Ranked by HAMP Impact State HAMP Trial Mods Q309 Seriously Delinquent Loans Percent Ser. Del. Loans Modified 1 New Hampshire 3,003 11,217 26.77% 2 Rhode Island 3,058 11,699 26.14% 3 Maryland 21,634 87,799 24.64% 4 Arizona 34,424 143,244 24.03% 5 Massachusetts 14,677 61,846 23.73% 6 Connecticut 8,446 37,023 22.81% 7 Virginia 16,981 74,850 22.69% 8 Minnesota 12,933 57,517 22.49% 9 District of Columbia 1,177 5,614 20.97% 10 Oregon 7,560 36,070 20.96% 11 Delaware 2,184 10,494 20.81% 12 Utah 5,427 27,317 19.87% 13 California 134,609 680,769 19.77% 14 Washington 12,869 65,119 19.76% 15 Illinois 33,514 172,877 19.39% 16 Hawaii 2,331 12,201 19.11% 17 Montana 897 4,758 18.85% 18 New Jersey 22,102 118,547 18.64% 19 Nevada 17,566 94,803 18.53% 20 New York 28,773 157,785 18.24% 21 Georgia 25,675 142,694 17.99% 22 Colorado 9,657 54,763 17.63% 23 North Carolina 13,654 79,839 17.10% 24 Vermont 494 2,929 16.87% 25 Missouri 8,105 48,746 16.63% 26 Maine 1,766 10,631 16.61% 27 Wisconsin 6,679 41,276 16.18% 28 New Mexico 2,268 14,051 16.14% 29 Pennsylvania 15,223 95,036 16.02% 30 West Virginia 1,180 7,431 15.88% 31 South Carolina 7,194 46,079 15.61% 32 Wyoming 352 2,286 15.40% 33 Alaska 431 2,823 15.27% 34 Michigan 22,031 146,040 15.09% 35 Idaho 2,660 17,699 15.03% 36 Tennessee 7,712 55,972 13.78% 37 Mississippi 2,774 20,645 13.44% 38 Nebraska 1,110 8,622 12.87% 39 Texas 21,260 165,261 12.86% 40 Alabama 4,651 36,563 12.72% 41 Florida 82,614 651,766 12.68% 42 Louisiana 4,061 32,321 12.56% 43 South Dakota 324 2,611 12.41% 44 Kansas 2,006 16,286 12.32% 45 North Dakota 170 1,390 12.23% 46 Arkansas 1,850 15,433 11.99% 47 Iowa 2,095 17,998 11.64% 48 Ohio 14,132 133,467 10.59% 49 Kentucky 2,928 28,151 10.40% 50 Indiana 7,449 75,480 9.87% 51 Oklahoma 2,022 23,159 8.73% Sources: MBA, Q309 National Delinquency Survey; Making Home Affordable Program "Servicer Performance Report Through October 2009" Prepared by: Cuyahoga County Foreclosure Prevention Program HAMP and Ohio This table combines two nationally aggregated data sets in an effort to measure the relative effectiveness of the HAMP mortgage modification program in each state. What the table demonstrates is that there is a huge disparity between the states in how well HAMP is working to ameliorate the foreclosure crisis. In the most successful state, New Hampshire (26.77%), the HAMP program has been more than three times as effective than in the lowest performing state, Oklahoma (8.73%). Ohio (10.59%) ranks 48th among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The column HAMP Trial Mods lists the state- level breakouts for active trial and permanent loan modifications through November 5, under the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). These numbers are taken from the recently released Servicer Performance Report prepared by the Treasury Department. The column Q309 Seriously Delinquent Loans breaks out the number of loans that are 90 days or more delinquent and the foreclosure inventory, by state, as aggregated in the most recent National Delinquency Survey, the benchmark report released every quarter since 1979 by the Mortgage Bankers Association. This is a generally accepted standardized measure of loans that are in serious trouble, but not yet legally forfeited---the most likely and urgent candidates for HAMP intervention. Finally, Percent Ser. Del. Loans Modified reports the ratio of HAMP trial modifications over seriously delinquent loans. The higher the resulting percentage, the higher the proportion of troubled loans that have been (temporarily) addressed by the HAMP program. That there are such huge disparities between the various states argues for a complete revamping of the HAMP program as it clearly fails to meet the needs of some of the most severely foreclosure-afflicted states. We feel that this table demonstrates that so long as the success of HAMP relies primarily upon the discretionary efforts of the mortgage servicing industry and ducks the crucial issue of loan principal reduction, it will continue to fail the states in greatest need.