A. clerical costs of purchase-order preparation. B. costs of deterioration, theft, or spoilage. C. costs associated with lost sales to customers. D. forgone interest on money tied up in inventory. . items !B! And !D! a"ove. Answer: #$: 1 %ype: &C '. Inventory holding costs would typically include all of the following e(cept: A. insurance. B. theft. C. transportation. D. o"solescence. . warehouse rent. Answer: C #$: 1 %ype: &C ). At the economic order *uantity: A. total annual inventory costs, holding costs, and ordering costs are all minimi+ed. B. total annual inventory costs and holding costs are minimi+ed. C. total annual inventory costs are minimi+ed, and holding costs e*ual ordering costs. D. total annual inventory costs are minimi+ed, and holding costs e(ceed ordering costs. . total annual inventory costs are minimi+ed, and ordering costs e(ceed holding costs. Answer: C #$: 1 %ype: , -. Chan uses an economic order *uantity model and has determined an optimal order si+e of .// units. Annual demand is 10,/// units, ordering costs are 112 per order, and holding costs are 11.2/ per unit. Chan3s annual ordering and holding costs total: A. 14//. B. 11,)2/. C. 14,4//. D. 1'5,-2/. . some other amount. Answer: A #$: 1 %ype: A 6se the following to answer *uestions 2-.: Cartwright 7raphics uses a special purpose paper in 0/8 of its 9o"s. %he paper is purchased in 1//-sheet pac:ages at a cost of 11// per pac:age. ;anagement estimates that the cost of placing and receiving a typical order is 112, and the annual cost of carrying a pac:age in inventory is 11.2/. Cartwright uses ',.// pac:ages each year. <roduction is constant, and the lead time to receive an order is 1 wee:. 2. %he economic order *uantity is appro(imately: A. '/) pac:ages. B. ''2 pac:ages. C. ''0 pac:ages. D. 2.2 pac:ages. . .)1 pac:ages. Answer: C #$: 1 %ype: A .. %he reorder point is: 88 Hilton, Managerial Accounting, Seventh Edition A. '2 pac:ages. B. 2/ pac:ages. C. 1// pac:ages. D. '/) pac:ages. . ''2 pac:ages. Answer: B #$: 1 %ype: A 5. =hen comparing $> and ?I% inventory systems, which of the following statements is false@ A. %he $> approach ta:es the viewpoint that some inventory is necessary. B. %he $> system assumes a constant order *uantity. C. ?I% argues that inventory investments should "e minimi+ed. D. %he $> system focuses on ac*uisition and holding costs. . ?I% argues that safety stoc:s are necessary to reduce the pro"a"ility of a stoc: shortage. Answer: #$: ' %ype: &C EXERCISES Implementation of EOQ; JIT 0. <ullman carries a part that is popular in the manufacture of automatic sprayers. Demand for this part is -,/// units per yearA order costs amount to 1)/ per order, and holding costs total 11.2/ per unit. <ullman currently places four orders per year with its suppliers. ;anagement is considering the implementation of an economic order *uantity model in an eBort to "etter manage its inventories. &e*uired: A. Compute <ullman3s economic order *uantity. B. Compute total annual inventory costs if <ullman follows the $> policy. C. Cow much will the company save "y adopting the $> model@ D. BrieDy e(plain the philosophical diBerence "etween the $> model and the 9ust-in-time model. =hich of the two models will li:ely result in lower holding costs for the Erm@ =hy@ #$: 1, ' %ype: &C, A Answer: A. %he $> can "e Egured "y ta:ing the s*uare root of: F' ( annual re*uirement ( cost per orderG H annual holding cost per unit. %he s*uare root of F' ( -,/// ( 1)/G H 11.2/, or 1./,///, is -//. B. %he ordering cost is "ased on 1/ orders F-,/// units H -// unitsG ( 1)/, and totals 1)//A the holding cost is computed on <ullmanIs average inventory of '// units F-// H 'G and amounts to 1)// F'// ( 11.2/G. %hus, costs at the $> total 1.// F1)// J 1)//G. C. <ullman is currently ordering four times each year, resulting in order costs of 11'/ F1)/ ( -G. ach order is for 1,/// units F-,/// H -G, which gives rise to an average inventory of 2// units F1,/// H 'G and holding costs of 152/ F2// ( 11.2/G. %otal costs are 105/ F11'/ J 152/G, and the $> produces a 1'5/ savings for the Erm F105/ - 1.//G. D. %he $> model assumes that some inventory is necessary for "usiness operations, and the goal is to optimi+e the order *uantity to produce a situation where ordering costs e*ual holding costs. In contrast, under ?I%, holding inventory in a warehouse is deemed to "e ineKcient and wasteful. %hus, inventory should "e minimi+ed and even eliminated, if possi"le. 89 Hilton, Managerial Accounting, Seventh Edition Inventory under a ?I% system is typically lower and, thus, holding costs are lower with this approach.