0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
153 vues1 page
Anthony Manguera was accused of raping and killing 16-year old Lorna Reanzares in 1996 when he was 15 years old. He was identified by the victim to her brother as her attacker before she died. At trial, Manguera argued that his minority at the time of the crime should be considered a mitigating circumstance to reduce the penalty. The court held that because Manguera was only 15 based on his birth certificate, the maximum penalty that could be imposed under the law was reclusion perpetua instead of death. It modified the trial court's decision accordingly.
Anthony Manguera was accused of raping and killing 16-year old Lorna Reanzares in 1996 when he was 15 years old. He was identified by the victim to her brother as her attacker before she died. At trial, Manguera argued that his minority at the time of the crime should be considered a mitigating circumstance to reduce the penalty. The court held that because Manguera was only 15 based on his birth certificate, the maximum penalty that could be imposed under the law was reclusion perpetua instead of death. It modified the trial court's decision accordingly.
Anthony Manguera was accused of raping and killing 16-year old Lorna Reanzares in 1996 when he was 15 years old. He was identified by the victim to her brother as her attacker before she died. At trial, Manguera argued that his minority at the time of the crime should be considered a mitigating circumstance to reduce the penalty. The court held that because Manguera was only 15 based on his birth certificate, the maximum penalty that could be imposed under the law was reclusion perpetua instead of death. It modified the trial court's decision accordingly.
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ANTHONY MANGUERA Y ALINGASTRE, accused-appellant.
FACTS:
That on or about the 25th day of February 1996, at about 6:30 oclock in the evening, at Barangay San Miguel, Municipality of Santo Tomas, Province of Batangas, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, by means of force and intimidation, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously have carnal knowledge of one Lorna Reanzares y Javier against her will and consent and by reason or on the occasion of the said rape, accused, armed with a bladed instrument, with intent to kill, willfully, unlawfully and feloniously stabbed the said Lorna Reanzares y Javier with the said instrument, thereby inflicting upon the latter stab wounds on the different parts of herbody which directly caused her death.
The author of the rape and the multiple stab wounds sustained by Lorna Reanzares was identified by her to her brother, to be a person nicknamed Nognog. Nognog, according to her, was Anthony Manguera, the son of Tonio from the East with a tricycle. At the time of the commission of the crime, Anthony Manguera was 15 years old, while the victim, Lorna Reanzares was 16 years of age.
ISSUE: Whether or not, the accused being 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the crime could treat his minority as a privileged mitigating circumstance and would reduce the imposable penalty by one degree.
HELD: Anthony Manguera was only fifteen (15) years old at the time of the commission of the crime as so evidenced by his Certificate of Live Birth (Exhibit 5). Thus, pursuant to the provisions of Article 47, as amended, and consonantly with Article 68 of the Revised Penal Code, the penalty that can only be imposed on appellant for the crime of rape with homicide is reclusion perpetua. Whereof the decision of the Regional Trial Court finding the accused, guilty beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of rape with homicide in that (a) the death penalty imposed by the trial court is commuted to reclusion perpetua and (b) the judgment on the civil liability is modified .