 3) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Rem B. Edwards Confidentiality and the Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Please visit the Philosophy Departments UT website (philosophy.utk.edu), Facebook site, and Blackboard site (online.utk.edu; access limited to current majors) for a variety of resources helpful to those studying Philosophy as well as information about our degree programs (including two new major concentrations: Legal & Political Philosophy, Philosophy of Science & Medicine) and other opportunities for undergraduatesincluding our scholarships, annual essay contest, and Philosophy Club. Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.2013 (1st session)
Professions Responder Grp: (B) June 11 th Professions & Professionals (part 4) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Jeffrey Montrose Reluctant Soldiers Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (C) June 12 th Non-traditional Professions & Professional Issues (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Denis G. Arnold & Keith Bustos Business, ethics, and global climate change Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (D) June 13 th Non-traditional Professions & Professional Issues (part 2) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Peter A. French Corporate Moral Agency Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (A) June 14 th Non-traditional Professions & Professional Issues (part 3) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Mike W. Martin Whistleblowing Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (B) June 17 th Week 4
Whistleblowing Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: William F. May Politics: The Despised Profession Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (C) June 18 th Issues in Politics (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: John C. Danforth The Point of Serving Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (D) June 19 th Issues in Politics (part 2) Draft Due Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Kenneth Kipnis Professional Responsibility and the Distribution of Legal Services Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (A) June 20 th Issues in Law (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: John Kleinig Judicial Corrosion Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (B) June 21 st Issues in Law (part 2) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: James Rachels Active and Passive Euthanasia Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (C) June 24 th Week 5
Issues in Medicine (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Judith Jarvis Thompson A Defense of Abortion Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (D) June 25 th Issues in Medicine (part 2) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Don Marquis Why Abortion is Immoral Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (A) June 26 th Issues in Medicine (part 3) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Norman Daniels Equality of Access to Health Care Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (B) June 27 th Issues in Journalism (part 1) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: Barbara ThomaB Wikileaks and the question of responsibility Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (C) June 28 th Issues in Journalism (part 2) Advocate: tba Detractor: tba Read: John C Merrill Professionalization of Journalism Poster 1: tba Poster 2: tba Responder Grp: (D)
Phil (244-301): Professional Responsibility - Sum.2013 (1st session)