Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 6

Maurits Wurzner

Stop Frame Animation Project Feedback


http://mauritstechnology.weebly.com/inquiry-and-analysis.html

Use the rubric below to comment on the following areas of the students project work:
Inquiring and Analysing:
I think you put in everything which was needed and you analyzed a couple of videos, but not in much detail. It could be improved by expanding more.
What I like about it is that everything is in order and the videos are appropriated. It should have a little more comments to make it understandable as
to why and why not you like the stop frame animation.
Mr Payne: Good start, But you need more detail in your description on you research. I like your first attempt as well. You could really evolve this
idea.
What will your message be. ? you need to have this on your site??? Answer your own questions on how you thought the animation went

4/8

Developing ideas:
I think that this part should improve more on. It should have something else other than Thoughts on First Attempt
Whilst you commented on your stop motion animation with things that did not work very well,you should have also added what did work well.
Creating the Solution:
Evaluating:
Comments / Content on Website:
Mr Payne: Please remove the stock photograpahy from your site and choose your own images
1

What makes it easy to follow? Give examples?


How has it been layed out?
What is good and bad about the comments, titles and images?
Does the website contain the following?

Design context
Brainstorm on what is needed to make an animation
Research/comments/storyboards on animations and previous grades work
Description of chosen message
Design specifications/Tips list
3 Storyboards on initial ideas
Detailed Story board on final idea Include images and notes
Steps to create your film
Continuous screen grabs of design/editing process. (very import)
Explanation of changes made to first draft animation based on feedback
Final animation
Evaluation Self and peer

Final Documentary
Does the animation contain the following? Are these elements easy to understand?
A storyline
A message
Materials Creative use of materials
Characters
Backgrounds? Props? creative use of
Music /audio / sound effects / narration
Hey Maurits! i really liked your stop frame animation, i think it portrayed the message you wanted to send very clearly. i also liked
the way you introduced the blue tac at the begining of the video and i think you animation was fun to watch! :) you did a
FaNtAbUloUs job!

Hello. i really liked your animations plot and story. it was very interesting and well thought out. the backgrounds were very
creative and i really liked how you made the running over truck get closer and closer to the camera.
I really liked your storyline and your message, but I didnt really get the message.
Answer the following Overall Questions:

What do you like about the animation?


What could be improved?
How have they been successful?
Explain the impact of your animation on the client/target audience. Have you met your design criteria ?

BERLIN BRANDENBURG INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL


Design Assessment Criteria
Unit __Stop Frame Animation_______
Grade ______9________
Inquiring and Analysing

D Creating the Solution


e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
g

Student

__________________________

E
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
n
g

I
d
e
a
s
1. Comprehensively written design context
2.Comprehensive brainstorm of what
information you will need to research to
make a animation. Prioritise each item as
primary and secondary importance
3. Comprehensive review and storyboards of
existing animations

1. Comprehensive Tips list based on your research 8 or


more Design Specifications that include a list of points that
you want your animation to be judged on.

2. Comprehensively developed 3 storyboards for your idea.


7

3. Comprehensive and detailed story board for your final


idea.

1. Comprehensively planned steps to


make the animation. How will you get
the information you need?
2. Comprehensively edited your
gathered information. (8 Screen grabs
or more)
3. Comprehensive first draft handed
in and comprehensive explanations of
any changes that are made based on
feedback given

4. A comprehensive description of your


message.

1. Comprehensive set of questions that you


would you ask people to find out if they
understood? Comprehensive evidence that
proves that you got your message got across.

2. Comprehensive evidence you have met your


design specifications. Comprehensive evidence
that you developed a survey that asks people to
rate your film against your design specifications.

3. Comprehensive Summarise your feedback


from above. Provided at least five
recommendations on how this film could be
improved or developed. What would you do
differently next time?

1. Good design context


2.Good brainstorm of what information you
will need to research to make a animation.
Prioritise each item as primary and secondary
importance
3. Good review and storyboards of last years
animations

1. Good Tips list based on your research 6 or more Design


Specifications that include a list of points that you want your
animation to be judged on.

2. Well developed 3 storyboards for your idea.

1. Basic Tips list based on your research 4 or more Design


Specifications that include a list of points that you want your
animation to be judged on.
4

3. Good Summary of your feedback from above.


Provided at least four recommendations on how
this film could be improved or developed. What
would you do differently next time?

3. Basic story board for your final idea.

3
3. Basic first draft handed in and basic
explanations of any changes that are
made based on feedback given

1. Simple Tips list based on your research 2 or more Design


Specifications that include a list of points that you want your
animation to be judged on.
2

1. Simply planned steps to make the


animation. How will you get the
information you need?
2

2. Simple storyboards for your idea materials etc


1

2
2. Simply edited your gathered
information. (2 Screen grabs or more)

3. Simple story board for your final idea.

1
3. Simple first draft handed in and
simple explanations of any changes
that are made based on feedback
given

1. No design context

3. No review and storyboards of last years


animations

2. Basically edited your gathered


information. (4 Screen grabs or more)

4. A simple description of your message

2. No brainstorm of what information you will


need to research to make a animation

3. Good first draft handed in and


good explanations of any changes
that are made based on feedback
given

4
2. Basic storyboards for your idea

1. Simple design context

3. Simple review and storyboards of last


animations

2. Good evidence you have met your design


specifications. Good evidence that you
developed a survey that asks people to rate your
film against your design specifications.

1. Basic planned steps to make the


animation . How will you get the
information you need?

4. A basic description of your message

2. Simple brainstorm of what information you


will need to research to make an animation
film. Prioritise each item as primary and
secondary importance

3. Good story board of your final idea.


5

1. Basic design context

3. Basic review and storyboards of last years


animations.

1. Good set of questions that you would you ask


people to find out if they understood?
Comprehensive evidence that proves that you
got your message got across.

2. Well edited your gathered


information. (6 Screen grabs or more)

4. A good description of your message

2. Basic brainstorm of what information you


will need to research to make an animation .
Prioritise each item as primary and secondary
importance

1. Well planned steps to make the


animation. How will you get the
information you need?

1. No Tips list based on your research 0 Design


Specifications that include a list of points that you want your
documentary to be judged on.
2. No storyboards for your idea

2. Not edited your gathered


information. (0 Screen grabs or more)

3. No story board for your final idea.

3. No first draft handed in and no

2. Basic evidence that you have met your design


specifications. Basic evidence that you
developed a survey that asks people to rate your
film against your design specifications.
3. Basic summary your feedback from above.
Provided at least three recommendations on
how this film could be improved or developed.
What would you do differently next time?
1. Simple set of questions that you would you
ask people to find out if they understood?
Comprehensive evidence that proves that you
got your message got across.
2. Simple evidence that you have met your
design specifications. Simple evidence that you
developed a survey that asks people to rate your
film against your design specifications.

3. Simple summary of your feedback from


above. Provided at least two recommendations
on how this film could be improved or
developed. What would you do differently next
time?
1. No questions or evidence that proves that you
got your message got across.

1. No steps to make the


documentary.
0

1. Basic set of questions that you would you ask


people to find out if they understood? Basic
evidence that proves that you got your message
got across.

2. No evidence you have met your design


specifications or developed a survey that asks
people to rate your film against your design
specifications.

4. No description of your chosen message

explanations of any changes that are


made based on feedback given

Grade Conversion 1 = 1-5


4 = 15-18
2 = 6-9
5 = 19-23
3 = 10-14
6 = 24-27
7 = 28-32

A
s
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
=
G
r
a
d
e
=

3. No summary

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi