Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 1

Dentech vs.

172 SCRA 588 | April 19, 1989
Facts: Benjamin Marbella, Armando Torno, Juanito Tajan, Jr. and Joel Torno were employed as
welders, upholsterers and painters by of Dentech Manufacturing Corporation, a firm engaged in the
manufacture and sale of dental equipment and supplies. However, they were dismissed from the firm
due to their alleged abandonment of their work without informing the company about their reasons for
doing so. Marbella et al filed a complaint with the arbitration branch of the NLRC for illegal dismissal and
violation of Presidential Decree No. 851. Among other things they sought the payment of the cash bond
they filed with the company at the start of their employment.
Issue: Whether or not Marbella et al are entitled to the refund of the cash bond they filed with
Dentech at the start of their service.

The Court held that refund of the cash bond filed by Marbella et al is in order.
Article 114 of the Labor Code prohibits an employer from requiting his employees to file a cash
bond or to make deposits, subject to certain exceptions: "when the employer is engaged in such trades,
occupations or business where the practice of making deductions or requiring deposits is a recognized
one, or is necessary or desirable as determined by the Secretary of Labor in appropriate rules and
Dentech have not satisfactorily disputed the applicability of this provision of the Labor Code to
the case at bar and further failed to show that the company is authorized by law to require the private
respondents to file the cash bond in question. Its to the effect that the proceeds of the cash bond had
already been given to a certain carinderia to pay for the accounts of the private respondents therein
does not merit serious consideration. In fact, no evidence or receipt has been shown to prove such