0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
9 vues2 pages
This document is the Minnesota Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Board refusing to take action on my complaint against Public Defendner Alexander Rogosheske based on the rules and case law making it against the rules and law to do so. This related to this Public Defender conspiring to Obstruct Justice by fixing a misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct Case against me. If you ever need your lawyer to fix your case against you, Alexander Rogosheske is you man. As this is my first time at the criminal show, I am uncertain how to proceed. I was attending the Matter of Sperllng v Sperling in Dakota County as a member of the Press. Ms. Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting preferential treatment. Ms Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting this preferential treatment for being the main drug supplier in the local drug trade and local law enforcement were complicit in that drug trade. An officer directed me out of the courtroom. Said officer arrested me on bogus Disorderly Conduct Charge. While incarcerated, an officer threatened me by saying approximately,"I can blow someones face off and the union will have me back on the job the nest day. The police fabricated evidence and testimony against me and have now destroyed the exculpatory video that I requested in a timely manner. They have tried to prevent the matter from being heard by a judge from a different county, even though Judge Asphaug ordered it from the bench. And now I have a Public Pretender that is acting to fix this case against me. Herein also find the extensive exhibits that document what has transpired. My next Court date is 1/28/2015 at 130pm in the Hastings MN Court House. If you can be there, I would appreciate it.
This document is the Minnesota Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Board refusing to take action on my complaint against Public Defendner Alexander Rogosheske based on the rules and case law making it against the rules and law to do so. This related to this Public Defender conspiring to Obstruct Justice by fixing a misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct Case against me. If you ever need your lawyer to fix your case against you, Alexander Rogosheske is you man. As this is my first time at the criminal show, I am uncertain how to proceed. I was attending the Matter of Sperllng v Sperling in Dakota County as a member of the Press. Ms. Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting preferential treatment. Ms Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting this preferential treatment for being the main drug supplier in the local drug trade and local law enforcement were complicit in that drug trade. An officer directed me out of the courtroom. Said officer arrested me on bogus Disorderly Conduct Charge. While incarcerated, an officer threatened me by saying approximately,"I can blow someones face off and the union will have me back on the job the nest day. The police fabricated evidence and testimony against me and have now destroyed the exculpatory video that I requested in a timely manner. They have tried to prevent the matter from being heard by a judge from a different county, even though Judge Asphaug ordered it from the bench. And now I have a Public Pretender that is acting to fix this case against me. Herein also find the extensive exhibits that document what has transpired. My next Court date is 1/28/2015 at 130pm in the Hastings MN Court House. If you can be there, I would appreciate it.
This document is the Minnesota Lawyer's Professional Responsibility Board refusing to take action on my complaint against Public Defendner Alexander Rogosheske based on the rules and case law making it against the rules and law to do so. This related to this Public Defender conspiring to Obstruct Justice by fixing a misdemeanor Disorderly Conduct Case against me. If you ever need your lawyer to fix your case against you, Alexander Rogosheske is you man. As this is my first time at the criminal show, I am uncertain how to proceed. I was attending the Matter of Sperllng v Sperling in Dakota County as a member of the Press. Ms. Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting preferential treatment. Ms Sperling alleged Mr. Sperling was getting this preferential treatment for being the main drug supplier in the local drug trade and local law enforcement were complicit in that drug trade. An officer directed me out of the courtroom. Said officer arrested me on bogus Disorderly Conduct Charge. While incarcerated, an officer threatened me by saying approximately,"I can blow someones face off and the union will have me back on the job the nest day. The police fabricated evidence and testimony against me and have now destroyed the exculpatory video that I requested in a timely manner. They have tried to prevent the matter from being heard by a judge from a different county, even though Judge Asphaug ordered it from the bench. And now I have a Public Pretender that is acting to fix this case against me. Herein also find the extensive exhibits that document what has transpired. My next Court date is 1/28/2015 at 130pm in the Hastings MN Court House. If you can be there, I would appreciate it.
In the Matter of the Complaint of SUMMARY DISMISSAL
DONALD THEODORE MASHAK
P.O. Box 231
Albertville, MN. 55301 against
ALEXANDER WINSLOW ROGOSHESKE,
a Minnesota Attorney,
Registration No. 394904.
TO: DONALD THEODORE MASHAK:
While attending a hearing in a civil court matter, you were arrested and charged
with disorderly conduct. Alexander Rogosheske was the public defender assigned to
represent you. You were dissatisfied with Mr. Rogosheske’s performance and his
representation of you.
This complaint is dismissed for the following reason. Rule 8(b), Rules on
Lawyers Professional Responsibility, states,
No investigation shall commence on a complaint by or on behalf of a party
represented by court appointed counsel, insofar as the complaint against
the court appointed attorney alleges incompetent representation by the
attorney in the pending matter. Any such complaint shall be summarily
dismissed without prejudice, The Director's dismissal shall inform the
complainant that the complaint may be sent to the chief district judge or
trial court judge involved in the pending matter, The judge may, at any
time, refer the matter to the Director for investigation
In addition, Rule 8(¢), states that “a summary dismissal by the Director under Rule 8(b)
shall be final and may not be appealed to a Board member for review.”
These rules were adopted by the Minnesota Supreme Court. The rules do not
allow this Office to investigate complaints against public defenders or other
court-appointed attorneys, unless a judge refers the matter or the criminal matter is,
completed. If the criminal matter is completed, and a conviction has been entered, this
Office will normally recommend that a person who is dissatisfied with defense counsel
or the prosecutor seek whatever relief may be available through the appellate courts,Mr. Rogosheske is, by way of a copy of this determination and your complaint,
being notified of your complaint and our decision not to investigate.
Dated: November 2-5 2014
MARTIN A. COLE
DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF LAWYERS.
PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
1500 Landmark Towers
345 St. Peter Street
St. Paul, MN 55102-1218
(651) 296-3952
Patrick R. Burns
First Assistant Director
ce: Alexander Winslow Rogosheske
Drag Queen Storytime - ST Cloud, MN, USA Great River Library - This Is What A Battle in The Unconventional Revolution I Have Long Said We Are in The Middle Of, Looks Like.