Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Factor
Concentration of acid.
Dependent
Controlled
Temperature.
Controlled
Initial Molarity.
Controlled
Materials:
Description
This will be accomplished
by starting off with 1M of
sulfuric acid (20ml) and
gradually replacing the acid
with water (i.e. 2ml per
experiment).
This will be measured by
using a timer. When the
experiment has finished, the
timer will be turned off and
the results recorded.
The room will be kept at a
constant temperature by the
air-conditioning, at its usual
24 degrees Celsius, but it is
also an important factor in
the experiment.
Keeping the initial
concentration of the sulfuric
acid the same is important,
because if the wrong
concentration is used, it will
make the data unreliable.
Changing the amount of
acid (different for each test),
water (different for each
test) or zinc (five grams)
will lead to a different result
instead of a reliable test.
Amount of acid
(ml)
20
15
10
5
Molarity
(M)
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
Trial One
(min)
1.30
1.56
1.28
2.15
I was able to calculate the molarity by a formula that I had inside of my book;
Msol = (MH2SO4 x VH2SO4)/Vsol.
Or the molarity of the solution is equal to the molarity of sulfuric acid times the volume of suliuci
Averages (min)
20
15
10
5
1.275
1.31
1.85
2.15
1
0.75
0.5
0.25
Y= -0.0625x + 2.3
Conclusion: Due to the higher concentration of acid, the rate of reaction was sped up by
the use of more sulfuric acid molecules having the ability to interact with the zinc
molecules. However, while my hypothesis was proven correct, there was also an
interesting trend with the second test conducted, the trial that used fifteen milliliters of
acid and five milliliters of water. Interestingly, one of the trials was a lot shorter, which
pulled the average very close to the average of the first test. Other than that discrepancy,
all of the other averages came together to mostly stay on a straight line. To be completely
honest though, none of my tests were completely controlled, and therefore are not
completely reliable, especially since they often had an incorrect amount of zinc and it
relied on a qualitative speculation for the experiment to be complete. Not only that, but it
also had several unforeseeable difficulties, namely pouring my materials into an incorrect
flask in trial 1(3), the first test run that had 0.5M, one of the pieces of zinc fell out and
was later added in trial 1(4), the only test that had a molarity of 0.25, and one test
accidentally became 25ml when I filled one flask up with 20ml of acid instead of 15ml,
which was test 2(2), the final test to use 0.75M; none of which I deleted from the record
or repeated due to time constraints. I also did not manage to complete my final trial.
Therefore my data is not completely valid.
Validity of hypothesis:
My hypothesis was correct, since collision theory states that a higher concentration of
sulfuric acid is likely to have more collisions with the same amount of zinc than a lower
concentration would. Knowing this, I specifically used this knowledge to have the
outcome of a correct hypothesis.
Evaluation:
The results seem to be reliable since I conducted another set of tests, though I didnt get
to the last one. Also, most of my data says near the trendline, and the measuring
instruments were accurate (up until I had to switch to Adens scale because of time
constraints). I also think that everyone basically used the same method of pouring the
acid in and pulling it away as it fills up, especially since Alex was the one pointing it out
to me because I tended to overshoot when trying to get an exact amount of acid or water.
I couldnt control the exact amount of zinc, I could only try and get close.
What I did wrong;
My data is compromised
due to a control variable
being jeopardized.
The data was compromised
yet again and I could not
tell how close the result
actually was to five grams.
This affects how reliable the
data is, because there is no
average and some tests have
a large discrepancy between
both, and a third piece of