0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
42 vues5 pages
If you fail to answer, judgment by default will be rendered against you, without further notice. Plaintiff is a resident of the CITY OF ST. Paul, COUNTY OF Ramsey, STATE OF MINNESOTA. He was an employee of defendant and employed within defendant's police department as a sergeant.
If you fail to answer, judgment by default will be rendered against you, without further notice. Plaintiff is a resident of the CITY OF ST. Paul, COUNTY OF Ramsey, STATE OF MINNESOTA. He was an employee of defendant and employed within defendant's police department as a sergeant.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
If you fail to answer, judgment by default will be rendered against you, without further notice. Plaintiff is a resident of the CITY OF ST. Paul, COUNTY OF Ramsey, STATE OF MINNESOTA. He was an employee of defendant and employed within defendant's police department as a sergeant.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
STATE OF MINNESOTA, DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File
AARON W. FOSTER, SR.,
Plaintiff, summoxs —_FECEIVED
(CIVIL) Nov y 3 2g
City CLERK
CITY OF ST. PAUL,
Defendant.
10: THE STATE OF MINNESOTA TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S):
YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to answer the attached Complaint of the
plaintiff that is hereby served upon you. You are required to serve a copy of your Answer upon
plaintiff's counsel, WILLIAMS & IVERSEN, P.A., 1611 West County Road B, Suite 208, St. Paul,
MN 55113, within twenty (20) days after the service of this Summons upon you, exclusive of the day
ofsuch service. If you fail to serve your answer within the time and manner set forth above,
judgment by default will be rendered against you, without further notice, for the relief demanded in
the Complaint.
Rule 114 of the General Rules of Practice for District Courts requires that the parties to
this action participate in altemative dispute resolution. Alternative dispute resolution involves,
without limitation, the following: adjudicative processes such as arbitration; evaluative processes
such as early neutral evaluation; facilitative processes such as mediation; or such other form that
the parties may agree upon.
‘The method for selecting a process and advising the Court is set forth in Rule 114 of the
General Rules of Practice for District Courts,
WILLIAMS & IVERSEN, P.A.
DATED: f/pey. 13, 2009 SZ Almcfe.
Paul W. Iversen 193707
1611 West County Road B, Suite 208
St. Paul, MN 55113
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
651-848-0280/Phone 651-848-0282/FaxSTATE OF MINNESOTA, DISTRICT COURT
COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
Court File
AARON W. FOSTER, SR.,
v.
Plaintiff, COMPLAINT
(civiLy
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
CITY OF ST. PAUL,
Defendant.
COMES NOW plaintiff, and for his cause of action, claims and alleges as follows:
Plaintiff, Aaron W. Foster, Sr,, is a resident of the City of St, Paul, County of Ramsey,
State of Minnesota.
Plaintiff was an employee of defendant and employed within defendant's police
department as a property clerk.
Plaintiff was an employee as defined in the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Mina.
Stat. §363A.03, subd.15,
Defendant, City of St. Paul, is a municipal corporation established by a City Charter
adopted pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota, and is defined as
a home rule charter city pursuant to Minn, Stat. §410.015.
Defendant is an employer as defined in the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.
Stat, §363A.03, subd.16
FACTS
Plaintiff worked for defendant in its police department for approximately 14 years
In November of 2007, plaintiff was arrested and charged with a felony related fo a case
that had been closed without charges being filed in 1981ML
12,
14,
15,
16,
18,
19.
After his arrest, defendant suspended plaintiff without pay.
In order to obtain funds to defend himself in the criminal action, plaintiff resigned his
employment with defendant.
White employees of defendant faced with criminal charges have been suspended with
pay, pending trial
Plaintiff was acquitted of the charges against him in June of 2008.
Plaintiff sought reinstatement by defendant and submitted a request for placement on
reinstatement register after resignation on October 1, 2008.
While defendant claims to have placed plaintiff on the reinstatement register and notified
plaintiff of this fact on November 3, 2008, plaintiff never received any notification that
he had been placed on the reinstatement register.
Defendant alleges that plaintiff's placement on the reinstatement register was only
effective until November 13, 2008,
Plaintiff was not, in fact, reinstated by defendant during the period he was on the
reinstatement register.
Defendant’s failure to reinstate plaintiff was because of his race.
COUNT1
RACE DISCRIMINATION
MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS ACT
Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every matter set forth in paragraphs 1-16
above, as if set forth fully herein.
Plaintiff, an African-American, is a member of a protected class under the Minnesota
Human Rights Act.
Plaintiff has suffered adverse employment actions by defendant.20,
21
22.
23,
24,
25
Defendant's stated reason for its adverse employment actions against plaintiff were mere
pretext for race discrimination.
Asa direct and proximate result of defendant’s wrongful conduct toward plaintiff,
plaintiff has suffered damages from loss of income that he has not yet been able to
replace fully, despite diligent efforts to do so, mental anguish, attorneys fees and other
damages recoverable under the Minnesota Human Rights Act, all in an amount to be
determined at trial in excess of $50,000,
COUNT 2
RACE DISCRIMINATIE
42 U.S.C. §1983
Plaintiff hereby repeats and realleges each and every matter set forth in paragraphs 1-16
above, as if set forth fully herein.
‘The actions of defendant deprived plaintiff of rights secured by the Constitution and laws
of the United States, including the right to be considered innocent until proved guilty and
the rights secured by 42 U.S.C. §1981 to have equal rights to make and enforce
employment contracts.
Defendant deprived plaintiff of these rights because of his race, in violation of 42
U.S.C, $1983.
Asa direct and proximate result of defendant's wrongful conduct toward plaintiff,
plaintiff has suffered damages from loss of income that he has not yet been able to
replace fully, despite diligent efforts to do so, compensatory damages, attorneys fees, and
other damages recoverable under 42 U.S.C. §1981a and §1983, all in an amount to be
determined at trial in excess of $50,000.WHEREFORE, plaintiff prays for relief as follows:
A. Damages for lost wages, compensatory damages, mental anguish damages, front pay,
and other damages in a reasonable sum to be determined at trial in excess of $50,000;
B. Costs, including reasonable attomeys fees incurred in pursuing this action; and
C. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and equitable in the
premises,
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
‘The undersigned hereby acknowledges that costs, disbursements, and reasonable attomey and
witness fees may be awarded pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 549.211, Subdivision 2, to the party against
whom the allegations in this pleading are asserted.
WILLIAMS & IVERSEN, P.A.
DATED: 12, 2eeg
Paul W. Iversen 193707
1611 West County Road B, Suite 208
St. Paul, MN 55113
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
651-848-0280/Phone 651-848-0282/Fax