Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Ministry of Transport
Materials Testing Division
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
9566
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
9566
100
7122
2444.0
25.5
9450
116.0
1.2
9530.0
36.0
0.4
9566.0
0.0
0.0
9566.0
0.0
0.0
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
9122
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
9122
100
6899
2223.0
24.4
8999
123.0
1.3
9100.0
22.0
0.2
9122.0
0.0
0.0
9122.0
0.0
0.0
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
10123
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
10123
100
7600
2523.0
24.9
9956
167.0
1.6
10090.0
33.0
0.3
10123.0
0.0
0.0
10123.0
0.0
0.0
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
Source
METHOD
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
AVERAGE
11/4/2012
ASTM C 136
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
AVERAGE
100
100
100
100
25.5
24.4
24.9
24.9
1.2
1.3
1.6
1.4
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
8412
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
8412
100
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
8412.0
100.0
205
8207.0
97.6
8300.0
112.0
1.3
8412.0
0.0
0.0
8412.0
0.0
0.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
7885
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
7885
100
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
7885.0
100.0
277
7608.0
96.5
7800.0
85.0
1.1
7885.0
0.0
0.0
7885.0
0.0
0.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
9506
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
9506
100
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
9506.0
100.0
302
9204.0
96.8
9385.0
121.0
1.3
9506.0
0.0
0.0
9506.0
0.0
0.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
Source
METHOD
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
AVERAGE
11/4/2012
ASTM C 136
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
AVERAGE
100
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
97.6
96.5
96.8
97.0
1.3
1.1
1.3
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
8829
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
8829
100
8829.0
100.0
8829.0
100.0
4800.0
4029.0
45.6
8699.0
130.0
1.5
8750.0
79.0
0.9
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
7419
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
7419
100
7419.0
100.0
7419.0
100.0
4441.0
2978.0
40.1
7333.0
86.0
1.2
7351.0
68.0
0.9
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
6587
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
6587
100
6587.0
100.0
6587.0
100.0
3811.0
2776.0
42.1
6505.0
82.0
1.2
6513.0
74.0
1.1
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
Source
METHOD
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
AVERAGE
11/4/2012
ASTM C 136
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
AVERAGE
100
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
45.6
40.1
42.1
42.6
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.3
0.9
0.9
1.1
1.0
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
4523
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
4523
100
4523.0
100.0
4523.0
100.0
923.0
3600.0
79.6
2419.0
2104.0
46.5
3400.0
1123.0
24.8
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
3698
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
3698
100
3698.0
100.0
3698.0
100.0
723.0
2975.0
80.4
2098.0
1600.0
43.3
2855.0
843.0
22.8
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
3962
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
3962
100
3962.0
100.0
3962.0
100.0
805.0
3157.0
79.7
2200.0
1762.0
44.5
3069.0
893.0
22.5
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
Source
METHOD
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
AVERAGE
11/4/2012
ASTM C 136
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
AVERAGE
100
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
79.6
80.4
79.7
79.9
46.5
43.3
44.5
44.8
24.8
22.8
22.5
23.4
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
2101
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
2101
100
2101.0
100.0
2101.0
100.0
0.0
2101.0
100.0
500.0
1601.0
76.2
1950.0
151.0
7.2
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
1923
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
1923
100
1923.0
100.0
1923.0
100.0
0.0
1923.0
100.0
409.0
1514.0
78.7
1777.0
146.0
7.6
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/3/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
2369
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
2369
100
2369.0
100.0
2369.0
100.0
0.0
2369.0
100.0
602.0
1767.0
74.6
2215.0
154.0
6.5
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
Source
METHOD
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
AVERAGE
11/4/2012
ASTM C 136
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
RETAINED
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
(Percent)
REMARKS
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
1
3
AVERAGE
100
100
100
100
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
76.2
78.7
74.6
76.5
7.2
7.6
6.5
7.1
/2"
/8"
/4"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
BLENDING SHEET
Consultant
Contractor
Project
No
1-3
Date
11/4/2012
Description
Source
METHOD
U.S. Sieves
Size
course agg.
