the problem until the megamargins calls in January and February 1995. It is only at this time, that management suspected Leesons trading was not arbitrage but naked positions and sent a team of auditors, but at this time it was too late, losses exceeded the value of the firm.
Why we can doubt about the management
ignorance? Process of loans to clients should request someone in the bank to check creditworthiness and level of exposure. Difference between margin deposited by Barings customers and the amount of funding requested by Leeson. This difference was GBP100m by the second half of 1994.
Conclusion : As if it appears that the
management was not officially aware of the problem, it seems really surprising. This case recall the more recent one with Jerome Kerviel and Societe Generale and its loss of EU4.9Bn in 2008, where the management was officially not aware, but in reality let him act because of the bonus exposure for his superiors.