"Developing Diversity and Equal Opportunity: Why the Disability
Perspective Matters." PMLA 120.2 (2005): 634-37. JSTOR. Web. 24 March 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25486199 Millers intent in his article is to explain why the disabled point of view matters in the scope of society. In his article, Miller discusses the merits that the ADA and IDEA acts have given to both those who have disabilities as well as the rest of society. Miller states in his article that because these laws were passed, Young people coming out of high school and college today do not know a society without the ADA and IDEA. These statutes have reshaped their environment for the better, and whether disabled or not, students expect to benefit from its provisions (634). However, Miller continues by explaining how even though these acts have brought about great change, there are still struggles within the laws (specifically the ADA) and compares it to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. Of this, he states the ADAs struggle is simply about civil rights, personal autonomy, and individual dignity (635). The dominant approach that Miller uses is contrast, as he explains important differences between Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the ADA. The biggest disparity that Miller makes is that the Civil Rights Act was made public knowledge though the mediums of television and radio, but that the ADA was passed silently with the public knowing only after the law had been passedno blatant publicity was made about this law. Miller also uses personal experience as an approach to the job market and the hiring process of those with disabilities. He makes special note about the court system, and how lawyers are severely lacking in knowledge about the disabled experience. Miller points out that this lack of knowledge is detrimental to discrimination cases. He also indicates that the lack of a disability voice in general is detrimental and that this particular voice is needed everywhere, but especially in higher education settings where these students can be better accommodated. Millers thesis and approach are made clear from the opening lines of the article as well as the title. He argues the case for the disabled voice to be heard effectively. The article is organized well for the argument, where historical background and personal experience help to ground the case; it is also easy to follow. There are no sources listed at the end of the article so this somewhat impinges on the accuracy of the article as well as its effectiveness. I agree wholeheartedly with the writer in that the voices of those who have disabilities needs to be made more prominent, especially in the areas of law, education, and the job market/hiring process. Reading this article has given me a better understanding of the many ways that the disability voice is needed in society today. While this article did not clash with my ideas in any way, it did give me a general understanding of the way the ADA and IDEA laws are helping but also hindering those with disabilities because of the lack of voice. The one thing that was not helpful from this article was the lack of bibliographical information. I would have liked to have had it available for more in depth viewing of the topic. The author did not use other viewpoints for this article, but did give a situation where disability was not mentioned as a part of diversity hiring processes. This article has helped me by enlightening my knowledge of the disability rights movement that is currently going on, and which has continued to spark my growing interest in Disability Studies as a whole. I would use this in my thesis as a foundational brick layer of Disability Studies and how is has affected Society, which ties in to the social aspect of my thesis.