fine agg
J.M.F
JMF TOLERANCE
M.O.T
Specification
percentage
1 1/2
35%
3/4 "
15%
3/8 "
10%
c.s
30%
sand
10%
2"
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
1"
24.9
100
100
100
100
74
65 - 83
55 - 85
3/4"
1.4
97.0
100
100
100
65
56 - 74
50 - 80
No. 4
0.3
1.2
42.6
79.9
100
39
31 - 47
30 - 60
No. 40
1.3
44.8
76.5
21
15 - 26
10 - 25
No. 200
1.0
23.4
7.1
4 - 11
3 - 10
General Remarks:-
Prepared By:
M.E. Contractor:
M.E CONSULTANT
Resident Engineer
Consultant
Project
Description
Source
BLENDING WORKSHEET
Contractor
No.
Date
METHOD
100
90
#200
Spec. Limits
_________
Job Mix
------
#100 #80
#40
#50
#30
#16
#10 #8
#4
3 1/2"
1-3
11/4/2012
ASTM C-136
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0.01
FINE
0.1
MEDIUM
COARSE
1 FINE
MEDIUM
10
100
COARSE
COBBLESS
SAND
GRAVEL
Prepared By:
M.E. Contractor:
M.E CONSULTANT
Resident Engineer
2
2
1
3/4
#4
#40
#200
i
50
50
25
19
4.75
0.425
0.075
100
100
74
65
39
21
8
100
100
55
50
30
10
3
100
100
85
80
60
25
10
RiyadhMinistry
- C.R. : 1010039430
of Transport
C.C.I.
No.: 11989
Materials
Testing Division
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Description
Source
11/6/2012
Date
METHOD
Test Class
Abrasive Change ( No of Sphere )
Sieves
Passing
Retained
mm
mm
in.
in
37.5
25
11/2 in
1in
25
19
1in
3/4in
19
12.5
3/4 in
1/2in
12.5
9.5
1/2 in
3/8in
9.5
6.35
3/8 in
1/4in
6.35
1.75
1/4 in
No.4
4.75
2.36
No.4
No.8
A
12
TOTAL
Mass of Sample Before Test
g.
x 100
ASTM C - 131
B
C
11
8
SAMPLE MASS
g.
1250
1250
1250
1250
2500
2500
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
5000
3622
3399
3322
27.6
32.0
33.6
Tested By :
M.E. Contractor:
Material Engineer
D
6
R.E. Consultant
Contractor
Sample No.
Date
METHOD
2 FACE
1 -3
11/6/2012
AASHTOTP 61
15233.0 grams
Grading as Received
Mass
Retained
0
3998.0
1402.0
1150.0
914.0
2017.0
Cum. Mass
Retained
0
3998.0
5400.0
6550.0
7464.0
9481.0
Cum. Percent
Retained
0
26.2
35.4
43.0
49.0
62.2
Percent
Passing
100
73.8
64.6
57.0
51.0
37.8
Mass. A
Test Portion g.
3998.0
1402.0
1150.0
914.0
2017.0
Mass B.
Crushed g.
3719.0
1303.0
1033.0
841.0
1879.0
Percent
Crushed B/A
93
93
90
92
93
Test Portion g.
Percent ( C )
26.2
9.2
7.5
6.0
13.2
62.2
Percent
Crushed
93
93
90
92
93
Weighted Percent
Crushed ( D )
24.4
8.6
6.8
5.5
12.3
57.6
Weighted Average Percent Particles = ( D/C) x 100 = 57.6 / 62.2 x 100 =92.6 %
Remarks
Requirement : 90 % min.
