0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
55 vues1 page
Wendt argues that anarchy is constructed by state interactions and identities, not fixed. He criticizes Waltz's definition of political structure for not accounting for how identities and interests form in anarchy and change over time through social interactions. Wendt introduces the concept of "structures of identity and interest" to explain that different constructions of anarchy are possible, not just self-help. In short, anarchy is what states make of it through ongoing social and political relationships.
Wendt argues that anarchy is constructed by state interactions and identities, not fixed. He criticizes Waltz's definition of political structure for not accounting for how identities and interests form in anarchy and change over time through social interactions. Wendt introduces the concept of "structures of identity and interest" to explain that different constructions of anarchy are possible, not just self-help. In short, anarchy is what states make of it through ongoing social and political relationships.
Wendt argues that anarchy is constructed by state interactions and identities, not fixed. He criticizes Waltz's definition of political structure for not accounting for how identities and interests form in anarchy and change over time through social interactions. Wendt introduces the concept of "structures of identity and interest" to explain that different constructions of anarchy are possible, not just self-help. In short, anarchy is what states make of it through ongoing social and political relationships.
Anarchy is what states make of it -Alexander Wendt
- Summary- Wendt focuses on identities and interests as they form the behaviour that occurs in the system of anarchy. He strongly argues they are variables, subject to influences and are not fixed; they are in fact constructed everyday by processes of social will formation ( for example a state has no identity until it interacts with another). Therefore it is what states have made of themselves; and anarchy is what states make of it.
Main points- -Wendt discusses Kenneth Waltz definition of political structure which is in three dimensions 1.ordering principles, 2.principles of differentiation, 3.distribution of capabilities. He criticises it however as the definitions cannot predict state behaviour therefore cannot predict the content or dynamics of anarachy as it cannot provide assumption about structure of identities and interests in system.
- Also introduces his concept of structures of identity and interest claiming that no particular one follows logically from anarchy.
- Finally discusses realist notion of self-help which he claims they reify (make it seem natural as opposed to a human ideology) and that from this a self-fulfilling prophecy is made. Wendt claims self help