tom.ollieuz@arteveldehs.be EXPERTISE NETWORK FOR TEACHER EDUCATORS, GHENT UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION, BELGIUM ARTEVELDE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, BELGIUM QUEST CENTRE FOR RESEARCH AND SOCIAL SERVICE, BELGIUM In this presentation Why (not) use Educational Design Research? Situational map of Educational Design Research in schools Metaphorical understanding of the position of the researcher, the practice, the funder and the methodology when conducting EDR in schools
Educational Design Research
Educational: in settings where education is pursued Design: development with iterative trial versions Research: investigating a topical question
a nascent research genre (cfr. Brown & Collins 1992) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 n u m b e r
o f
p a r t i c i p a n t s needs & cont ext analysis design, development & format ive evaluation semi-summative evaluation literature review & concept validation site visits prototype 1 prototype 2 cycle width is proportional to time scale: = circa 6 months prototype 3 prototype 4 final evaluation query Process display of a design study. Source: McKenney and van den Akker, 2005 McKenney and Reeves (2012) Research in which the iterative development of solutions to practical and complex educational problems also provides the context for empirical investigation, which yields theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others. Goals and methods rooted in complex variation of the real world Pro and Contra EDR Why? Why not? Potentially very powerful (McKenney & Reeves, 2012) Extremely ambitious (Phillips & Dolle, 2006) Use-inspired (Stokes, 1997) Contributes little to understanding or to use (Reeves, 2000) Theory through design (Wright brothers) (Schoenfeld 2006): Innovative design ill-specified (Van den Akker, 1999) New perspectives, refreshing (McKenney & Reeves, 2012) May not align to standard criteria (Kelly, 2004) Situational Map of EDR in schools Conjecture model explaining the relationship between the research perspective and the practice perspective
How do the major elements relate to each other?
Engagement The teacher or practitioner can reflect, research and design from outside the practice The teacher or practitioner can reflect, research and design from inside the practice Communication Professionalization DEFINITION Professional growth of teacher expertise Any amelioration of competence in educational setting
IN THE FIELD OF RESEARCH Changeable factors related to research problem (McKenney & Reeves, 2012) Usable knowledge (Lagemann, 2002) Cfr. action research: quality of action (Schostak, 2006)
Concern with the quality, relevance and significance of contents and methods of practice, structures and communication within educational settings.
The intervention To research practice
In-service training= to change custom practice
2 Orientations (McKenney & Reeves, 2012) Research on intervention Research through intervention
The intervention as a designed tool for research (direct or indirect) professional development Practice of Arts Education In educational settings (schools) In practice: in regular interaction between teacher(s) and pupil(s) Arts taught as an objective or as a means to achieve other objectives (De commissie Onderwijs en Cultuur, 2008) Including cultural education, heritage education and media education (Bamford, 2007) Perspectives Points of view (Constructivist approach) Not strictly opposite perspectives Teacher (Practice Perspective) Researcher (Research Perspective) Involvement EDR Research Perspective P r a c t i c e
P e r s p e c t i v e
Expectations Meeting points Expectations Meeting points EDR Research Perspective P r a c t i c e
P e r s p e c t i v e
Expectations Meeting points Expectations Meeting points EDR: Developing together Professional- ization Teaching Practice (Arts Education) Engagement EDR: Developing together Professional- ization Teaching Practice (Arts Education) Engagement Tools Practical situation Involvement Needs EDR Research Perspective P r a c t i c e
P e r s p e c t i v e
Expectations Meeting points Expectations Meeting points EDR: Developing together Professional- ization Teaching Practice (Arts Education) Engagement Tools Practical situation Involvement Needs EDR Research Perspective P r a c t i c e
P e r s p e c t i v e
Expectations Meeting points Expectations Meeting points The river metaphor Metaphorical understanding of the position of the researcher, the practice, the funder and the methodology when conducting EDR in schools River habitual flow, intentional direction, custom practice Deepens with time or sometimes opposite Sometimes fills with rubble or gets clogged Stakeholders: can be funders as well as teachers PRACTICE Elements From the Research Project Intentional direction Teachers view Indirect cocern RESEARCH PROJECT Elements From Practice Intentional direction Funders view PRACTICE Elements From the Research Project RESEARCH PROJECT Elements From Practice Intentional direction Funders view Teachers view Researcher EDR methodology Indirect concern direct concern References Bamford, A . (2007) Kwaliteit en consistentie. Kunst- en cultuureducatie in Vlaanderen. Brussel: Agentschap voor onderwijscommunicatie. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design Experiments: Theorethical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178. De commissie Onderwijs en Cultuur (2008). Gedeeld/Verbeeld. Eindrapport van de commissie Onderwijs en Cultuur. Brussel: Agentschap voor onderwijscommunicatie. Hake, R. R. (2008) Design-based research in physics education research: A review. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh & J. Y. Baek (Eds.), Handbook of design research methods in education (pp. 493-508). New York: Routledge Kelly, A. E. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115- 128. Lagemann, E. C. (2002). An elusive science: The troubling history of education research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press McKenney, S. and Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. London and New York: Routledge. McKenney, S. and van den Akker, J. (2005) Computer-based support for curriculum designers: A case of developmental research. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(2), 41-66 Phillips, D. C. & Dolle, J. R. (2006). From Plato to Brown and beyond: theory, practice, and the promise of design experiments. In L. Verschaffel, F. Dochy, M. Boekaerts & S. Vosniadou (Eds.), Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte (pp. 277-292). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd. Reeves, T. C. (2000). Socially responsible educational technology research. Educational Technology, 40(6), 19-28. Schoenfeld , A. H. (2006). Design experiments. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Ellmore & A. Skukauskaite (Eds.) , Handbook of complementary methods in educational research (pp.193-206). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Schostak, J. (2006). Interviewing and Representation in Qualitative Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteurs quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institutions Press. van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nieveen & T. Plomp (Eds.) Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp.1-14). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Thank you Concepts without experiences are empty, experiences without concepts are blind. (Immanuel Kant, 1781, p.129)