Tested By:
M.E. Contractor
Checked By:
M.E. Consultant
R.E. Consultant
SAND EQUIVALENT
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No:
Description
FINE AGGREGATES
Source
Date
11/6/2012
METHOD:
ASTM D 2419
DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE :
SAND READING
3.0
2.9
3.0
CLAY READING
8.9
9.0
9.0
SAND EQUIVALENT(A:Bx100)
34
32
33
AVERAGE
33.0
CORRECTED %
33
REMARKS:
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. C0NSULTANT
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Description
COURSE AGGREGATES
Source
SIEVE SIZE
Date
11/7/2012
METHOD
ASTM D 4791
TEST
PORTION
PERCENT
WEIGHED
PERCENT
B/A X 100
PERCENTAG
E OF THIN
ELONGATED
PIECES
PASSING
RETAINED
1" (25mm)
26.0
4122
105
2.55
0.663
1" (25mm)
9.0
3863
123
3.18
0.286
1/2" (12.5mm)
8.0
2156.0
144
6.68
0.534
1/2" (12.5mm)
3/8" (9.8mm)
6.0
1429.0
96
6.72
0.403
3/8" (9.8mm)
No: 4 (4.75mm)
12.0
1452.0
103
7.09
0.851
TOTAL
61
2.738
4.5
Specification - Max 8 %
Tested By:
M.E. Contractor
Mat. Inspector
Resident Engineer:
1010039430 : . -
4606315 : - 4605626 :
11989 :
Contractor
Project
Date
Description
Sampled By
METHOD
Source
Sieve
Grams.
Wt. g.
Wt. g.
(Wt. Ret.) (Cum. Ret.) Cum Passing
11/7/2012
ASTM 4318
Percent
Passing
3/4"
No. 4
No. 10
No. 40
No. 200
Pan
Wash
TOTAL
gm
Remarks
Test
Liquid Limit ( T- 89 )
Number of blows
Container Number
A Mass of wet Soil + Tare ( g)
B
Mass of dry Soil + Tare ( g)
C
Wt. of Water
D Wt. of Container
E
Mass of Dry Soil ( g)
%% B - C x 100
Moisture Content
37
1
41.22
37.30
3.92
18.92
18.38
21.33
30
2
42.22
38.11
4.11
19.22
18.89
21.76
22
3
43.69
39.00
4.69
18.00
21.00
22.33
13
4
45.22
40.2
5.02
18.99
21.21
23.67
5
31.22
29.20
2.02
18.25
10.95
18.45
6
31.02
28.99
2.03
18.25
10.74
18.90
C-A
Limits
Plastic Index (PI)
22.20
18.67
3.5
24.0
% Water Content
23.0
22.0
21.0
20.0
19.0
10
100
25
No of Blows
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
R.E. CONSULTANT
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Description
METHOD
FINE AGGREGATE
ASTM C 88
Grading
Weight Test
Weight Test
Loss in Weight
Actual Loss
Corrected Average
Original Sample
Fraction Before
Fraction After
After Test
After Test
Weighted Loss
% Retained
Test g.
Test g.
g.
Passing
Retained
(A)
(B)
(C)
(D)
(E)
(F)
No. 100
33.3
No. 50
No. 100
15.4
100.1
91.3
8.8
8.791
1.354
No. 30
No. 50
10.3
100.7
92.50
8.20
8.14
0.838
No. 16
No. 30
15.4
100.8
93.30
7.50
7.44
1.146
No. 8
No. 16
12.8
100.6
94.50
6.10
6.06
0.776
No. 4
No. 8
12.8
100.8
95.10
5.70
5.65
0.723
3/8"
No. 4
TOTALS
COARSE AGGREGATE
11/8/2012
Date
Source
Sieve Size
1-3
100.0
4.837
3/8"
#4
19.7
302.40
285.60
16.80
5.56
1.095
3/4"
3/8"
22.9
1002.30
979.50
22.80
2.27
0.520
1"
3/4"
57.4
1503.9
1466.9
37.00
2.46
1.412
TOTALS
NOTE :
D = B-C
E = ( D / B ) x100
F = ( A x E ) / 100
Remarks :
100.0
3.027
7.9
3/8 to 3/4 in consist of 33% 3/8 to 1/2 in material & 67% 1/2 to 3/4 in material
3/4 to 1 1/2-in consist of 33% 3/4 to 1-in material & 67% 1 to 11/2-in material
11/2 to 21/2-in consist of 50% 11/2 to 2 in material & 50% 2 to 21/2-in material
Tested By:
M.E. Contractor:
Mat. Inspector
Resident Engineer:
Contractor
Project
Sampled #
Description
Date Sampled
Source
Type of Test
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
L
M
N
P
R
1
11/8/2012
Sampled By
Modified Proctor
METHOD
Trial No.
