Peer Response Worksheet writers: 1 |4 aley Vuck ft! , Emoily u Readers: Yi Sauimcan “Jalen feclet Record your responses to the following questions in the spaces below or on a separate sheet of paper. Before you read Step 3, look at the sources that the writers used in their paper (located on the Works page). Briefly familiarize yourself with the sources and the information presented in them. hout pausing to write comments. Then put ions without looking back. Read Step 3 through once, rather quickly, the paper aside and answer the following ques 1, What single feature of the paper stands out to you as a reader? The wits hae a lot oF good WCabulary Th toy One ji A a ais ney used doy thon genie HAR. 3. Was there anything in the paper that seemed confusing to you? (Ifso, explain briefly) 2. a et dll yon hou Mek thy es Slight grammar cal errors and howd tw UNK srcnding ie one pour agi aye Now reread the paper, making any comments in the margins you feel would be helpful. Try to comment on development and organization of ideas: Do you understand the points the writers are trying to make? Do ideas seem well-connected? Remember, you are not being asked to evaluate the paper; you are being asked to respond to it with an eye toward helping the writers improve it. 4, Underline the thesis statement. Is it clearly stated? If not, what seems confusing? t5 woos 5, Underline the places where the writers directly reference the texts/genres they analyzed. Is there any place where the writer needs to support a claim with more concrete detail or explanation? If so, where? NO 6. How well do the writers make transitions between their main ideas? Identify places that need better transitions (ie tach pevagrayh cam ve tronnsitiond better