0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
35 vues4 pages
This document summarizes a case regarding the constitutionality of including livestock and poultry raising in the coverage of the country's Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. It discusses the petitioner's argument that livestock/poultry raising is different from traditional agriculture and land is not the primary resource. It also discusses the respondent's counterargument that agriculture is broadly defined. The court ultimately found merit in the petition, determining that the framers of the constitution did not intend for livestock/poultry industries to be included based on transcripts of constitutional deliberations. It ruled sections of the law covering these industries to be unconstitutional as they exceeded the legislative mandate.
This document summarizes a case regarding the constitutionality of including livestock and poultry raising in the coverage of the country's Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. It discusses the petitioner's argument that livestock/poultry raising is different from traditional agriculture and land is not the primary resource. It also discusses the respondent's counterargument that agriculture is broadly defined. The court ultimately found merit in the petition, determining that the framers of the constitution did not intend for livestock/poultry industries to be included based on transcripts of constitutional deliberations. It ruled sections of the law covering these industries to be unconstitutional as they exceeded the legislative mandate.
This document summarizes a case regarding the constitutionality of including livestock and poultry raising in the coverage of the country's Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. It discusses the petitioner's argument that livestock/poultry raising is different from traditional agriculture and land is not the primary resource. It also discusses the respondent's counterargument that agriculture is broadly defined. The court ultimately found merit in the petition, determining that the framers of the constitution did not intend for livestock/poultry industries to be included based on transcripts of constitutional deliberations. It ruled sections of the law covering these industries to be unconstitutional as they exceeded the legislative mandate.
G.R. No. 86889. December 4, 1990 LUZ FARMS vs SECRETARY of DAR
LUZ FARMS, petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, respondent. This is a petition for prohibition with prayer for restraining orer an!or pre"iminary an permanent in#$nction against the %onorab"e &ecretary of the Department of 'grarian Reform for acting witho$t #$risiction in enforcing the assai"e pro(isions of R.'. No. 66)*, otherwise +nown as the ,omprehensi(e 'grarian Reform -aw of 1988 an in prom$"gating the G$ie"ines an .roce$re /mp"ementing .ro$ction an .rofit &haring $ner R.'. No. 66)*, insofar as the same app"y to herein petitioner, an f$rther from performing an act in (io"ation of the constit$tiona" rights of the petitioner. 's gathere from the recors, the fact$a" bac+gro$n of this case, is as fo""ows0 1n 2$ne 10, 1988, the .resient of the .hi"ippines appro(e R.'. No. 66)*, which inc"$es the raising of "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine in its co(erage 3Ro""o, p. 804. 1n 2an$ary 5, 1989, the &ecretary of 'grarian Reform prom$"gate the G$ie"ines an .roce$res /mp"ementing .ro$ction an .rofit &haring as emboie in &ections 16 an 65 of R.'. No. 66)* 3Ro""o, p. 804. 