Wt. Mold. Wet Soil
Wt. Mold
Wt. Wet Soil
Volume of Mold
Wet Density
Container
Wt. Cont. + Wet Soil
Wt. Cont. + Dry Soil
Wt. Water
Wt. Container
Wt. Dry Soil
Moisture Content
Dry Density
B-C
(B-C)/E
H-I
I-M
100 x L/N
100 x F/(100+P)
No.
g.
g
g
cc.
g/cc
No.
g
g
g
g
g
%
g/cc
1
9700
4817
4883
2120
2.303
C
822.5
802.0
20.5
52.0
750.0
2.7
2.242
2
9880
4817
5063
2120
2.388
A
946.5
910.0
36.5
72.0
838.0
4.4
2.289
ASTM D 1557
3
9946
4817
5129
2120
2.419
S
705.0
672.0
33.0
52.5
619.5
5.3
2.297
4
10029
4817
5212
2120
2.458
O
625.0
589.0
36.0
71.0
518.0
6.9
2.299
5
10041
4817
5224
2120
2.464
X
663.0
615.0
48.0
77.5
537.5
8.9
2.262
2.32
2.30
Weight of Hammer
10 lbs
18"
Drop of Hammer
No. of Layers
No. of Blows
56
Soil Classification
2.28
2.26
2.24
2.300
2.22
2
Optimum Moisture
6.5
10
Moisture Content %
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
M.I.CONSULTANT
R.E CONSULTANT
11
12
Sample #
Date
METHOD
MOISTURE CONTENT
No
gr
gr
gr
gr
gr
%
915.2
862.0
52.0
53.2
810.0
6.6
933.3
879.2
52.0
54.1
827.2
6.5
881.2
833
77
48.2
756.0
6.4
Average
MOLD
6.5
NO.
11422
6316
5106
2132
2.395
6.5
11630
6430
5200
2124
2.4482
6.4
Dry Density
2.171
2.249
2.301
10
30
65
gr/cc
SWELL
B LOWS
Test No. A
Time
Min.
ASTM D 1883
DENSITY DETERMINATION
CAN
BLOW 65
1
11/10/2012
MOLD # DATE
% SWELL
4.395
Test No. B
Molded :
Date:10/11/2012
Tested :
Date: 14/11/2012
Unit
Pent
Load
Load
Reading
mm.
(Kg)
Kg/Cm2
Stnd
Load
%
C.B.R
BLOW 30
Molded :
Date:10/11/2012
Tested :
%C.B.R
Corrected
Time
Min.
Pent
mm.
Date: 14/11/2012
Reading
Load
(Kg)
Unit
Load
Kg/Cm2
1/2
0.635
71.0
312.0
16.1
1/2
0.635
52.0
228.5
11.8
1.27
142.0
624.1
32.3
1.27
102.0
448.3
23.2
2.54
290.0
1275
65.9
2.54
211.0
927
47.9
3.81
456.0
2004
103.6
3.81
329.0
1446
74.7
5.08
602.0
2646
136.7
105
5.08
441.0
1938
7.62
752.0
3305
170.8
133
7.62
572.0
2514
10.16
866.0
3806
196.7
161
10.16
691.0
3037
70
94.1
130.2
Molded :
Date:10/11/2012
Tested :
Date: 14/11/2012
Unit
Time Pent
Load
Load
Reading
Min. mm.
(Kg)
Kg/Cm2
1/2 0.635
37.0
162.6
8.4
1
1.27
85.0
373.6
19.3
2.54
162.0
712
36.8
3.81
249.0
1094
56.6
5.08
311.0
1367
7.62
402.0
1767
10.16
455.0
0.0
2000
0
Stnd
Load
%
C.B.R
Stnd
Load
%C.B.R
%
Correcte
C.B.R
d
70
68.4
100.2
105
95.4
129.9
133
156.9
161
220
200
%C.B.R
Corrected
180
160
Load in kg/cm2
Test No.
