Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Case Digest

TITLE: TANJANCO vs. CA


18 SCRA 994 (1996)

FACTS:
1. Tanjanco courted Santos, both of legal age, and in due time, the latter reciprocated the tender
feelings expressed and prefossed by the former.
2. In consideration of the promise of marriage, Santos consented and acceded to Tanjancos pleas
to have carnal knowledge with him.
3. As a result, Santos conceived a child.
4. To avoid embarrassment and social humiliation, Santos had to resign from her job.
5. After being informed of Santos pregnancy, instead of honoring his promises, Tanjanco stopped
seeing the former and broke their engagement.

ISSUES:
Whether or not Santos is entitled to damages?

HELD:
Despite the fact that Santos have suffered