1n 2an$ary 9, 1989, the &ecretary of 'grarian Reform prom$"gate its R$"es an Reg$"ations imp"ementing &ection 11 of R.'. No. 66)* 3,ommercia" 7arms4. 3Ro""o, p. 814. -$8 7arms, petitioner in this case, is a corporation engage in the "i(estoc+ an po$"try b$siness an together with others in the same b$siness a""ege"y stans to be a(erse"y affecte by the enforcement of &ection 63b4, &ection 11, &ection 16, &ection 1634 an 1* an &ection 65 of R.'. No. 66)* otherwise +nown as ,omprehensi(e 'grarian Reform -aw an of the G$ie"ines an .roce$res /mp"ementing .ro$ction an .rofit &haring $ner R.'. No. 66)* prom$"gate on 2an$ary 5, 1989 an the R$"es an Reg$"ations /mp"ementing &ection 11 thereof as prom$"gate by the D'R on 2an$ary 9, 1989 3Ro""o, pp. 59664. %ence, this petition praying that aforesai "aws, g$ie"ines an r$"es be ec"are $nconstit$tiona". :eanwhi"e, it is a"so praye that a writ of pre"iminary in#$nction or restraining orer be iss$e en#oining p$b"ic responents from enforcing the same, insofar as they are mae to app"y to -$8 7arms an other "i(estoc+ an po$"try raisers. This ,o$rt in its Reso"$tion ate 2$"y 4, 1969 reso"(e to eny, among others, -$8 7arms; prayer for the iss$ance of a pre"iminary in#$nction in its :anifestation ate :ay 56, an 61, 1989. 3Ro""o, p. 984. -ater, howe(er, this ,o$rt in its Reso"$tion ate '$g$st 54, 1989 reso"(e to grant sai :otion for Reconsieration regaring the in#$ncti(e re"ief, after the fi"ing an appro(a" by this ,o$rt of an in#$nction bon in the amo$nt of .100,000.00. This ,o$rt a"so ga(e $e co$rse to the petition an re<$ire the parties to fi"e their respecti(e memorana 3Ro""o, p. 1194. The petitioner fi"e its :emoran$m on &eptember 6, 1989 3Ro""o, pp. 16191684. 1n December 55, 1989, the &o"icitor Genera" aopte his ,omment to the petition as his :emoran$m 3Ro""o, pp. 186918*4. -$8 7arms <$estions the fo""owing pro(isions of R.'. 66)*, insofar as they are mae to app"y to it0 3a4 Section 3(b) which inc"$es the =raising of "i(estoc+ 3an po$"try4= in the efinition of ='gric$"t$ra", 'gric$"t$ra" >nterprise or 'gric$"t$ra" 'cti(ity.= 3b4 Section 11 which efines =commercia" farms= as =pri(ate agric$"t$ra" "ans e(ote to commercia", "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine raising . . .= 3c4 Section 13 which ca""s $pon petitioner to e?ec$te a pro$ction9sharing p"an. 34 Section 16(d) and 17 which (est on the Department of 'grarian Reform the a$thority to s$mmari"y etermine the #$st compensation to be pai for "ans co(ere by the ,omprehensi(e 'grarian Reform -aw. 3e4 Section 32 which spe""s o$t the pro$ction9sharing p"an mentione in &ection 16 @ =. . . 3A4hereby three percent 36B4 of the gross sa"es from the pro$ction of s$ch "ans are istrib$te within si?ty 3604 ays of the en of the fisca" year as compensation to reg$"ar an other farmwor+ers in s$ch "ans o(er an abo(e the compensation they c$rrent"y recei(e0 .ro(ie, That these ini(i$a"s or entities rea"i8e gross sa"es in e?cess of fi(e mi""ion pesos per ann$m $n"ess the D'R, $pon proper app"ication, etermine a "ower cei"ing. 2 /n the e(ent that the ini(i$a" or entity rea"i8es a profit, an aitiona" ten 310B4 of the net profit after ta? sha"" be istrib$te to sai reg$"ar an other farmwor+ers within ninety 3904 ays of the en of the fisca" year . . .= The main iss$e in this petition is the constit$tiona"ity of &ections 63b4, 11, 16 an 65 of R.'. No. 66)* 3the ,omprehensi(e 'grarian Reform -aw of 19884, insofar as the sai "aw inc"$es the raising of "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine in its co(erage as we"" as the /mp"ementing R$"es an G$ie"ines prom$"gate in accorance therewith. The constit$tiona" pro(ision $ner consieration reas as fo""ows0 'RT/,-> C/// ??? ??? ??? 