BLOW 10
DIAL
READ
140
70
52.6
70.6
105
67.2
91.3
133
80
103.3
0.0
161
60
120
100
40
PROCTOR MODIFIED
20
LAB REF. No. : ABC, 01
O.M.C. : 6.5 %......
0.000.635
1.272.00 2.54
4.00
3.81
6.00
5.08
8.00
7.62
10.00
10.16
Penetration in mm.
M.D.D. : 2.300
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
M.E. Consultant
R.E / Consultant
12.00
Sample #
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE ,GRADING 1
Date Sampled
Location
Sampled b y
Source
METHOD
1
11/14/2012
ASTM D 1883
140.0
65 BLOWS
CBR - Values
Compact
CBR AT
ion Effort 2.54 mm
5.08m
130.0
120.0
110.0
Soaked CBR %
100.0
10
52.6
67.2
30
68.4
95.4
65
94.1
130.2
30 BLOWS
SWELL DATA
Dry
Swell
Density
%
90.0
Blows
10
2.171
30
2.249
65
2.301
80.0
70.0
10 BLOWS
60.0
50.0
2.16
2.21
2.26
2.31
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
M.E. Consultant
R.E / Consultant
SIEVE ANALYSIS
Consultant
Contractor
Project
Sample No
Date
11/5/2012
Source
METHOD
ASTM C 136
Original Wt =
SIEVE SIZE
15233
WT. RETAINED
CUM. PASSING
CUM.RETAINED
JMF
SPECIFICATIONS
(grams)
(grams)
(Percent)
(Percent)
TOLERANCE
(Percent)
0
3998
15233
100
100
100
11235.0
73.8
65 - 83
55 - 85
5400
9833.0
64.6
56 - 74
50 - 80
9481.0
5752.0
37.8
31 - 47
30 - 60
12022.0
3211.0
21.1
15 - 26
10 - 25
14096.0
1137.0
7.5
4 - 11
3 - 10
3"
2"
2"
1"
1"
3
/4 "
/2 "
/8"
/4 "
No. 4
No. 8
No. 10
No. 16
No. 30
No. 40
No. 50
No. 60
No. 80
No. 100
No. 140
No. 200
Pan
Wash Passing
No. 200
TOTAL
Remarks
Tested By:
M.E. CONTRACTOR
MAT. ENGINEER
R.E. CONSULTANT
SIEVE ANALYSIS
R.E. CONSULTANT
DESIGN DATA
BASED ON M.OT GENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ROAD & BRIDGE YEAR NOV.1998 FOR HEAVY TRAFFIC CATEGORY
CONSULTANT :
PROJECT
:
DESCRIPTION :
SOURCE
:
CONTRACTOR :
A.AGGREGATE QUALITY
REQUIRED
12% max.
45 % max.
45 % max.
45 % max.
45% min.
5 % max.
25 max.
6 max.
100% min.
8% max.
90% min.
SUBMITTED
7.9
27.6
32
33.6
33
0.31%
22.2
3.5
130%
4.5
92.6
JMF
SPECIFICATION
2"
1"
3/4"
No. 4
No. 40
No.200
100
74
65
39
21
8
100
55 - 85
50 - 80
30 - 60
10 - 25
3 - 10
M.E CONTRACTOR
MATERIAL ENGINEER
RESIDENT ENGINEER
CATEGORY
SUBMITTED
Project Name:
Agg. Base Couse Grading - I - Mix Design
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TEST DESCRIPTION
SL. #
PAGE NO.
DESIGN DATA
BLENDING WORKSHEET
BLENDING CHART
24
25
Atterberg Limits
26
27
SAND EQUIVALENT
28
10
29
11
30
12
13
SOUNDNESS OF AGGREGATE
33
14
HYDROMETER TEST
34
4 - 23
31 - 32