'GR'R/'N 'ND N'TDR'- R>&1DR,>& R>71R: &ection 4. The &tate sha"", by "aw, $nerta+e an agrarian reform program fo$ne on the right of farmers an reg$"ar farmwor+ers, who are "an"ess, to own irect"y or co""ecti(e"y the "ans they ti"" or, in the case of other farmwor+ers, to recei(e a #$st share of the fr$its thereof. To this en, the &tate sha"" enco$rage an $nerta+e the #$st istrib$tion of a"" agric$"t$ra" "ans, s$b#ect to s$ch priorities an reasonab"e retention "imits as the ,ongress may prescribe, ta+ing into acco$nt eco"ogica", e(e"opmenta", or e<$ity consierations, an s$b#ect to the payment of #$st compensation. /n etermining retention "imits, the &tate sha"" respect the rights of sma"" "anowners. The &tate sha"" f$rther pro(ie incenti(es for (o"$ntary "an9sharing. ??? ??? ???= -$8 7arms contene that it oes not see+ the n$""ification of R.'. 66)* in its entirety. /n fact, it ac+now"eges the correctness of the ecision of this ,o$rt in the case of the 'ssociation of &ma"" -anowners in the .hi"ippines, /nc. (s. &ecretary of 'grarian Reform 3G.R. *8*45, 14 2$"y 19894 affirming the constit$tiona"ity of the ,omprehensi(e 'grarian Reform -aw. /t, howe(er, arg$e that ,ongress in enacting the sai "aw has transcene the manate of the ,onstit$tion, in inc"$ing "an e(ote to the raising of "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine in its co(erage 3Ro""o, p. 1614. -i(estoc+ or po$"try raising is not simi"ar to crop or tree farming. -an is not the primary reso$rce in this $nerta+ing an represents no more than fi(e percent 3)B4 of the tota" in(estment of commercia" "i(estoc+ an po$"try raisers. /nee, there are many owners of resientia" "ans a"" o(er the co$ntry who $se a(ai"ab"e space in their resience for commercia" "i(estoc+ an raising p$rposes, $ner =contract9growing arrangements,= whereby processing corporations an other commercia" "i(estoc+ an po$"try raisers 3Ro""o, p. 104. -ans s$pport the b$i"ings an other amenities attenant to the raising of anima"s an birs. The $se of "an is incienta" to b$t not the principa" factor or consieration in pro$cti(ity in this in$stry. /nc"$ing bac+yar raisers, abo$t 80B of those in commercia" "i(estoc+ an po$"try pro$ction occ$py fi(e hectares or "ess. The remaining 50B are most"y corporate farms 3Ro""o, p. 114. 1n the other han, the p$b"ic responent arg$e that "i(estoc+ an po$"try raising is embrace in the term =agric$"t$re= an the inc"$sion of s$ch enterprise $ner &ection 63b4 of R.'. 66)* is proper. %e cite that Aebster;s /nternationa" Dictionary, &econ >ition 319)44, efines the fo""owing wors0 ='gric$"t$re @ the art or science of c$"ti(ating the gro$n an raising an har(esting crops, often, inc"$ing a"so, feeing, breeing an management of "i(estoc+, ti""age, h$sbanry, farming. /t inc"$es farming, hortic$"t$re, forestry, airying, s$garma+ing . . . -i(estoc+ @ omestic anima"s $se or raise on a farm, especia""y for profit. 7arm @ a p"ot or tract of "an e(ote to the raising of omestic or other anima"s.= 3Ro""o, pp. 859864. The petition is impresse with merit. The <$estion raise is one of constit$tiona" constr$ction. The primary tas+ in constit$tiona" constr$ction is to ascertain an thereafter ass$re the rea"i8ation of the p$rpose of the framers in the aoption of the ,onstit$tion 32.:. T$a8on E ,o. (s. -an Ten$re 'ministration, 61 &,R' 416 F19*0G4. 'scertainment of the meaning of the pro(ision of ,onstit$tion begins with the "ang$age of the oc$ment itse"f. The wors $se in the ,onstit$tion are to be gi(en their orinary meaning e?cept where technica" terms are emp"oye in which case the significance th$s attache to them pre(ai"s 32.:. T$a8on E ,o. (s. -an Ten$re 'ministration, 61 &,R' 416 F19*0G4. /t is genera""y he" that, in constr$ing constit$tiona" pro(isions which are ambig$o$s or of o$btf$" meaning, the co$rts may consier the ebates in the constit$tiona" con(ention as throwing "ight on the intent of the framers of the ,onstit$tion. /t is tr$e that the intent of the con(ention is not contro""ing by itse"f, b$t as its proceeing was pre"iminary to the aoption by the peop"e of the ,onstit$tion the $nerstaning of the con(ention as to what was meant by the terms of the constit$tiona" 3 pro(ision which was the s$b#ect of the e"iberation, goes a "ong way towar e?p"aining the $nerstaning of the peop"e when they ratifie it 3'<$ino, 2r. (. >nri"e, )9 &,R' 186 F19*4G4. The transcripts of the e"iberations of the ,onstit$tiona" ,ommission of 1986 on the meaning of the wor =agric$"t$ra",= c"ear"y show that it was ne(er the intention of the framers of the ,onstit$tion to inc"$e "i(estoc+ an po$"try in$stry in the co(erage of the constit$tiona""y9manate agrarian reform program of the Go(ernment. The ,ommittee aopte the efinition of =agric$"t$ra" "an= as efine $ner &ection 166 of R.'. 6844, as "a$ e(ote to any growth, inc"$ing b$t not "imite to crop "ans, sa"tbes, fishpons, i"e an abanone "an 3Recor, ,1N,1:, '$g$st *, 1986, Ho". ///, p. 114. The intention of the ,ommittee is to "imit the app"ication of the wor =agric$"t$re.= ,ommissioner 2amir propose to insert the wor ='R'I->= to isting$ish this +in of agric$"t$ra" "an from s$ch "ans as commercia" an in$stria" "ans an resientia" properties beca$se a"" of them fa"" $ner the genera" c"assification of the wor =agric$"t$ra"=. This proposa", howe(er, was not consiere beca$se the ,ommittee contemp"ate that agric$"t$ra" "ans are "imite to arab"e an s$itab"e agric$"t$ra" "ans an therefore, o not inc"$e commercia", in$stria" an resientia" "ans 3Recor, ,1N,1:, '$g$st *, 1986, Ho". ///, p. 604. /n the interpe""ation, then ,ommissioner Rega"ao 3now a &$preme ,o$rt 2$stice4, pose se(era" <$estions, among others, <$ote as fo""ows0 ??? ??? ??? =-ine 19 refers to gen$ine reform program fo$ne on the primary right of farmers an farmwor+ers. / woner if it means that "easeho" tenancy is thereby proscribe $ner this pro(ision beca$se it spea+s of the primary right of farmers an farmwor+ers to own irect"y or co""ecti(e"y the "ans they ti"". 's a"so mentione by ,ommissioner Taeo, farmwor+ers inc"$e those who wor+ in piggeries an po$"try pro#ects. / was wonering whether / am wrong in my appreciation that if someboy p$ts $p a piggery or a po$"try pro#ect an for that p$rpose hires farmwor+ers therein, these farmwor+ers wi"" a$tomatica""y ha(e the right to own e(ent$a""y, irect"y or $"timate"y or co""ecti(e"y, the "an on which the piggeries an po$"try pro#ects were constr$cte. 3Recor, ,1N,1:, '$g$st 5, 1986, p. 6184. ??? ??? ??? The <$estions were answere an e?p"aine in the statement of then ,ommissioner Taeo, <$ote as fo""ows0 ??? ??? ??? =&a panga"awang +atan$ngan ng Ginoo ay meyo hini +ami nag+a$nawaan. /pinaaa"am +o +ay ,ommissioner Rega"ao na hini namin ini"agay ang agric$"t$ra" wor+er sa +aahi"anang +asama rito ang piggery, po$"try at "i(estoc+ wor+ers. 'ng ini"agay namin ito ay farm wor+er +aya hini +asama ang piggery, po$"try at "i(estoc+ wor+ers 3Recor, ,1N,1:, '$g$st 5, 1986, Ho". //, p. 6514. /t is e(ient from the foregoing isc$ssion that &ection // of R.'. 66)* which inc"$es =pri(ate agric$"t$ra" "ans e(ote to commercia" "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine raising= in the efinition of =commercia" farms= is in(a"i, to the e?tent that the aforecite agro9in$stria" acti(ities are mae to be co(ere by the agrarian reform program of the &tate. There is simp"y no reason to inc"$e "i(estoc+ an po$"try "ans in the co(erage of agrarian reform. 3Ro""o, p. 514. %ence, there is merit in -$8 7arms; arg$ment that the re<$irement in &ections 16 an 65 of R.'. 66)* irecting =corporate farms= which inc"$e "i(estoc+ an po$"try raisers to e?ec$te an imp"ement =pro$ction9sharing p"ans= 3pening fina" reistrib$tion of their "anho"ings4 whereby they are ca""e $pon to istrib$te from three percent 36B4 of their gross sa"es an ten percent 310B4 of their net profits to their wor+ers as aitiona" compensation is $nreasonab"e for being confiscatory, an therefore (io"ati(e of $e process 3Ro""o, p. 514. /t has been estab"ishe that this ,o$rt wi"" ass$me #$risiction o(er a constit$tiona" <$estion on"y if it is shown that the essentia" re<$isites of a #$icia" in<$iry into s$ch a <$estion are first satisfie. Th$s, there m$st be an act$a" case or contro(ersy in(o"(ing a conf"ict of "ega" rights s$sceptib"e of #$icia" etermination, the constit$tiona" <$estion m$st ha(e been opport$ne"y raise by the proper party, an the reso"$tion of the <$estion is $na(oiab"y necessary to the ecision of the case itse"f 3'ssociation of &ma"" -anowners of the .hi"ippines, /nc. (. &ecretary of 'grarian Reform, G.R. *8*45J 'c$na (. 'rroyo, G.R. *9610J .abico (. 2$ico, G.R. *9*44J :anaay (. 2$ico, G.R. *9***, 14 2$"y 1989, 1*) &,R' 6464. %owe(er, espite the inhibitions pressing $pon the ,o$rt when confronte with constit$tiona" iss$es, it wi"" not hesitate to ec"are a "aw or act in(a"i when it is con(ince that this m$st be one. /n arri(ing at this conc"$sion, its on"y criterion wi"" be the ,onstit$tion an Go as its conscience gi(es it in the "ight to probe its meaning an isco(er its p$rpose. .ersona" moti(es an po"itica" consierations are irre"e(ancies that cannot inf"$ence its ecisions. I"anishment is as ineffect$a" as intimiation, for a"" the 4 awesome power of the ,ongress an >?ec$ti(e, the ,o$rt wi"" not hesitate =to ma+e the hammer fa"" hea(i"y,= where the acts of these epartments, or of any officia", betray the peop"e;s wi"" as e?presse in the ,onstit$tion 3'ssociation of &ma"" -anowners of the .hi"ippines, /nc. (. &ecretary of 'grarian Reform, G.R. *8*45J 'c$na (. 'rroyo, G.R. *9610J .abico (. 2$ico, G.R. *9*44J :anaay (. 2$ico, G.R. *9***, 14 2$"y 19894. Th$s, where the "egis"at$re or the e?ec$ti(e acts beyon the scope of its constit$tiona" powers, it becomes the $ty of the #$iciary to ec"are what the other branches of the go(ernment ha ass$me to o, as (oi. This is the essence of #$icia" power conferre by the ,onstit$tion =3/4n one &$preme ,o$rt an in s$ch "ower co$rts as may be estab"ishe by "aw= 3'rt. H///, &ection 1 of the 196) ,onstit$tionJ 'rtic"e C, &ection / of the 19*6 ,onstit$tion an which was aopte as part of the 7reeom ,onstit$tion, an 'rtic"e H///, &ection 1 of the 198* ,onstit$tion4 an which power this ,o$rt has e?ercise in many instances 3Demetria (. '"ba, 148 &,R' 508 F198*G4. .R>:/&>& ,1N&/D>R>D, the instant petition is hereby GR'NT>D. &ections 63b4, 11, 16 an 65 of R.'. No. 66)* insofar as the inc"$sion of the raising of "i(estoc+, po$"try an swine in its co(erage as we"" as the /mp"ementing R$"es an G$ie"ines prom$"gate in accorance therewith, are hereby D>,-'R>D n$"" an (oi for being $nconstit$tiona" an the writ of pre"iminary in#$nction iss$e is hereby :'D> permanent.